Toxic CO exhaust emission in industrial processes and vehicle combustions is harmful to mammals and vegetation and contributes to global warming [1, 2]. The conversion of CO gas into non-toxic CO₂ has been regarded as the most efficient and economical ways to remove CO among all the CO elimination methods. In this way, noble-metal catalysts, such as Au, Pd, Rh, have been demonstrated to exhibit high catalytic activity towards CO oxidation [3-5]. However, the low abundance, high costs, and unsatisfactorily thermal stability of these noble metal catalysts hinder the industrial application and drive us to search for alternative substitution catalysts for efficient and low temperature CO oxidation. Among the readily available low-cost catalysts, Co₃O₄ is considered as a promising non-noble metal catalyst to replace noble metals owing to its high activity for low temperature CO oxidation [6-8]. It has been reported that the morphology of Co₃O₄ plays a vital role in catalysis performance and can be designed through given preparation methods such as sol-gel methods [9], template methods [10], solid-state chemical method [11], precipitation methods [12], hydrothermal method [13].

As demonstrated in numerous works, the fine tailoring and accurate control of nanostructure morphology can be easily realized by hydrothermal method [14-16]. Xie and Shen et al. [17] synthesized Co₃O₄ nanorods with exposed (110) plane primarily through hydrothermal method and a complete CO oxidation can be obtained at -77 ℃. Liu et al. [18] also synthesized ultrathin two-dimensional (2D) Co₃O₄ nanoplates with exposed surfaces of (112) and the 100% CO conversion was achieved at ambient temperatures even under ultrahigh weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) about 750, 000 mL g^-1 h^-1. Although Co₃O₄ is extremely active for CO oxidation, the poor catalytic stability is still an important concern that limits its wide application. To obtain monolithic catalysts, the active powders are always fixed on ceramics or alloy supports using binders, which, consequently, takes the risk of peeling off during long term reaction due to the weak adhesion and discrepant thermal expansion between supports and active component. Hence, the development of Co₃O₄ monolithic catalysts with efficient activity and high stability is in need urgently.

In this work, we demonstrated the in-situ growth of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ monolithic catalysts on flexible Ti mesh substrate through scalable plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) technology associated with hydrothermal method (HR). Flexible Ti mesh as support can reduce the possibility of thermal inactivation due to the superior thermal conductivity. The in-situ growth of Co₃O₄ cocatalysts by HR ensures the tight combination with TiO₂ support. On these basis, Co₃O₄/TiO₂ monolithic catalysts with both high catalytic performance and strong stability can be obtained. The microstructures, interfaces and CO oxidation performance of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts are also well studied using series of characterization techniques.

The specific preparation process of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ monolithic catalysts is elaborated in supplementary information and is schematically shown in Scheme S1 (Supporting information). The fast surface oxidation of Ti mesh via energetic PEO process enables superior mechanical contact between porous TiO₂ film and Ti substrate [19, 20]. Meanwhile, the porous PEO film (anatase TiO₂), serving as the seed layer, is crucial to the in-situ preparation of TiO₂ nanosheet according to our previous studies [21, 22]. The ultra-thin TiO₂ nanosheets can not only reduce the transfer path of inner electron to the surface that enables a fast catalytic reaction, [22] but also hold excellent oxygen storage capacity (OSC) [23, 24], and the large specific surface area of TiO₂ nanosheet support can also provide sufficient active sites for the nucleation of Co₃O₄ cocatalyst with homogeneous distribution. The successful modification of highly active Co₃O₄ cocatalyst is confirmed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) results as shown in Fig. 1. The catalyst precursors of Co(OH)₂ (JCPDS No. 74-1057) and H₂Ti₂O₅ (JCPDS No. 47-1024) will be converted into final spinel Co₃O₄ (JCPDS No. 71-0816) and anatase TiO₂ (JCPDS No. 21-1272) phases after the annealing process. As shown in Fig. S1 (Supporting information), the morphology collapse and roughing occur due to the phase transformation from Co(OH)₂ to Co₃O₄. The ultra-thin Co₃O₄ nanoplate consists of numerous nanoparticles, which can provide sufficient active sites for CO oxidation. During HR process, the morphology of Co(OH)₂ precursor can be selectively controlled and well maintained after final calcination. The field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of final Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts with different HR time are shown in Fig. 1. Evidently, TiO₂ nanosheets are uniformly covered with dense and aligned Co₃O₄ cocatalysts after the HR reaction and the calcination process. Co₃O₄ particles obtained by HR 1 h cannot be observed in SEM images due to their high dispersion or the ultrafine size, while the energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) results clearly indicate the existence of Co element (Fig. S2 in Supporting information). As the prolong of reaction time, the ultrathin Co₃O₄ nanoplate with irregular planar shape come into being and evolve to integrated nanoplates under 10 h reaction. With further increase of HR time, there is no significant change in morphology except for the obvious increase in thickness as shown in Fig. S3 (Supporting information). Meanwhile, the urea content also has significant influence on the Co₃O₄ morphology due to the different solution supersaturation (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). Similarly, only TiO₂ nanosheets can be observed at the low urea content. As the urea content increases from 8 mmol to 32 mmol, the thickness of Co₃O₄ nanoplates increases slightly. However, the excessive growth of Co₃O₄ nanoplate under 32 mmol urea will lead to obvious structural collapse and adhesion decrease due to the loose self-aggregation of tiny particles. The low magnification SEM image of monolithic mesh catalysts and the EDS mapping clearly indicate the homogeneous distribution of Co₃O₄ (Figs. S5 and S6 in Supporting information), and the weak signal of Ti element implies the dense covering of Co₃O₄ on TiO₂ nanosheets.

