Construction of Cu-Ce interface for boosting toluene oxidation: Study of Cu-Ce interaction and intermediates identified by <i>in situ</i> DRIFTS

Construction of Cu-Ce interface for boosting toluene oxidation: Study of Cu-Ce interaction and intermediates identified by in situ DRIFTS

PDF

Jiahui Lu¹, Jinping Zhong¹, Quanming Ren, Jiaqi Li^*, Linghe Song, Shengpeng Mo, Mingyuan Zhang, Peirong Chen, Mingli Fu, Daiqi Ye^*

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2021, 32(11) : 3435 - 3439

Less

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2021, 32(11): 3435-3439

• Communication •

Construction of Cu-Ce interface for boosting toluene oxidation: Study of Cu-Ce interaction and intermediates identified by in situ DRIFTS

Full

Jiahui Lu¹, Jinping Zhong¹, Quanming Ren, Jiaqi Li^*, Linghe Song, Shengpeng Mo, Mingyuan Zhang, Peirong Chen, Mingli Fu, Daiqi Ye^*

Affiliations

School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

Published: 2021-11-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.029

Outline

Abstract

Less

A facile hydrothermal method was applied to gain stably and highly efficient CuO-CeO₂ (denoted as Cu1Ce2) catalyst for toluene oxidation. The changes of surface and inter properties on Cu1Ce2 were investigated comparing with pure CeO₂ and pure CuO. The formation of Cu-Ce interface promotes the electron transfer between Cu and Ce through Cu²⁺ + Ce³⁺ ↔ Cu⁺ + Ce⁴⁺ and leads to high redox properties and mobility of oxygen species. Thus, the Cu1Ce2 catalyst makes up the shortcoming of CeO₂ and CuO and achieved high catalytic performance with T₅₀ = 234 ℃ and T₉₉ = 250 ℃ (the temperature at which 50% and 90% C₇H₈ conversion is obtained, respectively) for toluene oxidation. Different reaction steps and intermediates for toluene oxidation over Cu1Ce2, CeO₂ and CuO were detected by in situ DRIFTS, the fast benzyl species conversion and preferential transformation of benzoates into carbonates through C=C breaking over Cu1Ce2 should accelerate the reaction.

Key words

Cu-Ce interface / Oxygen mobility / Intermediates / In situ DRIFTS / Toluene oxidation

Cite this Article

Jiahui Lu, Jinping Zhong, Quanming Ren, Jiaqi Li, Linghe Song, Shengpeng Mo, Mingyuan Zhang, Peirong Chen, Mingli Fu, Daiqi Ye. Construction of Cu-Ce interface for boosting toluene oxidation: Study of Cu-Ce interaction and intermediates identified by in situ DRIFTS[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2021 , 32 (11) : 3435 -3439 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.029

Full Text

Less

Nowadays, with the rapid development of economy and industry, environmental problems caused by volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions have also received increasing attention [1, 2]. VOCs includes benzene, toluene, xylene, formaldehyde, etc., as the precursor of PM_2.5 and a major factor in the generation of O₃, which seriously pollutes the environment and poses a threat to human health [3]. So far, catalytic oxidation is considered to be one of the most effective methods due to its low secondary pollution and high efficiency [4]. Currently, a lot of research has focused on the transition metal oxide catalysts (e.g., MnO_x, Co₃O₄, CeO₂, CuO, ZrO₂) as substitutes for noble metal catalysts because of their low cost and high thermal stability [5-7].

To date, researchers tried to create CuO-CeO₂ mixed oxide catalysts with low cost and high catalytic activity due to the synergistic effect between Cu and Ce. Zeng et al. synthesized a highly efficient CuO-CeO₂ catalyst for toluene oxidation by a double redox method, they found that the strong Cu-Ce interaction can promote the electron transfer between CuO and CeO₂ contributes to high redox properties [8]. He et al. used a simple self-precipitation protocol to gain mesoporous CuCeO_x catalysts and declared that the Cu²⁺ incorporated into CeO₂ lattice can form the Cu-O-Ce solid solution, which produces large amounts of oxygen vacancies in the interface of CuO and CeO₂ and enhances the catalytic efficiency [9]. Luo et al. reported that interaction between CuO and CeO₂ weakens the metal-oxygen bond by sharing oxygen at the interface leading to preferential CO oxidation [10]. Obviously, it has great significance to develop a highly efficient CuO-CeO₂ catalyst and investigate the interaction between CuO and CeO₂. Nevertheless, the catalytic mechanism over CuO-CeO₂ surface, especially VOCs oxidation, is still ambiguous.

