Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Recognition of glycine by cucurbit[5]uril and cucurbit[6]uril: A comparative study of exo- and endo-binding
收藏切换
PDF
Peihui Shana, Ruilian Linb, Ming Liua, Zhu Taoa, Xin Xiaoa, *, Jingxin Liub, *
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2021, 32(7) : 2301 - 2304
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2021, 32(7): 2301-2304
• Communication •
Recognition of glycine by cucurbit[5]uril and cucurbit[6]uril: A comparative study of exo- and endo-binding
Full
Peihui Shana, Ruilian Linb, Ming Liua, Zhu Taoa, Xin Xiaoa, *, Jingxin Liub, *
Affiliations
  • a Key Laboratory of Macrocyclic and Supramolecular Chemistry of Guizhou Province, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
  • b College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243002, China
Published: 2021-07-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.02.020
Outline
收藏切换

Recognition features of glycine (Gly) with cucurbit[5]uril (Q[5]) and cucurbit[6]uril (Q[6]) both in aqueous solution and solid state were investigated by 1H NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. 1H NMR data indicate that the Gly is located outside of the portals of the Q[5], exhibiting exo binding with the Q[5]. In the case of the Q[6], the Gly shows endo binding or a dual binding mode (endo and exo binding) with the host, which depends on the amount of the host in the aqueous solution. X-ray crystallography clearly display that the Gly forms 2:1 exclusion complex with the Q[5], and 2:1 inclusion complex with the Q[6]. Interestingly, hydrogen bondings between the encapsulated Gly molecules in the Q[6] were observed.

Cucurbituril  /  endo-binding  /  exo-binding  /  Selective recognition  /  Supramolecular assembly
Peihui Shan, Ruilian Lin, Ming Liu, Zhu Tao, Xin Xiao, Jingxin Liu. Recognition of glycine by cucurbit[5]uril and cucurbit[6]uril: A comparative study of exo- and endo-binding[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2021 , 32 (7) : 2301 -2304 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.02.020
Full Text
Less
Recognition and determination of amino acids, which play fundamental and significant roles in life systems, are of great interest in pharmaceutical science and materials science for potential applications in nutritional analysis, medical diagnostics, cell imaging, and drug delivery [1]. Recently, several supramolecular systems that can recognize specific amino acids or their residues in peptides and proteins have been developed [2-4]. For example, Wei et al. successfully developed a fluorescent sensor based on a functionalized pillar [5]arene, which exhibits high selectivity and sensitivity towards L-tryptophan [4a]. Rao and co-workers synthesized a series of transition metal complexes with calix[4]arene derivatives, which demonstrate excellent recognition features toward some amino acids [5].
In the vein of developing supramolecular systems for recognition amino acids, our efforts have been focused on the cucurbit[n]uril (n=5-8, Q[n]), a family of synthetic macrocyclic cavitands made of glycoluril units linked by methylene bridges (Fig. 1) [6]. Over the past two decades, Q[n]s have been applied in numerous areas such as sewage treatment, metal ion separation, catalysis, electrochemistry and photochemistry. They also be used to recognize and bind amino acids, peptides and proteins through the combination of ion-dipole, hydrogen bonding interactions, van der Waals interactions as well as hydrophobic effects [7-18]. Most of these works have focused on the larger Q[n] homologues (Q[8] and Q[7]), because their spacious hydrophobic cavity can accommodate one or more amino acid residues to form host-guest complex. For example, Urbach group and Kim group have demonstrated that Q[8] and Q[7] have strong affinity for numerous peptides and proteins [7]. The N-teminal aromatic residues of peptides and proteins can be encapsulated within the cavities of the hosts Q[8] and Q[7]. By contrast, the smaller Q[n] homologues Q[5] and Q[6] have smaller hydrophobic cavity and smaller coordination portal, which makes them even more difficult to recognize and encapsulate amino acids. And naturally very little attention was devoted to the smaller Q[n] homologues, especially for the smallest Q[5].
Not long ago we and others have found that Q[6] and its derivative α, α', δ, δ'-tetramethyl-Q[6] can bind to some amino acids through exo-binding [16-18]. Inspired by these findings, we start to investigate the binding interactions of the amino acids with the Q[5] and Q[6]. In this paper, we report the extraordinary binding modes of the glycine (Gly), the smallest of the 20 nonessential amino acids, with the Q[5] and Q[6] in aqueous solution and in the solid state through 1H NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography. Our objective was to reveal how the Q[5] and Q[6] recognize the Gly, and how the cavity size affects the possible binding modes.
