Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Multifunctional silicene/CeO2 heterojunctions: Desirable electronic material and promising water-splitting photocatalyst
收藏切换
PDF
Liang Xu*, a, c, Jian Zenga, Quan Li*, a, c, Xin Luob, c, Tong Chena, c, Jingjing Liua, Ling-Ling Wangc
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(8) : 3947 - 3950
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(8): 3947-3950
• Communication •
Multifunctional silicene/CeO2 heterojunctions: Desirable electronic material and promising water-splitting photocatalyst
Full
Liang Xu*, a, c, Jian Zenga, Quan Li*, a, c, Xin Luob, c, Tong Chena, c, Jingjing Liua, Ling-Ling Wangc
Affiliations
  • aEnergy Materials Computing Center, School of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
  • bDepartment of Applied Physics, School of Science, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China
  • cKey Laboratory for Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Devices of Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Published: 2022-08-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.11.026
Outline
收藏切换

The first-principles calculations demonstrate that covalently bonded (cb) heterojunction and van der Waals (vdW) heterojunction can coexist in silicene/CeO2 heterojunctions, due to the different stacking patterns. Especially, the cb heterojunction with band gap of 1.97 eV, forms a type-II heterojunction, exhibits good redox performance and has high-effective optical absorption spectra, thus it is a promising photocatalyst for overall water splitting. Besides, for the vdW heterojunction, the Dirac cone of silicene is well kept on CeO2 semiconducting substrate, with a considerable energy gap of 0.43 eV, which can be an ideal material in building silicene-based electronic device. These results may open a new gateway in both of nanoelectronic device and energy conversion for silicene/CeO2 nanocomposites.

Silicene  /  CeO2  /  Photocatalyst  /  Interfacial interaction  /  Dirac cone
Liang Xu, Jian Zeng, Quan Li, Xin Luo, Tong Chen, Jingjing Liu, Ling-Ling Wang. Multifunctional silicene/CeO2 heterojunctions: Desirable electronic material and promising water-splitting photocatalyst[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022 , 33 (8) : 3947 -3950 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.11.026
Full Text
Less
In recent decades, lots of studies have devoted themselves to searching high-performance photocatalysts to split water into clean energy hydrogen (H2) [1-5]. Stimulated by the graphene boom, a large number of two-dimensional (2D) catalytic materials have been studied [6-13]. As an element of the same group as C, Si is an important carrier in the electronic semiconductor industry. And its two-dimensional morphological structure, named silicene (the silicon counterpart of graphene but with a slightly buckling of about 0.44 Å) also has been theoretically investigated and experimentally synthesized [14-18]. Silicene shares many of the intriguing electronic properties in graphene, such as Dirac cone, high Fermi velocity and carrier mobility [19-22]. Considering the advantages of being inherently compatible with ubiquitous silicon-based semiconductor technology and facile tunability of the energy gap, in addition to constructing microelectronic devices, it may even be a good candidate for photocatalytic materials. The key lies in how to effectively adjust its band gap to obtain good photocatalytic performance, or opening without destroying its inherent Dirac Fermion characteristics for next-generation electronic-device application.
With the successional synthesis of various non-toxic and cheap nanostructured CeO2, rational design of nano-CeO2 supporting substrates or CeO2-based nanocomposites are considered as a prominent approach to realize better reaction activities and catalytic performance [23-29]. The rapid formation and elimination of oxygen vacancies in CeO2, such as the reversible phase transition between CeO2 and Ce2O3, endow it with high oxygen storage capacity and chemical activity, which plays an important role in the catalytic oxidation reactivity of the cerium oxide surface [30, 31]. Inspired by the significantly enhanced performance in our previous work of SiH/CeO2 heterojunction [32] and graphene/CeO2 heterojunction [26]. We consider combining silicene with CeO2 bulk material to form silicene/CeO2 heterojunctions is very likely to obtain more intriguing properties than the two individuals, and even than graphene/CeO2 heterojunction. In this paper, based on state-of-the-art hybrid density functional theory (the calculation details are in Supporting information), clearly studing the electronic properties of bulk Si/CeO2 and silicene/CeO2 heterojunctions. Our works not only find a superior semiconducting substrate material to grow or integrate Si/silicene, but also provide a promising visible-light photocatalyst for hydrogen production, or a promising electronic-device.
