Au nanoparticles loaded on hollow BiOCl microstructures boosting CO<sub>2</sub> photoreduction

Au nanoparticles loaded on hollow BiOCl microstructures boosting CO₂ photoreduction

PDF

Siwen Gong^a, Fei Rao^a, Weibin Zhang^b, Qadeer-Ul Hassan^a, Zhaoqing Liu^c, Jianzhi Gao^a, Jiangbo Lu^a, Mirabbos Hojamberdiev^d, Gangqiang Zhu^a^,^*

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(9) : 4385 - 4388

Less

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(9): 4385-4388

• Communication •

Au nanoparticles loaded on hollow BiOCl microstructures boosting CO₂ photoreduction

Full

Siwen Gong^a, Fei Rao^a, Weibin Zhang^b, Qadeer-Ul Hassan^a, Zhaoqing Liu^c, Jianzhi Gao^a, Jiangbo Lu^a, Mirabbos Hojamberdiev^d, Gangqiang Zhu^a^,^*

Affiliations

^a School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China

^b School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China

^c School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Institute of Clean Energy and Materials, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

^d Institute of Chemistry, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin 10623, Germany

Published: 2022-09-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.039

Outline

Abstract

Less

The BiOCl (BOC) synthesized by the water bath heating method was treated with sodium borohydride (NaBH₄) to introduce oxygen vacancies (OVs). At the same time, Au nanoparticles were loaded to prepare a series of Au/BiOCl samples with different ratios. OVs and Au nanoparticles can promote the light absorption of host photocatalyst in the visible region. The calculated work function of BiOCl and Au can verify the existence of Ohmic contact between the interface of them, which is conducive to the separation of charge carriers. Through a series of photoelectric tests, it was verified experimentally that the separation of charge carriers is indeed enhanced. The high-energy hot electrons produced by Au under the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect can increase the counts of electrons to participate in the CO₂ reduction reaction. Especially for 1.0%-Au/BOC, the yields of CO can reach 43.16 µmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹, which is 6.6 times more than that of BOC. Therefore, loading precious metal on semiconductors is an effective strategy to promote the photocatalytic performance of CO₂ reduction reactions.

Key words

BiOCl / Au nanoparticles / Oxygen vacancy / Ohmic contact / CO₂ photoreduction

Cite this Article

Siwen Gong, Fei Rao, Weibin Zhang, Qadeer-Ul Hassan, Zhaoqing Liu, Jianzhi Gao, Jiangbo Lu, Mirabbos Hojamberdiev, Gangqiang Zhu. Au nanoparticles loaded on hollow BiOCl microstructures boosting CO₂ photoreduction[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022 , 33 (9) : 4385 -4388 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.039

Full Text

Less

Photocatalytic reduction of CO₂ needs a very negative reduction potential, which requires the photocatalyst to have a relatively negative conduction band (CB) position. Generally, semiconductor photocatalysts that meet this condition have a wide band gap, which is not conducive to the absorption of visible light [1, 2]. Introducing defects and loading precious metals can be used as two important methods to solve this problem [3-8]. Due to its unique electronic structure, oxygen vacancies (OVs) will change the light absorption capacity and photogenerated carrier mobility of the semiconductor photocatalyst, thereby enhancing its performance [9]. The local electrons near the OVs can induce shallow donor levels below CB [10, 11]. The donor levels caused by the suitable content of OVs can further hybridize with the CB, thereby changing the Fermi level of the semiconductor and the forbidden band width [12]. Meanwhile, this energy level also promotes the separation of charge carriers [13].

The surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect makes noble metal nanoparticles capture partial visible light, and then produce high-energy hot electrons [14-17]. In this way, semiconductor loaded with noble metals can use these high-energy hot electrons to drive chemical reactions on their surfaces. Meanwhile, the metal-semiconductor heterojunction that forms Ohmic contacts facilitates the separation of charge carriers and promotes the progress of photocatalytic reactions [18, 19]. Thus, it is very critical to select the appropriate semiconductor and precious metal for constructing nanocomposites. BiOCl (BOC) is a wide-gap photocatalytic material. The CB position of BOC is relatively negative, generally between −0.9 V ~ −1.1 V (vs. SHE), which matches with the potential of reducing CO₂ to CO (−0.51 V vs. SHE) and CH₄ (−0.24 V vs. SHE) [20]. BOC has a valence band (VB) position of 1.7 V ~ 1.8 V (vs. SHE), which has sufficient oxidation capacity to decompose water (0.82 V vs. SHE), providing protons for CO₂ reduction [21]. Therefore, BOC can meet the potential requirements of CO₂ reduction. Loading metal nanoparticles with a suitable Fermi level can be selected to form a heterojunction in Ohmic contact with BOC, thereby improving the light absorption ability and the separation ability of photogenerated charge carriers.

In this work, the presence of OVs and Au nanoparticles in BOC (OVs-Au/BOC) not only significantly enhances the visible light absorption capacity of the composite sample, but also significantly improves the separation ability of photo-generated carriers, thereby greatly boosting the catalytic activity of the photocatalyst. Through the combination of experiments and DFT calculations, the improvement mechanism of photocatalytic activity and the reaction process of photocatalytic reduction of CO₂ are explored (Supplementary Notes 1–4 in Supporting information).

The synthesis process of BOC is described in Supplementary Note 5 (Supporting information). Furthermore, dissolve 0.2 g BOC in 30 mL deionized water, and then add the corresponding chloroauric acid solution and stirred for 1 h (Au: Bi molar ratios of 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0%, 2.5%). Weigh an appropriate amount of NaBH₄ (the molar concentration is 5 times than the Au concentration in the corresponding mixed solution), dissolve it in 30 mL of deionized water, and quickly pour it into the stirred mixed solution. The precipitate was washed several times with deionized water and alcohol, and collected after drying for 6 h at 60 ℃. According to the different proportions of Au loading, the photocatalyst is recorded as BOC, 0.5%-Au/BOC, 1.0%-Au/BOC, 1.5%-Au/BOC, 2.0%-Au/BOC, 2.5%-Au/BOC.

As shown in Fig. S1a (Supporting information), the X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern is exactly the same as that of the tetragonal BiOCl (PDF #85–0861). However, the diffraction peaks of Au are not observed after because of the low loading counts and unique dispersion [19]. As shown in Fig. S1b (Supporting information), FTIR further confirms the phase structure of as-prepared samples. In BOC and Au/BOC samples, the peak at 527 cm⁻¹ is attributed to the Bi-O stretching mode [19], and the peaks at 1293, 1423, and 1663 cm⁻¹ are attributed to the N−H −O group, pyrrole and free C=O stretch mode [22]. There is no obvious change in the position of the signal indicates that further characterization methods are needed to observe the loaded Au species.

The TEM image of 1.0%-Au/BOC is shown in Fig. 1a, which maintains the flower-shaped appearance of hollow structure of BOC stacked of nanosheets, where some nanoparticles with a diameter of 5–6 nm are distributed on the surface (Fig. 1b). In the HAADF-STEM images (Figs. 1c and d), two clear lattice plane spacings of 0.275 nm and 0.738 nm are shown, corresponding to the (110) and (001) of BiOCl, respectively. Fig. 1e shows a set of clear lattice plane spacing 0.235 nm, corresponding to the (111) lattice plane of Au⁰. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) further shows the distribution of elements. From Figs. 1f and g, it can be seen that the Bi, O, and Cl elements are uniformly distributed on the nanosheets, while the Au elements are mostly concentrated to form the nanoparticles. It proved that Au⁰ was successfully loaded onto BiOCl nanosheets.

