Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Exploiting styrene-maleic acid copolymer grafting chromatographic stationary phase materials for separation of membrane lipids
收藏切换
PDF
Mengying Liang, Delu Liu, Yangyang Nie, Yanli Liu, Xiaoqiang Qiao*
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(6) : 3123 - 3126
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(6): 3123-3126
• Communication •
Exploiting styrene-maleic acid copolymer grafting chromatographic stationary phase materials for separation of membrane lipids
Full
Mengying Liang, Delu Liu, Yangyang Nie, Yanli Liu, Xiaoqiang Qiao*
Affiliations
  • College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Analytical Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Diagnosis, Ministry of Education, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
Published: 2022-06-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.008
Outline
收藏切换

High performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry is one of the most commonly used strategies for lipid analysis. The development of versatile chromatographic stationary phases to meet the increasing demands for separation of complex lipids is very important. Styrene-maleic acid (SMA) copolymer is an amphiphilic polymer, which has been proven to have the ability to solubilize lipid molecules of various structures. In this study, styrene-maleic anhydride copolymer coated silica was first prepared by the thiol-ene click reaction. With l-cysteine hydrochloride or dodecanol as the post-modification reagents, Sil-SMA-amino acid and Sil-SMA-dodecanol stationary phase materials were further successfully fabricated via nucleophilic ring-opening reaction. The Fourier-transform infrared, thermogravimetric analysis, and elemental analysis results confirmed the two stationary phase materials were successfully prepared. Furthermore, both the Sil-SMA-dodecanol column and the Sil-SMA-amino acid column possessed reversed-phase/hydrophilic interaction/ion exchange mixed-mode retention mechanisms. The column efficiency of the Sil-SMA-derivatives columns reached 77,300 N/m. Based on the mixed-mode retention characteristics, the Sil-SMA-derivatives columns achieved both the lipid classes and species separation via a single column. The Sil-SMA-amino acid column was further successfully used to separate lipid extract from gastric cancer cell membrane. All these results demonstrated that the SMA-based stationary phase materials have a good potential for use in lipid separation.

Styrene-maleic acid copolymer  /  Mixed-mode  /  Stationary phase  /  Chromatographic separation  /  Lipids
Mengying Liang, Delu Liu, Yangyang Nie, Yanli Liu, Xiaoqiang Qiao. Exploiting styrene-maleic acid copolymer grafting chromatographic stationary phase materials for separation of membrane lipids[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022 , 33 (6) : 3123 -3126 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.008
Full Text
Less
As the boundary of the cell, the cell membrane is abundant in various finely sculpted proteins and lipids. The membrane lipids fulfill multiple biological functions, such as serving as selective barriers to cells, providing fuel for energy-demanding cellular activities, regulating the structure and activity of membrane proteins, and acting as messengers or transforming into bioactive molecules for working in a variety of physiological and pathological processes [1-3]. Severe imbalance of membrane lipids homeostasis is closely associated with metabolic diseases, immunological diseases, neurodegenerative diseases and cancers [4]. A recent study demonstrated that membrane lipids remodeling occurred in red blood cells from COVID-19 patients [5]. Some other studies have shown that bioactive lipids, such as anti-inflammatory lipoxin A4 and sphingolipid derivatives, may be beneficial in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 [6, 7]. Besides, the study of membrane lipids is important for its own sake. Tens of thousands of membrane lipids not only differ greatly in polarity and abundance, but also include complex isomer forms, such as sn-position isomers, double bond position isomers, double bond stereochemical isomers and enantiomers, which pose huge challenges for the multi-level structural identification of membrane lipids [8-11].
As an important approach for lipid separation and identification, high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) has been widely used. Through HPLC separation, lipid molecules can be separated according to classes or species, which can efficiently reduce matrix complexity and ion suppression effects during subsequent MS detection [12], thereby greatly expanding the identification coverage of lipid molecules. Moreover, the chromatographic separation process greatly reduces the limitations of MS on the identification of lipid isomers [13, 14]. The realization of high efficiency and robust separation of complex lipids largely depends on the types and performances of the chromatographic stationary phase materials [15-17]. For example, traditional reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) columns (C18 or C8) can achieve intra-class lipid separation based on hydrophobic differences deriving from their fatty acyl chain moieties [18, 19]. Normal phase liquid chromatography (NPLC) or hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) columns generally use different mobile phase systems to separate lipids based on their polar headgroups. Despite a little lower resolution than NPLC, HILIC performs better in terms of reproducibility and mass spectrum compatibility [20, 21]. In general, chromatographic stationary phases suitable for lipid separation are relatively limited. Further development of specifically designed stationary phase materials targeting for lipid separation could meet the increasing demand for in-depth separation and identification of complex lipid samples.