It is generally assumed that the catalytic oxidation of VOCs follows the Mars-van Krevelen mechanism [11]. So far, researchers employed in situ DRIFTS, GC-MS or TOF-MS to track the key intermediates and by-products to reveal the process of toluene oxidation [12, 13]. Yang et al. applied in situ DRIFTS to track the oxidation process of toluene. They found that toluene adsorbed in the form of benzyl alcohol on the surface of catalysts, then oxidized to benzaldehyde and benzoate species, ring opened to form maleic acid and to final product CO₂ and H₂O [14]. Ye et al. used in situ DRIFTS and PTR-TOF-MS to study the toluene oxidation process on spinel Co₃O₄ catalysts and suggested the pathway: Toluene, benzyl alcohol, benzaldehyde, benzoate, benzene, phenol, benzoquinone, maleic acid species [13]. Wang et al. found that the benzoate could be decomposed into either the carbonates by breaking C=C bond or phenolate by breaking C=O bond, and oxidized to maleic anhydride then finally to CO₂ and H₂O [15]. However, the description of the toluene oxidation pathway in literature is divided, it may be due to the reaction path of toluene oxidation related to the properties of catalysts. In our previous work, the oxygen vacancies concentration and crystal phases effects on the reaction step of VOCs oxidation were investigated, we found that these factors have impacts on the activation and generation of products during reaction process [16-18]. However, rarely have the works revealed how the interface affecting the VOCs oxidation pathway.

Inspired by these motivations, herein, CuO was post synthesized and in-situ grown on CeO₂ nanorods through a facile hydrothermal method to gain Cu1Ce2 catalysts for toluene oxidation. The characterizations of XRD (powder X-ray diffraction), BET (Brunner-Emmet-Teller measurements), SEM (scanning electron microscope), TEM (transmission electron microscope), Raman (Raman spectra), XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy), H₂-TPR (H₂-temperature programmed reduction) and O₂-TPD (oxygen temperature programming desorption) were used to study the Cu-Ce interaction on Cu1Ce2 comparing with pure CuO and pure CeO₂. Furthermore, the toluene oxidation mechanism and the reactivity of different adsorbed species over Cu1Ce2, CuO and CeO₂ were investigated by in situ DRIFTS.

Fig. S1 (Supporting information) shows the SEM images of the pure CeO₂, CuO, and the Cu-Ce mixed oxide Cu1Ce2. The pure CeO₂ presents nanorod morphology (Fig. S1c) and the pure CuO shows nanoparticle structure (Fig. S1d). As shown in Figs. S1a and b, after growing CuO by hydrothermal method on CeO₂, the CuO particles are bridged on the CeO₂ nanorods forming a matchstick-like morphology. As displayed in Fig. S2 and Table S1 (Supporting information), the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of the three samples exhibit the type-H3 hysteresis loop which is characteristic of mesoporous materials, broadest pore size distribution and largest pore volume and pore size of Cu1Ce2 are considered to be advantageous to catalytic activity of VOCs oxidation [19, 20].

Figs. a1–4a show the TEM images of the three catalysts. The pure CuO particles exist as irregular and large particles with sizes of 50–100 nm, and the pure CeO₂ nanorods present with width of about 8 nm and length of 100–200 nm. However, copper can be found as finely dispersed CuO clusters (less than 5 nm) and bulk CuO particles (up to 30 nm) in Cu1Ce2, indicates CuO were finely dispersed on CeO₂ through the in-situ growing process. It has been reported that small CuO clusters may improve catalytic performance [21]. The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of Cu1Ce2 is exhibited in Fig. 1b, the lattice fringe of 0.31 and 0.23 nm corresponding to the CeO₂ (111) and CuO (111) [8]. Herein, the distortion of CeO₂ lattice can be observed around the interfacial between CuO and CeO₂ phase because of Cu²⁺ incorporation in the CeO₂ lattice [22]. Moreover, EDX mapping images in Fig. 1c show the CuO clusters and bulk CuO particles dispersed on CeO_2.

