Diffusion of adsorbates is the primary means for accomplishing two crucial events required for catalysis: the encounter of different reaction partners to form the reactant complex and the arrival at an active site which provides strong affinity for the active intermediate of the reaction. The PMF surfaces clearly show significant barriers separating different binding sites. The diffusion of CO adsorbate should quite likely follow a typical jumping-among-minima behavior, making an elementary process in surface catalysis. The diffusion kinetics could be obtained based on the calculated free energy barrier in conjunction with TST, likely the most common approach in theoretical catalysis. Moreover, we would like to mention another approach to calculate the diffusion kinetics based on the dynamic protocol proposed here, that is, calculating the diffusion rate constant (
k) directly from the average diffusion time of MD trajectories jumping from one adsorption site to another. Based on adequate sampling, such approach undoubtedly possesses a more accuracy since the intrinsic error of TST can be properly avoided. As mentioned above, definition of a proper region around the local minimum point is necessary for evaluating the thermodynamics for a specified binding site. Similarly, definition of a proper region around the saddle point is necessary for calculating the kinetics. Accordingly, the diffusion barrier can be calculated based on the occupation probability difference of CO adsorbate between the defined TS region and the corresponding local minimum region. The calculated diffusion barriers based on PMF surfaces for CO adsorbate moving from
top to
hcp region were illustrated as gray bars in
Fig. 3a. The corresponding diffusion rate constants (
k) can be further evaluated based on TST and were illustrated as a gray line in
Fig. 3b, noted as the "PMF region + TST" approach. As a comparison, the free energy differences between TS and
top sites displayed on 2-D PMFs were shown as black bars in
Fig. 3a. On the other hand, the diffusion rate constants were calculated directly from the average diffusion time of MD trajectories, and illustrated as a blue line in
Fig. 3b, noted as the "MD" approach. The corresponding diffusion free energy barriers can be backstepped based on TST and illustrated as blue bars in
Fig. 3a, noted as the "MD + TST" approach. Our results showed that the diffusion barriers calculated by the "PMF region" and "MD + TST" approaches both increase with the rise of temperature, in consistent with the variation of relative free energy between
top and
hcp regions with temperature change shown in
Fig. 2a. However, there is significant difference in high temperature limit for the calculated kinetics by these two approaches, which can be mostly attributed to the limitation of TST. As shown in
Fig. 3a and Table S2 (Supporting information), we took the absolute percentage difference (APD) to evaluate the deviation in the backstepped free energy barrier from TST based on the calculated
k by the "MD" approach. As shown, the APD is as high to 30.4% at
T = 900 K, and is showed to reduce along with the decreasing of temperature. When temperature drops below 500 K, the APD is reduced to within 10%. Meanwhile, As shown in
Fig. 3b and Table S2, the deviation of
k based on the free energy barrier and TST was also evaluated. As shown, the TST underestimated the
k by 38.8% at 300 K, and increased dramatically to 184.4% when temperature is raised to 900 K. In contrast, the free energy differences (noted as "PMF point" approach in
Fig. 2a) show an opposite trend with the change of temperature, mainly due to the lack of two in-plane modes considered in free energy calculations. It is also found in
Fig. 3b that, different to TST rates based on PMF barriers, the directly calculated rates from diffusion time of MD trajectories show an obvious non-Arrhenius property, which should be close to the practical motif of an elementary process in heterogeneous catalysis [
76,
77].