A ratiometric merocyanine-based fluorescent probe for detecting hydrazine in living cells and zebra fish

A ratiometric merocyanine-based fluorescent probe for detecting hydrazine in living cells and zebra fish

PDF

Jinliang Han^a, Xiuxiu Yue^a, Jingpei Wang^a, Yun Zhang^a, Benhua Wang^a^,^*, Xiangzhi Song^a^,^b^,^*

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2020, 31(6) : 1508 - 1510

Less

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2020, 31(6): 1508-1510

• Communication •

A ratiometric merocyanine-based fluorescent probe for detecting hydrazine in living cells and zebra fish

Full

Jinliang Han^a, Xiuxiu Yue^a, Jingpei Wang^a, Yun Zhang^a, Benhua Wang^a^,^*, Xiangzhi Song^a^,^b^,^*

Affiliations

^a College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

^b Key Laboratory of Hunan Province for Water Environment and Agriculture Product Safety, Changsha 410083, China

Published: 2020-06-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.01.029

Outline

Abstract

Less

We developed a merocyanine-based fluorescent probe, NEPB, for tracing hydrazine (N₂H₄) in a ratiometric manner with large Stokes shifts and long emission wavelength. The fluorescence color of probe NEPB changed from green to yellow upon addition of hydrazine. Probe NEPB displayed high selectivity and sensitivity to hydrazine in solution, and could ratiometrically monitor N₂H₄ in living cells and zebrafish with low cytotoxicity.

Key words

Fluorescent probe / Hydrazine / Merocyanine / Ratiometric / Cell imaging

Cite this Article

Jinliang Han, Xiuxiu Yue, Jingpei Wang, Yun Zhang, Benhua Wang, Xiangzhi Song. A ratiometric merocyanine-based fluorescent probe for detecting hydrazine in living cells and zebra fish[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2020 , 31 (6) : 1508 -1510 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.01.029

Full Text

Less

Hydrazine (N₂H₄) is a significant industrial material and play important roles in chemical, pharmaceutical and agricultural areas [1, 2], such as catalysts, corrosion inhibitor and pharmaceutical intermediates because of its basic and reductive properties [3, 4]. In addition, it is widely used as high energy fuel in aerospace and military industry for its explosive characteristics [5-11]. Despite being very useful, it is a highly toxic and carcinogenic compound, which could cause serious damages to human lungs, liver, kidneys, and the central nervous system [12-15]. Therefore, it is necessary to provide reliable analytical methods to monitor N₂H₄ with high sensitivity and selectivity.

Various different analytical methods for determining hydrazine have been reported, including chromatography [16, 17], titrimetry [7], electrochemistry [18, 19], and so forth. However, these methods are limited by many factors, such as time consuming, complicated sample handling processes and poor compatibility in biological systems, which extremely restrict the application in living cells [15, 20]. Recently, fluorescent probes had been paid close attention due to their satisfactory selectivity, low cost, and non-invasive detection in organism systems [8, 21]. Over the past several years, a number of probes for hydrazine have been reported [2, 9, 22-24], but most of them are turn-on types with small Stokes shifts. It is known to us that the fluorescence intensity-based probes can be easily influenced by auto-fluorescence and unpredictable instrumental factors [25-27]. To circumvent this problem, ratiometric fluorescent probes that functioned through two signal outputs were developed to eliminate the interfering factors [15, 28-32]. To avoid two emission bands overlapping and make the probe more suitable in bioassays, large Stokes shifts (>60 nm) and long emission wavelength are desired.

In view of these above factors, we used merocyanine derivative (HNEP⁺) as the fluorophore and 4-bromobutyric acid as the reaction site [15] and constructed a novel probe NEPB for hydrazine. As shown in Scheme 1, intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) process played important part in the construction of ratiometric probes. Here, 4-bromobutyric acid also acted as an electron-withdrawing group and blocked the ICT process of the fluorophore. When probe NEPB reacted with N₂H₄, a substitutioncyclisation-elimination reaction happened at the recognizing site and released fluorophore HNEP⁺, which exhibited the ICT properties with large Stokes shifts and long emission wavelength. Probe NEPB was easily prepared within three steps as shown in Scheme S1 (Supporting information) and characterized by standard ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR and HRMS spectra (Supporting information).

