Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Ruthenium-modified porous NiCo2O4 nanosheets boost overall water splitting in alkaline solution
收藏切换
PDF
Rui Yanga, Xuezhao Shia, Yanyan Wangb, Jing Jina, Hanwen Liua, Jie Yina, Yong-Qing Zhaoa, Pinxian Xi*, a
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(11) : 4930 - 4935
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(11): 4930-4935
• Communication •
Ruthenium-modified porous NiCo2O4 nanosheets boost overall water splitting in alkaline solution
Full
Rui Yanga, Xuezhao Shia, Yanyan Wangb, Jing Jina, Hanwen Liua, Jie Yina, Yong-Qing Zhaoa, Pinxian Xi*, a
Affiliations
  • a State Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry Frontiers Science Center for Rare Isotopes College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University Lanzhou 730000, China
  • b Lanzhou Jinchuan Advanced Materials Technology Co., Ltd., Jinchang 737100, China
Published: 2022-11-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.058
Outline
收藏切换

Exploring efficient oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) electrocatalysts is crucial for developing water splitting devices. The composition and structure of catalysts are of great importance for catalytic performance. In this work, a heterogeneous Ru modified strategy is engineered to improve the catalytic performance of porous NiCo2O4 nanosheets (NSs). Profiting from favorable elements composition and optimized structure property of decreased charge transfer barrier, more accessible active sites and increased oxygen vacancy concentration, the Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs exhibits excellent OER activity with a low overpotential of 230 mV to reach the current density of 10 mA/cm2 and decent durability. Furthermore, Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs show superior HER activity than the pristine NiCo2O4 NSs, as well. When assembling Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs couple as an alkaline water electrolyzer, a cell voltage of 1.60 V can deliver the current density of 10 mA/cm2. This work provides feasible guidance for improving the catalytic performance of spinel-based oxides.

Ru modification  /  Porous nanosheets  /  Oxygen vacancy  /  Spinel-based oxides  /  Water splitting
Rui Yang, Xuezhao Shi, Yanyan Wang, Jing Jin, Hanwen Liu, Jie Yin, Yong-Qing Zhao, Pinxian Xi. Ruthenium-modified porous NiCo2O4 nanosheets boost overall water splitting in alkaline solution[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022 , 33 (11) : 4930 -4935 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.058
Full Text
Less
Electrocatalytic water splitting is regarded as a technology with great prospects for production of clean hydrogen energy [1-5]. However, there still exist great challenges to fabricate exceedingly efficient catalysts to accelerate the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in alkaline media, due to their sluggish kinetics and unseemly thermodynamics [6-10]. Especially for OER process, it contains complicated multistep proton-coupled electron transfer processes, responsible for a large overpotential [11]. At present, the commonly recognized OER and HER catalysts with prominent performance are Ir-based and Pt-based materials, respectively [12, 13]. But high price and limited reserve of these noble metals restrain their widespread application. Among all kinds of alternative catalysts for expensive materials, spinel-based oxides have gained enormous attention owing to rich element composition, variable valence state and good stability during electrocatalytic process [14-17]. Nevertheless, the electrocatalytic activity of spinel-based oxides without further modulating is still far from people's satisfaction.
Obviously, the catalytic activity of catalysts is highly associated with their elemental composition and structure traits [18, 19] Introducing heteroatoms into substrate materials has been certified a useful strategy to optimize materials' surface property and improve their catalytic performance [20, 21]. A critical point lies in the choice of heteroelement. It has been recorded that Ru has moderate H* and OH* intermediates absorption energy, due to the similar Ru-H bond energy (~65 kcal/mol) with Pt-H bond energy (~70 kcal/mol) and reasonable oxophilic character [22-25]. And the price of Ru is the cheapest among Pt-group metals [26]. Therefore, Ru has great potential to be used in electrocatalytic water splitting realm. For instance, Huang and co-workers reported the synthesis of Ru-doped CoCr LDHs as efficient a OER catalyst due to synergetic charge transfer [27]. Besides, Chen and co-workers designed RuCo nanoalloys catalyst, displaying impressive HER performance, with the overpotential of 28 mV being need to reach the current density of 10 mA/cm2 [26]. More importantly, Qi and co-workers engineered Co MOF by introducing Ru, forming hollow (Ru-Co)Ox compound which can promote overall water splitting performance [28]. In addition, the morphology of catalysts also plays a pivotal role in catalytic process. The two-dimension (2D) nanomaterial with largely exposed surface atoms and edge sites is deemed as an appealing electrocatalyst for water splitting, which is not only in favor of the absorption of reactant species due to its large parts of superficial coordination-unsaturated atoms but also helpful to abridged diffusion path of reactants and products [21, 29, 30]. It has been reported that nanosheets array structure of various catalysts show excellent performance such as NiFe-LDH [21], CoOOH [31] and Co-NiS2 [32]. Inspired by these relevant reports, it may be working to construct 2D spinel-based oxides catalysts integrated with Ru to achieve efficient overall water splitting.