Exo- and endo-binding modes of the Gly with the hosts Q[5] and Q[6] in aqueous solution can be monitored by 1H NMR titration experiments. It is well known that the hydrophobic cavity of Q[n] is proton-shielding region which would induce upfield shift of the corresponding proton signals, while the outside of the portals of Q[n] belong to proton-deshielding region which would induce downfield shift of the corresponding proton signals [19, 20]. On this theory, it is easy for us to deduce the relative position of the guest and the host from their 1H NMR spectra. As can be seen in Fig. 2, the 1H NMR spectrum of Gly in D2O exhibits only one resonance signal of the methylene protons. In the presence of different equivalents of Q[5] host, the methylene proton signal of Gly slightly shifted downfield (from 3.276 ppm to 3.306 ppm), indicating that Gly is located at the deshielding region of the Q[5]. In other words, the Gly is located near the Q[5] portals. On the basis of this observation, and combined with the ESI-MS of Gly with Q[5] (Fig. 3) which showed the charged peak at 981.0145 for {Gly∩Q[5]∩Gly·H}+ (calcd. 981. 3167), we conclude that Gly can bind exo to Q[5] to form exclusion complex Gly∩Q[5]∩Gly.
In contrast to Q[5] host, studies of the binding behavior of the Gly with the bigger Q[6] revealed completely different results. The 1H NMR spectra of Gly and Q[6] are shown in Figs. 4A and E, respectively. Upon the addition of 0.63 equiv. of Q[6] to the aqueous solution of Gly, two sets of signals of Gly were observed. One is on the upfield and the other is on the downfield (Fig. 4B). This observation suggests that the Gly reside inside and outside of the Q[6] host simultaneously in the presence of small amount of Q[6]. Obviously, Gly exhibits two binding modes (endo- and exo-binding) with the Q[6], generating an inclusion-exclusion hybrid complex Gly@Q[6]∩Gly. Notably, though, there are also two different types of complexes, inclusion complex Gly@Q[6] and exclusion complex Gly∩Q[6] in theory. The presence of the inclusion-exclusion hybrid complex Gly@Q[6]∩Gly is further evidenced by ESI-MS (Fig. 5). The peak at 1147.034 can be assigned to Gly@Q[6]∩Gly (calcd. {Gly@Q[6]∩Gly·H}+, 1147.37). When more and more Q[6] was added, the proton signals in the downfield disppeared (Fig. 4C and D), and only one set of proton signals of the Gly on the upfield are observed. It is clear that all the Gly molecules were encapsulated into the hydrophobic cavity of Q[6] host. It also suggests that the Gly molecules bind endo with the Q[6], forming only the inclusion complex Gly@Q[6] in the presence of enough of Q[6] host.
Above described 1H NMR experiments confirm that the Gly molecule can only bind exo to Q[5] to form exclusion complex because the Q[5] cavity is not large enough to accommodate the Gly molecule. For the Q[6] host, however, the binding modes depend on the quantities of the host. In the presence of enough of Q[6] host, the Gly molecule prefers to be encapsulated into the Q[6] cavity, and binds endo to Q[6] portals to form inclusion complex. In the presence of small amount of Q[6] host, the excessive Gly molecule also binds exo with the Q[6] to form exclusion complex.
In order to get the direct information of the binding interactions of the Gly with the Q[5] and Q[6], we also try to obtain their single-crystals. Slow vapor evaporation of the aqueous solution of Gly with Q[5] results in the single-crystals of compound 1, which crystallized in the tetragonal crystal system, space group I41/a (No. 88). X-ray structural analysis reveals that the asymmetric unit of the compound 1 contains one half of Q[5] host, one Gly molecule, and five lattice water molecules. As shown in Fig. 6, the Gly molecule is located outside of the portals of the Q[5] host, which is in agreement with the 1H NMR spectroscopic data. The amine group of the Gly connects with the carbonyl oxygen atoms (O1, O2 and O5) of the Q[5] host through three hydrogen bondings with N–H–O distances of 1.971, 2.075 and 2.082 Å, respectively (Fig. 6A). In other words, two Gly molecules bind exo with the Q[5] host, generating an exclusion complex of Gly∩Q[5]∩Gly with 2:1 stoichiometry, which is consistent with their NMR results. At the same time, the carboxyl group on the other side of the Gly is interacts with the CH group of the neighbouring Q[5] host with C–H···O distance of 2.560 Å (Fig. 6B). Obviously, hydrogen bonding between ammonium groups of Gly and portal oxygen atoms of Q[5] accompanied by the ion-dipole interaction between N-terminal nitrogen and carbonyl oxygen atoms are the important driving forces for the exclusion complex formation.
