Herein we identified the compositional dependence of reactivity and selectivity of the reaction mechanism for the heteronuclear complexes, which is rooted in the inherent nature of transition metal components. This dramatic difference in reactivity can be attributed to the stronger TM-O bonds of the 5d metals with respect to those of the lighter 3d and 4d congeners. The dissociation energy of diatomic TaO (8.30 eV) [
22] has been confirmed to be larger than the values of 6.48 and 7.53 eV for lighter VO [
23] and NbO [
24]. The high-level
ab initio calculations with the relativistic and correlation effects taken into account have demonstrated that the fascinating chemistry of 5d metals with regard to various chemical processes such as CO oxidation and C-H bond activation is to a great extent caused by relativity [
25,
26]. This same reason was invoked to elaborate on the discrepant maximum carbonyl-coordination number of the vanadium family (V
+, Nb
+, Ta
+) [
27]. The relativistic mass velocity contraction of the 6s orbital of Ta results in the contracted Ta-O bond (Table S3 in Supporting information) with respect to the corresponding Nb-O bond [
18]. As a result of the 6s orbital stabilization and 5d orbital destabilization for Ta, the
4F (3d
36s
2) ground state of Ta is in contrast to the
6D (3d
46s
1) ground state of Nb. Consequently, the electron affinity of Ta atom (0.323 eV) [
28] is significantly lower than those of lighter homologsV atom (0.526 eV) [
28] and Nb atom (0.894 eV) [
28]. Furthermore, the 6s orbital stabilization and 5d orbital destabilization for Ta are complemented by a significantly better overlap between the
π orbitals of the CO ligand with the 5d
π orbitals of Ta and therefore greater
πback-donation of electron density from the 5d
π orbitals of Ta, when compared to the 3d
π and 4d
π counterparts of V and Nb. Accordingly, the capability of net electron storage of Ta atom in TaNiO(CO)
n− complexes is less competitive with respective to that of Nb atom in congeneric NbNiO(CO)
n− [
18]. As a consequence of the stronger Ta-O bond and the less competitive electron storage ability of Ta, the TaNiO(CO)
n− complexes are less reactive towards CO oxidation than corresponding NbNiO(CO)
n− congeners and additional CO ligand adsorption is needed to drive the CO oxidation on TaNiO(CO)
n− complexes. Note that the calculated Mayer bond orders of Ta-O bond in
μ2-O-bent structures of TaNiO(CO)
n− (
n=4–7) fall in the range of 1.32–1.52, while the those for the
μ2-O-linearisomers are even larger and range from 1.60 to 1.77, suggesting the double-bond character of the Ta-O bond. As compared to the Ta
+ cation forming a seven-coordinate complex [
27], the maximum carbonyl-coordination number of Ta atom in the anionic TaNiO(CO)
n− complexes should decrease to six. The Ni atom in TaNiO(CO)
7− has reached its chemisorption saturation limit and its minimal value of partial charge. Consequently, beyond TaNiO(CO)
7−, additional CO ligand can either be physisorbed in order to retain the Ta-O double bond, or be accommodated
via chemisorption so that the Ta-O double bond becomes a single bond to reach the chemisorption saturation limit. In other word, both the chemisorption and physisorption on TaNiO(CO)
7− are so comparable with each other that both ER- and LH-like mechanisms prevail for the CO oxidation reaction on TaNiO(CO)
8− complex.