Herein, we synthesized porous NiCo2O4 nanosheets (NSs) arrays coupled with Ru aligned on carbon fiber cloth (CFC) (denoted as Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs) through a facile impregnating method to introduce Ru. The obtained porous Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs features desirable elements composition and favorable structure virtues which showcase higher oxygen vacancy concentration, decreased charge transfer impedance and more accessible active sites. Moreover, the introduction of Ru greatly reduces the activation energy of OER process. Accordingly, Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs manifest superior OER performance with only an overpotential of 230 mV at the current density of 10 mA/cm2 and long-term stability in alkaline media. Furthermore, Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs show superior HER activity than NiCo2O4 NSs counterpart. The integrated alkaline electrolyzer using Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs as bifunctional electrodes materials needs 1.60 V to reach the current density of 10 mA/cm2. And the activity and durability of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs overall water splitting system are both superior to Pt/C||RuO2 system. This work presents a viable guide for developing efficient spinel-based oxides electrocatalysts.
The synthesis of NiCo2O4 NSs refers to the previous report [20]. Firstly, the precursor NiCo-LDH was synthesized by a facile electro-deposition method. 0.1 mol/L Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (20 mL) and 0.1 mol/L Co(NO3)2·6H2O (40 mL) were mixed as electrodeposition electrolyte. A piece of carbon fabric cloth (CFC) was used as electro-deposition substrate. The process was performed at −1 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) for 15 min. After finishing, the final product was rinsed with DI water several times, and then dried in 50 ℃ electro-oven. The NiCo2O4 NSs were obtained by calcining NiCo-LDH at 300 ℃ for 2 h with the heating rate (2 ℃/min) in air atmosphere. Then, the Ru-NiCo2O4 was synthesized by impregnating NiCo2O4 NSs in RuCl3 solution (10 mg/mL) for 20 min, then dried in 50 ℃ electro-oven and further annealed at 300 ℃ for 2 h in air atmosphere.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement was conducted on Rigaku MiniFlex 600 diffractometer from 10° to 90° under a constant voltage of 40 kV and constant current of 15 mA. The morphology characterization was obtained by ThermoFisher Apreo S filed-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) with a voltage of 30 kV. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) and EDS mapping pictures of samples was collected on a Tecnai G2 F30 filed emission transmission electron microscopy. Raman spectra were measured on a Horiba LabRAM HR Evolution spectrophotometer with a laser line of 532 nm. Electron spin resonance (ESR) experiments were made on JES-FA300 electron spin resonance spectrometer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed by a VG ESCALAB 220I-XL device. The data were corrected using C 1s line as standard. Ultraviolet photoelectron spectrometer (UPS) was conducted on Kratos Axis Supra device. The contact angle test was carried out on a Kruss DSA100 optical contact angle/surface tension meter.
Electrochemical measurements were performed on CHI 760E electrochemical workstation (Shanghai Chenhua Instrument Corp., China) with a standard three-electrode configuration, with Pt plate and Hg/HgO as counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively, for OER test. While for HER test, the counter electrode was changed to a carbon rod. The catalysts grown on CFC were used as working electrodes directly. 1.0 mol/L KOH solution was used as electrolyte and Linear scan voltammogram (LSV) curves were carried out at a scan rate of 2 mV/s. All the electrode potential was converted to the reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), using the equation ERHE = EHg/HgO + 0.0591 × pH + 0.098 V.
