As mentioned above, the newly designed synthesis of AA005 (
1) is highly depended on the preparation of enantiopure bis-epoxide
6a, as well as its scalability. To clarify these concerns, three mechanism-different approaches were examined at the first stage (
Scheme 2). One is the hydrolytic kinetic resolution (HKR), which has emerged as a widely adopted powerful method to produce various terminal epoxides with high enantiopurities [
9]. A mixture of
6 (containing
6a/
6b/
6c) was applied as the substrate and chiral SalenCo
III complex was used as the catalyst in the assessment (
Scheme 2a). The chiral HPLC analysis of the starting glycol diglycidyl ether
6 (industrial grade) showed that it comprises (
S,
S)-
6a,
meso-(
R,
S)-
6b and (
R,
R)-
6c with a ratio of 28:48:24. Under the standard conditions with 1 mol% (
R,
R)-Salen-Co
III·OAc prepared
in situ [
9b], the percentage of
6a in the mixture increased up to 83% (30% yield based on 52% content of
6a/
6c in the mixture; 17% isolated yield based on all the material). Such a product purity was insufficiently qualified for the further synthesis. Phase transfer catalyst (PTC) approach was next examined by nucleophilic attack of glycol (
8) on (
R)-ECH (
9) under basic conditions [
7]. Nevertheless, it was difficult to predict,
a priori, which carbon (C
1-Cl in green, or C
3-O in red) of
9 would be predominately attacked by the alkoxy anion of
8. HPLC measurement showed that this approach could not deliver a good result either (
Scheme 2b), and all the
6a,
6b (the diastereomer of
6a) and
6c (the enantiomer of
6a) existed in the mixture with a ratio of 71:26:3 after the reaction. Several commonly available PTCs, including TBAB, TBAI and TEBAC, were tested to improve the regioselectivity, as well as varying base concentrations. Unfortunately, all these attempts delivered similar results. Obviously, both C1 and C3 of epoxide
9 were attacked by glycol
8 under the PTC conditions. The Lewis acid-promoted conditions were finally explored (
Scheme 2c) [
8]. To facilitate future scale-up, the neat reaction (without solvent) was tried [
8b]. To our delight, a bis-chlorohydrin intermediate was detected when a mixture of diol
8 and BF
3·Et
2O (0.7 wt%) was exposed to epoxide
9. It indicated that nucleophilic attack of diol
8 on
9 takes place only at C
3-O of epoxide
9 in the presence of BF
3·Et
2O. To simplify the procedure, the above resulting bis-chlorohydrin intermediate (after removal of excess (
R)-ECH (
9) in vacuum) was immediately treated with NaOH (2.1 equiv.) to rebuild the two epoxides [
10], affording enantiopure (
S,
S)-
6a (for details of condition screening see Supporting information). In a scale-up experiment (using 100 g of ethylene glycol
8 as raw material), approximately 111 g of
6a could be harvested in one batch after final purification by vacuum distillation. Obviously, this reaction shows great scalability and advantages of using economically available materials, ease of operation, convenient purification and mild reaction conditions.