Fig. 2a shows the XRD diffraction patterns of the three catalysts samples. The phase of CeO₂ and Cu1Ce2 can be attributed to the fluorite structured CeO₂ (PDF No. 43-1002). For the CuO, all diffraction peaks are ascribed to the monoclinic structured CuO (PDF No. 02-1040). It should be pointed out that for the Cu1Ce2, two weak diffraction peaks at 2θ of 35.6° and 38.8° correspond to (−111) and (111) planes for monoclinic CuO can be found [23], and the CeO₂ (111) diffraction peak shift can be observed, indicating the incorporation Cu²⁺ into CeO₂. Herein, as the radius of Cu²⁺ is smaller than that of Ce⁴⁺, the incorporation of Cu²⁺ into the CeO₂ framework should cause lattice contraction leading to the peak shifting towards a higher diffraction angle [24].

The surface component over samples and their chemical state were investigated by XPS. As shown in Fig. 2d, for the Ce 3d spectrum, CeO₂ and Cu1Ce2 both present similar profiles and the six peaks marked as V², V³, V⁴, U², U³ and U⁴ are associated with Ce(Ⅳ), while the four peaks marked as V⁰, V¹, U⁰ and U¹ are related to Ce(Ⅲ) [25]. As listed in Table S2 (Supporting information), the Ce³⁺ ions ratio for Cu1Ce2 and CeO₂ are 14.1% and 18.8%. With the incorporation of CuO, the Ce³⁺ content on CeO₂ decreased. This phenomenon may be due to the electron transfer from Ce³⁺ to Cu²⁺ through Cu²⁺ + Ce³⁺ → Cu⁺ + Ce⁴⁺ between CuO and CeO₂ [26]. As shown in Fig. 2c, for the Cu1Ce2, the existence of a lower Cu 2p_3/2 peak and the decreased area of satellite peaks are characterized by unsaturated CuO. Meanwhile, a shoulder peak belongs to Cu⁺ can be found in the Cu LMM auger spectra, indicating the CuO on Cu1Ce2 is in the coexistence state of Cu⁺ and Cu²⁺ [26, 27]. These results also related to the Cu²⁺ are partially reduced by Ce³⁺. Quite interestingly, it can be observed that the binding energy of Ce 3d_2/3 over the Cu1Ce2 also shifts to lower value. It may be attributed to electron transfer from Cu⁺ to Ce⁴⁺ through another redox process: Cu⁺ + Ce⁴⁺ → Cu²⁺ + Ce³⁺. Fig. 2b displays the O 1s XPS spectra of the three samples. Cu1Ce2 exhibits the highest content of surface chemisorbed oxygen and CuO shows the lowest (calculated by SO_ads/(SO_ads + SO_lat)) (Table S2). This indicates a good agreement between the H₂-TPR O₂-TPD and Raman results in Fig. S3 (Supporting information). Obviously, the construction of Cu-Ce interface can lead to the mobilization of lattice oxygen and promotes the formation of oxygen vacancies.

Fig. S4 (Supporting information) shows the catalytic activity test results of the three catalysts for toluene oxidation under the reaction condition of 1000 ppm toluene, 20% air and weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) 60, 000 mL g_cat⁻¹ h⁻¹. As summarized in Fig. S4 and Table. S3, Cu1Ce2 presents the best catalytic performance with T₅₀ = 234 ℃, T₉₉ = 250 ℃ (the temperature at which 50% and 90% C₇H₈ conversion is obtained, respectively) among the three catalysts. Notably, the toluene conversion rate for CuO is low in the low temperature stage but increased rapidly in the high temperature stage (T₅₀ = 253 ℃, T₉₉ = 281 ℃). However, the different phenomenon can be observed on CeO₂ (T₅₀ = 240 ℃, T₉₉ = 298 ℃). Interestingly, Cu1Ce2 obtains the advantages of both CuO and CeO₂ in the high temperature section and low temperature section and shows enhanced catalytic activity. In addition, the long-term activity test in condition of dry air and different relative humidity confirms the excellent catalytic stability of Cu1Ce2 (Fig. S5 in Supporting information).