Scheme 1 illustrates the synthesis procedure of catalysts. At first, the phases of samples obtained were analyzed by the X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique. Fig. 1a shows that the diffraction peaks of the pristine NiCo2O4 NSs can well match with cubic NiCo2O4 (JCPDS No. 20–781, space group F*3). And the Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs possess similar diffraction patterns with the pristine NiCo2O4 NSs without related Ru oxides phase being detected, implying Ru was doped successfully in NiCo2O4 NSs preliminarily. As shown in Fig. 1b and Fig. S1a (Supporting information), the original NiCo2O4 NSs presents interlaced nanosheets morphology grown on CFC characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM). From the transmission electron microscope (TEM) image (Fig. 1c), it can be detected that the nanosheets present porous property. It can be seen from Figs. 1d and e and Fig. S1b (Supporting information), the Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs exhibit similar morphology feature with the pristine NiCo2O4 NSs, declaring the introducing of Ru does not ruin porous nanosheets structure of NiCo2O4 NSs. It has been documented that porous structure is in favor of accelerating mass transfer process and enhancing the accessibility of active sites [33-35]. Furthermore, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs exhibits lattice spacing of 0.24 nm, which can be assigned to (311) plane of NiCo2O4 (Fig. 1f). The high-angle annular dark-field scanning TEM image (Fig. 1g) and TEM energy-dispersive spectra (EDS) mapping images (Fig. 1h) show the uniform distribution of Ru, Ni, Co and O in the checked region. Furthermore, Fig. 1i presents the crystal structure of NiCo2O4.
Moreover, the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Ultraviolet photoelectron spectrometer (UPS), Raman spectra and electron spin-resonance spectroscopy (ESR) were carried out to further probe the structural information of catalysts obtained. As shown in XPS survey spectrums of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs and NiCo2O4 NSs (Fig. S2 in Supporting information), the Ru 3p signal lays in Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs, while it does not appear in NiCo2O4 NSs, confirming Ru was introduced into NiCo2O4 NSs matrix successfully, which is consistent with the TEM-EDS result. The high-resolution O1s XPS spectra (Fig. 2a) can be deconvoluted into three parts: lattice oxygen, oxygen vacancy, or hydroxyl group and absorbed oxygen from low binding energy to high binding energy in sequence [36, 37] Compared with NiCo2O4 NSs, the binding energy of O 1s XPS spectra for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs positively shifts ~0.2 eV, exhibiting a slight electron-deficiency O state. Furthermore, the binding energy of Ru 3p3/2 in Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs is 463.7 eV (Fig. 2b), which is located between the reference samples RuCl3 (Ru3+) and RuO2 (Ru4+), implying that the average valence state of Ru is between +3 and +4 in Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs [27, 38]. Besides, there is no distinct difference between NiCo2O4 NSs and Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs concerning Co and Ni 2p XPS spectra, affirming the preservation of NiCo2O4 phase after Ru modification (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). In addition, the UPS was conducted to probe dynamics of electrons on the surface of the as-prepared catalysts [39]. As shown in Fig. 2c, the Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs and NiCo2O4 NSs exhibit different secondary electron cutoff energy with 16.34 eV for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs and 16.22 eV for NiCo2O4 NSs and thus the corresponding work function are 4.88 eV and 5.00 eV for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs and NiCo2O4 NSs, respectively. The smaller work function indicates that Ru modulation facilitates the electronic properties of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs, which is contributed to enhancing catalytic activity [40]. Besides, Raman as a surface-sensitive spectrum technology was further applied to gain insights into NiCo2O4 NSs before and after Ru modification. As shown in Fig. 2d, the Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs showcases similar spectra patterns with the pristine NiCo2O4 NSs except for a slight blue shift, which is due to the doping of Ru. Furthermore, the Raman spectra of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs exhibit different spectra feature compared with RuO2 (Fig. S4 in Supporting information), which implies the Ru may exist as a highly dispersed state in NiCo2O4 NSs substrate and further indicating that Ru are doped into NiCo2O4 NSs successfully. Moreover, ESR spectra were conducted to investigate the change of oxygen vacancy. From Fig. 2e, it can be seen that Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs owns a stronger ESR signal originating from the electron trapped at oxygen vacancies than that of NiCo2O4 counterpart [41, 42]. Therefore, we can deduce that the Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs possess more oxygen vacancies than NiCo2O4 NSs, which is helpful to facilitate water dissociation [43]. Furthermore, the excellent hydrophilicity feature of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs supported on CFC enables the easy accessibility of reactants and fast release of product molecules, thus accelerating catalytic process (Fig. 2f, the inset shows the contact angle of bare CFC) [44].