At the first step, we investigated the absorption and fluorescence properties of probe NEPB in DMSO/PBS buffer (9:1, v/v, 10.0 mmol/L, pH 7.4). As shown in Fig. S1 (Supporting information), the free probe NEPB displayed an absorption band at 360 nm. Upon reaction with excessive N₂H₄, the absorption band red-shifted to 413 nm, with the solution changed from pale-green to yellow, which was attributed to the ICT process. Probe NEPB exhibited strong green fluorescence with a maximum emission at 501 nm. When treated with N₂H₄, an intramolecular cyclization reaction happened at the ester site, which would release the yellow fluorophore of HNEP⁺ with an emission at 575 nm. These results demonstrated that probe NEPB could serve as a ratiometric fluorescent sensor to detect N₂H₄.

To evaluate the sensitivity of probe NEPB to N₂H₄, different amounts of N₂H₄ (0.0–1000.0 μmol/L) were added into the solution of NEPB. It was seen in Fig. 1A that the fluorescence intensity of probe NEPB at 501 nm reduced, and the intensity at 575 nm increased with the addition of incremental doses of N₂H₄, and it was finally saturated with 200.0 equiv. of N₂H₄. In addition, the fluorescence intensity was linearly related tothe concentration of N₂H₄ in the range of 0–700.0 μmol/L (Fig. 1B). The detection limit for N₂H₄ was estimated to be 2.6 μmol/L (S/N = 3), which indicates that NEPB could quantitatively detect N₂H₄ with good sensitivity.

Then the time-dependent fluorescence properties of probe NEPB in the absence/presence of N₂H₄ were carried out. As shown in Fig. S3 (Supporting information), a gradual increase at 575 nm and a simultaneous decline at 501 nm were observed as the time wenton. The reaction could be detected within 10 min and reached a plateau around 120 min when probe NEPB was reacted with 1000.0 μmol/L of N₂H₄.

In order to determine whether probe NEPB can operate well under physiological condition, the fluorescence behavior was investigated under different pH values in the absence/presence of N₂H₄. As shown in Fig. S4 (Supporting information), the fluorescence intensity ratio (I₅₇₅/I₅₀₁) of probe NEPB was almost no change in a wide pH range of 2 - 10, demonstrating that free probe NEPB was quite stable. However, the ratio dramatically increased within pH 6 - 11 in the presence of N₂H₄, suggesting that it is suitable for probe NEPB to detect N₂H₄ in physiological condition.

Next, we checked the specificity of probe NEPB for N₂H₄ over other competitive analytes. The fluorescence changes of probe NEPB were evaluated in the presence of various relevant species, including Na⁺, Zn²⁺, Al³⁺, Co²⁺, Ca²⁺, Ba²⁺, K⁺, NO^-, HSO₃^-, SO₃^2-, Br^-, HCO₃^-, SO₄^2-, S₂O₅^2-, S₂O₃^2-, NH₃ and N₂H₄. As depicted in Fig. 2, only N₂H₄ could result a significant increase in the fluorescence intensity at 575 nm and dramatic decrease at 501 nm, whereas other species did cause little spectral changes. What is more, the competitive experiments also demonstrated that the above interfering species did not affect the fluorescence performance of probe NEPB toward N₂H₄ (Fig. S2 in Supporting information). These results confirmed that probe NEPB could be used to detect N₂H₄ selectively.

Afterwards, to confirm the sensing mechanism, the reaction products of probe NEPB with N₂H₄ was analyzed by high resolution mass spectrometry (Fig. S6 in Supporting information). It was found that two new peaks appeared at m/z 123.0930 and 262.1244, which were exactly identical to the dye HNEP⁺ ([M]⁺ = 262.1226) and byproduct tetrahydro-pyridazin-3-one ([M + Na]⁺ = 123.0915). This result was in good agreement with the proposed sensing process in Scheme 1.

