Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Electrochemical synthesis of 3-azido-indolines from amino-azidation of alkenes
收藏切换
PDF
Shengping Guoa, 1, Liyan Liua, 1, Kangfei Hua, Qi Suna, Zhenggen Zhaa, Yu Yang*, b, Zhiyong Wang*, a
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2021, 32(3) : 1033 - 1036
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2021, 32(3): 1033-1036
• Communication •
Electrochemical synthesis of 3-azido-indolines from amino-azidation of alkenes
Full
Shengping Guoa, 1, Liyan Liua, 1, Kangfei Hua, Qi Suna, Zhenggen Zhaa, Yu Yang*, b, Zhiyong Wang*, a
Affiliations
  • a Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, CAS Key Laboratory of Soft Matter Chemistry & Center for Excellence in Molecular Synthesis of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology & School of Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • b School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hefei Normol University, Hefei 230601, China
Published: 2021-03-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.09.041
Outline
收藏切换

An electrochemical amino-azidation of 2-aminostyrene with sodium azide (NaN3) was developed, which can be carried out smoothly in water under metal-free condition, affording a series of 3-azido indolines with high yields.

Electrochemical  /  Amino-azidation  /  2-Aminostyrene  /  Metal-free  /  Oxidant-free  /  3-Azido indolines
Shengping Guo, Liyan Liu, Kangfei Hu, Qi Sun, Zhenggen Zha, Yu Yang, Zhiyong Wang. Electrochemical synthesis of 3-azido-indolines from amino-azidation of alkenes[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2021 , 32 (3) : 1033 -1036 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.09.041
Full Text
Less
Organic azides are useful building blocks in chemical synthesis because of their remarkable biological activity as well as synthetic versatility. Moreover, azide derivatives have been incorporated into a lot of lead compounds designed in drug discovery [1-5]. As one typical kind of these species, β-azide amines are powerful precursors of nitrogen-containing molecules, which are employed in the mild and versatile copper-catalyzed "click" chemistry [6-8]. Therefore acquiring β-azide amine has attracted great attention during the past several decades.
Traditionally, simple β-azide amines are synthesized based on the ring opening of aziridine with NaN3 (Scheme 1a) [9-13]. Recently, diverse β-azide amines were obtained by multistep processes, which involved haloamination of alkene followed by substitution with NaN3 (Scheme 1b) [14-18]. With the request of green chemistry, minimizing synthetic steps and finding more milder transformations are highly desirable and much effort has been devoted by chemists. For instance, a direct amino-azidation of alkene catalyzed by copper from N-allyl urea and NaN3 was reported by Chemler and co-worker in 2010 (Scheme 1c) [19]. However, the study mentioned above still existed some limitation, such as the need of metal. Therefore, there is still a great demand for the development of more green and sustainable approaches to produce this kind of product.
On the other hand, electrochemical synthesis, emerging as an environmentally friendly method, has been widely utilized in the construction of heterocyclic compounds [20-37], difunctionalization of olefins [38-45] and other functional molecules [46-58]. However, the direct electrochemical amino-azidolation of 2-aminostyrene with sodium azide has not been used for the synthesis of β-azide amines. With our ongoing interest in developing electrochemical synthesis and green methodology [59-70], as a consequence of the importance of azides in organic synthesis, we disclose a simple and efficient electrochemical amino-azidolation of 2-aminostyrene with sodium azide providing a facile route for the preparation of 3-azido-indolines in excellent yields.
At the outset of this investigation, a model reaction of 2-aminostyrene 1a and sodium azide 2a was performed in an undivided cell. Initially, n-Bu4NI was employed as the electrolyte and CH3CN as the solvent with a constant current of 10 mA. To our delight, the desired product 3a was obtained in 35% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Afterwards, other electrolytes, such as NH4I, n-Bu4NBr, n-BuNClO4, n-BuNBF4, NH4PF6 and Me4NI, were examined in the reaction (entries 2−7). We found only iodine salts could promote this transformation, especially Me4NI performed well in this reaction, giving the product 3a in 83% yield. The screening of the different kinds of solvent showed that CH3CN was the best solvent (entries 8−13). Moreover, the addition of water to this reaction could increase the yield of 3a, perhaps due to the improvement of the solubility of NaN3 in the presence of water (entry 14). Subsequently, the ratio of CH3CN and H2O was investigated. Changing the ratio of CH3CN/H2O to 5:1 could give the best result, that is, 3a can be obtained in 95% (entries 14–16). Increasing the reaction temperature did not increase the yield of this transformation (entries 17 and 18). Finally, other types of electrodes were examined and the results indicated that the C|C electrodes was the best electrode in this reaction (entries 19−21). No product was observed without electricity, suggesting that the reaction driving force should be the electric energy.
