Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Rhodium catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of Chiraphos derivatives
收藏切换
PDF
Ying-Ying Suna, Bin Zhanga, Liangbin Yub, Ranran Cuia, Qingyang Zhaob, *, Qing-Wei Zhanga, *
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(12) : 5084 - 5087
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(12): 5084-5087
• Communication •
Rhodium catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of Chiraphos derivatives
Full
Ying-Ying Suna, Bin Zhanga, Liangbin Yub, Ranran Cuia, Qingyang Zhaob, *, Qing-Wei Zhanga, *
Affiliations
  • a Department of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China, Heifei 230026, China
  • b School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
Published: 2022-12-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.04.054
Outline
收藏切换

Herein, we report a highly efficient versatile synthetic route to Chiraphos derivatives through Rh/Ph-bod catalyzed asymmetric addition of aryl boronic acids to phosphinyl dienes. Various substituted phosphinyl dienes, both on the parent skeleton and the phosphine atoms, were well tolerated with this method and provided chiral phosphine oxides in satisfied yield and up to 95% ee. The corresponding Chiraphos derivative displayed an advantage over Chiraphos in the representative Pd-catalyzed asymmetric 1,4-addition reaction.

Rhodium  /  Phosphine  /  Diene ligand  /  1,4-Addition  /  Chiraphos
Ying-Ying Sun, Bin Zhang, Liangbin Yu, Ranran Cui, Qingyang Zhao, Qing-Wei Zhang. Rhodium catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of Chiraphos derivatives[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022 , 33 (12) : 5084 -5087 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.04.054
Full Text
Less
Biphosphines ligands have found wide application in asymmetric catalysis as ligands in transition metals and organocatalysts by themselves [1-13]. Among them, Chiraphos ligand has a pivotal position in catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation [14-17], 1,4-addition [18-23] and allyl alkylation reaction [24, 25]. What is more, it has also been employed by BASF company as a ligand for the industrial asymmetric synthesis of l-menthol [26], which is widely used in pharmaceutical and food science. It has also been used as a chiral ligand for functional transition metal complexes and as an auxiliary for the synthesis of Au24 clusters with inherent chirality [27].
However, up to date, the synthesis of Chiraphos mainly relies on the original strategy developed by Bosnich et al. through nucleophilic substitution reactions of chiral 2,3-butandiol derivatives and lithium diphenylphosphide [28-31]. On the other hand, Phosphinyl diene 1a has also been used as a more accessible alternative starting material to access Chiraphos ligand. In 1997, Matteoli et al. reported a chiral resolution method through sequential NaBH4-mediated reduction of 1a, resolution of the resulting racemic mixtures and reduction of P-O (Scheme 1a) [32]. In 1999, Matteoli's group achieved a catalytic asymmetric synthesis of Chiraphos via Ru-BINAP catalyzed hydrogenation of 1a. However, the reaction proceeds with harsh reaction conditions (310 h, 100 ℃, 100 atm H2) and afforded Chiraphos in low yield and unsatisfactory selectivity (71% ee, 70% de) (Scheme 1b) [33]. In addition, there are no cases of backbone modify for preparing an array of Chiraphos derivatives in above-mentioned reports, which indeed limits the structure−activity relationship study of Chiraphos and its application in asymmetric catalysis.
On the basis of previous work [34-36], we reported herein a Rhodium catalyzed Hayashi-Miyaura reaction for the efficient synthesis of Chiraphos derivatives (Scheme 1c) [37-42]. Phosphinyl diene 1a and p-bromophenyl boronic acid 2a were selected as the model substrate (Table 1). Originally, the reaction was carried out with a rhodium biphosphine catalyst in the presence of a base. However, the reaction was sluggish even at 100 ℃, while the racemic reaction without a biphosphine ligand proceed smoothly at room temperature. Consequently, a series of diene ligands L1-L6 were tested as an alternative [43-57]. To our delight, all of these ligands could give the desired product in excellent yields and high ee (entries 1-6, 86%-99% yield, 62%-84% ee). Among them, (R,R)-Ph-bod ligand L6 gives the highest enantioselectivity and yield (entry 6, 84% ee and 99% yield). When the weaker base K2CO3 was used instead of NaOH, a slight decrease in enantioselectivity and yield was observed (entry 7, 82% ee and 97% yield). Besides, the screening of solvents indicated that the polarity of the solvent played a key role in determining the enantioselectivity of the reaction (entries 8-11). Generally, the reaction accelerated in polar solvents probably because of better solubility of 1a while provided lower ee. Finally, the enantioselectivity could be further improved at 15 ℃ and gave the product in 80% isolated yield and 87% ee (entry 12).