To understand the reaction mechanism and determine the intermediate species generated of toluene oxidation, in situ DRIFTS was employed to reveal the instantaneous composition on the surface of the three different catalysts. All the identified bands and related species are summarized in Table S4 (Supporting information).

As shown in Fig. 3, the characteristic peaks of major intermediates adsorbed on the surfaces of the three catalysts can be observed from 150 ℃, and their intensities reach maximum at 230 ℃ for CeO ₂ and Cu1Ce2, at 200 ℃ for CuO, then gradually decrease as the temperature continues to increase. In Fig. 3a, for the CeO₂, benzyl species (1370 cm⁻¹) and benzoate species are the major intermediates in the heating period (150–300 ℃), the υ_(C–H) (2854 cm⁻¹, 2930 cm⁻¹) and υ_(C=O) (2720 cm⁻¹) vibrations also confirm with the accumulation of alkoxide species and aldehydic species. As presented in Fig. 3b, for the CuO, carbonate and benzoate species as the major intermediates are observed, and the benzyl species (1147 and 1176 cm⁻¹, alkoxide species; 1685 cm⁻¹, aldehydic species) accumulated as the temperature rose. Remarkably, the adsorption peaks of phenolate species (1247 cm⁻¹) and maleic anhydride species (1700 cm⁻¹– 1950 cm⁻¹) can be found at 150–300 ℃, indicating the benzoate species not only convert into carbonates, but also partially transform into phenolate species and then convert into anhydride species on the surface of CuO. Herein, the accumulation of various by-products due to the poor oxygen vacancies and low redox properties of CuO. As shown in Fig. 3c, for the best-performance catalyst Cu1Ce2, carbonate species and benzoate species are the major intermediates in the toluene oxidation process. Meanwhile, there are no obvious adsorption peaks of benzyl species to be observed, confirms that the conversion of benzyl species is promoted over Cu1Ce2. Furthermore, the intensity of carbonate species which are considered as the ring-opened products of toluene, is higher than that of benzoate species at 150–230 ℃, and the carbonates decrease rapidly at 250 ℃, indicating that benzoate species preferentially transform into carbonates on Cu1Ce2 then convert into H₂O and CO₂. Obviously, toluene can be rapidly adsorbed and activated on the surface of Cu1Ce2. It should be due to the high mobility of oxygen species and abundant oxygen vacancies obtained by the formation of Cu-Ce interface.

Fig. 4 presents the in situ DRIFTS of adsorbed surface species arising from Cu1Ce2, CuO to CeO₂ treated with 230 ℃ in different atmosphere. As shown in Figs. 4a, c, e, in the O-rich atmosphere, most intermediates adsorbed on the three catalysts are similar to the results of temperature-dependent DRIFTS spectra in Fig. 3. Moreover, as presented in Fig. S6 (Supporting information) the growth rate of carbonates on Cu1Ce2 is much higher than the other two catalysts, indicates the C=C breaking of benzoates on Cu1Ce2 is accelerated to form the formation of carbonates. As shown in Figs. 4b, d, f, in the O-poor atmosphere, various intermediates for the three catalysts are further accumulated comparing with that under the air atmosphere, implies that the toluene oxidation rate is decreased. It should be due to the oxygen vacancies of catalysts cannot be replenished by gas phase oxygen and reconstruct surface active oxygen species to involve in reaction. In addition, the significant accumulation of carbonates (~1400 cm⁻¹) on the surfaces of the three catalysts indicating that the decomposition of carbonates preferentially to CO₂ and H₂O is prevented in O-poor atmosphere. Hence, typical adsorption peaks of phenolates (~1247 cm⁻¹, ~1277 cm⁻¹) and maleic anhydride species (1700 cm⁻¹– 1950 cm⁻¹) are detected, confirms that the C=C bond of aromatic ring is harder to break in O-poor atmosphere leading to the benzoates partially convert into phenolates, and the phenolates can react with the bulk lattice oxygen to form maleic anhydrides. As presented in Fig. S7 (Supporting information), the low generation rate of phenolates on Cu1Ce2 confirms the C=C bond of aromatic ring can be preferentially broken on Cu1Ce2 even in O-poor atmosphere. As stated above, the C=C breakage of the aromatic ring should be the rate-controlling step during toluene oxidation. Furthermore, combined with the results of XPS, H₂-TPR and O₂-TPD, the formation of Cu-Ce interface is in favor of adsorption and activation for oxygen [8], and the improvement of the migration rate of lattice oxygen and abundant oxygen vacancies leads to the fast C=C breaking of benzoates and accelerating the process of toluene oxidation on Cu1Ce2 [15, 16].

