We chose the reaction of 2-(2, 2-difluorovinyl)naphthalene
1a with lithium organoborate, which was easily formed
in situ by mixing phenylboronic acid pinacol ester with
n-BuLi under −20 ℃ [
27,
28], as the model reaction to optimize the reaction conditions. We initially discovered that in the presence of 5.0 mol% NiBr
2•DME and 2.5 mol% of 4, 4′-dimethyl-2, 2′-bipyridine ligand
L1, reaction of 2-(2, 2-difluorovinyl)naphthalene
1a with lithium phenylorganoborate
2a and 50 mol% of ZnBr
2 in a number of common organic solvents, such as Et
2O, THF, DME, DMF or toluene did not proceed into full conversion after 12 h at 0 ℃ and the yields for the desired to monofluoroalkene
3a were low (
Table 1, entries 1–5). However, stereoselectivity of the reaction was excellent since only
Z-monofluoroalkene
3a was observed in
19F NMR spectroscopies. To our delight, when a mixed solvent of Et
2O/THF (9:1) was employed, the yield of compound
3a was significantly improved to 94% along the formation of single
Z-isomer (
Table 1, entry 6). Decreasing the ratio of Et
2O in the mixed solvents from 9:1 to 4:1 has little effect on the yield and selectivity of the reaction. Yet, further decrease the ratio of Et
2O in the mixed solvents to 1:1 led to significantly decrease the yield of the reaction to 80% (
Table 1, entries 7 and 8). The choice of different nickel catalyst precursors and ligands played an essential role for the high yielding formation of compound
3a. When NiI
2 was used as the catalyst precursor, the yield decreased dramatically (
Table 1, entry 9). On the other hand, reactions using NiCl
2•DME or Ni(OAc)
2 as the catalyst gave the coupled products in slightly lower yields (
Table 1, entries 10 and 11). In contrast, when a Ni(0) complex Ni(cod)
2 was used as the precursor, the yield of the reaction deceased significantly to 48% (
Table 1, entry 12). Likewise, the electronic properties of the ligand were also equally important for the high yields of the reaction. Using either more electron-donating or electron-poor bipyridine derivatives resulted in lower yields (
Table 1, entries 13–16). Further optimization disclosed that the reaction conducted at room temperature gave lower yield (
Table 1, entry 17). In addition, it was found that reaction using ZnI
2 as an additive gave the defluoroarylation product
3a in slightly low yields, while reactions using other additives such as Zn(OTf)
2 or MgBr
2 were not effective at all (
Table 1, entries 18–20). Our initially studies showed that the amount of ZnBr
2 was important for the conversion of the reaction. Nevertheless, it was found that the yields decreased with the increase of the amount of ZnBr
2 to 0.8 or 1.5 equiv. The effect of the addition of ZnBr
2 to a solution of lithium aryl borate has been reported to generate lithium aryl zincates [Ph
xZnBr
y]
n− (
n =
x + y − 2) [
29], which facilitates the transmetalation step of the nickel-catalyzed cross coupling reaction [
24]. Alternatively, ZnBr
2 might act as a Lewis acid to abstract the bromide on the nickel metal center to facilitate the transmetalation step. Finally, control experiments showed that reactions in the absence of either nickel precursor, the ligand or additive ZnBr
2 occurred in less than 10% yield (
Table 1, entries 21–24).