Initially,
1a and
2a were employed as a model reaction and our chiral
L-Cu complex were employed as the catalysts to optimize the reaction conditions (
Table 1). First of all, the reaction was carried out in different solvents at 0 ℃. When methanol was employed as the solvent, the enantioselectivity of the product was moderate and low yield was observed (entry 4). When methyl
tert-butyl ether and CHCl
3 were employed as the solvent, the reaction can afford the desired products with moderate yields but low enantioselectivities (entries 5 and 6). Gratifyingly, when toluene was employed as solvent, the desired product
3a can be obtained with both moderate yield and good enantioselectivity (entry 1). However,
3a was unstable in the flash column seperation. The hydroxyl groups of
3a need to be protected in order to obtain the stable product
4a. After optimization, as shown in
Table 1 (entries 1–3),
3a was transformed into
4a by virtue of methylation in the presence of
t-BuOK. To improve the
ee, further screening of the copper salts was also carried out. The counter ions of the copper salts had a great influence on the reaction, perhaps due to the difference of the conductivity, as shown in Tables S3-S5 (Supporting information). It was found that the use of CuBr
2 instead of Cu(OTf)
2 gave a significant improvement in enantioselectivity in spite of a longer reaction time (entry 7). Afterwards, various ligands were examined in this reaction. We found that the different substituents on the aromatic ring at the pyrrole moiety of the ligands had a great influence on the enantioselectivity (entries 7–12). As a consequence, only ligand
1 led to the highest enantioselectivity (entry 7). Subsequently, the different temperature was screened in this reaction since the temperature can affect the
ee value obviously (entries 7, 13–15). At low temperature of −5 ℃, the reduced enantioselectivity could be observed although the reaction yield could be maintained. When the temperature was increased from 0 ℃ to 5 ℃, the
ee value can be increased from 85% to 95% (entry 14). To raise the temperature further resulted in the decrease of the
ee value, as shown in entry 15. Therefore, the optimal temperature was determined at 5 ℃. Afterwards, trifluoroethanol and anhydrous sodium sulfate were added as additives to polish this reaction. To our delight, the employment of these two additives resulted in obviously enhancement in the enantioselectivity of the reaction (entry 14). And
3a could be obtained with high yield (93%), excellent
ee value (98%) and high dr value (> 20:1). Finally, when the loading of Cu complex was reduced from 10.0 mol% to 5.0 mol% and 2.5 mol%, the
ee value was reduced from 95% to 91% and 85% in spite of an almost maintained yield. Therefore, the optimal loading of Cu complex was determined at 10.0 mol%. As a result, the optimal conditions for the reaction can be concluded as follows: the chiral L
1CuBr
2 complex as the catalyst, toluene as the solvent, Et
3N as the base, trifluoroethanol and anhydrous sodium sulfate as the additives, and the reaction being carried out at 5 ℃. Then under −10 ℃, the methylation of
3a was carried out in the presence of
t-BuOK and CH
3I in THF.