Based on these results, the proper mechanism for toluene oxidation on the surface of catalysts is proposed. As shown in Scheme S1 (Supporting information), the oxidation of toluene on the catalysts can be divided into two steps. The first step of toluene oxidation over the three catalysts is consistent: toluene → benzyl alcohol → benzaldehyde → benzoate. In the second step, benzoates are decomposed into carbonates by breaking C=C bond and further converted into H₂O and CO₂ on the CeO₂ and Cu1Ce2. On the surface of the CuO, benzoates can decompose into either the carbonates by breaking C=C bond or phenolate by breaking C=O bond, then further oxidized to anhydride species finally into CO₂ and H₂O. In addition, C=C breakage should be impeded without gas phase oxygen and results in the generation of phenolates and anhydrides. Moreover, the main intermediates on the three catalysts are different: Among them, the main intermediates for Cu1Ce2 are carbonates and partially benzoates; the main intermediate products of CeO₂ are benzoate and part of benzyl substances; The main intermediate products of pure CuO catalyst are benzoate and carbonate, as well as a small amount of benzyl and anhydrides. Thus, the breaking of C=C should be the rate-controlled step in the toluene oxidation process, and the construction of Cu-Ce interface obtains abundant oxygen vacancies and high mobility of lattice oxygen leading to the rapid benzyl species conversion and speed up the C=C bond breaking of benzoates.

In this work, we reported a facile hydrothermal method to obtain Cu1Ce2 catalysts for toluene oxidation. The formation of Cu-Ce interface affects the phase structure and textural properties of CuO and CeO₂. The Cu-Ce interaction functions through the reaction: Cu²⁺ + Ce³⁺ ↔ Cu⁺ + Ce⁴⁺. The enhanced electron transfer between CuO and CeO₂ and the generation of Cu-O-Ce solid solution at the interface lead to high redox properties and abundant oxygen vacancies. Therefore, the Cu1Ce2 catalyst achieves the best catalytic performance both in low and high temperatures with T₅₀ = 234 ℃ and T₉₉ = 250 ℃. Furthermore, different major intermediates over Cu1Ce2, CeO₂ and CuO were detected by in situ DRIFTS: Benzoate and carbonate species over Cu1Ce2; benzyl and benzoate species over CeO₂; benzoate, carbonate and benzyl species over CuO. Herein, the construction of Cu-Ce interface significantly affects the reaction step. The abundant oxygen vacancies and high mobility of lattice oxygen of Cu1Ce2 result in the rapid conversion of benzyl and fast C=C breaking of benzoates to accelerate the toluene oxidation.

Declaration of competing interest

Less

The authors report no declarations of completing interest.

Acknowledgments

Less

This research described above was financially supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2018M643090) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52000077); the National Key Research and Development Project of Research (No. 2017YFC0212805); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51878292); the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2015B020236002); and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2020M682715).

Supplementary materials

Less

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.029.

References

Less

[1]

M. Zhang, S. Zou, S. Mo, et al., Chemosphere 262(2021) 127738.

[2]

Z. Abbasi, M. Haghighi, E. Fatehifar, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 186(2011) 1445-1454.

[3]

M. Dezest, M. Le Bechec, L. Chavatte, et al., Sci. Rep. 7(2017) 10707.

[4]

Y.T. Lai, T.C. Chen, Y.K. Lan, et al., ACS Catal. 4(2014) 3824-3836.

