Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Tunable construction of transition metal-coordinated helicene cages
收藏切换
PDF
Yongle Dinga, b, Chengshuo Shen*, a, Fuwei Gana, Jinghao Wanga, Guoli Zhanga, Lingling Lib, Mouhai Shua, Bangshang Zhu*, b, Jeanne Crassousc, Huibin Qiu*, a
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2021, 32(12) : 3988 - 3992
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2021, 32(12): 3988-3992
• Communication •
Tunable construction of transition metal-coordinated helicene cages
Full
Yongle Dinga, b, Chengshuo Shen*, a, Fuwei Gana, Jinghao Wanga, Guoli Zhanga, Lingling Lib, Mouhai Shua, Bangshang Zhu*, b, Jeanne Crassousc, Huibin Qiu*, a
Affiliations
  • aSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Frontiers Science Center for Transformative Molecules, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • bInstrumental Analysis Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • cUniv Rennes, Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes, UMR CNRS 6226, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes 35042, France
Published: 2021-12-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.033
Outline
收藏切换

We report a facile and tailored method to prepare globally twisted chiral molecular cages through tunable coordination of bis-bipyridine-terminated helicene ligands to a series of transition metals including Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II). This system shows an efficient remote transfer of stereogenecity from the helicene core to the bipyridine-metal coordination sites and subsequently the entire cages. While the Fe(II), Co(II) and Ni(II)-derived M2L3 (M for metal and L for ligand) cages exhibit quasi-reversible redox features, the Zn(II) analogues reveal prominent yellow circularly polarized luminescence. Interestingly, with the addition of Na2SO4, the Zn2L3 cages reassemble into sextuple-stranded Zn6L6(SO4)4 cages in which three Zn2L2 units are bound together by four sulfates and further coalesced by offset inter-ligand π-π interactions.

Helicene  /  Coordination cage  /  Chiral  /  Global helicity  /  Circularly polarized luminescence
Yongle Ding, Chengshuo Shen, Fuwei Gan, Jinghao Wang, Guoli Zhang, Lingling Li, Mouhai Shu, Bangshang Zhu, Jeanne Crassous, Huibin Qiu. Tunable construction of transition metal-coordinated helicene cages[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2021 , 32 (12) : 3988 -3992 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.033
Full Text
Less
Molecular cages with well-defined structures and internal cavities have raised abundant interest in recent years [1, 2]. The synthesis of these intrinsic hollow species normally involved tailored connections of molecular building blocks either through covalent bonding or coordination to metals [3-9]. The flexible linkage chemistry along with the diversity in building blocks has favored an unprecedentedly wide access to cages with tunable geometries and functions [10-12]. Amongst, chiral molecular cages have drawn significant attentions due to their potential applications in chiral sensing, chiral separation and asymmetric catalysis [13-17]. So far, a series of chiral molecular building blocks have been adopted to enantioselectively create these chiral entities [18, 19]. However, the facile construction of chiral cages with highly extended, globally distorted unsymmetrical structures remains a great challenge, majorly as a consequence that the conventional chiral molecular building blocks normally fail to efficiently transfer the local chirality to the whole cage skeletons in spite of a few advances (mainly in helicates) achieved by axially chiral building blocks [20-22].
Helicenes are a type of chiral molecules constituted by ortho-fused aromatic rings with unique helical shapes [23-25]. Helicene-cored molecule generally exhibits an apparent three-dimensionally twisted structure with chirality effectively expressed across the whole molecule along with the remote substituents [26, 27]. Normally, carbo[n]helicenes with the number of rings (n) larger than 5 possess stable configuration against racemization [28]. We have previously demonstrated that helicene derivatives can serve as building blocks to construct covalent organic cages, which presented a globally distorted, triple-stranded helical structure with high recognition ability towards chiral guest molecules [29]. Clever et al. further synthesized bis-pyridine-terminated helicenes and used them as ligands to prepare a series of Pd-coordinated chiral cages, which also showed promising guest recognition features [30]. However, the structure and function of these helicene cages is so far limited by the diversity of helicene precursor and linkage chemistry. Herein, we introduce two 2,2′-bipyridine moieties onto the 4,13-positions of [6]helicene through two alkyl bridges and develop a globally bent ligand, which favors a tunable coordination to a variety of transition metals with efficient transfer of stereogenecity to the coordination sites, and hence allow the formation of coordination cages with unique triple-stranded binuclear or sextuple-stranded hexanuclear structures and distinctive properties (Scheme 1).