The electrocatalytic performance of catalysts prepared was evaluated by a standard three-electrode configuration using 1.0 mol/L KOH as electrolyte. Linear scan voltammogram (LSV) curves of OER (Fig. 3a) show that the required overpotentials for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs, NiCo2O4 NSs and RuO2 to reach the current density of 10 mA/cm2 are 230 mV, 340 mV and 329 mV, respectively, manifesting excellent OER activity of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs. Furthermore, the Fig. 3b illustrates Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs possesses a small Tafel slope (79 mV/dec) lower than that of NiCo2O4 NSs (95 mV/dec) and RuO2 (82 mV/dec) counterparts, indicating the accelerated OER kinetic for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs. Besides, the stability is also a vital aspect for assessing the performance of catalysts. From Fig. 3g (green line), it can be seen that Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs show nearly no activity decay in the period of 42 h OER test. To gain the insights about the origin of activity, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs and NiCo2O4 NSs were collected to investigate charge transfer ability. As shown in Fig. 3c, Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs exhibits a smaller radius than that of NiCo2O4 NSs counterpart, implying a lower charge transfer (Rct) impedance of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs for OER process, which is conducive to improving OER performance [45]. In addition, electrochemical double-layer capacitance (Cdl) was tested to access the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) of the as-prepared catalysts (Fig. S5 in Supporting information) [46]. The value of Cdl for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs and NiCo2O4 NSs are 278 mF/cm2 and 200 mF/cm2 (Fig. 3h), respectively, suggesting the larger ECSA of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs. The larger ECSA manifests more accessible active sites on Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs surface in catalytic process, thus boosting OER performance. Moreover, LSV curves at various temperature for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs and NiCo2O4 NSs were analyzed to evaluate apparent kinetic barriers in OER process. Extended the obtained Arrhenius plots to the OER thermodynamic equilibrium potential, the value of apparent activation energy (Ea) can be obtained [47, 48]. As illustrated in Fig. S6 (Supporting information), the value of Ea of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs is 26.6 kJ/mol while the Ea of NiCo2O4 NSs is 45.9 kJ/mol, implying Ru modification availably decrease Ea for OER course.
Due to the similar Ru-H bond energy to Pt-H bond energy [22], the HER performance of NiCo2O4 NSs after Ru modification may also be improved. As shown in LSV curves of HER (Fig. 3d), an overpotential of 313 mV is needed for NiCo2O4 NSs to reach current density of 10 mA/cm2, while the value decreases to 117 mV for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs. The Tafel slopes are analyzed to be 88 mV/dec and 97 mV/dec for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs and NiCo2O4 NSs, respectively (Fig. 3e), declaring a more favorable HER kinetics for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs. Regarding long-time stability, the chronopotentiometry test shows no obvious activity degradation of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs after 42 h (Fig. 3g, blue line). Furthermore, EIS plots were collected to assess charge transfer feature of materials between electrode and electrolyte interface. As illustrated in Fig. 3f, the Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs possess a smaller Rct than that of NiCo2O4 NSs, manifesting that Ru modification accelerates charge transfer in HER process, thus promoting HER activity. Fig. 3i displays a larger Cdl for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs (21.3 mF/cm2) than NiCo2O4 NSs (2.2 mF/cm2) based on CVs test (Fig. S7 in Supporting information), thereby a larger ECSA of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs for HER catalysis, which is also favorable to promote HER performance.