With the optimized catalytic conditions, we evaluated the scope of the phosphinyl diene substrates (Scheme 2). The stereohindrance of the aryl substituents of the diene substrates could significantly influence the enantioselectivities of the reaction (3a-3e). A tert-butyl group at the para-position would lead to a dramatic decrease in the ee (3d, 15% ee). While the electronic properties have little effect both on the enantioselectivity and reactivity, all of the substrates except 3d could deliver the desired products in comparable yields and ee (64%-89%). Among these examples, 3, 5-dimethyl substituted aryl phosphinyl diene could give the product 3h in highest 89% ee. It is worth noting that substrates with a 2-naphthyl or piperonyl substituents could also afford products 3i and 3j in respective 59%, 56% yields and 78%, 74% ee, thus enabling the synthesis of diversified Chiralphos derivatives. In addition, the bromine atom in the products holds the potential to transform to a series of functional groups by cross coupling reactions.
The reaction scope was then demonstrated with diphenylphosphinyl (4a-4q) as well as 3, 5-dimethyl diphenylphosphinyl (4a'-4r') dienes in the presence of various arylboronic acids (Scheme 3).
A plethora of substituents of the arylboronic acids at para positon were tested. In most cases, products from 4a'-4r' could be obtained with over 80% ee while suffered from lower yields due to inferior reactivities. On the contrary, 4a-4q were obtained in high yields albeit with lower ee. Electron withdrawing substituents of the arylboronic acids at the para position could react smoothly to afford the corresponding products, including halides (4a-4b, 4a'-4b'), ester (4c, 4c'), aldehyde (4d, 4d'), ketone (4e, 4e'), trifluoromethyl (4f, 4f') and nitroso groups (4g'). Phenylboronic acid could also deliver the desired products with both phosphinyl dienes in 81% yield (4h) and 92% ee (4h') respectively. Substrates bearing electron neutral and donating para-methyl, para-tertbutyl and para-methoxyl groups reacted slower, affording the desired products (4i-4k, 4i'-4k') in relatively lower ee (65%-82%). The phenomena that electron-withdrawing arylboronic acid reacts more quickly than electron-rich arylboronic acid, indicated that transmetallation was probably the rate-limiting step. Besides, the absolute configuration of 4h has been unambiguously determined to be R by single-crystal XRD analysis (4h, see Supporting information for details).
Substituents at the meta position of the arlylboronic acids were also tested. All substrates could give the desired products in 67%-85% ee. In addition, 2-naphthyl boronic acid could also give the product in 73% ee, albeit with low yield probably due to the stereohindrance of the naphthyl group. The subtle difference in stereohindrance of the boronic acids has a significant influence both on the reactivity and enantioselectivity of the reaction. During the research, we also found that the phosphinyl dienes also suffered from low reactivity in the reaction, as also seen in prof. Matteoli's paper that harsh reaction conditions were required for the hydrogenation reaction [32].
To investigate the scalability of this reaction, the reaction was carried out at in gram-scale at an elevated temperature (25 ℃) for higher conversion. As a result, the product 4h was obtained in 85% yield and slightly decreased 76% ee (Scheme 4a). However, the ee of 4h could be easily enriched to 97% by recrystallization from EA in 38% yield.
Furthermore, 4h was used as a showcase for facile synthesis of Chiraphos derivative. After extensive study of various reduction conditions, a highly efficient route was developed. As shown in Scheme 4b, the first reduction was performed at the alkene double bond with Crabtree's catalyst specifically providing 5 [58-60] in 94% yield without erosion of ee (97%). The absolute configuration of 5 was unambiguously assigned by single-crystal XRD analysis (5, see Supporting information for details). Subsequently, the second reduction was performed at the P=O with HSiCl3 in the presence of triethylamine [29, 61]. The stable 6 was obtained in one pot with excellent overall yield (90%, two steps), which could give the free disphosphine ligand 7 by removing borane moieties through treating with excess of DABCO [62].
More importantly, in view of the significant role of transition metal catalysis, we successfully evaluated the newly synthesized ligand application in palladium-catalyzed 1,4-addition reaction, this new ligand could give the product 9 with 80% isolated yield and 81% ee (Scheme 4c), which conforming that this kind of modified ligand showed higher enantioselectivity than the parent Chiraphos in the 1,4-addition reaction [31].