Homoternary inclusion complex in which the Q[6] cavity accommodated two Gly molecules. The compound 2 was prepared in the presence of CdCl2. The X-ray crystal structure of compound 2 reveals a unique endo-binding structure, which crystallized in the cubic system with the Ia 3 (no. 205) space group. The asymmetric unit of the compound 2 consists of one half of Q[6] host, one protonated Gly molecule, one tetrahedral [CdCl4]2- anion, and eleven lattice water molecules. As can be seen in Fig. 7, the carboxyl group of the Gly is located inside the Q[6] cavity while the amine group of the Gly remain outside of the portal. A closer observation reveals that the carbon atom C19 of the Gly is 0.287 Å above the mean plane of the six carbonyl oxygen atoms of the Q[6] portal, indicating that the methylene resides outside of the Q[6] portal, which is distinctly different from what we observed in the aqueous solution. The amine group of the Gly also forms two hydrogen bondings with the carbonyl oxygen atoms (O5 and O6) of the Q[6] host with N–H–O distances of 2.083 and 2.165 Å respectively. On the whole, two Gly molecules bind endo with the Q[6] host, generating a homoternary inclusion complex Gly2@Q[6].
The most remarkable feature of the compound 2 is that two carboxyl groups of two encapsulated Gly molecules are connected to each other through hydrogen bonding with O–H···O distance of 1.729 Å. It is well known that the spacious hydrophobic cavity of Q[8] can simultaneously accommodate two guests. More often than not, charge-transfer complex formation was observed inside the hydrophobic cavity [21]. However, in the case of the inclusion complex Gly2@Q[6], two Gly molecules were observed be encapsulated into the small hydrophobic cavity of Q[6]. Except for the well known hydrophobic effects [22], the main reasons which contribute to the formation of this homoternary inclusion complex include: (i) O–H···O hydrogen bondings between two carboxyl groups of two encapsulated Gly molecules, (ii) N–H···O hydrogen bondings between the amine group of the Gly and the carbonyl oxygen atoms on the Q[6] portal, (iii) ion-dipole interactions between the quaternized nitrogen of the Gly and the carbonyl oxygen atoms on the Q[6] portal, as well as (iv) van der Waals interactions between the surfaces of the Gly and the inner wall of the Q[6].
In summary, this study explored the recognition feature of the hosts Q[5] and Q[6] toward the Gly molecule in aqueous solution and solid state. The binding interaction of the hosts Q[5] and Q[6] with the Gly reveals two different binding modes (exo and endo binding), depending on the size of the hydrophobic cavity of the hosts. Experimental data indicate that the Gly binds exo with the Q[5] host, forming exclusion complex Gly∩Q[5]. However, the Gly can binds endo and exo with the Q[6] host, generating hybrid complex Gly@Q[6]∩Gly in aqueous solution and inclusion complex Gly2@Q[6] in solid state. Interestingly, hydrogen bondings between two encapsulated Gly molecules were observed in the inclusion complex Gly2@Q[6] in solid state. The use of the smaller Q[n] homologues Q[5] and Q[6] to recognize Gly will greatly extend the application of Q[n]s.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
Less
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21861011), the Innovation Program for High-level Talents of Guizhou Province (No. 2016-5657), the Major Program for Creative Research Groups of Guizhou Provincial Education Department (2017-028), the Science and Technology Fund of Guizhou Province (No. 2018-5781) and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province of China (Nos. 1808085MB43, 2008085MB36).
References
Less
[1]
(a) M. Freidman, J. Agric. Food Chem. 47 (1999) 3457-3479;(b) Y. Zhou, J. Yoon, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41 (2012) 52-67;(c) H. Heli, M. Hajjizadeh, A. Jabbari, A. Moosavi-Movahedi, Anal. Biochem. 388 (2009) 81-90;(d) Q.P. Duan, Y. Cao, Y. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 10542-10549;(e) B.B. Shi, K.C. Jie, Y.J. Zhou, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 80-83;(f) G.C. Yu, G.P. Tang, F.H. Huang, J. Mater. Chem. C 2 (2014) 6609-6617;(g) G.C. Yu, D. Wu, Y. Li, et al., Chem. Sci. 7 (2016) 3017-3024;(h) Y. Cao, X.Y. Hu, Y. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 10762-10769;(i) M. Liu, J.L. Kan, Y.Q. Yao, et al., Sensors Actuators B: Chem. 283 (2019) 290-297;(j) R.H. Gao, L.X. Chen, K. Chen, Z. Tao, X. Xiao, Coord. Chem. Rev. 348 (2017) 1–24.