The morphological and structural features of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts are further investigated by transmission electron microscope (TEM) under high magnification. It is shown that the as synthesized Co₃O₄ nanoplates are composed of numerous nanoparticles with uniform size of about 40 nm (Figs. 2a–c and Fig. S7 in Supporting information). The lattice-resolved high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) analysis indicates that the Co₃O₄ nanoplate synthesized from multi-step process is highly crystallized and it exhibits a clear lattice fringe of 0.46 nm, corresponding to the (111) crystal plane of spinel Co₃O₄ phase (Fig. 2d). The fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern (Fig. 2e) also matches well with the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of face-centered cubic Co₃O₄ taken along the [011] zone axis. The elemental mappings of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts clearly show the homogeneous distribution of Co and O elements, while the weak signal of Ti indicates that TiO₂ nanosheets are covered by dense Co₃O₄ nanoplates (Figs. 2f–i). The good crystallinity, smaller size and uniform distribution of Co₃O₄ will undoubtedly favour the efficient low-temperature CO oxidation in practical application.

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to analyse the oxidation states and the surface compositions of the Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts synthesized under the urea content of 4-32 mmol (denoted as Co₃O₄ (4)-Co₃O₄ (32)). The characteristic peaks of Ti, O, Co and C can be clearly observed and two distinct peaks Ti 2p are the characteristic peaks of anatase TiO₂ as shown in Fig. S8 (Supporting information) [25]. Fig. 3a shows the O 1s spectra of the catalysts that can be divided into three components at ~529.5, 531.2 and 533.2 eV, which are assigned to lattice oxygen (O_α), adsorbed oxygen such as O^- or -OH (O_β), and oxygen in molecular water adsorbed on the catalyst surface (O_γ), respectively [26]. The ratios of different oxygen species over all the Co₃O₄/TiO₂ samples are listed in Table S1 (Supporting information). Obviously, the Co₃O₄ (32) sample presents a higher molar ratio of surface or chemisorbed oxygen (O_β + O_γ), implying the presence of more oxygen vacancies, which plays a prominent role in the catalytic performance CO oxidation [27]. With the increase of urea content, the oxygen vacancies also increase on the surface (Table S1). Therefore, it is speculated that the increase of oxygen vacancies may occur during the annealing process caused by the insufficient oxygen at interface of TiO₂/Co₃O₄ or the large thickness of Co₃O₄ nanoplates according to the SEM and XPS results and the improved catalytic performance of Co₃O₄ (32) discussed later also confirms the existence of more oxygen vacancies. Based on the electroneutrality principle, the increase of oxygen vacancies can be induced by the enhanced Co³⁺ species on the surface. As shown in Fig. 3b, the Co 2p_3/2 peaks of the catalysts could be divided into Co³⁺ at about 779.2 ± 0.5 eV and Co²⁺ at about 781.2 ± 0.5 eV [28, 29]. The proportion of Co³⁺ ion on the surface increases as urea concentration increases, while Co₃O₄ (4) shows a proportion of 29.4%. Among all these catalysts, the Co₃O₄ (32) catalyst shows the highest ratio of 80.0%, suggesting that the Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts synthesized under high urea content have more highly active Co³⁺ ions. The rich Co³⁺ active sites on the surface of catalysts will result in enhanced activity doubtlessly [30].

