To probe the molecular packing modality in coassemblies and selective self-sorting behaviors, powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was employed (
Fig. 5 and Fig. S5 in Supporting information). PGly individual aggregate show sharp XRD pattern, originating from the crystallization-induced self-assembly process (
Fig. 5a). The coassemly in water possesses very similar patterns to the pristine self-assembly. However, magnified pattern suggests slight shifts. For example, peaks at 8.55, 9.44, 10.40 and 15.95 shift to 8.48, 9.29, 10.21 and 15.75° respectively. The shift values are relatively small (around ± 0.2°), which is beyond instrumental system errors. Such shifts of diffraction peaks indicate the remaining of individual assemblies with intercalated TCNB. This mode as illustrated in
Fig. 5g (Packing Ⅰ) is reminiscent of heterojunction structure or block copolymers. The aggregated segments inserted into the packing arrays of Fmoc-amino acids, which triggers the small shift of diffraction peaks. In comparison, HP coassembly can be assigned as the second packing mode (Ⅱ,
Fig. 5g). HP individually form lamellar structure due to the d-spacing ratios. However, the addition of TCNB induces the disappearance of pristine peaks with the appearance of new peaks (
Fig. 5b). This pattern clearly evidences the formation of new phase without any individual assemblies of HP. In this packing modality, alternative packing of Fmoc-amino acids and TCNB is highly expected based on the previous reports and cocrystal profiles [
30]. Besides, there is an example which contains both Packing Ⅰ and Packing Ⅱ modalities. A typical case can be found in Ile-coassembly (
Fig. 5c). Coassembly owns a new emerged peak at 6.13° while other peaks are retained at their original location with slight shifts. The XRD patterns of PGly, HP and Ile-are in good consistence with the CT emission shown in
Fig. 1. Other several examples can be found in Supporting information. Among the applied Fmoc-amino acids, there are five examples which could not form CT emission with TCNB. We also used XRD to analyze their binding behaviors (
Figs. 5d-
f and Fig. S5). In two typical cases, Ser-and Tyr (
Figs. 5d and
e) with additional hydroxyl group possess better solubility in water compared to other Fmoc-amino acids. The presence of TCNB would interfere the self-assembly process of Tyr-and Ser. The mixtures only show XRD patterns of TCNB without any shifts, indicating that only TCNB aggregated and Ser/Tyr-remain in a supersaturation state without aggregation. In another typical example (
Fig. 5f), NV/TCNB mixture contains almost complete original XRD patterns. The final XRD pattern is an overlap of NV and TCNB individually, suggesting a self-sorting process, which is assigned as the Packing Ⅲ mode (
Fig. 5g). We further carried out Job's plot characterization. As shown in the Fig. S8, Val/TCNB mixture in DMSO [total concentration = 10 mmol/L] with different molar ratio displays a binding ratio of 1:2. It means that in pure solution, two TCNB molecules bind one Fmoc-group
via a sandwich-like complexation mode. This stoichiometry is different to the solid-state probed by the X-ray structure, where an alternative packing presents.