Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Platinum monolayers stabilized on dealloyed AuCu core-shell nanoparticles for improved activity and stability on methanol oxidation reaction
收藏切换
PDF
Weihua Guo, Xiaozhang Yao, Lingyi Peng, Bingqing Lin, Yongqiang Kang, Lin Gan*
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2020, 31(3) : 836 - 840
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2020, 31(3): 836-840
• Communication •
Platinum monolayers stabilized on dealloyed AuCu core-shell nanoparticles for improved activity and stability on methanol oxidation reaction
Full
Weihua Guo, Xiaozhang Yao, Lingyi Peng, Bingqing Lin, Yongqiang Kang, Lin Gan*
Affiliations
  • Division of Energy and Environment, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
Published: 2020-03-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.06.018
Outline
收藏切换

Deposition of platinum (Pt) monolayers (PtML) on Au substrate represents a robust strategy to maximally utilize the Pt atoms and meanwhile achieve high catalytic activity towards methanol oxidation reaction for direct methanol fuel cells owing to a substrate-induced tensile strain effect. However, recent studies showed that PtML on Au substrate are far from perfect smooth monoatomic layer, but actually exhibited three-dimensional nanoclusters. Moreover, the PtML suffered from severe structural instability and thus activity degradation during long-term electrocatalysis. To regulate the growth of PtML on Au surface and also to improve its structural stability, we exploit dealloyed AuCu core-shell nanoparticles as a new substrate for depositing PtML. By using high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray elemental mapping combined with electrochemical characterizations, we reveal that the dealloyed AuCu core-shell nanoparticles can effectively promote the deposition of PtML closer to a smooth monolayer structure, thus leading to a higher utilization efficiency of Pt and higher intrinsic activity towards methanol oxidation compared to those on pure Au nanoparticles. Moreover, the PtML deposited on the AuCu core-shell NPs showed substantially enhanced stability compared to those on pure Au NPs during long-term electrocatalysis over several hours, during which segregation of Cu to the Au/Pt interface was revealed and suggested to play an important role in stabilizing the PtML catalysts.

Platinum monolayers  /  Methanol oxidation reaction  /  Core-Shell nanoparticles  /  Dealloying  /  Stability
Weihua Guo, Xiaozhang Yao, Lingyi Peng, Bingqing Lin, Yongqiang Kang, Lin Gan. Platinum monolayers stabilized on dealloyed AuCu core-shell nanoparticles for improved activity and stability on methanol oxidation reaction[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2020 , 31 (3) : 836 -840 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.06.018
Full Text
Less
Direct methanol fuel cells (DMFC) represent one of the most promising clean energy sources for portable consumable electron-ics due to their high energy densities. However, the sluggish anodic methanol oxidation reaction (MOR) has greatly limited the efficiency and power density of DMFCs and generally requires the use of large amounts of noble metal electrocatalysts like platinum (Pt) [1-4]. In addition, Pt also suffers from severe poisoning effect by the CO intermediate (-COads) formed during MOR [3]. To decrease the usage and increase the activity of Pt, Brankovic et al. developed an efficient catalyst design strategy by deposition of a monoatomic-thick Pt layer (namely, Pt monolayer, hereafter denoted as PtML) on a second substrate through surfacelimited redox replacement of a pre-formed underpotential deposited Cu monolayer [5-9]. These PtML could ideally achieve 100% Pt utilization, thus showing promising mass-normalized catalytic activities [10-13]. Deposition on different substrates can also result in strain/ligand effect on the PtML in combination of the can sensitively modulate the Pt surface catalytic activities [7, 14, 15]. In particular, a tensile strain on the PtML was achieved on Au substrate due to a larger lattice parameter (or atomic radius) of Au compared to Pt, leading to enhanced adsorption of hydroxyl (-OH) from water [12]. The enhanced OH formation could promote the oxidation of -COads or a direct oxidation of -COHads to CO2 without the formation of COads, thus leading to enhanced MOR activities.