As mentioned above, the different morphologies of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts are closely related to the surface area and the catalytic performance will be further affected. The BET surface area of Co₃O₄ (4)-Co₃O₄ (32) catalysts is measured and the results are listed in Table S2 (Supporting information). It can be seen that Co₃O₄ (32) has the largest surface area of 33.1 m²/g, which is slightly higher than others. All the catalysts have the similar pore size distribution and average pore size, and produce Type IV adsorption isotherm with H3 type hysteresis in spite of the morphology difference, indicating the existence of mesopores (Fig. S9 and Table S2 in Supporting information) [31].

To evaluate the catalytic properties of the Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts, CO oxidation as a probe reaction is carried out. Figs. 4a and b show the CO oxidation light-off curves of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts with different morphologies, and one can see that the complete conversion of CO to CO₂ can be achieved in the temperature range of 110-250 ℃ under normal feeding gas. It is found that the T₁₀₀ (the temperature to 100% oxidize CO gas) gradually decreases as the increase of urea content and HR time, indicating that more Co₃O₄ cocatalysts favour the oxidation of CO gas (Fig. S10 in Supporting information). However, the excessive growth of Co₃O₄ nanoplates under 32 mmol urea or HR 20 h will lead to the peeling off due to the weak adhesion between Co₃O₄ and TiO₂ nanosheet support (Fig. S11 in Supporting information). To examine the contribution of Co₃O₄, the catalytic performance of TiO₂ nanosheets supported on Ti mesh without Co₃O₄ active component was investigated (Fig. S12 in Supporting information), and it was found that pure TiO₂ nanosheet can only completely oxidize CO gas molecular above 420 ℃, which in turn indicates the excellent oxidation capability of Co₃O₄ nanostructures. In this regard, the Co₃O₄ (16) catalyst may have both high performance and superior adhesion for exceptional stability. As shown in Figs. 4c and d, the light-off curves of Co₃O₄ (16) catalysts after 2 months storage and the fresh one are almost the same, and the 100% CO conversion can be well maintained during continuous 40 h test at its T₁₀₀ (120 ℃). Even though the best T₁₀₀ of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts is still higher than some pure Co₃O₄ nanorod catalysts, its oxidation capability is still more competitive and advantageous to some noble metal catalysts as listed in Table S3 (Supporting information). Especially, the sufficient reactive oxygen species, large specific area and short electron transfer path provided by TiO₂ nanosheets and the in-situ integration strategy of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ monolithic catalysts enable strong adhesion with beneath Ti mesh, which guarantees the superior long-term stability compared with other results reported literatures [11].

According to the XPS results and CO light-off curves, a possible scheme is proposed for the pathways of CO oxidation over the monolithic structured Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts supported on Ti mesh. Previous studies have demonstrated that CO molecules are always adsorbed preferentially on Co³⁺ sites, which are generally considered as the active positions suitable for CO oxidation [32]. Meanwhile, abundant V_O on the catalyst surface will react with absorbed O₂ to form active oxygen species, which can react with adsorbed CO molecules and generate CO₂. The modification of Co₃O₄ cocatalyst through hydrothermal process produces rich oxygen vacancy on catalyst surface and ensures the high catalytic activity, which is competitive with some noble metals. Undoubtedly, the synthesized Co₃O₄/TiO₂ catalysts free of noble metal component will surely open up more opportunities for oxide-based catalysts towards long-term and efficient catalysis in diverse fields such as total oxidation (TOX), preferential catalytic oxidation of CO (PROX), three-way catalysis (TWCs) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR).

In conclusion, the synthesis of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ monolithic catalysts on flexible Ti mesh substrate was demonstrated through scalable PEO technology followed by hydrothermal treatment, and the high activity and superior stability in CO oxidation are confirmed. The in-situ nucleation of TiO₂ nanosheet substrate and Co₃O₄ cocatalyst provides strong adhesion to maintain the long-term stability, while the ultra-thin TiO₂ nanosheet offers sufficient active sites and fast electron transfer path to achieve outstanding CO oxidation capability. The full conversion of CO to CO₂ at temperature as low as 120 ℃ of Co₃O₄/TiO₂ monolithic catalysts is achieved, which is comparable or even superior to some noble metal catalysts. The in-situ integrated synthesis strategy holds great promise in industry and can open up more opportunities for the preparation of relevant monolithic catalysts for diverse applications.

The authors report no declarations of interest.

This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51872296), the Joint Fund between Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science and State Key Laboratory of Advanced Processing and Recycling of Nonferrous Metals (No. 18LHPY012).

Supplementarymaterial related to this article can befound, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.008.