We firstly explore the Si/CeO2 heterojunctions. As shown in Figs. 1a and b, Si and CeO2 nanocrystals are both cubic crystal structures and share an approximate bulk lattice constant a, which is 5.43 Å and 5.41 Å [33, 34], respectively, and the lattice constants of their (111) surfaces are even closer, as given in Table S1 (Supporting information). Therefore, a 1 × 1 stoichiometric cubic CeO2(111) surface slab with 9 layers is used to match an approximate 1 × 1 supercell for Si(111) plane with 8 layers, realizing a negligible lattice mismatch of only 0.16% in their nanocomposite, the details are listed in Table S1. Our calculations clearly demonstrate that the Si/CeO2 nanocomposite is a covalently bonded (cb) heterojunction with a typical cb equilibrium spacing of 1.69 Å (Fig. 1c). And the inapparent electron transfer at interface further confirms the formation of covalently-linked interface in Si/CeO2 heterojunction. Although the Si/CeO2 heterojunction is a gapless metal, there may be a sizable optical band gap for Si/CeO2 heterojunction (Fig. 1d). The band width between the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) corresponding to the isolated Si (SiL and SiH) is 1.17 eV, this value exactly equals to the band gap of isolated bulk Si [33], as illustrated in Fig. S1b (Supporting information). Meanwhile, the band width between LUMO of CeO2 and the HOMO of Si (CeO2L and SiH) is 3.23 eV, and this value approximates to the energy gap of freestanding CeO2 nanocrystals (Fig. S2b and c in Supporting information) [35]. The electronic density distributions of CeO2L, SiL and SiH have been plotted in Fig. 1e, which confirms our observations and analyses. Subsequently, the optical absorption spectra of Si/CeO2 heterojunction and its constituents are given in Fig. 1f. Si/CeO2 composite shows a similar absorption curve with that of CeO2, except that the former is much stronger especially in the long wave region of visible light. In addition, to further verify our calculations, the electronic structure and optical properties of isolated Si, Si(111), CeO2, CeO2(111) are also given (Figs. S1 and S2 in Supporting information), and these results are found to be in excellent agreement with others [33-38]. Although Si/CeO2 heterojunction is not a promising photocatalyst, its optical band gap is very interesting and remains to be explored.
Combining CeO2 with Si to form Si/CeO2 heterojunction cannot significantly improve the photocatalytic performance of CeO2, so we turn to explore the silicene/CeO2 heterojunctions. Our previous work has proved that the silicane (SiH)/CeO2 is a type-II heterojunction with excellent photocatalytic performance [32]. The geometric and electronic structures of silicene and silicane are quite different. Silicene and silicane are both low buckled structures with a buckling height of 0.43 and 0.73 Å, and their Si-Si bond lengths are 2.25 and 2.34 Å, which are consistent with the results of previous studies [15, 32, 39]. Silicene is a gapless semiconductor that is not a good candidate as photocatalyst (Fig. S3 in Supporting information) [40], and it can be further proved by the inferior visible-light absorption of silicene (Figs. S3d and e). Due to the lattice constants of silicene and CeO2(111) are very close (Table S1) [15, 41]. Hence, we select a 1 × 1 silicene unit on the surface of 1 × 1 CeO2(111) supercell to obtain a lattice mismatch in their composites as low as 0.30%. For the silicene/CeO2 heterojunctions, there are five different stacking patterns with various atom-alignment types, among which, two are cb heterojunctions and three are vdW heterojunctions (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). Based on the value of adhesive energies (Ead) (Table S1), the leftmost configuration in Fig. S4 (Si-c), and the rightmost configuration in Fig. S4 (Si-v) are selected as the representatives of cb heterojunctions and vdW heterojunctions, respectively. Subsequently, the molecular dynamics simulation and phonon dispersions further confirm their stability (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). In addition, whether the conversion between Si-v and Si-c is easy is also a question worth considering. Using CINEB method, we calculate the energy profiles and structures of the transition states for Si-v to Si-c. As shown in Fig. S6 (Supporting information), the energy barrier from Si-v to Si-c is as high as 2.626 eV, indicating that this process is not easy to occur, and also that they have relatively good structural stability. To have a strict and complete study, another case that Ce atoms locate on the outside surface also should be considered, named CeO2(111)'. After structural optimization, the silicene/CeO2(111)' heterojunction with the lowest Ead is selected for research (Fig. S7 in Supporting information, named Si-v').