We first synthesized the helicene ligand through a Sonogashira coupling reaction between 5-bromo-2,2′-bipyridine and 4,13-diethynyl[6]-helicene in both racemic and enantiopure forms (Scheme S1 in Supporting information). The resulting ligand showed a bent, non-planar structure with two extended bipyridine arms organized in a (for bis-bipyridine-terminated (P)-helicene, i.e., (P)-ligand) or (for bis-bipyridine-terminated (M)-helicene, i.e., (M)-ligand) chiral fashion (the dihedral angle between two arms was ca. 165°, Figs. S4–1 and S4–15 in Supporting information) [31]. We then mixed the ligand with Fe(CF3SO3)2 in a ratio of 3:2, and subsequently observed an immediate change of color from paled-yellow to deep-red, corresponding to a fast chelating process between the bipyridine groups and Fe(II) [32]. The collected product showed a clean and simple 1H NMR pattern with the same number of proton environments as the ligand (Fig. 1a, Figs. S2–1, S3–1 and S3–2 in Supporting information). Notably, protons H-22 and H-28 adjacent to the nitrogen atoms drastically shifted upfield from 8.98 to 8.73 ppm to 7.92 and 7.30 ppm, respectively, demonstrating the complexation between the bipyridine modules and Fe(II) [33]. Electrospray ionization high resolution mass spectrometry (ESI-HRMS) revealed three main peaks at m/z = 541.3949 (z = 4), 771.5036 (z = 3) and 1231.7511 (z = 2), which can be indexed as [Fe2L3]4+, [Fe2L3(CF3SO3)]3+ and [Fe2L3(CF3SO3)2]2+, respectively (L for the helicene ligand, Fig. 1b).
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction further confirmed the yield of Fe2L3 coordination cages (Fig. 1c), in which three helicene ligands were bridged by two Fe atoms (distance of ca. 18.3 Å) and formed a triple-stranded helical structure (Fig. 1d). The three surrounding helicene ligands created a sizeable internal cavity, which could accommodate a sphere with a diameter of ca. 9 Å (with its surface just attaching the van der Waals surface of the cage framework). For the cage derived from the (P)-ligand (i.e., (P)-Fe2L3), both two Fe-bipyridine coordination sites were in Δ stereogenecity, and the whole cage framework adopted a P helical conformation [34]. Similarly, in the enantiomeric mirror series, the cage formed by the (M)-ligand (i.e., (M)-Fe2L3) displayed an M helical shape with two Fe-bipyridine sites solely in Λ stereogenecity. It seemed that the helicene core substantially dominates the stereogenecity of the coordination domains as well as the helicity of the entire cage, which renders the cage formation reaction highly diastereoselective and prevents the formation of other diastereomers. This was actually also demonstrated by the simple 1H NMR spectrum, which was indicative of the absence of other isomers. Such efficient remote transfer of stereogenic information probably can be interpreted by the minimal-energy stacking of the relatively rigid, globally bent helicene ligands.
The Fe2L3 cage showed a group of intensive UV-vis absorption bands from 230 to 450 nm (Fig. 1e), roughly reprinting the nature of the helicene ligand. The ECD signals in the region of 360–450 nm were dramatically enhanced compared to that of the helicene ligands, which was probably due to the coordination to Fe(II). The Fe2L3 cage also revealed a distinctive absorption band with moderate intensity in the region of 450–650 nm, which could be attributed to the metal to ligand charge transfer (MLCT) from the Fe(II) centers to the bipyridine modules [35, 36]. The corresponding ECD curves were resolved in a bisignate fashion. The (P)-Fe2L3 cage displayed a positive Cotton effect at 570 nm and a negative one at 490 nm, which is in accordance with the Δ configuration of the Fe-bipyridine coordination sites [35]. Meanwhile, the (M)-Fe2L3 cage presented a mirror-imaged ECD curve, indicating a Λ configuration.
We further switched the transition metals to Co(II) and Ni(II) and obtained yellow-colored products. ESI-HRMS analysis (Figs. S3–4 and S3–5 in Supporting information) and/or single-crystal X-ray diffraction (Fig. S4–4 in Supporting information) confirmed the formation of Co2L3 and Ni2L3 cages in a triple-stranded helical shape with the selective formation of stereogenic coordination sites analogous to the Fe2L3 cage. The Co2L3 and Ni2L3 cages revealed similar UV-vis and ECD spectra to the Fe2L3 cage in the shorter wavelength region (< 450 nm), but in the longer wavelength region (> 450 nm) no obvious absorption band was detected (Fig. 1e), indicating a distinct metal to ligand electron transition mechanism [35]. Besides, due to the introduction of electrochemically active metal coordination sites [37, 38], all these three helicene cages exhibited a single redox event at +0.68 (Fe2L3 cage), +0.78 (Co2L3 cage) and +0.69 V (Ni2L3 cage) vs. Fc+/Fc0, respectively, which appeared to be quasi-reversible (Fig. 1f).
