Mechanistic investigation of zwitterionic MOF-catalyzed enyne annulation using UNLPF-14-Mn<sup>III</sup> as catalyst

Mechanistic investigation of zwitterionic MOF-catalyzed enyne annulation using UNLPF-14-Mn^III as catalyst

PDF

Taotao Liu^a^,^b^,^c, Ruihong Duan^a, Yanyan Wang^a, Shijun Li^a, Lingbo Qu^a, Jinshuai Song^*^,^a, Qiang Liu^*^,^b, Yu Lan^*^,^a^,^d

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(9) : 4281 - 4286

Less

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(9): 4281-4286

• Communication •

Mechanistic investigation of zwitterionic MOF-catalyzed enyne annulation using UNLPF-14-Mn^III as catalyst

Full

Taotao Liu^a^,^b^,^c, Ruihong Duan^a, Yanyan Wang^a, Shijun Li^a, Lingbo Qu^a, Jinshuai Song^*^,^a, Qiang Liu^*^,^b, Yu Lan^*^,^a^,^d

Affiliations

^aGreen Catalysis Center, and College of Chemistry, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China

^bCenter of Basic Molecular Science (CBMS), Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

^cCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453000, China

^dSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Chongqing Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China

Published: 2022-09-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.041

Outline

Abstract

Less

Hybrid quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics calculations were performed to elucidate how [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺X⁻-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) catalyze the [2 + 1] cycloisomerization of enynes and why zwitterionic MOFs exhibit strong activity in Lewis acid catalysis. The calculations showed that zwitterionic MOFs have a "pure cationic active center" leading to a concerted nucleophilic attack pathway with lower barriers. In contrast, metals with coordinating anions have reduced electrophilicity, resulting in a stepwise radical-type pathway with much higher barriers. Further calculations showed the nature of catalysis was strongly depended on the charge on the anion ligand. A good linear relationship between the NPA charge and barrier was found, and verified by 73 anions with small derivations, which presents a universal adaptive character for various coordinated anions.

Key words

ONIOM QM/MM / Zwitterionic MOF / [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺X⁻ / Enyne annulation / Mechanism / Anion effect

Cite this Article

Taotao Liu, Ruihong Duan, Yanyan Wang, Shijun Li, Lingbo Qu, Jinshuai Song, Qiang Liu, Yu Lan. Mechanistic investigation of zwitterionic MOF-catalyzed enyne annulation using UNLPF-14-Mn^III as catalyst[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022 , 33 (9) : 4281 -4286 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.041

Full Text

Less

Transition-metal catalysis is a powerful tool for the sustainable development of organic synthesis [1], and has been widely used in pharmaceutical [2], materials [3], life sciences [4], and other fields [5]. In transition-metal catalysis, as the metal center is usually in a positive oxidative state, electrophilicity is often exhibited. Therefore, the charge density of the central metal atom often affects the catalytic activity. In homogeneous transition-metal catalysis, the type of counterion usually plays a vital role in determining the strength of interaction with the central metal atom, and will affect its charge distribution [6, 7]. Generally, strongly coordinating anions (SCAs), such as Cl⁻ and OAc⁻, are widely used owing to their ready availability [8, 9]. Although less common, weakly coordinating anions (WCAs, such as PF₆⁻, BF₄⁻ and SbF₆⁻), which have larger volumes or stronger electron attracting effects, can be employed as counter anions in complexes to enhance the positive charge of the cationic metal center [10-12]. This strategy can be used to obtain a more positively charged transition-metal center for further transformations by binding with nucleophilic substrates. Furthermore, the use of zwitterionic metal complexes, which, instead of a common anion, contain a negatively charged ancillary ligand covalently bonded to the cationic metal fragment to achieve formal separation of the positive and negative charges, is an attractive alternative approach. These zwitterionic metal complexes with neutral internal charge and tunable electrophilicity have proven to be promising catalysts for various organic reactions, and are considered effective alternatives to the corresponding complexes with WCAs [13, 14]. However, electrostatic interaction between two zwitterionic molecules in the reaction system, which is difficult to be avoid in homogeneous catalysis (Scheme 1), would significantly reduce the catalytic activity [15]. Furthermore, difficulties in the synthesis and recycling of zwitterionic metal complexes restrict their further application. Therefore, the design of zwitterionic catalysts that can realize the separation and fixation of anions and cations, and be prepared via simple synthetic steps and recycled by simple post-processing operations are needed for further catalytic studies and practical applications.