As shown in Figs. 2a and d, Si-c forms type-II heterojunction with a moderate energy gap of 1.97 eV. Its valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) are dominated by two different individuals, which further confirms the formation of type-II heterojunction, and is very conducive to the separation of photogenerated carriers. More interesting, the Dirac cone of silicene is well kept in Si-v with a dream energy gap up to 0.43 eV, which can pave the avenue for the application of silicene-based high-speed nanoelectronics [42, 43]. There is no doubt that we have opened a considerable band gap in silicene without damaging its intrinsic electronic structure by combining with CeO2 nanocrystal (Figs. 2b and d). Additionally, the Si-v' is a metal but displays a similar electronic structure with that of Si-v (Fig. 2c). For the Si-v', there is one point we should note, the Dirac cone of silicene also has been opened, but its Fermi level shifts up and makes this system a gapless metal. Fig. S8 (Supporting information) shows the band structure of silicene with lattice mismatch of 0.3%, and its Dirac cone is still not opened. Therefore, such a small lattice mismatch hardly affects the band structure of silicene. For the pure silicene, the difference of onsite energy between the two sublattices is zero [44]. While in the formed Si-v heterojunction, this balance is broken by the interaction between silicene and substrate CeO2. This point can also be confirmed from the charge analysis. We can see the charge density difference (Fig. 3a), due to the effect of the substrate CeO2, the charges of the two Si atoms in the silicene layer are obviously different. Bader calculations show that the upper and lower Si atoms gain 0.0360 e and lose 0.0540 e, respectively. This can be attributed to the formation of the built-in electric field in the interlayer, also proves that the potential balance between the two Si atoms in the silicene layer is no longer maintained, the symmetry between the two sublattices of silicene is broken and the two Si atoms are no longer identical [44], so the Dirac cone is captured in Si-v. And the Dirac cone is captured in Si-v' for the same reason, the upper and lower Si atoms lose 0.0004 e and gain 0.3750 e, respectively. Of course, for the Si-c, the formation of Si-O destroys the inherent electronic structure of silicene, so Dirac cones cannot be captured and has undergone major changes.
Among the three heterojunctions, Si-c exhibits the most effective optical absorption and Si-v owns the widest response range in the whole UV-vis light (Fig. 4a). By comparing with the constituents, we can see that the optical absorption of Si-c has been enhanced greatly. Besides, the optical absorption spectra of Si-v' and the CeO2(111)' also have been plotted (Fig. 4b). Although Si-v' is a gapless metal, it demonstrates a significantly improved UV-vis absorption, especially around the UV ray, which implies its promising application in the field of photocatalytic. In addition, to shed light on the potential applications of these heterojunctions in producing hydrogen, their band edge potentials with respect to the water redox potentials have been aligned in Fig. 4c. To be an eligible photocatalyst in hydrogen production, the band gap of them must cross the redox potential of water splitting [45-47]. Clearly, neither the silicene nor Si-v is an adequate photocatalyst for water splitting, because they do not have strong enough redox properties (blue block in Fig. 4c). But the CeO2 and Si-c can do well in water splitting. Moreover, Si-c is a type-II heterojunction with suitable band gap, which is benefit to the effective separation of photo-excited electrons and holes. On the basis of above results and analyses, we can conclude that the Si-c is very likely to be an excellent water-splitting photocatalyst (Fig. 4d).