The element composition and chemical state of the sample were further analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The survey spectra and high-resolution spectra of Bi 4f and Cl 2p of BOC and 1.0%-Au/BOC samples are shown in Fig. S2 (Supporting information). In the HR-XPS of Au 4f, the peaks at 83.2 eV and 86.8 eV can be attributed to Au⁰ [23], indicating that Au exists in the composite sample in the form of metal, and there is no Au element in the pure BOC sample (Fig. 2a). In Fig. 2b, three peaks at 529.4, 531.4 and 532.9 eV are ascribed to lattice oxygen, surface adsorbed oxygen, and surface adsorbed oxygen in water molecules [24]. The O at 530.5 eV is OV. It can be seen that the peak area of OVs in the metal-loaded BOC has increased, which demonstrates that the amount of OVs has been increased. In order to directly prove the existence and variation of OVs in as-prepared samples, the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of the sample was tested, as shown in Fig. 2c. BOC and 1.0%-Au/BOC both show resonance signals at g = 2.003 [25], while the signal of BOC is relatively weak. It indicates that OVs have existed in BOC. After chemical reduction, more OVs are generated, so the peak intensity in 1.0%-Au/BOC gets higher, which is consistent with the conclusion in XPS.

Fig. 2d records the UV–vis absorption spectra of BOC and Au/BOC, reflecting the light absorption properties of the photocatalysts. The location of the absorption band edge of BOC is about 367 nm, which shows that BOC has strong absorption for ultraviolet light and has a weak response to visible light. This weak visible light response can be attributed to the existence of the OVs in BOC. As the loading of Au nanoparticles increases, the absorption of the photocatalyst in the visible light region becomes more robust. In addition, an absorption peak that appears near 531 nm can be attributed to the SPR effect of Au nanoparticles [26]. From the absorption edge of as-prepared samples, it can be observed that the edge gradually redshifts toward the visible region with the increase of the Au loading, owing to the increasing content of OVs. OVs are mainly reflected in two aspects to promote the activity of semiconductor photocatalysts. Firstly, the localized electrons on OVs energy level can be excited to the CB under visible light [2]. Secondly, the intermediate energy levels of these defect states may also accept electrons in the valence band (VB) transition under the excitation of visible light, and indirectly transfer photoelectrons to CB, which not only broadens the visible light response range, but also inhibits the recombination of e⁻-h⁺ pairs [27]. According to the DFT calculation of the density of states (DOS), the conclusion can be drawn that the shallow energy levels come into being by O 2p orbit in OVs-BOC (Fig. S3 in Supporting information), which is overlapped with the bottom of the CB to narrow the band gap, thereby enhancing light absorption.

The photocatalytic performance of the as-prepared samples is evaluated by the CO₂ photoreduction test. As shown in Fig. 3a, after 1 h of simulated sunlight exposure, the formation rate of CO and CH₄ over BOC are 6.57 µmol/g and 3.03 µmol/g, respectively. The loading of Au⁰ in BOC and the introduction of OVs remarkably boosted the photoreduction activity of CO₂ (Table S1 in Supporting information). Especially for 1.0%-Au/BOC, the yields of CO and CH₄ can reach up to 43.16 µmol g ⁻¹h⁻¹ and 5.98 µmol g⁻¹h⁻¹, respectively. The rate of CO generation is 6.6 times higher than that of pristine BOC. Furthermore, the activity of 1.0%-Au/BOC is still very good compared with other photocatalysts (Table S2 in Supporting information). However, with the continuous increase of the loading, the photocatalytic activity decreased, which is due to the size augment of Au⁰ nanoparticles. The changes in the specific surface area (S_BET) and pore size distribution of the pure BOC sample and composite material can be observed through the nitrogen (N₂) adsorption-desorption curves (Fig. S4 in Supporting information), which is an essential factor affecting the photocatalytic activity. With reference to the IUPAC classification, the isotherm of the sample shows a typical IV-type isotherm and H3 hysteresis, indicating that the synthesized material has a mesoporous structure. After loading Au⁰, the increased S_BET of the sample is beneficial to the photocatalytic performance. But as the loading ratios increase, the S_BET of the sample gradually decreases, which decreases the surface reaction and adsorption sites for the target gas. The size augment of Au⁰ nanoparticles will cause the photogenerated electrons to recombine before reaching the surface of the Au⁰ to react with CO₂, thereby reducing the reaction activity [20]. Therefore, it is extremely important to adjust the loading amount so that the Au⁰ nanoparticles maintain the appropriate amount and size to promote the CO₂ photoreduction performance.

