The synthetic procedure of NCNTs@MoS
2 is illustrated in Scheme S1 (Supporting information). Firstly, MoO
3 nanorods were obtained via a hydrothermal method. Then, the MoO
3@PPy composites were prepared through a one-pot oxidative polymerization method. Subsequently, the PPy nanotubes were fabricated by etching the MoO
3 cores in ammonia solution through hydrothermal conditions. After hydrothermal reaction with (NH
4)
2MoS
4, a layer of MoS
2 nanosheets were grown on the surface of NCNTs by a solution-based method. Followed by annealing under nitrogen atmosphere to crystallize the sheath of MoS
2, yielding the final product of NCNTs@MoS
2 with high crystallinity. As shown in
Fig. 1, the as-prepared hollow carbon nanotubes are uniform with a shell thickness of about 40 nm (
Fig. 1a). The hollow interior of carbon nanotubes is further confirmed by TEM (
Fig. 1b). The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pattern of the NCNTs is shown in Fig. S1A curve a (Supporting information), the broad peaks for graphitic carbon of N-doped carbon nanotube at 28° and 44° were obtained. While after the solvothermal process, the one dimensional morphology retains, while the surface of NCNTs becomes rough, indicating the successfully decoration with MoS
2 nanosheets (
Figs. 1c and
d). The SEM image shows that the MoS
2 layer is assembled by ultrathin nanosheets (
Fig. 1c).These structural features are also verified by the TEM images (
Fig. 1d). Moreover, the loaded MoS
2 could not be dislocated from the surface of the NCNTs after long time of sonication, which indicated an excellent adhesion between the MoS
2 and NCNTs. This can be attributed to the strong interactions between the doped nitrogen atom of NCNTs and the MoS
2. The uniformly nitrogen doped carbon nanotubes could not only supply growing sites for MoS
2 but also prevent the aggregation of the formed MoS
2 nanosheets. While without the support of NCNTs, severely aggregated nanosheets-assembled MoS
2 particles are obtained (Fig. S2 in Supporting information). Moreover, the coverage density of MoS
2 could be easily controlled by adjusting the (NH
4)
2MoS
4 concentration and the weight ratio to the NCNTs. Higher (NH
4)
2MoS
4 concentrations resulted in high coverage density of MoS
2 nanosheets on the surface of the NCNTs (
Figs. 1e and
f). Here, in our experiment, the weight ratio between (NH
4)
2MoS
4 and NCNTs was adjusted to 2:1. As shown in curve b of Fig. S1A, the formation of MoS
2 is verified by the XRD. The peaks at around 26°, 14.2°, 33.1°, 39.6°, 49.2°, and 59° can be attributed to [002] plane of graphitic carbon and [100], [103], [105], [108], and [110] planes of MoS
2, respectively [
34]. This is further confirmed by the following XPS data. As shown in Fig. S1C (Supporting information), the XPS spectrum shows directly the presence of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, molybdenum and sulfide elements. It was shown in Fig. S1D (Supporting information) that the peaks located at 229.8 and 232.9 eV are related to Mo 3d
5/2 and Mo 3d
3/2, the additional weak peak of 226.2 eV is assigned to S 2s [
35]. The spectra of S 2p display two peaks at 163.6 and 162.5 eV relating to S 2p
1/2 and S 2p
3/2 (Fig. S3 in Supporting information), showing the valence of Mo and S are 4 and -2, respectively, and therefore confirming the stoichiometric ratio of Mo:S is 2:1 [
21]. The BET surface area of the NCNTs@MoS
2 is acquired by the nitrogen adsorption/desorption curve (Fig. S1B in Supporting information). The as-synthesized NCNTs@MoS
2 possessed a BET surface area of 22.605 m
2/g. The pore-size distribution obtained by density functional theory further demonstrated a hierarchical structure with mesopores, and macropores, which were attributed to the hollow tubes cores and the decorated MoS
2 nanosheets.