While the monolayer structure of PtML was generally assumed and has been observed on Pd substrate [16], recent studies show that PtML grown on Au substrate, either bulk [17, 18] or nanoparticle (NP) surfaces [18, 19], is far from a perfect monolayer film but exhibits three-dimensional (3D) rough agglomerates (namely, a Volmer-Weber growth mode), which not only reduces the utilization of Pt atoms but also weakens the tensile strain effect. This is probably due to the large lattice parameter difference (4%) between Au (4.08 Å) and Pt (3.92 Å), while lattice mismatch between Pd (3.89 Å) and Pt (3.92 Å) is on 0.77% [20, 21]. Indeed, conformal overgrowth of Pd on Pt nanocube seeds into epitaxial core-shell structure have been demonstrated, whereas overgrowth of Au on the Pt seed resulted in anisotropic heterostructure [20]. In addition to the effect of lattice parameter, the weak interaction between Au and Pt (or more favorable Pt-Pt interactions) [17] and much lower surface energy of Au compared to Pt [22, 23] were also considered to contribute to the formation of 3D Pt agglomerates on Au. Moreover, the 3D Pt agglomerates on Au surface were unstable during long-term operation particularly under high potentials, leading to substantial catalyst degradation [19, 24]. To promote the formation of a smooth Pt monolayer on Au {111} surface, a CO stabilization strategy was developed by utilizing a stronger interaction of CO with Pt compared to that with Au [17]. However, once removing the CO adsorbent, three-dimensional Pt agglomerate re-generate, suggesting a great limitation of the CO stabilization strategy.
In this paper, we exploit a new approach to regulate the growth of smooth PtML catalysts on Au surface by utilizing dealloyed Cu-Au core-shell NPs as the substrate. The use of dealloyed Cu-Au NPs not only reduce the usage of noble metal Au, but also can efficiently promote the growth of PtML on the Au surface closer to a smooth monolayer, leading to improved MOR activity. This was confirmed by using high resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopic mapping and electrochemical characterizations. The core-shell compositional fine structures of the as-grown PtML on dealloyed Au-Cu core-shell NPs before and after long-term MOR electro-catalysis were further carefully characterized, suggesting substantially improved stability after long-term MOR electrocatalysis in comparison with those grown on pure Au NPs. This study provides a new way to stabilize smooth Pt monolayers on Au surface for enhanced electrocatalytic properties on MOR.
The AuCu NPs were prepared by a previously-reported seeded solvothermal method using pre-synthesized Au NPs as the seed [25] and then supported on a high surface area carbon (Vulcan XC) (detailed experimental procedures are presented in the supplementary material). Fig. 1a shows TEM image of the supported AuCu NPs, which exhibit a uniform particle size with an average diameter of 4.5 nm (particle size distribution analysis in Fig. S1 in Supporting information) and a composition close to Cu50Au50 as confirmed by EDX analysis. For comparison, a home-made pure Au catalyst with the average particle size of 5.1 nm supported on Vulcan XC was also prepared (the TEM image is shown in Fig. S1). Dealloyed AuCu coreshell NPs (denoted as D-AuCu) were then prepared by electrochemical cycling (200 cycles) of the AuCu NPs in 0.1 mol/L HClO4 between 0.05 Vand 1.2 V (Unless otherwise specified throughout the paper, all potentials are normalized to reversible hydrogen electrode, RHE) at 500 mV/s (Fig. 1b). During this process, surface non-noble Cu atoms were gradually removed as indicated by the large oxidative peaks at around 0.58 V. A smaller reductive peak at around 0.55 V can be also observed and can be ascribed to underpotential deposition (UPD) of part of leached Cu2+ on the Au surface. However, this reductive peak was much smaller than the oxidative peak related to Cu leaching, meaning that the UPD rate is far lower than that of Cu leaching. After 200 cycles, no oxidative/reductive peak can be observed, indicating the complete removal of surface Cu. The AuCu alloy core and Au shell in the dealloyed Au-Cu NPs are confirmed by EDX mapping (Fig. 1c) as well as the Z-contrast STEM image (Fig. S2 in Supporting information), and the average composition was determined to be Au75Cu25 from large area EDX analysis. Fig. 1d presents the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the pristine AuCu, the D-AuCu and the pure Au catalyst, all of which show a face-centered-cubic structure. The AuCu alloy NPs manifest an obvious shift of diffraction peaks to higher angles relative to pure Au NPs, indicating a decreased lattice parameter (3.96 Å) compared to Au (4.08 Å) due to Cu alloying. After leaching the surface Cu, the average lattice parameter of the D-AuCu NPs (4.04 Å) increases but still range between the pure Au (4.08 Å) and pure Pt (3.92 Å). In another word, the dealloyed AuCu NPs can still result in a tensile strain for subsequently deposited PtML.