Encouraged by the above results, the capacity of probe NEPB to detect N₂H₄ in living cells was then assessed. We first used the conventional MTT assay with HeLa cells to evaluate the cytotoxicity of probe NEPB. As shown in Fig. S5 (Supporting information), the cell viability exceeded 86% when the cells were treated with 20.0 μmol/L of probe NEPB for 24 h, indicating that probe NEPB was almost non-toxicity and suitable for biological applications.

In the following steps, practical applications of probe NEPB in living HeLa cells and zebra fish were investigated. As shown in Fig. 3, we observed a strong fluorescence in green channel and an ignorable fluorescence in yellow channel when cells only treated with probe NEPB (5.0 μmol/L). With the addition of N₂H₄, a strong fluorescence appeared in yellow channel, and accompanied by the reduction of fluorescence in green channel. These results indicated that probe NEPB had the ability to monitor N₂H₄ in living cells. Inspired by the good performance in living cells, the imaging experiments in zebra fish were further carried out. To our delight, the phenomena in NEPB-treated zebra fish were consistent with the above cell imaging experiments (Fig. 4). These findings clearly demonstrated the ability of probe NEPB to detect N₂H₄ via dual distinct emission bands in living systems.

In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized a novel ratiometric fluorescent probe NEPB with large Stokes shift and long emission wavelength for the detection of N₂H₄. Probe NEPB displayed high sensitivity and selectivity as well as low detection limit towards N₂H₄. Additionally, probe NEPB was successfully applied for detecting N₂H₄ in living cells and zebra fish. Considering these, we believed that the probe would have a good potential to act as a valuable tool to detect N₂H₄ in environmental pollution and living systems.

Declaration of competing interest

Less

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper

Acknowledgments

Less

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1608222), Special Fund for Agroscientific Research in the Public Interest of China (No. 201503108), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (Nos. 2019zzts438, 2019zzts846) and the State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics (No. 2016005).

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Less

Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.01.029.

References

Less

[1]

W.Z. Xu, W.Y. Liu, T.T. Zhou, et al., Spectrochim. Acta A 193(2018) 324-329.

[2]

G. Li, Y. Liu, J. Song, et al., J. Fluoresc. 27(2017) 323-329.

[3]

J.Y. Wang, Z.R. Liu, M. Ren, W. Lin, Sci. Rep. 7(2017) 1530-1537.

[4]

K.F. Khaled, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252(2006) 4120-4128.

[5]

Y. Qian, J. Lin, L. Han, et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 58(2014) 282-286.

[6]

C. Hu, W. Sun, J. Cao, et al., Org. Lett. 15(2013) 4022-4025.

[7]

Z. Li, W. Zhang, C. Liu, et al., Sens. Actuators B 241(2017) 665-671.

[8]

Z. Lu, W. Fan, X. Shi, et al., Anal. Chem. 89(2017) 9918-9925.

[9]

B. Shi, Y. He, P. Zhang, et al., Dyes Pigm. 147(2017) 152-159.

[10]

J.W. Mo, B. Ogorevc, X. Zhang, et al., Electroanalysis 12(2000) 48-54.

[11]

Q. Wu, J. Zheng, W. Zhang, et al., Talanta 195(2019) 857-864.

[12]

J. Zhang, L. Ning, J. Liu, et al., Anal. Chem. 87(2015) 9101-9107.

[13]

C.A. Reilly, S.D. Aust, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 10(1997) 328-334.

[14]

J. Liu, J. Shen, M. Li, L.P. Guo, Chin. Chem. Lett. 26(2015) 1478-1484.

[15]

Y. Hao, Y. Zhang, K. Ruan, et al., Sens. Actuators B 244(2017) 417-424.

[16]

D.P. Elder, D. Snodin, A. Teasdale, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 54(2011) 900-910.

[17]

Y.Y. Liu, I. Schmeltz, D. Hoffmann, Anal. Chem. 46(1974) 885-889.