In situ Raman spectra characterization analysis was performed to reveal changes on Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs electrodes during the OER and HER processes. The peak located at ~470 cm−1 and ~670 cm−1 are attributed to Eg phonon modes and A1g phonon modes of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs, respectively (Fig. 4). Potentials from open circuit voltage (OCV) to 1.6 V vs. RHE were applied for OER in suit Raman measurements. The corresponding spectra result are shown in Fig. 4a, characteristic peaks associated with Eg and A1g phonon modes exhibits no differentiable variation, implying good stability of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs in OER process. For HER, we applied potential from OCV to −0.25 V vs. RHE. The corresponding spectra (Fig. 4b) obtained also show no obvious change, manifesting good HER stability of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs. Besides, SEM characterization was conducted to probe the change of morphology of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs after OER and HER. As shown in Fig. S8 (Supporting information), the morphology of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs after OER and HER remains nanosheets structure. All evidences illustrate the good stability of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs.
Based on the enhanced OER and HER performance of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs, the overall water-splitting performance was assessed by utilizing Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs as both anode and cathode catalysts in 1.0 mol/L KOH solution. Fig. 5a illustrates the configuration of overall water splitting device. Fig. 5b showcases the LSV curves of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs for the overall water splitting at various temperatures (25, 45 and 65 ℃). A cell voltage of 1.60 V was needed to reach the current density of 10 mA/cm2 at 25 ℃ for Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs couple, which is lower than that of Pt/C||RuO2 set (1.64 V) (Fig. 5c). The overall water splitting performance of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs system can be further improve by increasing temperature. As exhibited in Fig. 5d, cell voltages needed to obtain the current density of 10 mA/cm2 at 45 ℃ and 65 ℃ are 1.54 V and 1.49 V, respectively. In addition, Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs set displays good stability on a long-time testing at different current densities 10, 20, 40, 80 mA/cm2 (Fig. 5e), while for Pt/C||RuO2 system, the cell voltages enlarge constantly over time (Fig. 5f). All the results verify Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs can be used as efficient overall water splitting catalysts.
In summary, the porous NiCo2O4 NSs integrated with Ru through a facile impregnation method is devised. The obtained Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs catalysts exhibit superior OER activity with a low overpotential of 230 mV at 10 mA/cm2, the enhanced HER activity and robust stability. The promotion of catalytic performance of Ru-NiCo2O4 NSs can be attributed to the low charge transfer impedance, more accessible active sites and higher oxygen vacancy concentration. Experimental results demonstrate that the introduction of Ru efficiently regulates the surface structure property of NiCo2O4 NSs. The optimized components and structural advantages facilitate synergistically OER and HER process. This work presents a practicable strategy for improving the catalytic performance of spine-based oxides for both OER and HER.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
We acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21922105 and 21931001), the National Key R & D Program of China (2021YFA1501101) as well as the Special Fund Project of Guiding Scientific and Technological Innovation Development of Gansu Province (No. 2019ZX-04) and the 111 Project (No. B20027). We also acknowledge support by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. lzujbky-2021-pd04, lzujbky-2021-sp41, lzujbky-2021-it12 and lzujbky-2021-37). J. Yin acknowledges the support of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2021M691375) and the China National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (No. BX20200157).
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.058
References
Less
[1]
Z.W. Seh, J. Kibsgaard, C.F. Dickens, et al., Science 355 (2017) eaad4998.
[2]
I. Roger, M.A. Shipman, M.D. Symes, et al., Nat. Rev. Chem. 1 (2017) 0003.
[3]
H. Sun, L. Chen, Y. Lian, et al., Adv. Mater. 32 (2020) 2006784.
[4]
J. Cao, C. Lei, J. Yang, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 6 (2018) 18877.
[5]
K. Wang, Wang X, Li Z, et al., Nano Energy 77 (2020) 105162.
[6]
L. An, J. Feng, Y. Zhang, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 (2019) 1805298.
[7]
L. Wang, Z. Li, K. Wang, et al., Nano Energy 74 (2020) 104850.
[8]
C. Lei, S. Lyu, J. Si, et al., ChemCatChem 11 (2019) 5855–5874.
[9]
F. Cheng, L. Wang, H. Wang, et al., Nano Energy 71 (2020) 104621.
[10]
C. Liu, J. Qian, Y. Ye, et al., Nat. Catal. 4 (2021) 36–45.
[11]
S.L. Zhang, B.Y. Guan, X.F. Lu, et al., Adv. Mater. 32 (2020) 2002235.