The dealloyed Au-Cu NPs were then applied as the substrate for depositing PtML by the well-established redox replacement of UPD CuML process. Firstly, a CuML was underpotentially deposited on the dealloyed Au-Cu core-shell NPs in N2-satruated CuSO4 and H2SO4 solution and then subsequently replaced by K2PtCl4 in N2-saturated 50 mmol/L H2SO4. Following previous reports, the use of Pt2+ precursor in H2SO4 solution enables one-by-one replacement of Cu by Pt2+ [9, 18]. The as-deposited catalyst was denoted as D-AuCu@Pt. The pristine AuCu NPs were not directly used as the substrate for PtML since not only the outmost-surface Cu but also the near-surface Cu atoms would be replaced by Pt2+ precursor, leading to a AuPt alloy surface instead of a Pt monolayer on top of Au substrate. For comparison, PtML was also deposited on the pure Au NPs following the same protocol (denoted as Au@Pt). Fig. 2 presents the high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) STEM characterization of the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst and the Au@Pt catalyst. Consistent with our previous findings [19], the Au@Pt catalyst (Fig. 2a, and more images in Fig. S3 in Supporting information) exhibits an irregularly shape with a high surface roughness and sharp corners/protrusions, significantly different from the near spherical shape of original Au NPs (Fig. S1). High resolution STEM (HR-STEM) image (Fig. 2b) also presents a non-uniform image contrast across the NP as indicated by the intensity line profile shown in the inset, indicating a non-uniform Pt deposition on the surface. EDX mapping in Fig. 2c also evidences a non-uniform deposition of Pt, with the sharp corners identified as the formation of 3D Pt nanoclusters. In contrast, the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst demonstrates similarly smooth NP surface as the original D-AuCu NPs (Fig. 2d). No prominent islands or sharp corners are observed on the surface of D-AuCu@Pt particles and the HR-STEM image (Fig. 2e) exhibits a uniform image contrast across the whole NP, indicating successful deposition of smooth PtML. This was corroborated by EDX-mapping (Fig. 2f), where Pt distributes more homogeneously on the D-AuCu NPs without apparent Pt-rich sharp corners.
The more uniform deposition of PtML on the D-AuCu core-shell NPs compared to those on pure Au NPs indicates a significant role of Cu at the core in regulating the growth of smooth PtML on the Au surface. Geometrically, alloying of Cu at the core can induce decreased lattice parameter of Au and thus reduced lattice mismatch between Au and Pt, which benefits a continuous epitaxial growth of PtML instead of Volmer-Webber growth. Thermodynamically, the 3D agglomerate structure of Pt on pure Au surface was previously ascribed to much lower surface energy of Au compared to Pt, which drives the segregation of Au over Pt [17, 26]. On dealloyed Au-Cu core-shell NPs, the compressive strain exerted by the AuCu alloy core would in principle increase the surface energy of the Au shell compared to unstrained pure Au surface, since the latter represents the most stable state and thus has the lowest surface energy. Thus, decreased surface energy difference between Au and Pt is expected and favors the formation of 2D PtML on D-AuCu NPs
The surface composition of the D-AuCu@Pt and Au@Pt catalyst can be further evaluated by surface adsorption/desorption during cyclic voltammetry (CV) in N2-saturated 0.1 mol/L HClO4 solution (Fig. 3a). A clear hydrogen adsorption/desorption feature on Pt can be clearly observed between 0.05 V and 0.35 V. In addition, there are two reduction peaks at 0.4–0.9 V and 0.9–1.4 V corresponding to the reduction of Pt surface oxides and Au surface oxides formed under high potentials, respectively [27]. From the charge associated with the hydrogen adsorption/desorption on Pt (210 μC/cm2) and Au oxide reduction (180 μC/cm2 for a upper potential limit of 1.5 V) [28], the surface compositions of the Au@Pt and the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst were estimated to be 47% Pt and 75% Pt, respectively. The higher Pt surface composition on the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst is in good accordance with its higher Pt coverage as revealed by STEM-EDX mapping.
CO stripping was also performed to gain further insight into the catalyst surface adsorption properties (Fig. 3b). The onset and peak potentials of the CO stripping are highly sensitive to the binding energy of Pt with CO and with hydroxyl from water, both of which are critical for oxidation of adsorbed CO on Pt surface [12]. Adsorption of CO on Au can be ruled out since no CO stripping peak can be observed on pure Au NPs (Fig. S4 in Supporting information), consistent with previous findings [27]. The commercial Pt/C (Johnson Matthey 3000, 2 nm) shows the most delayed CO oxidation among the three catalysts, since CO adsorbs strongly yet hydroxyl adsorbs too weakly on pure Pt surface for CO oxidation. Due to a stronger adsorption of OH on Pt surface with a tensile strain, an earlier CO stripping was observed on both Au@Pt and D-AuCu@Pt catalysts compared to pure Pt catalyst. On par with Au@Pt, the onset potential of CO stripping on the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst is further lower, indicating a further enhanced adsorption of hydroxyl. MOR electrocatalytic activity measurement (Fig. 3c) show that the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst produced 3-fold enhancement in terms of mass-normalized activity at 0.8 V. When normalized to the ECSA of Pt, the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst also demonstrates substantially enhanced (1.5×) surface-specific activities than that of the Au@Pt catalyst and much higher (4.5×) compared to commercial Pt catalyst (Fig. 3d). This result indicates that, although the lattice parameter of the dealloyed Cu-Au NPs decreased compared to Au NPs, PtML deposited on D-AuCu NPs may experience even higher tensile strain than those on Au NPs. This is reasonable since the 3D nanocluster morphology of PtML on the latter would greatly compromise the substrate-induced tensile strain effect.