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are emerging as excellent catalyst platforms owing to their tunable structure, high porosity, and crystalline properties [16-20]. Benefitting from a bottom-up synthesis strategy, both vital structural components of MOFs, namely, organic linkers and inorganic secondary building units (SBUs), can be synthesized with either net-positive or net-negative charge. Furthermore, MOFs prepared by the assembly of cationic organometallic complex-based organic linkers with anionic inorganic SBUs can be considered potential heterogeneous zwitterionic catalyst candidates [21, 22]. It is foreseeable that such zwitterionic MOFs poccess enhanced electrophilicity because the anionic SBUs have no coordination effect with the cationic metal center in the organic linker. More importantly, the strategy can avoid the electrostatic interactions between two zwitterionic molecules in the reaction system, which is difficult to avoid in molecular zwitterionic transition-metal complexes catalysis (Scheme 1a), would significantly increase the catalytic activity.

Recently, Zhang reported a synthesis of zwitterionic MOFs (UNLPF-14-Mn^III, Scheme 1b) composed of cationic [M^IIIporphyrin]⁺ (M = Mn, Fe) linkers and anionic SBUs ([In(RCO₂)₄]⁻, Scheme 1c), which showed considerable catalytic activity in the [3 + 2] cycloaddition of aziridines and alkenes, [4 + 2] hetero-Diels–Alder cycloaddition of aldehydes with dienes, and [2 + 1] cycloisomerization of enynes (Scheme 1d). In comparison, the corresponding catalytic activity of another MOF comprising neutral [M^IIIporphyrin]⁺X⁻ (X⁻ = SbF₆⁻, BF₄⁻, Cl⁻) linkers and neutral Zr₆(μ₃—OH)₄(OH)₄(COO)₁₂ SBUs and their corresponding molecular catalysts was significantly lower [23]. For [2 + 1] cycloisomerization of enynes, zwitterionic MOF UNLPF-14-Mn^III showed the highest catalytic activity (95% yield and 99% selectivity for target product in 8 h), MOF PCN-223-Mn^III[SbF₆] with WCAs gave moderate catalytic activity (63% yield and 67% selectivity for target product in 24 h), and almost no reaction was observed when MOF PCN-223-Mn^IIICl with SCAs was used as catalyst.

As part of a continuing effort to gain indepth knowledge of zwitterionic MOF, we intend to reveal the reason of its high catalytic activity using DFT method. In our opinion, the "pure cationic active center" obtaining from charge separation would contribute to high catalytic performance. We think the "pure cationic active center" can reduce the activation energy of nucleophilic attack and lead to concerted nucleophilic attack pathway.

MOFs exhibit remarkably complicated connectivity and high dimensionality in their structures. Therefore, hybrid quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations or multiscale models would be necessary for the theoretical investigation of MOF catalysis [24-27]. Although QM/MM calculations [28] have more commonly been applied to the computational study of enzymes catalysis, they have great potential for application to the theoretical study of MOF catalysis, despite this being rare [29-32].

Herein, the [2 + 1] cycloisomerization of 1, 6-enynescatalyzed by MOFs containing [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺X⁻ (X⁻ = none, SbF₆⁻, Cl⁻) was selected as the model reaction for theoretical calculations.

Reported crystal structures for UNLPF-14-Mn^III, PCN-223-Mn^III[SbF₆], and PCN-223-Mn^IIICl were used to build QM/MM calculation models (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1 in Supporting information for UNLPF-14-Mn^III; Figs. S2 and S3 in Supporting information for PCN-223-Mn^III[SbF₆] and PCN-223-Mn^IIICl, respectively). One [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺X⁻ (X⁻ = none, SbF₆⁻, Cl⁻) unit was selected in the QM regions. The MM region of UNLPF-14-Mn^III contained eight [In(RCO₂)₄]⁻ SBUs and eight [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺linkers to balance charge. To balence the distortion of [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺X⁻ (X⁻ = none) in the reaction pathway, a complete organic ligand, which contains the QM region, together with parts of MM region-eight adjacent In(RCO₂)₃ atomic groups, were set as active atoms during geometry optimization, while all remaining atoms were kept fixed. Correspondingly, for PCN-223-Mn^III[SbF₆] and PCN-223-Mn^IIICl in catalytic cycles, QM regions containing organic ligands were set as active atoms during geometry optimization, while all remaining atoms were kept fixed. QM/MM calculations were conducted using the ONIOM method [33, 34] implemented in Gaussian 16 [35] with G09 default key word. The B3LYP [36-38] hybrid functional with D3BJ [39] dispersion correction cooperated with def2-SVP [40] basis set was used for QM calculations, and the universal force field (UFF) [41] was used for MM calculations. Furthermore, the charge equilibration method (QEq) was used to calculate the potential charge on the MM region atoms, and the electronic embedding scheme was used to deal with electrostatic interactions between QM and MM regions. The def2-TZVPP basis set with the same density functional was used for single-pointenergy calculations to provide more accurate relative energies.