[5]

Q. Ren, S. Mo, J. Fan, et al., Chin. J. Catal. 41(2020) 1873-1883.

[6]

M. Zhang, S. Zou, Q. Zhang, et al., Inorg. Chem. 59(2020) 3062-3071.

[7]

J. Wang, X. Quan, S. Chen, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 368(2019) 621-629.

[8]

Y. Zeng, K.G. Haw, Z. Wang, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 404(2021) 124088.

[9]

C. He, Y. Yu, L. Yue, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 147(2014) 156-166.

[10]

J.Y. Luo, M. Meng, Y.Q. Zha, L.H. Guo, J. Phys. Chem. C 112(2008) 8694-8701.

[11]

C. He, J. Cheng, X. Zhang, et al., Chem. Rev. 119(2019) 4471-4568.

[12]

W. Xu, B. Chen, X. Jiang, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 387(2020) 122004.

[13]

J. Zhong, Y. Zeng, D. Chen, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 386(2020) 121957.

[14]

X. Yang, X. Yu, M. Jing, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(2019) 730-739.

[15]

P. Wang, J. Wang, X. An, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 282(2021) 119560.

[16]

S. Mo, Q. Zhang, J. Li, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 264(2020) 118464.

[17]

Q. Zhang, S. Mo, J. Li, et al., Catal. Sci. Technol. 9(2019) 4538-4551.

[18]

J. Fan, Q. Ren, S. Mo, et al., ChemCatChem 12(2020) 1046-1054.

[19]

W. Xu, X. Chen, J. Chen, H. Jia, J. Hazard. Mater. 403(2021) 123869.

[20]

X. Zhang, H. Zhao, Z. Song, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 493(2019) 9-17.

[21]

M. Zabilskiy, P. Djinović, B. Erjavec, G. Dražić, A. Pintar, Appl. Catal. B Environ. 163(2015) 113-122.

[22]

S. Zeng, K. Liu, L. Zhang, et al., J. Power Sources 261(2014) 46-54.

[23]

S. Zeng, Y. Wang, B. Qin, et al., Catal. Sci. Technol. 3(2013) 3163-3172.

[24]

S.T. Hossain, E. Azeeva, K. Zhang, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 455(2018) 132-143.

[25]

R. Peng, S. Li, X. Sun, et al., Appl. Catal. B Environ. 220(2018) 462-470.

[26]

Y. Zeng, Y. Wang, F. Song, S. Zhang, Q. Zhong, Sci. Total Environ. 712(2020) 135635.

[27]

Y. Xia, J. Lao, J. Ye, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7(2019) 18421-18433.

Appendix

Less

Year 2021 volume 32 Issue 11

PDF

Cite this Article

BibTeX

Article Info

doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.029

Receive Date：2021-03-04
Online Date：2026-01-04
Published：2021-11-15

Article Data

Affiliations

History

Received：2021-03-04
Revised：2021-03-27
Accepted：2021-05-17

Affiliations

School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

References

Share

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.029

Share to

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article

BibTeX

Citations

表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Fig. 1 TEM images of CuO (a1), CeO₂ (a2) and Cu1Ce2 (a3, a4). HRTEM image (b) and EDX analysis mapping (c) of Cu1Ce2.

Fig. 2 XRD patterns (a) and XPS spectra of (b) O 1s, (c) Cu 2p and Cu LMM of CuO and Cu1Ce2, (d) Ce 3d of CeO ₂ and Cu1Ce2

Fig. 3 In situ DRIFTS spectra as a function of temperature exposed to 400 ppm toluene/air over CeO₂ (a), CuO (b), Cu1Ce2 (c).

Fig. 4 In situ DRIFTS spectra of toluene oxidation as a function of time exposed to toluene 400 ppm/air (a) and toluene 400 ppm/N₂ (b) over CeO₂; Toluene 400 ppm/air (c) and toluene 400 ppm/N₂ (d) over CuO; Toluene 400 ppm/air (e) and toluene 400 ppm/N₂ (f) over Cu1Ce2 at 230 ℃.

Articles: Latest Articles; Most Read; Collections

Updates: Events; News; Multimedia

About: About Us

Contact

No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing

100081

010-62199257

qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House