Electrocatalytic stability of the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst on the MOR was further evaluated by long-term chronoampemetry holding at 0.6V for 12 h, in comparison with the Au@Pt catalyst measured at identical conditions (Fig. 4a). Both the two catalysts exhibit obvious activity drop, which can be ascribed to the accumulation of COad intermediate which poisons the Pt surface. In particular, the Au@Pt catalyst almost show no activity after 8 h. The D-AuCu@Pt catalyst, although degrades first as well, maintains a stable electrocatalytic activity after 10 h, thus showing improved stability than the Au@Pt catalyst. To gain atomic origin of the different stability, we further conducted STEM-EDX mapping of the aged catalyst NPs. The aged D-AuCu@Pt NPs (Fig. 4c) generally still show a high coverage of the PtML shells, despite lower than those before stability test. In contrast, the aged Au@Pt NPs show much lower Pt coverage on the surface or even no Pt at all (Fig. 4d). To quantitatively analysis the Pt coverage, the perimeter of the PtML on the surface was measured and divided by the perimeter of the projected image of Au NPs, as illustrated in Fig. S5 (Supporting information). The statistical results are shown in Fig. 4b. The Pt coverages of all the analyzed Au@Pt NPs (mostly below 40%) are much lower than those of the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst (above 60%). These results suggest an obvious structural change of the PtML on Au NPs during extended electrocatalytic stability test, which would exacerbate the activity degradation due to both decreased ECSA and weakened tensile strain effect. Subsurface Cu alloying can effectively suppress the structural instability of PtML, thus contributing to enhanced electrocatalytic stability.
Besides the structural stability of PtML, it appears that the distribution of Cu in the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst substantially changed after the stability test. In contrast to the pristine D-AuCu NPs where Cu is mainly confined at the core, the EDX mappings in Fig. 4c show that part of Cu migrates to the interface between Au and PtML. This can be quantitatively revealed by the line profiles along the dash line regions of particle c1 and particle c3, as shown in Figs. 4e and f, respectively. The detailed reason of Cu interface segregation was unclear at present but could be induced by alleviated interface strain energy. Similar interface segregation phenomenon has been observed in random grain boundaries of Ni-Bi bulk alloys [29] and twin boundaries of Mg bulk alloys containing impurities like Zn and Gd [30], yet the segregation at the nanoscale interfaces of coreshell NPs has not been reported and needs further studies. It is however highly speculated that Cu segregated at the Au/Pt interfaces may play an important role in stabilizing the PtML on Au due to the much stronger Cu-Pt and Cu-Au interaction compared to Pt-Au.
In conclusion, we demonstrate an efficient approach to stabilize Pt monolayers on Au surface by using dealloyed AuCu core-shell NPs as substrate. The existence of Cu at the NP core not only decreased the usage of the precious metal Au but also reduced the lattice mismatch and surface energy difference between Au and Pt, thus favoring the epitaxial growth of a smooth PtML on the Au-rich shell. As a result, the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst shows a higher ECSA of Pt and enhanced mass activity compared to the Au@Pt catalyst. Moreover, the obtained smooth PtML on the D-AuCu NPs also showed higher specific catalytic activity than the Au@Pt catalyst due to a higher strain effect. During long-term steady state electrocatalytic stability test by holding at 0.6 V for 12 h, the D-AuCu@Pt catalyst largely maintained a high Pt coverage (above 60%) and achieved a stable electrocatalytic activity, while the Au@Pt catalyst showed significantly decreased Pt coverage and pronounced activity degradation (completely inactive after 10 h). In addition, EDX mapping suggests that Cu segregated at the interface between Au and Pt after the long-term stability test, which may play an important role in stabilizing the PtML due to strong Cu-Pt and Cu-Au interaction. The utilization of dealloyed core-shell NPs as the substrate provide a new strategy for finetuning the growth of atomically smooth PtML electrocatalysts on noble metal substrates as well as their electrocatalytic activity and stability.
