In order to evaluate the gas sensing performance of the samples, many tests were carried out on the measurement system (more details can be found in Supporting information). Regarding a gas sensor, working temperatures have a significant impact on its performance. The responses of gas sensors based on pure Fe
2O
3, Co
3O
4 and Fe
2O
3/Co
3O
4 microcubes towards 20 ppm acetone at different temperatures are shown in
Fig. 5a. The results clearly show that the responses of the gas sensors all present a parabolic-like shape. It can be seen that with the working temperature rose, the response of each gas sensor first increased, then reached the maximum and decreased finally. It' not hard to understand that the response towards acetone depends on the balance between the adsorption rate and desorption rate. If the working temperature increases, the adsorption of acetone will be accelerated, thereby enhancing the gas response. When the working temperature rises to a higher level, the desorption rate will be much faster than the adsorption rate, thereby reducing the response. Obviously, from the
Fig. 5a, the working temperatures of the Fe
2O
3, Co
3O
4 and Fe
2O
3/Co
3O
4 microcubes-based gas sensor at their maximum responses towards 20 ppm acetone are 270 ℃, 150 ℃ and 200 ℃, respectively. These always can be used as their optimal working temperatures. Meanwhile, the response of microcubes-based gas sensor is 21.2, which is almost 2.1 and 5.5 times much higher than that of Fe
2O
3 and Co
3O
4-based gas sensors at their optimal working temperatures. The above results show that the responses of microcubes-based gas sensor are significantly better than that of Fe
2O
3 and Co
3O
4-based gas sensors. Hence, the modification of Fe
2O
3 by Co
3O
4 cannot only effectively reduce the working temperature of a Fe
2O
3-based gas sensor, but also increase its response.
Fig. 5b displays the responses of the gas sensors to different concentrations of acetone,
e.
g., 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 200 ppm, at their optimal working temperatures. It is obvious that the microcubes-based gas sensor has the optimum responses towards acetone. As the acetone concentration increases, all the gas sensors show a saturated trend, which is due to the relative saturation of adsorption sites on the sensing materials.
Fig. 5c gives dynamic curves of the gas sensors towards low acetone concentrations of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ppm at their optimal working temperature. These curves illustrate that all the gas sensors have good response-recovery properties. Among them, microcubes-based gas sensor also showed superior performance than others, and it still has a response of 1.70 when the acetone concentration is as low as 0.1 ppm.
Fig. 5d presents the fitting curves of the concentration (
x)
versus the response (
y) obtained from the
Fig. 5c. A good linear relationship and a perfect
R2 of 0.995 are given for the microcubes-based gas sensor, indicating a promising application for the quantitative detection of acetone at a low concentration.
Fig. 5e showed five cycles of microcubes-based gas sensor towards 1 ppm acetone at 200 ℃, and the response varies slightly, demonstrating its excellent stability for low concentration. In addition, the selectivity is also a key parameter for determining a gas sensor's effectiveness and accuracy.
Fig. 5f depicts the responses of the gas sensors to acetone, ethanol, methanol, ammonia and toluene of 20 ppm at 200 ℃, respectively. The microcubes-based gas sensor had the highest response of 21.2 towards acetone, which is
ca. 1.8, 4.2, 6.4, 16.2 times larger than that of ethanol, methanol, ammonia, and toluene. This indicates the microcubes-based gas sensor has an outstanding selectivity toward acetone against the other four unwanted gases.