The resulting POM surfactants were characterized by FT-IR,
1H NMR,
13C NMR,
29Si NMR,
31P NMR and electron spray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS). The characterization results of representative sample Na−PW
11−NC
16 were shown in
Fig. 1. In FT−IR spectroscopy of Na−PW
11−NC
16 (
Fig. 1a and Fig. S24 in Supporting information), peaks of the alkyl chains (2924, 2852, 1463, 1078 cm
−1) and the POM cluster (1038, 967, 900, 871, 822, 712 cm
−1) were visible. The peaks of 1112 and 1078 cm
−1 represented the vibrations of the Si−O−Si bond and the stretching vibrations of the C−N bonds for quaternary amine cations, which inferred that the cationic ligands were modified onto the POM cluster. It should be noted that the Si−OEt groups were crucial to link the organic ligands with PW
11, while they were highly sensitive to the water, which may result in hydrolysis and self-polymerization. In
1H NMR spectra (Fig. S25 in Supporting information), signals of the quartet at 3.83 ppm and the triplet at 1.24 ppm (stars signs) suggested that the Si−OEt groups existed in NC
16 ligands. After the covalent modification, these signals were disappeared, indicating the replacement of Si−OEt to Si−O−Si or Si−O−W groups in TMA−PW
11−NC
16 samples. For TMA−PW
11−NC
16, the intensity ratio of the protons of
N, N-dimethyl in two ligand chains (3.04, 3.06 ppm, 12H, square) and methyl protons of TMA
+ (3.11 ppm, 12H, triangle) was around 1 suggesting that the whole polar head had one negative charge, which was in agreement with the theoretical net charge. The complete counterion exchange from TMA
+ to Na
+ was proven by the absence of the signals of TMA
+ in Na−PW
11−NC
16 (
Fig. 1b). The modification of the POM cluster can also be confirmed by the unique signals of −13.77 ppm in
31P NMR and −51.7 ppm in
29Si NMR spectra, which were attributed to the structure of two organosilicate embedded to the lacunary site of the PW
11 cluster (
Figs. 1c and
d). Moreover, only one signal exists in both spectra indicated that the product was pure. From the ESI-MS spectrum (
Fig. 1e), the molecule mass of Na−PW
11−NC
16 with a formula of Na{PW
11O
39[SiO
0.5(CH
2)
3N(CH
3)
2C
16H
33]
2} was determined as 3372.09
m/z, which was consistent with theory. Furthermore, from the analysis of the TG curve (Fig. S43 in Supporting information), the ligand chains were degrade from 372.6 ℃ to 506.5 ℃ and the POM head was retained even the temperature higher than 700 ℃, confirming the considerable thermal stability of Na−PW
11−NC
16. The co-existence of anionic and cationic centers in Na−PW
11−NC
16 was proven by the dye extraction experiments. With adding one drop of the aqueous solution of cationic dye methylene blue into the chloroform solution of Na−PW
11−NC
16, the blue color was extracted to the nonpolar phase. The same phenomenon was also observed when the dye was anionic methyl orange. These phenomena suggested that both the cationic dye and anionic dye could be captured by the zwitterionic center of the Na−PW
11−NC
16 surfactant (Fig. S29 in Supporting information). Based on the above characterizations, the structure of the surfactant Na−PW
11−NC
n could be proposed, in which the nonpolar tail groups were two alkyl long chains and the polar head group was the covalently linked POM anion and quaternary amine cations. For comparison, the cationic surfactants encapsulated POM salts were prepared by directly mixing the K
7PW
11O
39 with surfactants like cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) in an aqueous solution and collecting the resulted salt precipitates (CTA + PW
11).