In conclusion, a Rh/Ph-bod catalyzed asymmetric addition of aryl boronic acids to phosphinyl dienes has been developed with high yields and good enantioselectivities. The resulting product can be converted to Chiraphos-derivate through a facile route. Moreover, this kind of modified Chiraphos has achieved highly efficient palladium-catalyzed 1,4-addition reactions. Therefore, this strategy enables fine modulating of Chiraphos feasible, and paves a new Chiraphos-based toolbox for transition metal catalyzed asymmetric synthesis. Further investigations toward this field are in progress in our group.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
We are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21901235 and 22071224), the USTC Research Funds of the Double First-Class Initiative (No. YD20600002010), and the Anhui Provincial Natural Science-Foundation (No. 1908085MB34). Q. Zhao thanks the Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen (No. JCYJ20190807155201669) for the support.
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.04.054
References
Less
[1]
T.P. Dang, H.B. Kagan, Chem. Commun. (1971) 481.
[2]
H.B. Kagan, T.P. Dang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 94 (1972) 6429–6433.
[3]
H.B. Kagan, N. Langlois, T.P. Dang, J. Organomet. Chem. 90 (1975) 353–365.
[4]
B.D. Vineyard, W.S. Knowles, M.J. Sabacky, G.L. Bachman, D.J. Weinkauff, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99 (1977) 5946–5952.
[5]
R. Noyori, T. Ohkuma, M. Kitamura, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109 (1987) 5856–5858.
[6]
W. Tang, X. Zhang, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 3029–3070.
[7]
W. Zhang, X. Zhang, Bisphosphacycles–from DuPhos and BPE to a diverse set of broadly applied ligands, in: Q.L. Zhou (Ed. ), Privileged Chiral Ligands and Catalysts, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2011, pp. 55–91.
[8]
M. Dutartre, J. Bayardon, S. Jugé, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016) 5771–5794.
[9]
T. Imamoto, Chem. Rec. 16 (2016) 2659–2673.
[10]
H. Guo, Y.C. Fan, Z. Sun, Y. Wu, O. Kwon, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 10049–10293.
[11]
H. Ni, W.L. Chan, Y. Lu, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 9344–9411.
[12]
G. Xu, C.H. Senanayake, W. Tang, Acc. Chem. Res. 52 (2019) 1101–1112.
[13]
X.H. Kang, C. Qian, H. Yang, et al., Green Synth. Catal. 3 (2022) 185–189.
[14]
R. Mutin, W. Abboud, J.M. Bass, D. Sinou, J. Mol. Catal. 33 (1985) 47–59.
[15]
I. Ojima, N. Clos, C. Bastos, Tetrahedron 45 (1989) 6901–6939.
[16]
R. Kadyrov, T.H. Riermeier, U. Dingerdissen, V. Tararov, A. Börner, J. Org. Chem. 68 (2003) 4067–4070.
[17]
C.J. Scheuermann née Taylor, C. Jaekel, Adv. Synth. Catal. 350 (2008) 2708–2714.
[18]
P. Mauleon, J.C. Carretero, Org. Lett. 6 (2004) 3195–3198.
[19]
T. Nishikata, Y. Yamamoto, N. Miyaura, Chem. Commun. (2004) 1822–1823.
[20]
T. Nishikata, Y. Yamamoto, N. Miyaura, Chem. Lett. 34 (2005) 720–721.
[21]
T. Nishikata, Y. Yamamoto, N. Miyaura, Chem. Lett. 36 (2007) 1442–1443.
[22]
K. Kurihara, N. Sugishita, K. Oshita, et al., J. Organomet. Chem. 692 (2007) 428–435.
[23]
X.Q. Yu, T. Shirai, Y. Yamamoto, N. Miyaura, Chem. Asian J. 6 (2011) 932–937.
[24]
M. Yamaguchi, T. Shima, T. Yamagishi, M. Hida, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2 (1991) 663–666.
[25]
E. Gomez-Bengoa, N.M. Heron, M.T. Didiuk, C.A. Luchaco, A.H. Hoveyda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 7649–7650.
[26]
C. Jaekel, R Paciello, US Patent 7534921, 2006.
[27]
K. Campbell, C.A. Johnson, R. McDonald, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 5967–5971.
[28]
M. Sugiuchi, Y. Shichibu, K. Konishi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 7855–7859.
[29]
M.D. Fryzuk, B. Bosnich, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99 (1977) 6262–6267.
