We conducted a thermodynamic study on the pathway of methanol catalytic reaction on pure Pd and Fe
2O
3/Pd surfaces with assistant of hydroxyl by DFT. The reaction path involves solution-mediated and metal-catalysed elementary steps. In the decomposition methanol process shown in Fig. S4 (Supporting information), there exist two possibilities to dehydrogenation: C-H bond scission (black line) and the O-H bond cleavage alternatively (red line). The calculated data of barrier energy for Pd and Fe
2O
3/Pd is shown in Table S2 (Supporting information) and Figs. S5 and S6 (Supporting information). The road of Pd would like to react along pathway 1, illustrating C-H bond cleavage is more feasible than O-H bond scission owing to lower barrier energy. While on the Fe
2O
3/Pd, reaction energy of CH
3OH decomposition energetically favors O-H bond scission with a barrier energy of 2.05 eV, which is smaller than that C-H bond cleavage (2.61 eV) shown in Fig. S6. In all, free of hydroxyl OH*, the energy barrier of the catalytic reaction is relatively high, and the trend is upward, which is fatal to the MOR catalysis. While, in the alkaline electrochemical conditions, hydroxyl OH* in solution would assist heterogeneous catalyst dehydrogenation reactions of CH
3OH, which is different from gas phase reaction [
48,
49]. The reaction Gibbs free energy of MOR on Pd(111) and Fe
2O
3/Pd surfaces with an assistance of interfacial hydroxyl OH* are investigated following the reaction pathway and configurations shown in Fig. S7 (Supporting information). The result shows inverse heterogeneous Fe
2O
3/Pd has lower Gibbs free energy than pure Pd. As shown in
Fig. 4c and Table S3 (detail configurations and barrier energy in Supporting information), the calculated dissociative barrier energy of methanol on the Pd surface is as high as 2.21 eV, and thus the O-H bond of CH
3OH activation by Pd is unlikely. However, the presence of surface hydroxyl OH* intermediate can facilitate the O-H bond (in methanol) activation
via the proton transfer in nearly the same way as it occurs in solution. This process significantly lowers the activation barrier to less than 1.00 eV, which is smaller than without OH assistant. The volcano map with configurations is shown in Fig. S8 (Supporting information). Moreover, the calculated energy barrier of the first dehydrogenation step (CH
3OH* + OH* → CH
3O* + H
2O*) on Fe
2O
3/Pd is as low as 0.25 eV. As shown in
Fig. 4d, the energy barrier of the second dehydrogenation step (CH
2OH* + OH* → CH
3O* + H
2O*) on Fe
2O
3/Pd is 0.27 eV, while second dehydrogenation step on Pd is 2.30 eV. However, the energy barrier of the third dehydrogenation step (CH
2O* + OH*→ CHO* + H
2O*) shows the opposite result, which is larger on Fe
2O
3/Pd compared to that on Pd. These results suggest that formed formaldehyde on Fe
2O
3/Pd could not be easily further dehydrogenated, leading to a highly selective MOR to formaldehyde on the Fe
2O
3/Pd surface. The formation of the Fe
2O
3/Pd interface would induce electron transfer from Pd to Fe
2O
3, which could downshift the
d band centre of Pd, thus increases the surface reactivity and enhances the adsorption ability of hydroxyl OH*, greatly facilitating the process of selective methanol oxidation to formaldehyde. We calculated the reaction free energy using the computational hydrogen electrode (CHE) method. The MOR on Fe
2O
3/Pd is more feasible than Pd from Gibbs free energy points. The MOR pathway on Fe
2O
3/Pd undergoes
i.e., CH
3OH* + OH* → CH
3O* + OH* → CH
2O* + OH* → CHO* + OH*, with the lower Gibbs free energy. Intermediates including CH
3OH*, CH
3O*, CH
2O*, CHO*, are all adsorbed on Pd side of Fe
2O
3/Pd; Fig. S9 (Supporting information) show the optimize structures of all active species involved in MOR on Pd(111). Because the electronegativity of Fe (1.83) is much lower than Pd (2.20) [
38], the alloying of Fe can modify the Pd electronic properties as the electrons will transfer from Pd to Fe and contribute to the
d band hybridization of Pd and Fe. The downward shift of the
d band center relative to the Fermi level would enhance the adsorption of OH* species on the Pd surface and greatly facilitate the process of MOR. It is reasonable that the Fe
2O
3 will have a positive effect on the electrocatalytic Pd NPs. However, excess amount of Fe
2O
3 amount can largely decrease the electrocatalytic activity due to its poor conductivity. A clear picture of how the interface promotes MOR catalytic reaction in the Fe
2O
3/Pd system shown in Fig. S10 (Supporting information).