We initiated our investigation with the model reaction between
1a and
2a by virtue of our chiral copper complex. Firstly, different temperatures and copper salts were screened for this reaction (see section 1.2 in Supporting information). It was found that 20 ℃ was the best temperature and CuBr
2 was the best Lewis acid for this reaction, affording the corresponding product with 87% yield and 82%
ee. Next, various solvents were examined in this reaction. It was found that ethanol was the best solvent (
Table 1, entries 1-5). Subsequently, the electronic effect and the steric effect of the ligands were investigated (
Table 1, entries 1, 6-10). Neither strong electron withdrawing substituent CF
3 at the phenyl of ligand (
L) nor the strong electron donating substituent OCH
3 at the phenyl of ligand (
L) favored this reaction. The commercial Box Ligand
L could not improve the enantioselectivity either. Even worse,
L did not work in this reaction. Finally, we found that
L was still the most efficient ligand. With the optimal
L-Cu catalyst in hand, various bases (
Table 1, entries 1, 11-15) were examined. The employment of
N-ethylmorpholine gave the best results (
Table 1, entry 14). To further improve the enantioselectivity, the dosage of
N-ethylmorpholine was optimized (
Table 1, entries 14, 16-19). It was found that 2 equiv.
N-Ethylmorpholine gave the corresponding product with 89% yield, 91%
ee. In summary, the optimal reaction conditions were listed as follows: the reaction being carried out in ethanol at 20 ℃ for 36 h with
L as the ligand, CuBr
2 as the Lewis acid, ethanol as the solvent and two equivalent
N-ethylmorpholine as the base.