In order to verify that the promotion of the photocatalytic activity is due to the SPR effect of Au⁰, the performance test under visible light irradiation was carried out. It can be observed that the photocatalytic performance trends of all samples are consistent with the results under simulated sunlight (Fig. 3b). After loading Au⁰ nanoparticles, 1.0%-Au/BOC has the most significant increase. It can reach CO: 13.02 µmol g⁻¹h⁻¹, CH₄: 1.90 µmol g⁻¹h⁻¹, respectively, which is 8 times and 5 times than BOC. It can be proved that the loading of Au⁰ nanoparticles enhances the effective absorption of visible light. Detailed performance data is shown in the supporting documents (Table S3 in Supporting information). In addition, a cyclic measurement was performed to manifest the stability of 1.0%-Au/BOC. Even after five photocatalytic reactions, 1.0%-Au/BOC still maintains high reactivity (Fig. 3c). By comparing the XRD before and after the reaction (Fig. S5a in Supporting information), it can be seen that the phase structure of the catalyst was not destroyed even after several photocatalytic reduction experiments of CO₂, which indicates that 1.0%-Au/BOC possesses high stability.

To explore the source of carbon in the product, a sequence of experiments have been done to prove that under the effect of the photocatalyst, CO₂ is reduced to other carbon-containing substances (Fig. S5b in Supporting information). In order to more intuitively verify the source of carbon in the product, the isotope labeling method (¹³CO₂) was used in the experiment. From Fig. 3d, the peaks of 1.0%-Au/BOC at m/z 17 and m/z 29 can be ascribed to ¹³CH₄ and ¹³CO, respectively, which proves the carbon in CH₄ and CO comes from the ¹³CO₂.

To explore the specific process of CO₂ reduction and the intermediate products, in-situ FT-IR tests were carried out in the presence or absence of light irradiation condition. As exhibited in Fig. 4a, the adsorption/desorption equilibrium is reached in the dark environment. The peaks at 1650 cm⁻¹ correspond to H₂O, and the peaks at 1280 and 1369 cm⁻¹ attributed to bicarbonate (HCO₃^–), the peaks at 1314, 1426, 1463, and 1616 cm⁻¹ ascribed to carbonate (CO₃^2–), which are all caused by the initial reactive adsorption of CO₂ [28-30]. The peaks at 1515 and 1771 cm⁻¹ correspond to formate (HCOO^–), and the peaks at 1695 and 1740 cm⁻¹ correspond to CO₂^– and CO, respectively [12, 19]. These are important intermediate products in the reduction of CO₂. After turning on the light, as shown in Fig. 4b, it can be observed that the shape of the in-situ infrared peak has no obvious change, but the intensity is significantly increased, especially for CO and HCOO^–. The increase of these two important intermediate products represents the rapid progress of the reaction. The specific reaction process is listed in Supplementary Note 6 (Supporting information).

After loading Au nanoparticles, the performance of the photocatalyst has been greatly improved. The adsorption of CO₂ over the surface of photocatalysts has an important influence on CO₂ photoreduction. The CO₂ adsorption curve has been shown in Fig. S6 (Supporting information). It can be found that there is no significant difference between the two samples, which indicates that in this experiment, the CO₂ physical adsorption ability is not the main factor impacting the photocatalytic performance. The enhancement of photocatalytic performance is governed by other factors.

