Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Water molecule-induced hydrogen bonding between cellulose nanofibers toward highly strong and tough materials from wood aerogel
收藏切换
PDF
Xiaoshuai Hana, Zhenxing Wangb, Linhu Dinga, Lian Chena, Feng Wanga, Junwen Pub, Shaohua Jiang*, a
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2021, 32(10) : 3105 - 3108
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2021, 32(10): 3105-3108
• Communication •
Water molecule-induced hydrogen bonding between cellulose nanofibers toward highly strong and tough materials from wood aerogel
Full
Xiaoshuai Hana, Zhenxing Wangb, Linhu Dinga, Lian Chena, Feng Wanga, Junwen Pub, Shaohua Jiang*, a
Affiliations
  • a Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
  • b MOE Engineering Research Center of Forestry Biomass Materials and Bioenergy, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Published: 2021-10-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.044
Outline
收藏切换

Lightweight, highly strong and bio-based structural materials remain a long-lasting challenge. Here, inspired by nacre, a lightweight and high mechanical performance cellulosic material was fabricated via a facile and effective top-down approach and the resulting material has a high tensile strength of 149.21MPa and toughness of 1.91 MJ/m3. More specifically, the natural balsawood (NW) was subjected to a simple chemical treatment, removing most lignin and partial hemicellulose, follow by freeze-drying, forming wood aerogel (WA). The delignification process produced many pores and exposed numerous aligned cellulose nanofibers. Afterwards, the WA absorbed a quantity of moisture and was directly densified to form above high-performance cellulosic material. Such treatment imitates highly ordered "brick-and-mortar" arrangement of nacre, in which water molecules plays the role of mortar and cellulose nanofibrils make the brick part. The lightweight and good mechanical properties make this material promising for new energy car, aerospace, etc. This paper also explains the strengthening mechanism for making biomimetic materials by water molecules-induced hydrogen bonding and will open a new path for designing high-performance bio-based structural materials.

Wood aerogel  /  Cellulose nanofibers  /  Water molecules  /  Hydrogen bonding  /  Strength and toughness
Xiaoshuai Han, Zhenxing Wang, Linhu Ding, Lian Chen, Feng Wang, Junwen Pu, Shaohua Jiang. Water molecule-induced hydrogen bonding between cellulose nanofibers toward highly strong and tough materials from wood aerogel[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2021 , 32 (10) : 3105 -3108 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.044
Full Text
Less
Materials that have lightweight, high strength and good toughness properties are attracting more attention because of their promising applications for architecture, new energy vehicles, aerospace, etc. However, the mechanical properties of strength and toughness are often mutually exclusive [1]. Surprisingly, nature gives us some inspirations to fabricate strong yet tough materials, and the nacre is a good example. The nacre is a kind of material possessing excellent strength and toughness attributing to highly ordered "brick-and-mortar" arrangement and robust interfacial bonding [2, 3]. Inspired by nacre, scientists assembled a series of high-performance materials, including Chitosan-Montmorillonite nacre-like film [4], clay-based nacre-like composites [5, 6], graphene oxide-based artificial nacres [7], bulk artificial nacres [8], lignocellulose-based artificial nacre [9, 10], etc. However, there are many shortcomings in above assembling technique, such as chemical intensive, energy consuming, small scale, and complicated forming process.
Wood is a kind of biomass material and it is abundant, renewable, and sustainable in nature [11-16]. When it comes to high-performance structural materials, we should first think of the use of wood and its derivatives. Nanocellulose is a nanoscale semi-crystalline derivative of cellulose [17-20]. Nanocellulose has many good physical and mechanical properties, such as low density (1.6 g/cm3), high tensile strength (0.3 – 1.4 GPa) and excellent stiffness (140 GPa), making it a desirable reinforced material [21-23]. Researchers have already used the nanocellulose to fabricate a series of strong and tough nacre-mimic materials, such as nanopapers [24], functional composite paper and films [25, 26], three-dimensional transparent composites [27], etc. Although the Nanocellulose-based strengthening and toughening materials are attractive, the extraction of nanocellulose is tedious and chemical/energy intensive. In recent years, some high strong wood-based structural materials (such as transparent wood composites [28, 29]) are manufactured using top-down method, to evade the intricate nanocellulose extraction process and maintain nanocellulose groups' well-aligned structure. But the adding of resin makes the resulting products become not pure "green" and sustainable. So, finding a wood "glue" with natural, "green", good adhesive properties, directly used is in demand and valuable.