Similarly, with the addition of Zn(II) salts into the solution of the bis-bipyridine-helicene ligand, we obtained a yellow-colored compound, which showed a simple 1H NMR curve (Fig. S3–6 in Supporting information) and well-resolved ESI-HRMS peaks at m/z = 546.1373 (z = 4, Fig. 2a). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction again confirmed the formation of Zn2L3 cages with homologous triple-stranded helical topology (Fig. 2b). ECD spectra further reflected the chiral fashion of the resulting Zn2L3 cage in solution (Fig. 2c), which was similar to the Co2L3 and Ni2L3 cage. Like other Zn-bipyridine coordination complexes [39], the Zn2L3 cages showed yellow luminescence (λmax = 580 nm, Fig. 2d) under the irradiation of UV light, which was considerably bathochromically shifted compared with the blue luminescence of the helicene ligand (λmax = 430 nm). As a result of the global transfer of stereogenic information throughout the whole cage, these Zn2L3 cages presented prominent circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) with dissymmetric factor glum of ±0.002 at 580 nm (negative for (P)-Zn2L3 cage and positive for (M)-Zn2L3 cage, i.e., with the signs in agreement with the lowest ECD-active band).
Interestingly, when treating the Zn2L3 cage solution with Na2SO4 powder, we obtained a green-luminescent compound with a splitting of all proton environments into two sets in the 1H NMR spectrum (Fig. 3b). For example, the signals of protons H-22 and H-28 at 8.56 and 8.01 ppm were split, with one set drastically shifted upfield to 7.52 and 7.03 ppm and the other set moved downfield to 9.98 and 9.39 ppm, respectively. ESI-HRMS showed that this new composite possesses a relatively large molecular weight (m = 4884.7608, Figs. S3–S15 in Supporting information), which can be assigned as Zn6L6(SO4)4. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction of the racemic product further illustrated a six-stranded helical structure with the integration of three tilted homochiral Zn2L2 macrocyclic modules by two pairs of sulfates aligned on the vertical axis (Figs. 3a and c). The intricate trigonal-bipyramid-like Zn3(SO4)2 cluster also revealed a helical conformation with the two SO4 vertexes slightly twisted with each other. The neighboring helicene ligands belonging to two Zn2L2 modules were closely packed in a short distance of ca. 3.6 Å and revealed unsymmetrical offset π-π interactions (Figs. S4–S16 in Supporting information), which rendered a more sophisticated environment and hence the split of the 1H NMR signals. This giant cage showed an expanded cavity compared with the original Zn2L3 cage and could host a sphere with a diameter of ca. 10.0 Å.
By gradual addition of Na2SO4 into the Zn2L3 cage solution in a mixture of CD3OD/CDCl3, the 1H NMR spectra revealed an apparent evolution with the rising of the Zn6L6(SO4)4 cage and the free ligand in a molar ratio of 1:3, and the simultaneous consumption of the Zn2L3 cage precursor (Figs. S3–S16). This strongly indicated that each Zn6L6(SO4)4 cage was assembled from three Zn2L3 cages via ligand exchange to sulfates, with the corresponding release of three free helicene ligands. Notably, no obvious peaks for other intermediates were observed, demonstrating that this assembly process might undergo in a cooperative pathway [40].
The Zn6L6(SO4)4 cages showed similar absorption bands as the Zn2L3 cages, suggesting that the major electron transition modes were generally preserved in this new coordination complex. However, the Zn6L6(SO4)4 cages presented intense ECD bands in the region of 370–450 nm with Δεmax = ± 1040 L mol-1 cm-1, which was ca. 1.6 folders of the Zn2L3 cages (with consideration of the number of helicene ligands, Fig. 3d). Such drastic enhancement might be resulted from the unique chiral packing of the helicene ligands as well as the twisted structure of the whole Zn6L6(SO4)4 cage. On the other hand, the changes on the coordination sites apparently affected the luminescence property and hence the maximum emission hypsochromically shifted to 520 nm. Notably, the Zn6L6(SO4)4 cages revealed remarkable CPL with glum of ±0.004 (doubled compare to the Zn2L3 cages, Fig. 3e vs. Fig. 2d).
In conclusion, we have prepared a series of chiral coordination cages via facile coordination of bis-dipyridine-terminated helicene ligands with a variety of transition metals. The flexible selection of metal centers substantially enriches the chemistry and functions (potentially for electrochemical or luminescence-sensitive recognition and separation of chiral guest molecules) of the resultant cages. Besides, the relatively dynamic association between the bipyridine modules and Zn(II) may also favor the fabrication of more complex chiral coordination cages via ligand exchanges using other suitable inorganic and organic species. We are currently exploring the construction of other distinctive chiral molecular cages utilizing the diverse helicene coordination chemistry [41], aiming at innovative structures and functions.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (No. 2020YFA0908100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 92056110 and 22075180), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Nos. 18JC1415500, 195271040, 20JC1415000). The authors thank Prof. Shunai Che's group in Tongji University for assistance with CPL measurement.
