The effect of Mie resonance in hollow nanoshells on the photocatalytic activity is investigated by the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution in an Eosin Y-sensitized system with Pt as the cocatalyst and triethanolamine (TEOA) as the sacrificial donor under visible light irradiation (
Fig. 3a). The C-TiO
2 and C-TiO
2-1%Pt hollow nanoshells show no activity for H
2 generation due to the wide band gap of anatase TiO
2. However, the Eosin Y-sensitized C-TiO
2-1%Pt hollow nanoshells presents the enhanced photocatalytic performance for water splitting due to the excitation of Eosin Y molecules and the electrons transfer from excited state Eosin Y to TiO
2 under visible light irradiation [
32-
34]. Meanwhile, the Eosin Y-sensitized 210(18)@C-TiO
2-1%Pt exhibits a higher H
2-evolution rate (468.1 μmolh
−1 g
−1), which is 4.4 times as much as Eosin Y-sensitized 160(18)@C-TiO
2 hollow nanoshells (105.5 μmolh
−1 g
−1). The experimental parameters of photocatalytic hydrogen generation are particularly identical over 160(18)@C-TiO
2 and 210(18)@C-TiO
2, including catalyst amount, Pt loading amount, Eosin Y concentration, and TEOA amount. The only difference between the two samples is their different inner diameter, and thus different Mie scattering. Moreover, we also take the specific surface area into account, and the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms with pore size distributions are displayed in
Fig. 3b. These two samples show the type Ⅳ isotherms with H3 hysteresis loops at high relative pressure, indicating the existence of slitlike mesopores [
35]. The 160(18)@C-TiO
2-1%Pt and 210(18)@C-TiO
2-1%Pt hollow nanoshells have the specific surface area of 144.5 and 121.1 m
2/g, respectively, and both of them show the similar pore size distribution from 2 nm to 10 nm. The photocatalytic activity of Eosin Y-sensitized 210(18)@C-TiO
2-1%Pt is 5.2 times as high as that of Eosin Y-sensitized 160(18)@C-TiO
2-1%Pt if the photocatalytic H
2-generation rate is calculated by per unit surface area. Therefore, the enhanced photocatalytic H
2 production of Eosin Y-sensitized 210(18)@C-TiO
2-1%Pt is because its Mie scattering peak (436 nm) can excite the Eosin Y molecules more compared to 160(18)@C-TiO
2-1%Pt under visible light irradiation. The apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) for hydrogen evolution over 210(18)@C-TiO
2-1%Pt with Eosin Y sensitization reaches 22.5%. In addition, it is found that the H
2-evolution rate gradually decreases with increasing reaction time, possibly due to the degradation of sensitized dyes (
Fig. 3a) [
36]. The UV–vis absorption spectra are measured to determine the change of Eosin Y dyes (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). The Eosin Y dyes are gradually degraded in the photocatalytic process of hydrogen evolution, and the absorption peak shifts to shorter wavelength, resulting in the decreased photocatalytic activity with increasing reaction time. Furthermore, we investigate the stability of hydrogen evolution over 210(18)@C-TiO
2-1%Pt with Eosin Y sensitization under visible light irradiation (λ≥420 nm). After each run, the catalyst is collected by centrifuging from the reaction mixture and re-dispersed in the fresh 10% TEOA aqueous solution with Eosin Y dyes and then evacuated in Labsolar-6A photocatalytic system (Beijing Perfectlight Technology Co., Ltd., China). As shown in
Fig. 3c, the photocatalytic performance remained stable after a few cycles, indicating the good stability of 210(18)@C-TiO
2 system.