Recently, water-induced hydrogen bonding assembly strategy is widely used to fabricate functional polymeric materials. Water molecules as co-monomers/structural water were involved in polymers and they played a big role in tuning mechanical properties of graphene oxide paper [30] and improving adhesion of supramolecular [31]. In addition to the application in fossil-based materials, it was also found that water molecules could change the tensile strength of cellulose bulk materials [32] and simultaneously improve the strengthening and toughening of cellulose-based materials [20, 33].
Herein, we try to fabricate a lightweight and strong cellulosic material by means of water molecules-induced hydrogen-bonding between cellulose nanofibers as shown in Fig. 1. It is a top-down approach for fabricating high-performance cellulosic materials through compressing rehydrated wood aerogel (WA). In detail, natural balsawood (NW) was successively delignified and freeze-dried forming WA with well-aligned cellulose nanofibers. Next, the oven-dried WAs absorbed a certain amount of water molecules, followed by directly compressed at room temperature. Finally, the compressed samples were dried at 70 ℃ to be the high-performance cellulosic materials (The materials, chemicals, preparation process and characterization can be found in Supporting information). The delignification process can expose more cellulose nanofibrils within the wood cell walls; Absorbing water molecules can soft the cellulose nanofibrils, tending to entangle nanofibrils under compression. These two critical steps enabled superior mechanical performance of the high-performance structural materials.
Lignin is hydrophobic and it will hinder the investigation of water molecules effect on forming hydrogen bonding between cellulose nanofibers. So, we conduct the delignification using sodium chlorite (NaClO2). The result of delignification showed the delignified wood (DW) was composed of 77.72% cellulose, 16.78% hemicellulose, and 2.68% lignin, demonstrating 4.30% hemicellulose and 88.92% lignin removal (Fig. 2a). In order to further validate the delignification effect, the NW and DW were characterized by FTIR spectroscopy (Figs. 2c and d). For NW, there are characteristic lignin absorption peaks at 1508 cm−1 and 1595 cm−1 (C=H stretching of the aromatic rings), 1365 cm−1 (symmetric C-H bending from methoxyl group), and 1233 cm−1 (C-O stretching of the aromatic rings). Meanwhile, the absorption peak at 1734 cm−1 belongs to unconjugated carbonyl C=O in hemicellulose. After delignification process, above typical absorption peaks for lignin and hemicellulose disappeared. During sample preparation, the wet DW was freeze-dried into WA. In the freeze-drying process, the DW swelled by ice crystals. Therefore, WA showed the lowest density of 0.10 g/cm3 and highest porosity (93.64%) (Fig. 2b). Before compression, the oven-dried WA was conditioned in a desiccator providing 97.6%±0.5% relative humidity (RH). Cellulose nanofiber is a kind of hygroscopic material, tending to attracting water through hydrogen bonding via its surface O and H atoms. After absorbing different moisture, the WAs were then compressed. At 0% moisture content (MC), the WA is hard to be compressed due to sponge-like structure. With the increase of MC, The WA was more likely to be compressed into dense and compact material because of forming some hydrogen bonding between cellulose nanofibers. The density of WA compressed at 18% moisture content (CWA18%) was 0.84 g/cm3, which is more than 8 times that for WA. Therefore, the CWA18% had a lowest porosity (43.73%).
The morphology and structure of the NW, WA and CWA18% were shown in Fig. 3. Figs. 3a and b showed the light brown NW turns completely white after delignification, supposing the almost all lignin and hemicellulose have been removed. Above hypothesis has been proved by component analysis (Fig. 2a) and It also suggested the WA consisting of almost whole cellulose has been successfully fabricated. After having 18% MC, the WA was directly compressed into hard cellulosic slice (Fig. 3c). The SEM images showed the NW possesses a three-dimensional (3D) porous structure with lumina of 30 − 50 μm in diameter and 150 − 400 μm in length (Figs. 3d and g). After delignification and freeze-drying, the intrinsic cell lumina structure was destroyed and the connection among wood cells was also broken (Fig. 3e). Besides, the tangential section SEM image of WA showed that the original tracheid structure has almost disappeared (Fig. 3h). After compression, wood cells had been stacked together to form layer-by-layer architecture liking nacre structure. And in every layer, cellulose nanofibers and cell walls had entangled tightly and merged together by compression (Fig. 3f). Meanwhile, the tangential SEM images of CWA18% indicated the structure of every layer is dense and compact (Fig. 3i).