Furthermore, to have an insight into the interfacial interactions and the enhanced photocatalytic performance of Si-c, their 3D charge density difference and quantitative results of charge distribution are given in Fig. 3. One thing to note here is that all the isovalues in Figs. 3a and c and Fig. S4 are 0.001 e/Å3, while that of Fig. 3b is 0.005 e/Å3. The more accurate Bader calculation results are listed in Table S1. Si-c has significantly more charge transfer from silicene to CeO2 than Si-v, due to the strong action of Si-O. But silicene in Si-v' gains electrons from CeO2, which should be attributed to the exposed metal Ce atoms on the surface of CeO2. These results can well in line with the analysis of charge density difference. Such a good charge transfer effect of Si-c can more fully demonstrate its remarkable photocatalytic water splitting performance. On the other hand, the transfer of a large amount of charge to CeO2 accelerates the reversible phase transition between CeO2 and Ce2O3, which to a certain extent provides greater possibilities for the enhancement of the redox properties for CeO2. To further prove it, the charge changes of Ce atoms in the pure CeO2 and Si-c are calculated. Results show that the charge of Ce atoms in Si-c is 0.0799 e/atom more than Ce atoms in pure CeO2, indicating that the valence state of Ce atoms in Si-c is reduced, and a reversible phase transition between CeO2 and Ce2O3 has occurred.
In summary, using first-principles calculations, we systematically investigate the electronic, interfacial and optical properties of Si/CeO2 and silicene/CeO2 heterojunctions. The Si/CeO2 nanocomposite is neither a good photocatalyst nor electronic material due to its unsuitable band structure, but its light absorption performance is well interesting and worthy of further exploration. Interestingly, the silicene/CeO2(111) heterojunctions can stably exist in the forms of both vdW and cb heterojunctions. The Si-c, as a type-II heterojunction with a moderate band gap of 1.97 eV, is an excellent photocatalyst in splitting water to produce hydrogen. In Si-v, the Dirac cone of silicene is well kept and opened up to 0.43 eV, this sizable energy gap over 0.4 eV without degrading its intrinsic Dirac Fermion characteristics is of great significance in silicene-based high-speed nanoelectronics. In short, this paper provides sufficient evidence supporting for designing high-performance silicene-based electronic device and CeO2-based water-splitting photocatalyst.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Acknowledgments
Less
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11764018, 20212BAB201013, 31760157), the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Nos. 20202ACBL211004, 20212BAB201013, 20202BABL211009, 20192BAB212003) and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Ganzhou City.
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.11.026
References
Less
[1]
Y. Liu, Q. Feng, W. Liu, et al., Nano Energy 81 (2021) 105641.
[2]
Y. Lei, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 20794-20812.
[3]
J. Zeng, L. Xu, X. Luo, Tungsten 4 (2022) 52-59.
[4]
W. Zhao, Q. Dong, C. Sun, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 409 (2021) 128185.
[5]
J. Zeng, L. Xu, K. Dong, K. Yang, L. Wang, Adv. Theory Simul. 4 (2021) 2100169.
[6]
L. Xu, J. Zeng, Q. Li, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 530 (2020) 147181.
[7]
R. Liu, H. Fei, G. Ye, Tungsten 2 (2020) 147-161.
[8]
L. Xu, J. Zeng, Q. Li, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 547 (2021) 149207.
[9]
X. Yu, C. Yang, P. Song, J. Peng, Tungsten 2 (2020) 194-202.
[10]
J. Zeng, L. Xu, Y. Yang, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23 (2021) 8318-8325.
[11]
L. Fu, R. Wang, C. Zhao, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 414 (2021) 128857.
[12]
H. Yang, C. He, L. Fu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 3202-3206.
[13]
R. Wang, C. He, W. Chen, C. Zhao, J. Huo, Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 3821-3824.
[14]
P. Vogt, P. De Padova, C. Quaresima, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 155501.
[15]
N.D. Drummond, V. Zólyomi, V.I. Fal'ko, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012) 075423.
