We opted for the total synthesis of the displayed structure (2
S, 3
S, 11
R, 12
S, 14
S)-versiquinazoline H (
6,
Fig. 1) as the first objective of this investigation. For this purpose, Huang's third generation approach was adopted [
8b]. Thus, the synthesis commenced with the known
N-aroyl-L-tryptophan
8 [
7g], prepared by aroylation of L-tryptophan (L-Trp) with o-nitrobenzoyl chloride (
Scheme 1). The coupling of the mixed anhydride, generated
in situ from
8 and
i-BuOCOCl/
N-methylmorpholine (NMM), with benzyl D-
allo-isoleucinate
p-toluenesulfonic acid salt (THF, −20 ℃, 12 h) afforded
9 in 92% yield. The low-valent Ti-reagent mediated-quinazolinone formation [
9] (Zn/TiCl
4 and trimethyl orthoformate, THF) [
7c] proceeded smoothly at 0 ℃ to give
10 in 95% yield. Exposure of
10 to DMDO [
8,
10] at −78 ℃ followed by treating the resultant intermediates with an aqueous solution of Na
2SO
3 [
8] at 45 ℃ for 2 h afforded, in one-pot, the double cyclization product
11 along with monocyclization product
12 in 32% and 33% yield, respectively.
O-Debenzylation of
12 under catalytic hydrogenolytic conditions yielded the corresponding acid derivative
13, which, without isolation, was subjected to lactamization conditions. However, under the previously used lactamization conditions [(COCl)
2 (1.5 equiv.), DIPEA (2.0 equiv.), cat. DMF, DCM (0.04 mol/L), −10 ℃, 45 min], the desired product
6 was obtained in only 29% yield. Increasing (COCl)
2 from 1.5 equiv. to 3.0 equiv. led to an even lower yield (20%). Employing the Ye coupling reagent (DEPBT) [(2.0 equiv.) [
11], DIPEA (2.0 equiv.), DCM (0.04 mol/L), 25 ℃, 8 h] resulted in a higher yield of 54%. Finally, it was found that another coupling method employing HOAt (6.0 equiv.) and EDCI (3.0 equiv.) in dichloromethane (0.05 mol/L) (30 ℃, 12 h) produced the proposed structure of versiquinazoline H (
6) in 95% yield over two steps. The sense of optical rotation {[
α]
D20 69.6 (
c 0.1, CH
3OH)} and spectral (
1H and
13C NMR) data of our synthetic compound are different from those reported for the natural (−)-versiquinazoline H {[
α]
D20 −100 (
c 0.1, MeOH) [
5]}, suggesting that the originally proposed stereochemistry (
6) for (−)-versiquinazoline H was incorrect.