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.033.
References
Less
[1]
R. Chakrabarty, P.S. Mukherjee, P.J. Stang, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 6810–6918.
[2]
T. Hasell, A.I. Cooper, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1 (2016) 16053.
[3]
M.M.J. Smulders, I.A. Riddell, C. Browne, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 1728–1754.
[4]
A.M. Castilla, W.J. Ramsay, J.R. Nitschke, Acc. Chem. Res. 47 (2014) 2063–2073.
[5]
R. Custelcean, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 1813–1824.
[6]
G. Zhang, M. Mastalerz, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 1934–1947.
[7]
W. Wang, Y.X. Wang, H.B. Yang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016) 2656–2693.
[8]
G.H. Clever, P. Punt, Acc. Chem. Res. 50 (2017) 2233–2243.
[9]
T.R. Cook, P.J. Stang, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 7001–7045.
[10]
H. Amouri, C. Desmarets, J. Moussa, Chem. Rev. 112 (2012) 2015–2041.
[11]
S. Zarra, D.M. Wood, D.A. Roberts, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 419–432.
[12]
D. Zhang, T.K. Ronson, J.R. Nitschke, Acc. Chem. Res. 51 (2018) 2423–2436.
[13]
M. Yoshizawa, J.K. Klosterman, M. Fujita, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2009) 3418–3438.
[14]
C.J. Brown, F.D. Toste, R.G. Bergman, et al., Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 3012–3035.
[15]
S.H.A.M. Leenders, R. Gramage-Doria, B. de Bruin, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 433–448.
[16]
T. Hasell, M.A. Little, S.Y. Chong, et al., Nanoscale 9 (2017) 6783–6790.
[17]
P. Howlader, E. Zangrando, P.S. Mukherjee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 9070–9078.
[18]
L.J. Chen, H.B. Yang, M. Shionoya, Chem. Soc. Rev. 46 (2017) 2555–2576.
[19]
M. Pan, K. Wu, J.H. Zhang, et al., Coord. Chem. Rev. 378 (2019) 333–349.
[20]
A. Lützen, M. Hapke, J. Griep-Raming, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41 (2002) 2086–2089.
[21]
J. Bunzen, T. Bruhn, G. Bringmann, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 3621–3630.
[22]
C. Gütz, R. Hovorka, N. Struch, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 11830–11838.
[23]
Y. Shen, C.F. Chen, Chem. Rev. 112 (2012) 1463–1535.
[24]
M. Gingras, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 968–1006.
[25]
K. Dhbaibi, L. Favereau, J. Crassous, Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 8846–8953.
[26]
C. Shen, G. Loas, M. Srebro-Hooper, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 8062–8066.
[27]
K. Dhbaibi, L. Favereau, M. Srebro-Hooper, et al., Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 735–742.
[28]
J. Barroso, J.L. Cabellos, S. Pan, et al., Chem. Commum. 54 (2018) 188–191.
[29]
A.U. Malik, F. Gan, C. Shen, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 2769–2772.
[30]
T.R. Schulte, J.J. Holstein, G.H. Clever, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 5562–5566.
[31]
T. Damhus, C.E. SchäFfer, Inorg. Chem. 22 (1983) 2406–2412.
[32]
E.M. Kober, T.J. Meyer, Inorg. Chem. 21 (1982) 3967–3977.
[33]
P. Bonakdarzadeh, F. Pan, E. Kalenius, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 14890–14893.
[34]
N. Struch, C. Frömbgen, G. Schnakenburg, et al., Eur. J. Org. Chem. (2017) 4984–4989.
[35]
M. Ziegler, A. von Zelewsky, Coord. Chem. Rev. 177 (1998) 257–300.
[36]
G. Auböck, M. Chergui, Nat. Chem. 7 (2015) 629–633.
[37]
Q.T. He, X.P. Li, Y. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48 (2009) 6156–6159.
[38]
S.H.R.W. Singh, H.L.C. Feltham, S. Brooker, Dalt. Trans. 48 (2019) 15435–15444.
[39]
K.D. Oyler, F.J. Coughlin, S. Bernhard, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007) 210–217.
[40]
C.T. McTernan, T.K. Ronson, J.R. Nitschke, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 664–670.
[41]
E.S. Gauthier, R. Rodríguez, J. Crassous, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 22840–22856.
Appendix
Less
Year 2021 volume 32 Issue 12
PDF
64
35
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.033
  • Receive Date：2021-03-24
  • Online Date：2026-01-04
  • Published：2021-12-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2021-03-24
  • Revised：2021-05-13
  • Accepted：2021-05-16
Affiliations
    aSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Frontiers Science Center for Transformative Molecules, State Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    bInstrumental Analysis Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
    cUniv Rennes, Institut des Sciences Chimiques de Rennes, UMR CNRS 6226, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes 35042, France
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.033
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House