Scheme 2 shows the proposed mechanism, containing two possible pathways, of the MOF-catalyzed [2 + 1] cycloisomerization of 1, 6-enynes, where [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺X⁻ was considered as the active center. The catalytic cycleis initiated by coordination of the enyne substrate to Mn^III, affording intermediate 1 with a metal-activated alkyne. In pathway A, the alkyne moiety is considered to be activated by the cationic metal, facilitating intramolecular nucleophilic attack by the alkene moiety to achieve [2 + 1] cycloaddition through a concerted process, affording [4.1.0]-bicyclic intermediate 3 bearing a Mn–carbene moiety. Alternatively, Mn also exhibited high-spin character, allowing the coordinated alkyne moiety to react with the alkene moiety through a radical-type addition to afford radical intermediate 2. A sequential radical coupling then provides the same intermediate 3. In either pathway, the subsequent 1, 2-hydride shift of complex 3 yields a [4.1.0]-bicyclic enamine product with regeneration of a Mn^III species. Pathway A is a much simpler process than pathway B, involving the direct conversion of intermediate 1 to intermediate 3.

Commutated free energy profiles for the catalytic cycle of UNLPF-14-Mn^III-catalyzed [2 + 1] cycloisomerization of 1, 6-enynes are shown in Fig. 2, in which the real MOF catalyst was considered using the aforementioned QM/MM method. Enyne coordination to UNLPF-14-Mn^III forms intermediate 1, which has a relative energy set to zero in the free energy profiles. The alkyne moiety can be activated by coordination to the Mn^III center. Therefore, 6-endo cyclizationcanoccur by nucleophilic attack via transition state 2-ts, with an activation energy of 16.9 kcal/mol, affording [4.1.0]-bicyclic ring intermediate 3, with a relative energy only 5.9 kcal/mol higher than that of intermediate 1. In this process, two C–C bonds are formed simultaneously without any intermediates. A rapid 1, 2-hydride shift then occurs via transition state 4-ts, with an energy barrier of only 1.5 kcal/mol. Subsequently, an enamine-coordinated Mn^III MOF is formed irreversibly in an exothermic process (34.4 kcal/mol). Finally, the free enamine target product is released from the metal center by coordination with a new substrate, affording a new intermediate 1 for the next catalytic cycle. QM/MM calculations clearly indicated that the rate-determining step was 6-endo nucleophilic attack of the alkene moiety in the metal-activated alkyne. Therefore, the electron density of the metal center plays a critical role in determining the reactivity. Accordingly, the activation energy of 6-endo nucleophilic attack using PCN-223-Mn^III[SbF₆] or PCN-223-Mn^IIICl-type MOF catalysts was also studied theoretically. QM/MM calculation results (Fig. 2) showed that, when PCN-223-Mn^III[SbF₆] was used as catalyst, the calculated activation energy for the first 6-endo nucleophilic attack was 27.3 kcal/mol, which was 10.4 kcal/mol higher than that using UNLPF-14-Mn^III as catalyst. Interestingly, a stepwise process was observed in this case. Radical intermediate 8 was observed, with a relative free energy 1.4 kcal/mol lower than that of transition state 7-ts. Meanwhile, the formation of intermediate 10 occurred via radical-coupling transition state 9-ts with a free energy barrier of 1.7 kcal/mol. Geometry information for transition state 7-ts clearly showed that the WCA ([SbF₆]⁻) was close to Mn, which would partially decrease the positive charge of Mn, leading to lower catalytical activity in an ionic pathway. Furthermore, when a PCN-223-Mn^IIICl-type MOF with SCA Cl⁻ was used, the calculated activation energy further increased to 37.3 kcal/mol (Fig. 2). A radical intermediate was also found in a stepwise [2 + 1] cycloaddition process. The high activation energy and stepwise process was attributed to the SCA (Cl⁻) further decreasing the positive charge of Mn, which is unfavorable for alkyne activation. The computational results for the catalytic abilities of various MOFs were consistent with the experimental observations reported by the Zhang group.