With the optimized conditions in hand, the scope of this reaction was investigated and the results were showed in Scheme 2. A variety of substituted 2-aminostyrene 1 were employed in this reaction. The styrenes bearing different groups could afford the amino-azidation products with good to excellent yields (Schemes 2 3a–3o). Electron-rich and electron-neutral substituted 2-aminostyrene on the phenyl ring were typically examined. In general, the substrates with electron-donating groups (R1 = 5-Me, 5-Et, 5-n-Bu, 5-t-Bu, 5-OMe) on the phenyl ring gave higher yields than those bearing electron-withdrawing groups (R1 = 5-COOMe, 5-COMe, 5-NO2). Gratifyingly, halogen substituted aryl amines (R1 = 5-F, 5-Cl, 5-Br) could perform well to give the target products in excellent yields (3j, 3k and 3l, Scheme 2). Sterically encumbered 2-aminostyrenes (R1 = 6-Me, 7-Me) were also explored and it was found that hindrance had a negative influence on the reaction (3m and 3n, Scheme 2). It was noted that disubstituted alkene can be employed as the reaction substrate in this reaction. For instance, 1o (R2 = Me) could work well in the reaction to give the corresponding product in good yield (3o, Scheme 2). Moreover, 2-aminostyrenes with different N-protecting groups (PG = p-trifluoromethylbenzenesulfonyl, o-nitrobenzenesulfonyl) can also survived the reaction to afford the corresponding products 3p and 3q in 82% and 60% yields, respectively, as shown in Scheme 2.
In order to test the practicality and scalability of this developed method, we then scaled up this reaction (Scheme 3a). When 6.0 mmol of 2-aminostyrene was subjected to the reaction, corresponding product 3a was obtained with a satisfactory yield of 82% (1.54 g), demonstrating the great potential of this method. Subsequently, some derivatizations based on the 3-azido-indolines can be obtained smoothly. For instance, 3a was reduced to 3r in methanol by using hydrogen with Pd/C electrodes, which could be exploited as a precursor of the other nitrogen-containing heterocycles (Scheme 3b). Besides, the click reaction of 3a under electrochemical conditions gave the product 3s in 79% yield (Scheme 3c), which is an impotrant moiety in the inhibitors of HCV NS3 protease [71].
To get insight into the reaction mechanism, some control experiments were performed (Scheme 4). When the radical scavenger 2, 6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT) was added to the reaction mixture, we did not observe the decrease of the reaction yield, which implied that there might be no radical intermediate involved in this reaction (Scheme 4a). The product 3a could be obtained with 47% yield when 1 equiv. of I2 was employed in the absence of other oxidants. This showed that I2 could catalyze this transformation (Scheme 4b). However, the yield was low under the direct catalysis of molecular iodine. Perhaps the rate of the iodine addition to double bond is much faster than that of nucleophilic addition of aniline to the iodonium, resulting in the side reaction. Under electrochemical conditions, I− was slowly oxidized to molecular iodine and the following formation of iodonium can be carried out slowly. In this way, the rate of iodonium formation can match that of annulation of nucleophilic addition, avoiding the side reaction.
Based on our mechanistic studies and the previous reports [72-77], a plausible mechanism involved an iodonium ion intermediate was proposed in Scheme 5. The transformation begins with the oxidation of I− to I2 at the anode. Subsequently, I2 reacts with 1a to give the intermediate A, then, the following nucleophilic addition leads to the formation of C and further deprotonation gives D, followed by the nucleophilic attack of azide to give the product 3a.
In summary, we developed an effective electrochemical method for the synthesis of 3-azido-indolines. Compared with the previous methods, this process is environmentally friendly without any metal or oxidizing agent. Moreover, this reaction tolerates a variety of functional groups with a broad scope of the reaction substrates. Further efforts are underway to develop electrochemical water-phase asymmetric synthesis in our group.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Acknowledgments
Less
We are grateful to the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21672200, 21772185, 21801233) and the assistance of the product characterization from the Chemistry Experiment Teaching Center of University of Science and Technology of China. This work was supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2018M632532) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. XDB20000000).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Less
Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.09.041.
References
Less
[1]
D.M. Huryn, M. Okabe, Chem. Rev. 92 (1992) 1745-1768.