[12]
T. Wu, S. Sheng, J. Song, et al., Nat Catal. 2 (2019) 763–772.
[13]
J. Kim, H. Jung, S.M. Jung, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 1399–1408.
[14]
Q. Zhao, Z. Yan, C. Chen, et al., Chem. Rev. 117 (2017) 10121–10211.
[15]
J. Li, D. Chu, H. Dong, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 50–54.
[16]
J. Bao, X. Zhang, B. Fan, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 7399–7404.
[17]
Y. Sun, H. Liao, J. Wang, et al., Nat Catal. 3 (2020) 554–563.
[18]
Y. Duan, J.Y. Lee, S. Xi, et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 7418–7425.
[19]
Y. Wen, P. Chen, L. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 6482–6490.
[20]
J. Yin, J. Jin, M. Lu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 18378–18386.
[21]
R. Yang, L. An, Y. Zhang, et al., ChemCatChem 11 (2019) 6002–6007.
[22]
J. Yang, B. Chen, X. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 9495–9500.
[23]
X. Wang, Y. Zheng, W. Sheng, et al., Mater. Today 36 (2020) 125–138.
[24]
X. Liu, F. Liu, J. Yu, et al., Adv. Sci. 7 (2020) 2001526.
[25]
S.Y. Bae, J. Mahmood, I.Y. Jeon, et al., Nanoscale Horiz. 5 (2020) 43–56.
[26]
J. Su, Y. Yang, G. Xia, et al., Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 14969.
[27]
C. Dong, X. Zhang, J. Xu, et al., Small 16 (2020) 1905328.
[28]
C. Wang, L. Qin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 17219–17224.
[29]
S. Jiang, R. Zhang, H. Liu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 6461–6466.
[30]
Q. Lu, Y. Yu, Q. Ma, et al., Adv. Mater. 28 (2016) 1917–1933.
[31]
S.H. Ye, Z.X. Shi, J.X. Feng, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 2672–2676.
[32]
J. Yin, J. Jin, H. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 18676–18682.
[33]
Y. Gu, A. Wu, Y. Jiao, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 6673–6681.
[34]
J. Yin, J. Jin, H. Liu, et al., Adv. Mater. 32 (2020) 2001651.
[35]
T.X. Nguyen, Y.C. Liao, C.C. Lin, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 (2021) 2101632.
[36]
T. Zhao, X. Shen, Y. Wang, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 (2021) 2100614.
[37]
J. Gao, C.Q. Xu, S.F. Hung, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 3014–3023.
[38]
D.J. Morgan, Surface Interf. Anal. 47 (2015) 1072–1079.
[39]
J. Yang, C. Wang, H. Ju, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 (2017) 1703864.
[40]
Y. Duan, Z.Y. Yu, S.J. Hu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 15772–15777.
[41]
F. Lei, Y. Sun, K. Liu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 6826–6829.
[42]
Y. Li, M. Wen, Y. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 910–916.
[43]
T. Ling, D.Y. Yan, H. Wang, et al., Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1509.
[44]
J. Deng, H. Li, S. Wang, et al., Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 14430.
[45]
X. Ren, C. Wei, Y. Sun, et al., Adv. Mater. 32 (2020) 2001292.
[46]
L. Zhang, W. Cai, N. Bao, et al., Adv. Mater. 33 (2021) 2100745.
[47]
Y. Shi, J. Wang, C. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 7365–7370.
[48]
Y. Guo, Y. Tong, P. Chen, et al., Adv. Mater. 27 (2015) 5989–5994.
Appendix
Less
Year 2022 volume 33 Issue 11
PDF
56
32
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.058
  • Receive Date：2021-08-30
  • Online Date：2025-12-24
  • Published：2022-11-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2021-08-30
  • Revised：2021-12-17
  • Accepted：2021-12-22
Affiliations
    a State Key Laboratory of Applied Organic Chemistry Frontiers Science Center for Rare Isotopes College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University Lanzhou 730000, China
    b Lanzhou Jinchuan Advanced Materials Technology Co., Ltd., Jinchang 737100, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.058
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House