[2]
(a) C.B. Lebrilla, Acc. Chem. Res. 34 (2001) 653-661;(b) W. Si, P. Xin, Z.T. Li, J.L. Hou, Acc. Chem. Res. 48 (2015) 1612–1619;(c) A. Casnati, F. Sansone, R. Ungaro, Acc. Chem. Res. 36 (2003) 246-254;(d) K. Yang, Y. Pei, J. Wen, Z. Pei, Chem. Commun. 52 (2016) 9316–9326;(e) M. Giuliani, I. Morbioli, F. Sansone, A. Casnati, Chem. Commun. 51 (2015)14140–14159;(f) R. Pinalli, A. Pedrini, E. Dalcanale, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 (2018) 7006-7026.
[3]
(a) A.R. Urbach, V. Isr. Ramalingam, J. Chem. 51 (2011) 664;(b) A.T. Wright, M.J. Griffin, Z.L. Zhong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 6375-6378;(c) Q.H. Bai, S.W. Zhang, H.R. Chen, et al., ChemistrySelect 2 (2017) 2569-2573.
[4]
(a) T.B. Wei, J.F. Chen, X.B. Cheng, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 4 (2017) 210-213;(b) L. Chen, W. Si, L. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 2152-2155;(c) S. Tashiro, M. Tominaga, M. Kawano, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 (2005) 4546-4547;(d) P. Wang, Z.T. Li, X.F. Ji, Chem. Commun. 50 (2014) 13114-13116;(e) C.J. Li, J.W. Ma, L. Zhao, et al., Chem. Commun. 49 (2013) 1924-1926;(f) B. Hua, J. Zhou, G.C. Yu, Tetrahedron Lett. 56 (2015) 986-989.
[5]
(a) J.P. Chinta, A. Acharya, A. Kumar, C.P. Rao, J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (2009) 12075-12083;(b) R.K. Pathak, J. Dessingou, C.P. Rao, Anal. Chem. 84 (2012) 8294-8300;(c) R.K. Pathak, V.K. Hinge, K. Mahesh, et al., Anal. Chem. 84 (2012) 6907-6913;(d) J. Dessingou, A. Mitra, K. Tabbasum, G.S. Baghel, C.P. Rao, J. Org. Chem. 77 (2012) 371-378;(e) R. Joseph, B. Ramanujam, A. Acharya, C.P. Rao, J. Org. Chem. 74 (2009) 8181-8190.
[6]
(a) J. Lagona, P. Mukhopadhyay, S. Chakrabarti, L. Isaacs, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 4844-4870;(b) X.L. Ni, X. Xiao, H. Cong, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 9480-9508;(c) E. Masson, X. Ling, R. Joseph, L. Kyeremeh-Mensah, X. Lu, RSC Adv. 2 (2012) 1213-1247;(d) K.I. Assaf, W.M. Nau, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 394-418;(e) S.J. Barrow, S. Kasera, M.J. Rowland, J. Barrio, O.A. Scherman, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 12320-12406;(f) X.L. Ni, S.Y. Chen, Y.P. Yang, Z. Tao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 6177-6183.
[7]
(a) L.A. Logsdon, C.L. Schardon, V. Ramalingam, S.K. Kwee, A.R. Urbach, J. Am.Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 17087-17092;(b) J.M. Chinai, A.B. Taylor, L.M. Ryno, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 8810-8813;(c) L.A. Logsdon, A.R. Urbach, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 11414-11416;(d) L.C. Smith, D.G. Leach, B.E. Blaylock, O.A. Ali, A.R. Urbach, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 3663-3669.
[8]
(a) M.V. Rekharsky, H. Yamamura, Y.H. Ko, et al., Chem. Commun. (2008) 2236-2238;(b) W.J. Kim, K. Kim, H.I. Kim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 126 (2014) 7591-7595;(c) J.W. Lee, H.H.L. Lee, Y.H. Ko, K. Kim, H.I. Kim, J. Phys. Chem. B 119 (2015) 4628-4636;(d) L.T. Li, M. Liu, L.D. Yue, et al., Anal. Chem. 92 (2020) 9322-9329;(e) L.D. Yue, C. Sun, Q. Cheng, et al., Chem. Commun. 55 (2019) 13506-13509;(f) S. Combes, K.T. Tran, M.M. Ayhan, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 5897-5907.