[2]
H. Li, R. Aneja, I. Chaiken, Molecules 18 (2013) 9797-9817.
[3]
D. Intrieri, P. Zardi, A. Caselli, E. Gallo, Chem. Commun. 50 (2014) 11440-11453.
[4]
K. Banert, Synthesis 48 (2016) 2361-2375.
[5]
D. Huang, G. Yan, Adv. Synth. Catal. 359 (2017) 1600-1619.
[6]
E. Scriven, K. Turnbull, Chem. Rev. 88 (1988) 297-368.
[7]
S. Brase, C. Gil, K. Knepper, V. Zimmermann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 5188-5240.
[8]
M. Minozzi, D. Nanni, P. Spagnolo, Chem. Eur. J. 15 (2009) 7830-7840.
[9]
J.L. Jat, M.P. Paudyal, H. Gao, et al., Science 343 (2014) 61-65.
[10]
K. Guthikonda, P.M. Wehn, B.J. Caliando, J.D. Bois, Tetrahedron 62 (2006) 11331-11342.
[11]
B. Wu, J.R. Parquette, T.V. RajanBabu, Science 326 (2009) 1662.
[12]
H. Sun, C. Yang, R. Lin, W.J. Xia, Adv. Synth. Catal. 356 (2014) 2775-2780.
[13]
S. Minakata, D. Kano, Y. Oderaotoshi, M. Komatsu, Angew. Chem. In. Ed. 43 (2004) 79-81.
[14]
S.N. Yu, Y.L. Li, J. Deng, Adv. Synth. Catal. 359 (2017) 1-11.
[15]
H. Wang, M. Frings, C. Bolm, Org. Lett. 18 (2016) 2431-2434.
[16]
M.T. Bovino, S.R. Chemler, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 51 (2012) 3923-3927.
[17]
F.E. Michael, P.A. Sibbald, B.M. Cochran, Org. Lett. 10 (2008) 793-796.
[18]
G.X. Ortiz, B. Kang, Q. Wang, J. Org. Chem. 79 (2014) 571-581.
[19]
F.C. Sequeira, B.W. Turnpenny, S.R. Chemler, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49 (2010) 6365-6368.
[20]
R. Francke, J. Beilstein, Org. Chem. 10 (2014) 2858-2873.
[21]
S. Tang, X.L. Gao, A.W. Lei, Chem. Commun. 53 (2017) 3354-3356.
[22]
L.J. Wesenberg, S. Herold, A. Shimizu, J.I. Yoshida, S.R. Waldvogel, Chem. Eur. J. 23 (2017) 12096-12099.
[23]
Z.W. Hou, Z.Y. Mao, H.C. Xu, Synlett 28 (2017) 1867-1872.
[24]
C.Y. Cai, H.C. Xu, Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 3551-3557.
[25]
Z.W. Hou, Z.Y. Mao, Y.Y. Melcamu, X. Lu, H.C. Xu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 1636-1639.
[26]
X. Hu, G. Zhang, F. Bu, L. Nie, A.W. Lei, ACS Catal. 8 (2018) 9370-9375.
[27]
Y.Y. Jiang, K. Xu, C.C. Zeng, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 4485-4540.
[28]
R. Mei, J. Koeller, L. Ackermann, Chem Commun. 54 (2018) 12879-12882.
[29]
R. Mei, N. Sauermann, J.C.A. Oliveira, L. Ackermann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 7913-7921.
[30]
Y. Qiu, C. Tian, L. Massignan, T. Rogge, L. Ackermann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 5818-5822.
[31]
C. Tian, L. Massignan, T.H. Meyer, L. Ackermann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 2383-2387.
[32]
Z.H. Ye, M.R. Ding, Y.Q. Wu, et al., Green Chem. 20 (2018) 1732-1737.
[33]
S. Zhang, L.J. Li, M.Y. Xue, et al., Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 3443-3446.
[34]
X.L. Gao, P. Wang, Q.Q. Wang, J.T. Chen, A.W. Lei, Green Chem. 21 (2019) 4941-4945.
[35]
J.W. Hua, Z. Fang, J. Xu, et al., Green Chem. 21 (2019) 4706-4711.
[36]
Z.X. Ruan, Z.X. Huang, Z.N. Xu, et al., Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 1237-1240.
[37]
J. Wu, Y.C. Dou, R. Guillot, C. Kouklovsky, G. Vincent, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 2832-2837.
[38]
J.C. Siu, J.B. Parry, S. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 2825-2831.
[39]
J.C. Siu, G.S. Sauer, A. Saha, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 12511-12520.
[40]
N. Fu, G.S. Sauer, A. Saha, A. Loo, S. Lin, Science 357 (2017) 575-579.
[41]
Y. Wang, L.L. Deng, H.B. Mei, et al., Green Chem. 20 (2018) 3444-3449.
[42]
L.L. Zhang, G.T. Zhang, P. Wang, Y.L. Li, A.W. Lei, Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 7396-7399.