[16]
E. Noguchi, K. Sugawara, R. Yaokawa, et al., Adv. Mater. 27 (2015) 856-860.
[17]
D. Chiappe, E. Scalise, E. Cinquanta, et al., Adv. Mater. 26 (2014) 2096-2101.
[18]
Z. Gao, J.S. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12 (2020) 14298-14307.
[19]
K. Takeda, K. Shiraishi, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 14916-14922.
[20]
P. De Padova, C. Quaresima, B. Olivieri, P. Perfetti, G. Le Lay, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98 (2011) 081909.
[21]
G.G. Guzmán-Verri, L.C. Lew Yan Voon, Phys. Rev. B 76 (2007) 075131.
[22]
J. Zhao, H. Liu, Z. Yu, et al., Prog. Mater. Sci. 83 (2016) 24-151.
[23]
J. Chen, W. Ouyang, W. Yang, J.H. He, X. Fang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 (2020) 1909909.
[24]
R. Ma, S. Zhang, L. Li, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7 (2019) 9699-9708.
[25]
W. Zou, B. Deng, X. Hu, et al., Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 238 (2018) 111-118.
[26]
L. Xu, W.Q. Huang, L.L. Wang, G.F. Huang, ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 6 (2014) 20350-20357.
[27]
Q. Su, L. Chang, J. Zhang, G. Du, B. Xu, J. Phys. Chem. C 117 (2013) 4292-4298.
[28]
Y. Ding, H. Bao, R. Qian, T. Shen, S. Tong, Sep. Purif. Technol. 225 (2019) 80-87.
[29]
R. Sun, C. He, L. Fu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 527-532.
[30]
K. Werner, X. Weng, F. Calaza, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 17608-17616.
[31]
C. Zhu, X. Wei, W. Li, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8 (2020) 14397-14406.
[32]
J. Zeng, L. Xu, X. Luo, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23 (2021) 2812-2818.
[33]
H. Scheel, S. Reich, C. Thomsen, Phys. Status Solid. 242 (2005) 2474-2479.
[34]
H.T. Chen, Y.M. Choi, M. Liu, M.C. Lin, ChemPhysChem 8 (2007) 849-855.
[35]
H.T. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. C 116 (2012) 6239-6246.
[36]
A.U. Savchouk, S. Ostapenko, G. Nowak, J. Lagowski, L. Jastrzebski, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67 (1995) 82-84.
[37]
P.J. Hay, R.L. Martin, J. Uddin, G.E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 125 (2006) 34712.
[38]
R. Ma, S. Zhang, T. Wen, et al., Catal. Today 335 (2019) 20-30.
[39]
S. Han, Y. Li, J. Chai, Z. Wang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 (2020) 8565-8571.
[40]
Z. Ni, Q. Liu, K. Tang, et al., Nano Lett. 12 (2012) 113-118.
[41]
M.A. Henderson, C.L. Perkins, M.H. Engelhard, S. Thevuthasan, C.H.F. Peden, Surf. Sci. 526 (2003) 1-18.
[42]
L.B. Meng, S. Ni, Z.M. Zhang, S.K. He, W.M. Zhou, J. Mater. Chem. C 9 (2021) 4316-4321.
[43]
Y.F. Zhang, J. Pan, H. Banjade, et al., Nano Res. 14 (2020) 584-589.
[44]
L. Li, M. Zhao, J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014) 19129-19138.
[45]
J. Han, Z. Liu, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 4 (2021) 1004-1013.
[46]
T. Yu, C. Wang, X. Yan, G. Yang, U. Schwingenschlogl, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 (2021) 2464-2470.
[47]
S.J.A. Moniz, S.A. Shevlin, D.J. Martin, Z.X. Guo, J. Tang, Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (2015) 731-759.
Appendix
Less
Year 2022 volume 33 Issue 8
PDF
50
27
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.11.026
  • Receive Date：2021-08-13
  • Online Date：2025-12-19
  • Published：2022-08-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2021-08-13
  • Revised：2021-09-08
  • Accepted：2021-11-05
Affiliations
    aEnergy Materials Computing Center, School of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Nanchang 330013, China
    bDepartment of Applied Physics, School of Science, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China
    cKey Laboratory for Micro-Nano Optoelectronic Devices of Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.11.026
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House