[18]

S. Daemi, A.A. Ashkarran, A. Bahari, et al., Sens. Actuators B 245(2017) 55-65.

[19]

L. Wang, Q. Teng, X. Sun, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 512(2018) 127-133.

[20]

Y. Gao, Y. Lin, T. Liu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30(2019) 63-66.

[21]

Y. Yang, Q. Zhao, W. Feng, et al., Chem. Rev. 113(2013) 192-270.

[22]

S. Wang, S. Ma, J. Zhang, et al., Sens. Actuators B 261(2018) 418-424.

[23]

T. Tang, Y.Q. Chen, B.S. Fu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 27(2016) 540-544.

[24]

Q. Fang, L. Yang, H. Xiong, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31(2020) 129-132.

[25]

H.H. Xiong, L. He, Y. Zhang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 30(2019) 1075-1077.

[26]

J. Fan, W. Sun, M. Hu, et al., Chem. Commun. 48(2012) 8117-8119.

[27]

Y. Hao, Y. Zhang, K. Ruan, et al., Spectrochim. Acta A 184(2017) 355-360.

[28]

S.I. Reja, N. Gupta, V. Bhalla, et al., Sens. Actuators B 222(2016) 923-929.

[29]

Z. Xu, M. Pang, C. Li, et al., Luminescence 32(2017) 466-470.

[30]

J. Wu, J. Pan, Z. Ye, et al., Sens. Actuators B 274(2018) 274-284.

[31]

C. Zhao, X. Zhang, K. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137(2015) 8490-8498.

[32]

S. Goswami, S. Das, K. Aich, et al., Org. Lett. 15(2013) 5412-5415.

Appendix

Less

Year 2020 volume 31 Issue 6

PDF

Cite this Article

BibTeX

Article Info

doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.01.029

Receive Date：2019-11-05
Online Date：2026-01-31
Published：2020-06-15

Article Data

Affiliations

History

Received：2019-11-05
Revised：2020-01-09
Accepted：2020-01-10

Affiliations

^a College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

^b Key Laboratory of Hunan Province for Water Environment and Agriculture Product Safety, Changsha 410083, China

References

Share

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.01.029

Share to

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article

BibTeX

Citations

表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Scheme 1 The recognition mechanism of probe NEPB towards N₂H₄.

Fig. 1 (A) Normalized absorption and (B) fluorescence emission spectra of probe NEPB (5.0 μmol/L) in the absence (black) and presence(red) of N₂H₄ (200.0 equiv.) in DMSO/PBS buffer (9:1, v/v, 10 mmol/L, pH 7.4). λ_ex = 380 nm.

Fig. 2 Fluorescence spectra of probe NEPB (5.0 μmol/L) in the presence of various biological species (1.0 mmol/L): (1) Na⁺; (2) Zn²⁺; (3) Al³⁺; (4) Co²⁺; (5) Ca²⁺; (6) Ba²⁺; (7) K⁺; (8) NO^-; (9) HSO^3-; (10) SO₃^2-; (11) Br^-; (12) HCO₃^-; (13) SO₄^2-; (14) S₂O₅^2-; (15) S₂O₃^2-; (16) NH₃; (17) N₂H₄.

Fig. 3 Fluorescence and bright field images of cells. (A1-D1): Cells incubated with probe NEPB (5.0 μmol/L) for 30 min. (A2-D2): Cells treated with probe NEPB (5.0 μmol/L) and then incubated with N₂H₄ (1000.0 μmol/L) for 2 h. Green channel was collected from 500 nm to 550 nm and yellow channel was collected from 570 nm to 620 nm. λ_ex = 390–420 nm. Scale bar = 20 μm.

Fig. 4 Images of NEPB in 3-day-old zebra fish. (A1-D1): Zebra fish incubated with probe NEPB (5.0 μmol/L) for 30 min. (A2-D2): Zebra fish treated with probe NEPB (5.0 μmol/L) and then incubated with N₂H₄ (1000.0 μmol/L) for 2 h. Green channel was collected from 500 nm to 550 nm and yellow channel was collected from 570 nm to 620 nm. λ_ex = 390–420 nm. Scale bar = 500 μm.

Articles: Latest Articles; Most Read; Collections

Updates: Events; News; Multimedia

About: About Us

Contact

No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing

100081

010-62199257

qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House