The electrocatalytic activities of NiFeB@ NiFeB
i, NiFeB, NiB@NiB
i and FeB@FeB
i catalysts, as well as commercial IrO
2, were tested in the 1.0 mol/L KOH electrolyte using a three-electrode system (pH 13.6). Those catalysts were deposited onto the glass carbon electrode (GCE) to evaluate them OER activity and the catalyst loading was 0.306 mg/cm
2. Polarization curves were recorded from linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) test with a scan rate of 1.0 mV/s. In order to eliminate the effect of ohmic resistance, we conducted an iR correction to all raw data in the further discussions. Firstly, we dig out the most suitable nickel to iron ratios of NiFeB@NiFeB
i-X. As shown in Figs. S13 and S14 (Supporting information), the best OER performance catalyst is NiFeB@NiFeB
i-15% and we further continued the experiments with this sample. As shown in
Fig. 3a, NiFeB@NiFeB
i shows the best performance in those catalysts with an overpotential of 237 mV to drive a current density of 10 mA/cm
2 (
η10 = 237 mV), which is much lower than that of NiFeB (
η10 = 273 mV), NiB@NiB
i (
η10 = 303 mV), FeB@FeB
i(
η10 = 373 mV) and IrO
2 (
η10 = 287 mV). In addition, the OER activity of annealed NiFeB@NiFeB
i-800 was also tested and it showed much lower OER activity than the amorphous NiFeB@NiFeB
i, further highlighting the key role of amorphous state of NiFeB
i in facilitating the OER process (Fig. S15 in Supporting information). It is worth noting that the OER catalytic activity of NiFeB@NiFeB
i is among the top of the reported metal borates/ borides and higher than most of the reported metal-metalloid-based electrocatalysts as indicated in Table S3 (Supporting information). To investigate the catalytic kinetics, the Tafel slopes were calculated as shown in
Fig. 3b, demonstrating that NiFeB@NiFeB
i exhibited the most favorable OER dynamics, suggesting that the introduction of iron dominated the improvement of the overall OER process [
35,
36]. In addition, we calculated the TOFs of NiFeB@NiFeB
i across the OER region (Fig. S16 and details of the TOF calculation in Supporting information) [
37,
38]. As shown in
Fig. 3c, the iron species can significantly increase the catalytic performance of NiB@NiB
i[
39,
40]. However, a larger ratio of iron in the NiFe hybrid may lower the number of actual Ni site and result in the decrease of the overall OER activity. In addition, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out to evaluate the charge transfer resistance during OER process. As shown in
Fig. 3d, the Nyquist plot of NiFeB@NiFeB shows the smallest semicircle diameter, suggesting the fastest charge transfer because of the lowest resistance of charge transfer (
Rct) [
41]. The small Tafel slope and
Rct of NiFeB@NiFeB
i suggest the fast reaction kinetics under the OER conditions, which should be attributed to bimetallic cores with favorable electronic conductivity as well as the amorphous NiFeB
i nanosheets with higher intrinsic activity. In addition, both 2000 CV cycling test and chronopotentiometry results suggest the superior stability of the NiFeB@NiFeB
i in alkaline media. As illustrated in the Fig. S17 (Supporting information), after the continuously cyclic voltammetry (CV) scanning for 2000 cycles with a range of 1.2–1.7 V (
vs. RHE), a slight positive shift of
η10 from the linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curve is observed, which is also in correspondence with the chronopotentiometry results.