To further understand the reactivity of zwitterionic MOF-catalyzed [2 + 1] cycloisomerization of 1, 6-enynes, the catalytic active species comprising [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ was extracted and selected as a model catalyst for QM calculations using the B3LYP-D3BJ/def2-SVP method, as shown in Fig. 3. Furthermore, the def2-TZVPP basis set with B3LYP-D3BJ/PCM approach was used for single-pointenergy calculations. [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ catalysts with WCA [SbF₆]⁻ and SCA Cl⁻ were also selected to explore and compare the catalytic activity. QM calculations found that, when [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ was used as catalyst, the activation energy for the first 6-endo cyclization was 16.9 kcal/mol via transition state 21-ts, affording a carbocation intermediate 22. This intermediate then undergoes a barrierless process via transition state 23-ts to achieve [2 + 1] cycloaddition. The entire [2 + 1] cycloaddition can be considered a quasi-concerted process. A 1, 2-hydride shift via transition state 25-ts can then result in enamine-coordinated Mn^III species 26. The QM-calculated activation energy for 6-endo cyclization using the [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ model catalyst (16.9 kcal/mol) was close to that of UNLPF-14-Mn^III MOF catalyst obtained using the QM/MM method. Therefore, the active center was considered a free cationic species [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ when UNLPF-14-Mn^III MOF was used as catalyst. To further elucidate the coordinated anion effect, [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ catalysts with WCA [SbF₆]⁻ and SCA Cl⁻ were also considered by QM calculations, giving calculated activation energies for 6-endo cyclization of 25.4 and 33.0 kcal/mol, respectively. DFT calculations also clearly showed that a stepwise process occurred in both cases. These results were consistent with the cases using PCN-223-Mn^III[SbF₆] or PCN-223-Mn^IIICl MOFs as catalyst.

Both QM and QM/MM results highlighted the high catalytic efficiency of zwitterionic MOFs or [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ complex-catalyzed [2 + 1] cycloisomerization reactions. Based on these results, we want to reveal the advantage of zwitterionic MOFs by explaining the reason of its lowest energy barrier of transition state among selected MOFs and the direct conversion of intermediate 1 to intermediate 3 (Scheme 2). To better understand the dependence of catalytic activity on catalyst ability, a restricted bond length model was constructed for [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺Cl⁻, in which the coordinates of Mn and Cl, and Mn–Cl distance was set to fixed values in both the reaction intermediate and transition state of the first 6-endo cyclization step. As shown in Fig. S4 (Supporting information), the calculated negative NPA charge of Cl in intermediate 34 increased as the fixed Mn–Cl distance increased. The computed results showed that an increasing Mn–Cl distance decreased the interaction between SCA Cl⁻ and the metal center. An excellent linear effect between the NPA charge of Cl and the activation energy of 6-endo cyclization was observed, with an R² value of 0.961 (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, when −1 charge of Cl in [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ was used in the equation, the obtained barrier is 16.5 kcal/mol which is consistent with that of previous computed result (15.9 kcal/mol). In addition, when −1 charge of hypothetical anion in UNLPF-14-Mn^III, −0.82 charge of SbF₆⁻ in QM region of PCN-223-Mn^III[SbF₆] calculation model and −0.48 charge of Cl in QM region of PCN-223-Mn^IIICl calculation model were substituted into the equation, the obtained barrier were 16.5, 23.1 and 35.3 kcal/mol, respectively, which are closed to that of zwitterionic MOF (16.9 kcal/mol), PCN-223-Mn^III[SbF₆] (27.3 kcal/mol) and PCN-223-Mn^IIICl (37.3 kcal/mol). To verify the adaptation of this formula, 73 more coordinated anions (Fig. 4b) were tested and found the mean unsigned error (MUE) of the barriers is 1.3 kcal/mol (Table S1 in Supporting information). The correlation of metal center's charge and activation free energy indicates that interaction of the coordinated anion with the metal leads to poor reactivity. Therefore, the high catalytic activity of the UNLPF-14-Mn^IIIMOF could be attributed to charge separation providing a "pure cationic active center" for cationic [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ active center.

For the direct conversion of intermediate 1 to intermediate 3 when UNLPF-14-Mn^III used as catalyst, spin density analysis was conducted for intermates 22, 29 and 36. As shown in Fig. 5, the calculated spin density of C1 was 0.53 in 22, which was much lower than those of 29 (0.88) and 36 (0.95) proving that 29 and 36 have stronger radical character. Furthermore, nature population analysis (NPA) showed that the positive charge of C1 in 22 was 0.25, which was much higher than those in 29 (0.12) and 36 (0.09), indicating rapid annulation process was relied on the net positive charge of C1 [42]. Obviously, "pure cationic active center"in zwitterionic MOF could lead to one-step concerted nucleophilic attack pathway and then accelerate reaction progress.