Acknowledgments
Less
We thank the financial supports by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Nos. 21573123 and 51622103), the Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program (No. 2017BT01N111), Guangdong Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 2016A030306035), and Basic Research Program of Shenzhen (No. JCYJ20160531194754308) in China. This work made use of the TEM facilities at the Electron Microscopy Laboratory, Materials and Devices Testing Center, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Less
Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2019.06.018.
References
Less
[1]
X. Zhao, M. Yin, L. Ma, et al., Synth. Lect. Energy Environ. Technol. Sci. Soc. 4(2011) 2736.
[2]
J.N. Tiwari, R.N. Tiwari, G. Singh, K.S. Kim, Nano Energy 2(2013) 553-578.
[3]
B. Braunchweig, D. Hibbitts, M. Neurock, A. Wieckowski, Catal. Today 202(2013) 197-209.
[4]
L. Gan, H. Du, B. Li, F. Kang, J. Power Sources 191(2009) 233-239.
[5]
S.R. Brankovic, J.X. Wang, R.R. Adzic, Surf. Sci. 474(2001) L173-L179.
[6]
J. Zhang, Y. Mo, M.B. Vukmirovic, et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 108(2004) 10955-10964.
[7]
R.R. Adzic, J. Zhang, K. Sasaki, et al., Top. Catal. 46(2007) 249-262.
[8]
S.E. Bae, D. Gokcen, P. Liu, et al., Electrocatalysis US 3(2012) 203-210.
[9]
D. Gokcen, Q.Y. Yuan, S.R. Brankovic, J. Electrochem. Soc. 161(2014) D3051-D3056.
[10]
K. Sasaki, H. Naohara, Y. Cai, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49(2010) 8602-8607.
[11]
M. Shao, K. Shoemaker, A. Peles, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132(2010) 9253-9255.
[12]
M. Li, P. Liu, R.R. Adzic, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3(2012) 3480-3485.
[13]
S. Khateeb, S. Guerreo, D. Su, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 163(2016) F708-F713.
[14]
J.L.Zhang, M.B.Vukmirovic, Y.Xu, et al., Angew.Chem.Int.Ed.44(2005)2132-2135.
[15]
S. Koh, P. Strasser, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129(2007) 12624-12625.
[16]
J.X. Wang, H. Inada, L.J. Wu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131(2009) 17298-17302.
[17]
S. Brimaud, R.J. Behm, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135(2013) 11716-11719.
[18]
R. Loukrakpam, Q. Yuan, V. Petkov, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16(2014) 18866-18876.
[19]
L. Peng, L. Gan, Y. Wei, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 120(2016) 28664-28671.
[20]
S.E. Habas, H. Lee, V. Radmilovic, et al., Nat. Mater. 6(2007) 692-697.
[21]
D. Wang, Y. Li, Adv. Mater. 23(2011) 1044-1060.
[22]
D. Friebel, D.J. Miller, D. Nordlund, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50(2011) 10190-10192.
[23]
E. Christoffersen, P. Liu, A. Ruban, et al., J. Catal. 199(2001) 123-131.
[24]
S.H. Ahn, Y. Liu, T.P. Moffat, ACS Catal. 5(2015) 2124-2136.
[25]
W. Chen, R. Yu, L. Li, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49(2010) 2917-2921.
[26]
M.S.P. Jagannath, S. Divi, A. Chatterjee, J. Phys. Chem. C 122(2018) 26214-26225.
[27]
J. Suntivich, Z. Xu, C.E. Carlton, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135(2013) 7985-7991.
[28]
G. Tremiliosi-Filho, L.H. Dall'Antonia, G. Jerkiewicz, J. Electroanal. Chem. (Lausanne) 422(1997) 149-159.
[29]
Z. Yu, P.R. Cantwell, Q. Gao, et al., Science 358(2017) 97-102.
[30]
J.F. Nie, Y.M. Zhu, J.Z. Liu, X.Y. Fang, Science 340(2013) 957-960.
Appendix
Less
Year 2020 volume 31 Issue 3
PDF
51
29
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2019.06.018
  • Receive Date：2019-05-08
  • Online Date：2026-01-31
  • Published：2020-03-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2019-05-08
  • Revised：2019-06-04
  • Accepted：2019-06-10
Affiliations
    Division of Energy and Environment, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen 518055, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2019.06.018
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House