Fig. 4 displays the tensile stress-strain curves (Fig. 4a) and corresponding mechanical properties of NW, WA and CWAs. Because of the fluffy and fragile characteristic formed during freeze-drying, the tensile strength and failure strain of WA cannot be tested. The compressed wood aerogels compressed under 9% moisture content (CWA9%) has an improved mechanical performance compared to NW (tensile strength of 47.54 vs. 23.22MPa, and Young's modulus of 13.14 vs. 2.82 GPa) (Fig. 4b), which can be ascribed to the water molecules-induced hydrogen bonding between cellulose nanofibers. Above results implied that the dense structure initiated by hydrogen bonding endowed CWA9% with a big mechanical performance. The toughness of the CWA9% is also 8 times than that of NW, reaching 1.6 MJ/m3. With the increase of MC to 18%, the CWA showed sharply and simultaneously enhanced mechanical properties as compared to NW (tensile strength of 135.63 vs. 23.22MPa, Young's modulus of 18.68 vs. 1.82 GPa, and toughness of 1.6 vs. 0.16 MJ/m3) (Fig. 4b), which is 5.8 times for tensile strength, 10.3 times for Young's modulus, and 10 times for toughness. Above results indicated that the WA contains a lot of binding sites that can form hydrogen bonding with water molecules and 9% MC has not saturated the binding sites in the WAs. That means the 9% MC is lower than fiber saturation point of WAs sample. As the MC increased to 18%, more water molecules were adsorbed and formed hydrogen bonding with O and H atoms of cellulose nanofibers. So, the CWA18% sample has a bigger mechanical property than CWA9%. Besides, the CWA18% also showed very high specific strength (161.46MPa cm3/g) as compared to other conventional building materials, including concrete, low carbon steel (AISI 1010, LCS), stainless steel (304, SS), and aluminum alloy (7075-T6, AA). This high specific strength is because of the relatively low density of the cellulosic materials, making the compressed wood aerogel a light yet strong material.
The essential cause of the increased densification, compactness, and mechanical properties at higher MC could be analyzed in three aspects. Firstly, water molecule can be viewed as flexibilizer and softener to WAs, causing cell walls and its internal cellulose nanofibers to densely pack together and tightly intertwine under compression. Secondly, 0%, 9% and 18% MCs are all lower than the fiber saturation point of WAs. So, there are more bound water in cellulose nanofibers, more hydrogen bonding between cellulose nanofibers, and less internal defect in the structure of CWA18%. Thirdly, there is a sliding movement between cellulose nanofibers in the tensile test process, leading to the break of hydrogen bonding between cellulose nanofibers. However, the broken hydrogen bonding can quickly regenerate due to water-molecule bridging effect [34]. In addition, the cellulose nanofibers intertwined together under compression, giving CWA a good fracture toughness [35]. Thus, the more MCs gave CWA more hydrogen bonding, faster regeneration, and good fracture toughness. Based on the above reasons, the compressed wood aerogel at 18% MC has a stronger tensile strength and a longer strain under tensile stress test, inducing a bigger toughness.
Because our final product was from the WA, we have also characterized a typical property of WA - the thermal insulation performance. As shown in Fig. S1a (Supporting information), the thermal conductivity of the WA is smaller than that of NW (0.044 vs. 0.039 W/mK), indicating delignification and freeze drying can increase the porosity of sample and then endowing superior thermal insulation property of WA. Comparing to the NW and WA, the CWA18% sample has a bigger thermal conductivity. Due to the compression, the wood cellulose nanofibers were tightly entangled together and the porosity of sample was reduced, inducing the increase of the thermal conductivity (up to 0.102 W/mK). This trend is also consistent with the density, porosity, and microstructure as shown in the previous section. Although the CWA18% has a relative bigger thermal conductivity, the value is still much smaller than some traditional commercial building materials (Fig. S1b in Supporting information). Together with the mechanical property characterization, we actually fabricated a kind of engineering materials with superior mechanical performance and thermal insulation property.
In summary, we fabricated a lightweight, strong and tough cellulosic structural material by three-step streamlined process, including making WA, rehydration and water molecule-induced hydrogen-bonding assembling under compression. The obtained WAs showed a low thermal conductivity of 0.039 W/mK along the layer-stacking direction, closing to a pure cellulose-based aerogel. In addition, the CWAs showed an increased mechanical property along the increased MC prior to compression. Surprisingly, the CWA18% had a highest tensile strength of 135.63MPa and toughness of 1.60 MJ/m3, which are approximately 6 and 10 times higher, respectively, as compared to those of NW. More importantly, there's a simultaneously improved strength and toughness in CWAs, and the reinforcement mechanism was analyzed. Because of the top-down fabrication, sustainable materials and superior mechanical properties, the high-performance cellulosic material can be used in modern architecture, new energy vehicles, etc. Besides, this preparation process also provided the sustainable solution of reusing the wasted WAs.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Acknowledgements
Less
We acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51803093) and National Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20180770).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Less
Supplementary material related to this article canbefound, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.044.