[9]
(a) A. Hennig, H. Bakirci, W.M. Nau, Nat. Methods 4 (2007) 629-632;(b) D.M. Bailey, A. Hennig, V.D. Uzunova, W.M. Nau, Chem. Eur. J. 14 (2008) 6069-6077;(c) A. Praetorius, D.M. Bailey, T. Schwarzlose, W.M. Nau, Org. Lett. 10 (2008) 4089-4092;(d) W.M. Nau, G. Ghale, A. Hennig, H. Bakirci, D.M. Bailey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 11558-11570;(e) H. Yin, X.J. Zhang, J.W. Wei, et al., Theranostics 11 (2021) 1513-1526;(f) H. Yin, D. Bardelang, R.B. Wang, Trends Analyt. Chem. 3 (2021) 1-4.
[10]
M. Pozo, P. Hernàndez, L. Hernàndez, C.J. Quintana, Mater. Chem. 21 (2011) 13657–13663.
[11]
(a) S. Sonzini, T.J.S. Ryan, O.A. Scherman, Chem. Commun. 49 (2013) 8779-8781;(b) K.I. Kuok, S.K. Li, Ian W. Wyman, R.B. Wang, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1398 (2017) 108-119.
[12]
M.A. Gamal-Eldin, D.H. Macartney, Org. Biomol. Chem. 11 (2013) 488-495.
[13]
T. Minami, N.A. Esipenko, B. Zhang, L. Isaacs, P. Anzenbacher Jr, Chem.Commun. 50 (2014) 61–63.
[14]
Y. He, Y. Liang, H. Yu, ACS Comb. Sci. 17 (2015) 409-412.
[15]
(a) D.T. Dang, H.D. Nguyen, M. Merkx, L. Brunsveld, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (2013) 2915-2919;(b) H.D. Nguyen, D.T. Dang, J.L.J. van Dongen, L. Brunsveld, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49 (2010) 895-898.
[16]
O. Danylyuk, V.P. Fedin, Cryst. Growth Des. 12 (2012) 550-555.
[17]
(a) P. Thuéry, Inorg. Chem. 50 (2011) 10558-10560;(b) P. Thuéry, CrystEngComm 14 (2012) 8128-8136.
[18]
(a) J.M. Yi, Y.Q. Zhang, H. Cong, S.F. Xue, Z. Tao, J. Mol. Struct. 933 (2009) 112-117;(b) P.H. Shan, S.C. Tu, R.L. Lin, et al., CrystEngComm 19 (2017) 2168-2171;(c) T. Yin, S. Zhang, M.X. Li, C. Redshaw, X.L. Ni, Sens. Actuator. 281 (2019) 568-573.
[19]
(a) K. Moon, A.E. Kaifer, Org. Lett. 6 (2004) 185;(b) A.E. Kaifer, Acc. Chem. Res. 47 (2014) 2160-2167;(c) R.L. Lin, J.Q. Li, J.X. Liu, A.E. Kaifer, J. Org. Chem. 80 (2015) 10505-10511.
[20]
(a) Y.X. Qu, R.L. Lin, Y.Q. Zhang, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 4 (2017) 1799-1805;(b) R.L. Lin, G.S. Fang, W.Q. Sun, J.X. Liu, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016);(c) R.L. Lin, Y.P. Dong, Y.F. Hu, et al., RSC Adv. 2 (2012) 7754-7758.
[21]
(a) Y.H. Ko, E. Kim, I. Hwang, K. Kim, Chem. Commun. (2007) 1305-1315;(b) Y. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Gao, Z. Wang, X. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49 (2010) 6576-6579;(c) F. Biedermann, O.A. Scherman, J. Phys. Chem. B 116 (2012) 2842-2849;(d) Z. Ji, J. Li, G. Chen, M. Jiang, ACS Macro Lett. 5 (2016) 588-592.
[22]
(a) F. Biedermann, V.D. Uzunova, O.A. Scherman, W.M. Nau, A.D. Simone, J. Am.Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 15318-15323;(b) F. Biedermann, M. Vendruscolo, O.A. Scherman, A.D. Simone, W.M. Nau, J.Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 14879-14888.
Appendix
Less
Year 2021 volume 32 Issue 7
PDF
58
31
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.02.020
  • Receive Date：2020-11-11
  • Online Date：2026-01-04
  • Published：2021-07-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2020-11-11
  • Revised：2021-02-03
  • Accepted：2021-02-09
Affiliations
    a Key Laboratory of Macrocyclic and Supramolecular Chemistry of Guizhou Province, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
    b College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243002, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.02.020
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House