Promoting the effective separation of photogenerated carriers is an important aspect to boost the activity of photocatalysts. Fig. S7 (Supporting information) shows the surface photovoltage spectra (SPV), the photocurrent response, the impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and the fluorescence spectra, which suggests that the Au⁰ component can improve the separation ability and suppress the recombination of photogenerated carriers so that the activity of the photocatalyst has been improved.

The fundamental reason why the separation ability of photogenerated carriers has been improved will be further explored through DFT calculation. The heterojunction composed by metal nanoparticles and semiconductor is favorable for charge carrier transfer. As shown in Fig. S8 (Supporting information), the work function of OVs-BOC (110) (5.19 eV) is higher than the work function of Au⁰ (111) (3.32 eV), so an Ohmic contact can be formed in the interface between them [15]. The band structure of Au⁰ and OVs-BOC before contact is exhibited in Fig. 4c. After contact (Fig. 4d), the electrons of Au⁰ flow to OVs-BOC to achieve a thermodynamic balance, thereby bending the energy band of OVs-BOC to form an Ohmic contact. When 1.0%-Au/BOC was excited by light with suitable energy, photogenerated electrons jumped from VB in OVs-BOC to CB. In addition, the photogenerated electrons move to Au⁰ under the effect of the built-in electric field, which improves the separation ability of photogenerated electron-hole pairs.

In summary, the semiconductor is mainly excited by ultraviolet light to produce e⁻/h⁺ pairs in the BOC without modification; when OVs are present, OVs can form shallow energy levels near the CB, which can not only hybridize with the bottom of the CB to narrow the band gap, and can also be used as a step for photogenerated electrons. The electrons generated by light excitation can first jump to the OVs energy level and then jump to the CB. This process will absorb visible light, thereby enhancing the light absorption. After loading Au⁰, the electrons on the CB will move to Au nanoparticles to participate in the reaction, enhancing the separation ability of e⁻/h⁺ pairs. In addition, Au nanoparticles will absorb visible light and produce the SPR effect and generate hot electrons. The hot electrons with higher energy will cross the contact barrier between the semiconductor and the metal and move to the CB of the semiconductor to participate in the reaction, so that the number of available electrons participating in the reaction will increase, which in turn accelerate the reaction rate. Our work provides a new perspective for the use of defects and metal loading to solve the problem of low efficiency of photoreduction of CO₂.

Declaration of competing interest

Less

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Less

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51772183, 52072230), and the Yulin Science and Technology Project (No. CXY-2020–040). The authors also thank Professor Jiangbo Lu, Dr. Wang Li, Dr. Hongmei Jing and Dr. Lujun Zhu for the help in using ac-TEM (the Electron Microscopy Platform of School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China).

Supplementary materials

Less

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.039

References

Less

[1]

X. Liu, P. Wang, H. Zhai, et al., Appl. Catal. B:Environ. 232 (2018) 521–530.

[2]

S. Cao, B. Shen, T. Tong, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 28 (2018) 1800136.

[3]

P. Qiu, J. Wang, Z. Liang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 3501–3504.

[4]

B. Sun, Z. Liang, Y. Qian, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 12 (2020) 7257–7269.

[5]

Z. Liang, Y. Xue, X. Wang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 421 (2021) 130016.

[6]

Y. Chen, S. Ji, W. Sun, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 1295–1301.

[7]

S. Jian, Z. Tian, J. Hu, et al., Adv. Powd. Mater. 1 (2022) 100004.

[8]

G. Zhao, W. Ma, X. Wang, et al., Adv. Powd. Mater. 1 (2022) 100008.

[9]

J. Mizusaki, Solid State Ionics 52 (1992) 79–91.

[10]

M. Xing, J. Zhang, F. Chen, et al., Chem. Commun. 47 (2011) 4947–4949.

[11]

F. Zuo, L. Wang, T. Wu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010) 11856–11857.

[12]