In summary, this DFT study clearly showed that zwitterionic MOFs have much higher catalytic activity than MOFs with WCAs or SCAs. The zwitterionic MOFs, which use [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ without a counterion as the organic ligand, lower the barrier of the rate-determining step in the [2 + 1] cycloisomerization of enynes, owing to its "pure cationic active center" of [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺. Nucleophilic attack pathway was observed when cationic metal catalysts without WCAs or SCAs were used. Meanwhile, the WCA or SCA coordination decreased the electrophilicity, resulting in a stepwise radical-type pathway. Charge control calculations based on Mn–Cl distance were conducted, further confirming the contribution of "pure cationic active center" to the catalytic performance of zwitterionic MOFs. It exhibits high reliability when examing the linear relationship between the NPA charge and barrier of 6-endo cyclization by massive anions, revealing a universal adaptive character for various coordinated anions. Thus, the NPA charge could be used as an effective descriptor to predict the catalytic reactivity of Lewis acid. This work provides insight into theoretical design of porous catalysts.

Declaration of competing interest

Less

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Less

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21822303 21772020 22173083), Program for Science Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province (No. 20HASTIT004). The authors thank the support from the Henan Province Supercomputing Center.

Supplementary materials

Less

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.041

References

Less

[1]

W.Y. Ai, R. Zhong, X.F. Liu, Q. Liu, Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 2876–2953.

[2]

Y. Nieves-Quinones, T.J. Paniak, Y.E. Lee, S.M. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 10016–10032.

[3]

A.C. Deacy, E. Moreby, A. Phanopoulos, C.K. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 19150–19160.

[4]

Y.Y. Ning, Y. Huo, H.Z. Xue, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 10219–10227.

[5]

K. Sordakis, C.H. Tang, L.K. Vogt, et al., Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 372–433.

[6]

M.Q. Jia, M. Bandini, ACS Catal. 5 (2015) 1638–1652.

[7]

A. Zhdanko, M.E. Maier, ACS Catal. 4 (2014) 2770–2775.

[8]

C.F. Zhu, G.Z. Yuan, X. Chen, Z.W. Yang, Y. Cui, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 8058–8061.

[9]

D.W. Feng, Z.Y. Gu, J.R. Li, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 10307–10310.

[10]

J.M. Falkowski, T. Sawano, T. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 5213–5216.

[11]

C.Y. Sun, G. Skorupskii, J.H. Dou, A.M. Wright, M. Dinca, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 17394–17398.

[12]

Y.Z. Liu, Y.H. Ma, Y.B. Zhao, et al., Science 351 (2016) 365–369.

[13]

J.C. Thomas, J.C. Peters, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 5100–5101.

[14]

T.A. Betley, J.C. Peters, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42 (2003) 2385–2389.

[15]

M. Stradiotto, K.D. Hesp, R.J. Lundgren, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49 (2010) 494–512.

[16]

L. Jiao, Y. Wang, H.L. Jiang, Q. Xu, Adv. Mater. 30 (2018) 1703663.

[17]

D.A. Gomez-Gualdron, T.C. Wang, P. García-Holley, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (2017) 33419–33428.

[18]

Y.J. Cui, Y.F. Yue, G.D. Qian, B.L. Chen, Chem. Rev. 112 (2012) 1126–1162.

[19]

G. Akiyama, R. Matsuda, H. Sato, M. Takata, S. Kitagawa, Adv. Mater. 23 (2011) 3294–3297.

[20]

Z.J. Lin, J. Lu, M.C. Hong, R. Cao, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 5867–5895.

[21]

M.L. Aubrey, J.F. Long, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 13594–13602.

[22]

B.B. Li, Z.F. Ju, M. Zhou, K.Z. Su, D.Q. Yuan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 7687–7691.

[23]

J.A. Johnson, B.M. Petersen, A. Kormos, E. Echeverría, Y.S. Chen, J. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 10293–10298.

[24]

H. Hirao, W.K.H. Ng, A.M.P. Moeljadi, S. Bureekaew, ACS Catal. 5 (2015) 3287–3291.

[25]

L.Y. Xie, Q. Zhu, G.Z. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 4136–4140.