References
Less
[1]
R.O. Ritchie, Nat. Mater. 10 (2011) 817-822
[2]
W. Cui, M.Z. Li, J.Y. Liu, et al., ACS Nano 8 (2014) 9511-9517
[3]
Y.P. Feng, L.P. Ding, D.Y. Ji, L.L. Wang, W. Guo, Chin. Chem. Lett. 29 (2018) 892-894
[4]
W. Li, J. Liu, B. Liang, Y. Shu, J. Wang, Compos. Part B: Eng. 204 (2021) 108492
[5]
Y.X. Liu, S.H. Yu, L. Bergstrom, Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 (2018) 1703277
[6]
P. Xu, T. Erdem, E. Eiser, Soft Matter. 16 (2020) 5497-5505
[7]
Y. Wang, T. Li, P.M. Ma, et al., ACS Nano 12 (2018) 6228-6235
[8]
H.L. Gao, S.M. Chen, L.B. Mao, et al., Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 287
[9]
Y.P. Chen, B.K. Dang, C.D. Jin, Q.F. Sun, ACS Nano 13 (2019) 371-376
[10]
Y.P. Chen, J.Z. Fu, B.K. Dang, et al., ACS Nano 14 (2020) 2036-2043
[11]
Y. Zou, P. Yang, L. Yang, et al., Polymer 217 (2021) 123464
[12]
L. Chen, Z. Xu, F. Wang, et al., Compos. Commun. 20 (2020) 100355
[13]
F. Wang, J.Y. Cheong, Q. He, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 414 (2021) 128767
[14]
C. Wang, Z. Yang, X. Wang, Q. Yu, J. For. Eng. 4 (2019) 10-18
[15]
B. Joseph, S.V. K, C. Sabu, N. Kalarikkal, S. Thomas, J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 5 (2020) 223-237
[16]
X.S. Han, R. Bi, H. Oguzlu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8 (2020) 14955-14963
[17]
M.Y. Li, S.C. Cheng, D. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 26 (2015) 221-225
[18]
D.W. Wei, H. Wei, A.C. Gauthier, et al., J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 5 (2020) 1-15
[19]
F. Xu, Y. Chen, T. You, J. Mao, X. Zhang, J. For. Eng. 4 (2019) 1-7
[20]
X.S. Han, Y.H. Ye, F. Lam, J.W. Pu, F. Jiang, J. Mater. Chem. A 7 (2019) 27023-27031
[21]
Q.Q. Mei, X.J. Shen, H.Z. Liu, B.X. Han, Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 15-24
[22]
B. Thomas, M.C. Raj, K.B. Athira, et al., Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 11575-11625
[23]
R.J. Moon, A. Martini, J. Nairn, J. Simonsen, J. Youngblood, Chem. Soc. Rev. 40 (2011) 3941-3994
[24]
H.L. Zhu, S.Z. Zhu, Z. Jia, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112 (2015) 8971-8976
[25]
W.T. Cao, F.F. Chen, Y.J. Zhu, et al., ACS Nano 12 (2018) 4583-4593
[26]
L. Chang, Z. Peng, T. Zhang, C. Yu, W. Zhong, Nanoscale 13 (2021) 3079-3091
[27]
S.K. Biswas, H. Sano, M.I. Shams, H. Yano, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 9 (2017) 30177-30184
[28]
Q.H. Tang, L. Fang, Y.F. Wang, M. Zou, W.J. Guo, Nanoscale 10 (2018) 4344-4353
[29]
R.Y. Mi, T. Li, D. Dalgo, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 (2020) 1907511
[30]
O.C. Compton, S.W. Cranford, K.W. Putz, et al., ACS Nano 6 (2012) 2008-2019
[31]
Q. Zhang, T. Li, A. Duan, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 8058-8063
[32]
M. Frey, D. Widner, J.S. Segmehl, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 10 (2018) 5030-5037
[33]
Y. Hou, Q.F. Guan, J. Xia, et al., ACS Nano 15 (2021) 1310-1320
[34]
Y.B. Zhou, C.J. Chen, S.Z. Zhu, et al., Mater. Today 30 (2019) 17-25
[35]
T. Li, C.J. Chen, A.H. Brozena, et al., Nature 590 (2021) 47-56
Appendix
Less
Year 2021 volume 32 Issue 10
PDF
54
30
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.044
  • Receive Date：2021-02-15
  • Online Date：2026-01-04
  • Published：2021-10-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2021-02-15
  • Revised：2021-03-13
  • Accepted：2021-03-17
Affiliations
    a Co-Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    b MOE Engineering Research Center of Forestry Biomass Materials and Bioenergy, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.03.044
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House