X. Xiang, F. Pan, Y. Li, Adv. Compos. Hybrid Mater. 1 (2018) 6–31.

[13]

F. Rao, G. Zhu, W. Zhang, et al., ACS Catal. 11 (2021) 7735–7749.

[14]

N. Celebi, M.Y. Aydin, F. Soysal, et al., J. Alloy. Compd. 860 (2021) 157908.

[15]

M. Sharma, G. Singh, R. Vaish, Nanotechnology 32 (2021) 145716.

[16]

S. Liu, W. Qi, S. Adimi, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 13 (2021) 7238–7247.

[17]

R.B. Wei, P.Y. Kuang, H. Cheng, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5 (2017) 4249–4257.

[18]

F. Rao, G. Zhu, W. Zhang, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 281 (2021) 119481.

[19]

S. Gong, G. Zhu, R. Wang, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 297 (2021) 120413.

[20]

L. Fu, R. Wang, C. Zhao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 414 (2021) 128857.

[21]

J. Hu, W. Fan, W. Ye, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 158 (2014) 182–189.

[22]

X. Li, W. Zhang, W. Cui, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 221 (2018) 482–489.

[23]

J. Wan, Y. Zhang, R. Wang, et al., J Hazard. Mater. 384 (2020) 121484.

[24]

X. Xie, Q.U. Hassan, H. Lu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 2038–2042.

[25]

J. Nie, J. Gao, Q. Shen, et al., Sci. China Mater. 63 (2020) 2272–2280.

[26]

Y. Tian, L. Ma, X. Tian, et al., Chemosphere 269 (2021) 128717.

[27]

M. Humayun, L. Xu, L. Zhou, et al., Nano Res. 11 (2018) 6391–6404.

[28]

J.Y. Tang, R.T. Guo, W.G. Pan, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 467 (2019) 206–212.

[29]

W. Wu, K. Bhattacharyya, K. Gray, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (2013) 20643–20655.

[30]

R.W. Stevens, Jr., R.V. Siriwardane, J. Logan, Energy Fuels 22 (2008) 3070–3079.

Appendix

Less

Year 2022 volume 33 Issue 9

PDF

Cite this Article

BibTeX

Article Info

doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.039

Receive Date：2021-10-12
Online Date：2025-12-24
Published：2022-09-15

Article Data

Affiliations

History

Received：2021-10-12
Revised：2021-11-05
Accepted：2021-12-15

Affiliations

^a School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710062, China

^b School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China

^c School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Institute of Clean Energy and Materials, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

^d Institute of Chemistry, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin 10623, Germany

References

Share

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.039

Share to

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article

BibTeX

Citations

表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Fig. 1 The TEM images (a, b), HAADF-STEM images (c-e) and EDX mappings of 1.0%-Au/BOC (f, g).

Fig. 2 The high-resolution XPS spectra of Au 4f (a), O 1s (b) and EPR spectra (c) of BOC and 1.0%-Au/BOC samples, UV–vis diffuse absorbance spectra of all prepared samples (d).

Fig. 3 Generation rate of CO and CH₄ under simulated sunlight (a), under visible light (b), cyclic experiment over 1.0%-Au/BOC (c), mass spectra of ¹³CH₄ (m/z 17) and ¹³CO (m/z 29) generated over 1.0%-Au/BOC (d).

Fig. 4 The in situ FTIR spectra of 1.0%-Au/BOC during the CO₂ reduction process (a) in dark and (b) with illumination under simulated light, schematic diagram of energy band change of 1.0%-Au/BOC before (c) and after (d) contact (Φ is the work function, E₀ is the vacuum level, E_f1 and E_f2 are the Fermi levels of OVs-BOC and Au⁰, respectively, and E_f is the Fermi level of 1.0%-Au/BOC).

Articles: Latest Articles; Most Read; Collections

Updates: Events; News; Multimedia

About: About Us

Contact

No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing

100081

010-62199257

qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House