[26]

K. Xu, Y. Wang, H. Hirao, ACS Catal. 5 (2015) 4175–4179.

[27]

Y. Mo, L. Song, Y. Lin, et al., J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8 (2012) 800–805.

[28]

S.O. Odoh, C.J. Cramer, D.G. Truhlar, L. Gagliardi, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 6051–6111.

[29]

H.J. Xie, R.B. Wu, F. Xia, Z.X. Cao, J. Comput. Chem. 29 (2008) 2025–2032.

[30]

R. Wang, J.Q. Xu, L.L. Fu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 4359–4366.

[31]

D. Zhu, Y. Zhang, S.S. Bao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 3049–3053.

[32]

Y. Lan, Theoretical study of Mn-catalysis, Computational Methods in Organometallic Catalysis, 1st ed., WILEY-VCH GmbH, Boschstr, Weinheim, Germany, 2021.

[33]

L.W. Chung, W.M.C. Sameera, R. Ramozzi, et al., Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 5678–5796.

[34]

S. Dapprich, I. Komaromi, K.S. Byun, K. Morokuma, M.J. Frisch, Theochem 461-462 (1999) 1–21.

[35]

M.J. Frisch, G.W. Trucks, H.B. Schlegel, et al., Gaussian 16, Revision A. 03, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2016.

[36]

A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 5648–5652.

[37]

C. Lee, W. Yang, R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 785–789.

[38]

B. Miehlich, A. Savin, H. Stoll, H. Preuss, Chem. Phys. Lett. 157 (1989) 200–206.

[39]

S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, H. Krieg, J. Chem. Phys. 132 (2010) 154104.

[40]

J.N. Hanks, A.K. Snyder, M.A. Graham, et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 58 (2005) 385–399.

[41]

A.K. Rappe, C.J. Casewit, K.S. Colwell, W.A. Goddrad, W.M. Skiff, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 10024–10035.

[42]

T. Lu, F.W. Chen, Comput. Chem. 33 (2012) 580.

Appendix

Less

Year 2022 volume 33 Issue 9

PDF

Cite this Article

BibTeX

Article Info

doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.041

Receive Date：2021-08-22
Online Date：2025-12-24
Published：2022-09-15

Article Data

Affiliations

History

Received：2021-08-22
Revised：2022-01-13
Accepted：2022-01-16

Affiliations

^aGreen Catalysis Center, and College of Chemistry, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China

^bCenter of Basic Molecular Science (CBMS), Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

^cCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453000, China

^dSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Chongqing Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China

References

Share

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.041

Share to

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article

BibTeX

Citations

表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Scheme 1 (a) Development of zwitterionic metal–organic frameworks from zwitterionic metal complexes; (b) Crystal structure of the cation ([Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺) and anion ([In(CO₂)₄]⁻) in completely separated zwitterionic MOF UNLPF-14-Mn^III; (c) Shortest distance between [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ and [In(CO₂)₄]⁻ in UNLPF-14-Mn^III; (d) [2 + 1] Cycloisomerization of enynes catalyzed by zwitterionic MOF UNLPF-14-Mn^III.

Fig. 1 QM/MM calculation model of zwitterionic MOF UNLPF-14-Mn^III, QM region (one [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ complex, ball-and-stick models), active MM region (entire [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺ complex with eight adjacent In(CO₂)₃ atomic groups, stick models), and the remaining fixed MM region (wireframe models).

Scheme 2 Proposed mechanism for the [2 + 1] cycloisomerization of enynes.

Fig. 2 Potential energy diagrams (kcal/mol) for [2 + 1] cycloisomerization reactions of enynes catalyzed by UNLPF-14-Mn^III, PCN-223-Mn^III[SbF₆] and PCN-223-Mn^IIICl as determined at the ONIOM(B3LYP-D3BJ/def2-SVP: UFF) level.

Fig. 3 Potential energy diagrams (kcal/mol) for the [2 + 1] cycloisomerization of enynes catalyzed by [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺, [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺SbF₆⁻, and [Mn^IIIporphyrin]⁺Cl⁻.

Fig. 4 (a) Linear relationship between energy barrier of 35-ts (kcal/mol) and NPA charge of Cl in intermediate 34. (b) The error distribution of barrier obtained from the linear-fitting formula for 73 anions coordinating complexes used as catalyst.

Fig. 5 Spin density map of intermediate (a) 22, (b) 29 and (c) 36.

Articles: Latest Articles; Most Read; Collections

Updates: Events; News; Multimedia

About: About Us

Contact

No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing

100081

010-62199257

qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House