[30]
J. Jansen, B.L. Feringa, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1 (1990) 719–720.
[31]
M. Jin, M. Nakamura, Chem. Lett. 42 (2013) 1035–1037.
[32]
U. Matteoli, V. Beghetto, C. Schiavon, A. Scrivanti, G. Menchi, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 8 (1997) 1403–1409.
[33]
V. Beghetto, U. Matteoli, A. Scrivanti, Chem. Commun. (2000) 155–156.
[34]
V. Hornillos, C. Vila, E. Otten, B.L. Feringa, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 7867–7871.
[35]
W.J. Yue, J.Z. Xiao, S. Zhang, L. Yin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 7057–7062.
[36]
A. Kondoh, Ishikawa S, M. Terada, Org. Biomol. Chem. 18 (2020) 7814–7817.
[37]
M. Sakai, H. Hayashi, N. Miyaura, Organometallics 16 (1997) 4229–4231.
[38]
Y. Takaya, M. Ogasawara, T. Hayashi, M. Sakai, N. Miyaura, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 (1998) 5579–5580.
[39]
T. Hayashi, M. Takahashi, Y. Takaya, M. Ogasawara, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 5052–5058.
[40]
T. Hayashi, K. Yamasaki, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 2829–2844.
[41]
A. Kina, H. Iwamura, T. Hayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 3904–3905.
[42]
N. Lefevre, J.L. Brayer, B. Folléas, S. Darses, Org. Lett. 15 (2013) 4274–4276.
[43]
T. Hayashi, K. Ueyama, N. Tokunaga, K. Yoshida, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125 (2003) 11508–11509.
[44]
R. Shintani, K. Ueyama, I. Yamada, T. Hayashi, Org. Lett. 6 (2004) 3425–3427.
[45]
N. Tokunaga, Y. Otomaru, K. Okamoto, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 13584–13585.
[46]
Y. Otomaru, K. Okamoto, R. Shintani, T. Hayashi, J. Org. Chem. 70 (2005) 2503–2508.
[47]
R. Shintani, T. Kimura, T. Hayashi, Chem. Commun. (2005) 3213–3214.
[48]
R. Shintani, K. Okamoto, T. Hayashi, Org. Lett. 7 (2005) 4757–4759.
[49]
R. Shintani, A. Tsurusaki, K. Okamoto, T. Hayashi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 3909–3912.
[50]
R. Shintani, Y. Ichikawa, T. Hayashi, et al., Org. Lett. 9 (2007) 4643–4645.
[51]
S. Sörgel, N. Tokunaga, K. Sasaki, K. Okamoto, T. Hayashi, Org. Lett. 10 (2008) 589–592.
[52]
R. Shintani, T. Hayashi, Aldrichim. Acta 42 (2009) 31–38.
[53]
C.G. Feng, M.H. Xu, G.Q. Lin, Synlett (2011) 1345–1356.
[54]
S. Abele, R. Inauen, D. Spielvogel, C. Moessner, J. Org. Chem. 77 (2012) 4765–4773.
[55]
M. Nagamoto, T. Nishimura, ACS Catal. 7 (2017) 833–847.
[56]
J.P. Chen, M.H. Xu, Org. Biomol. Chem. 18 (2020) 4569–4574.
[57]
J. -P. Chen, Y. Li, C. Liu, et al., Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 571–577.
[58]
R. Crabtree, Acc. Chem. Res. 12 (1979) 331–337.
[59]
R.H. Crabtree, M.W. Davis, J. Org. Chem. 51 (1986) 2655–2661.
[60]
J.M. Brown, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 26 (1987) 190–203.
[61]
D. Herault, N. Duc Hanh, D. Nuel, G. Buono, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 2508–2528.
[62]
H. Brisset, Y. Gourdel, P. Pellon, M. Lecorre, Tetrahedron Lett. 34 (1993) 4523–4526.
Appendix
Less
Year 2022 volume 33 Issue 12
PDF
61
33
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.04.054
  • Receive Date：2022-02-04
  • Online Date：2025-12-24
  • Published：2022-12-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2022-02-04
  • Revised：2022-04-20
  • Accepted：2022-04-20
Affiliations
    a Department of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China, Heifei 230026, China
    b School of Pharmaceutical Sciences (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518107, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.04.054
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House