[43]
L. Sun, Y. Yuan, M. Yao, et al., Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 1297-1300.
[44]
G.S. Sauer, S. Lin, Adv. Synth. Catal. 8 (2018) 5175-5187.
[45]
P. Xiong, H. Long, J.S. Song, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 16387-16391.
[46]
A. Jutand, Chem. Rev. 108 (2008) 2300-2347.
[47]
J.I. Yoshida, K. Kataoka, R. Horcajada, A. Nagaki, Chem. Rev. 108 (2008) 2265-2299.
[48]
R. Francke, R.D. Little, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 2492-2521.
[49]
M. Yan, Y. Kawamata, P.S. Baran, Chem. Rev. 117 (2017) 13230-13319.
[50]
M.D. Karkas, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 (2018) 5786-5865.
[51]
C. Ma, P. Fang, T.S. Mei, Adv. Synth. Catal. 8 (2018) 7179-7189.
[52]
N. Sauermann, T.H. Meyer, L. Ackermann, Chem. Eur. J. 24 (2018) 16209-16217.
[53]
N. Sauermann, T.H. Meyer, Y.A. Qiu, L. Ackermann, Adv. Synth. Catal. 8 (2018) 7086-7103.
[54]
S.R. Waldvogel, S. Lips, M. Selt, B. Riehl, C.J. Kampf, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 6706-6765.
[55]
Q.L. Yang, P. Fang, T.S. Mei, Chin. J. Chem. 36 (2018) 338-352.
[56]
J.I. Yoshida, A. Shimizu, R. Hayashi, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 4702-4730.
[57]
T.H. Meyer, L.H. Finger, P. Gandeepan, L. Ackermann, Trends Analyt. Chem. 1 (2019) 63-76.
[58]
H.M. Wang, X.L. Gao, Z.C. Lv, T. Abdelilah, A.W. Lei, Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 6769-6787.
[59]
E.J. Horn, B.R. Rosen, P.S. Baran, ACS Cent. Sci. 2 (2016) 302-308.
[60]
L.S. Kang, M.H. Luo, C.M. Lam, et al., Green Chem. 18 (2016) 3767-3774.
[61]
P. Wang, S. Tang, A.W. Lei, Green Chem. 19 (2017) 2092-2095.
[62]
P.F. Huang, P. Wang, S.C. Wang, S. Tang, A.W. Lei, Green Chem. 20 (2018) 4870-4874.
[63]
K.D. Moeller, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 4817-4833.
[64]
S. Möhle, M. Zirbes, E. Rodrigo, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 57 (2018) 6018-6041.
[65]
S. Tang, Y.C. Liu, A.W. Lei, Chem 4 (2018) 27-45.
[66]
A. Wiebe, T. Gieshoff, S. Möhle, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 5594-5619.
[67]
M. Yan, Y. Kawamata, P.S. Baran, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 4149-4155.
[68]
K.J. Li, Y.Y. Jiang, K. Xu, C.C. Zeng, B.G. Sun, Green Chem. 21 (2019) 4412-4421.
[69]
Q.Y. Li, S.Y. Cheng, H.T. Tang, Y.M. Pan, Green Chem. 21 (2019) 5517-5520.
[70]
Y.Z. Zhang, Z.Y. Mo, H.S. Wang, et al., Green Chem. 21 (2019) 3807-3811.
[71]
J. Naud, C. Lemke, N. Goudreau, et al., Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 3400-3404.
[72]
F. Wang, S.S. Stahl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 6385-6390.
[73]
K.F. Hu, Y. Zhang, Z.H. Zhou, et al., Org. Lett. 22 (2020) 5773-5777.
[74]
X. Zong, Q.Z. Zheng, N. Jiao, Org. Biomol. Chem. 12 (2014) 1198-1202.
[75]
S. Liang, C.C. Zeng, X.G. Luo, et al., Green Chem. 18 (2016) 2222-2230.
[76]
I.S. El-Hallag, J. Chil, Chem. Soc. 55 (2010) 67-72.
[77]
G.Q. Liu, Y.M. Li, J. Org. Chem. 79 (2014) 10094-10109.
Appendix
Less
Year 2021 volume 32 Issue 3
PDF
64
35
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.09.041
  • Receive Date：2020-08-17
  • Online Date：2026-01-04
  • Published：2021-03-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2020-08-17
  • Revised：2020-09-11
  • Accepted：2020-09-23
Affiliations
    a Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale, CAS Key Laboratory of Soft Matter Chemistry & Center for Excellence in Molecular Synthesis of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology & School of Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
    b School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hefei Normol University, Hefei 230601, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.09.041
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House