Tonge et al. first researched the membrane-solubilizing effect of amphiphilic styrene-maleic acid (SMA) copolymer which can transform lipid bilayers into stable polymer/lipid assemblies (nano-sized bilayer disks) [22, 23]. In the first study to make use of the benefits of this discovery, Knowles et al. utilized SMA copolymer to extract membrane proteins. Proteins PagP and bacteriorhodopsin can integrate into the SMA/lipid particles (SMALPs, also referred to as "native nanodiscs") with improved solubility [24]. Since then, SMALPs technology has become a promising tool for membrane research, as it can simultaneously and non-selectively extract lipids and proteins from biological membranes [25]. A series of SMA derivatives (such as SMA-ED, SMAd-A, SMA-EA, SMA-SH, SMA-Glu, SMI, and SMA-MA/EtA/PA) have been developed by post-modification of the anhydride groups in the styrene-maleic anhydride (SMAnh) copolymer, which exhibited enhanced pH and divalent cations tolerance and expanded application range [26-31]. Furthermore, membrane lipids co-extracted in SMALPs have also been analyzed [32, 33]. SMA copolymer exhibited excellent solubilization ability to lipids of various headgroups, alkyl chains and configurations [34, 35].
This study takes advantage of the excellent solubilization properties of SMA copolymers. They were first exploited as the chromatographic stationary phase materials to separate membrane lipids. For fabrication of the chromatographic materials, styrene and maleic anhydride were in-situ polymerized and grafted on the surface of spherical silica via the one-pot method. As a proof-of-concept demonstration, l-cysteine hydrochloride and dodecanol were further utilized to post-modify the material (Fig. 1). The performances of the Sil-SMA-dodecanol and Sil-SMA-amino acid stationary phases thus obtained were researched and they were further exploited to separate phospholipid standards and gastric cancer cell membrane lipid extracts.
The Sil-SMA-dodecanol and Sil-SMA-amino acid stationary phases were first characterized by Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR). For Sil-SMAnh, the absorption peaks at 1495 cm−1 and 1450 cm−1 are attributed to the skeleton stretching vibration of the benzene ring, and the absorption peak at 700 cm−1 represents the bending vibration of C-H of the benzene ring. The absorption peaks at 1860 cm−1 and 1780 cm−1 belong to the asymmetric and symmetric stretching vibration of C=O in maleic anhydride, respectively. For Sil-SMA-dodecanol and Sil-SMA-amino acid stationary phases, the weakening of the peak intensity at 1780 cm−1 and the appearance of the peak at 1730 cm−1 indicates that the anhydride groups were esterified or amidated (Fig. S1 in Supporting information). These results demonstrate the successful preparation of the Sil-SMA-dodecanol and Sil-SMA-amino acid stationary phase materials. The successful preparation of the Sil-SMA-derivatives stationary phase materials was further proved by thermogravimetric analysis (Fig. S2 in Supporting information) and elemental analysis (Table S1 in Supporting information).
Considering that the Sil-SMA-dodecanol and Sil-SMA-amino acid stationary phase materials contain versatile groups, both the two packed columns can provide multiple interactions for the analytes. For example, the hydrophobic alkylbenzenes demonstrated RPLC retention mechanism on both the two columns (Figs. 2a and b). However, compared with the Sil-SMA-amino acid column, the Sil-SMA-dodecanol column exhibited stronger retention under the same elution condition, derived from the stronger hydrophobicity of the introduced dodecanol groups. For the hydrophilic amides, both the two columns indicated HILIC retention characteristic while the Sil-SMA-amino acid column exhibited stronger hydrophilicity (Figs. 2c and d). Moreover, ion exchange retention mechanism was also observed from both the two columns (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). The suitability of the columns was also investigated by separation of alkylbenzenes and amides for the Sil-SMA-dodecanol and Sil-SMA-amino acid columns, respectively (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). After continuous injection for 100 runs, similar chromatographic profiling was observed, except that the retention time of niacinamide slightly lagged.
In order to test the chromatographic performances of the Sil-SMA-derivatives columns, different kinds of samples were selected. For example, for the hydrophilic amides, 6 amides were efficiently separated with sharp peaks on the Sil-SMA-amino acid column using acetonitrile (ACN)/H2O (98:2, v/v) as the mobile phase (Fig. 3a). The tailing factors of the 6 peaks were between 0.95–1.12. The maximum theoretical plate number was up to 77,300 N/m. Under the same conditions, the retention ability of these amides on the Sil-SMA-dodecanol column was weaker than that on the Sil-SMA-amino acid column, and the peaks of thioacetamide and 2-cyanoacetamide were completely stacked together (Fig. 3b). When further decreasing the proportion of water in the mobile phase to 1%, the resolution of thioacetamide and 2-cyanoacetamide on the Sil-SMA-dodecanol column did not improve (Fig. 3c).
More hydrophobic phenols were further used to test the chromatographic properties of the Sil-SMA-derivatives columns. From Fig. S5 (Supporting information), we can see the 6 phenols were fully separated on Sil-SMA-amino acid column within 14 min, with the tailing factors of 0.93–1.05. The highest theoretical plate number reached 52,400 N/m. Under the same conditions, only 5 compounds were eluted on the Sil-SMA-dodecanol column on the Sil-SMA-dodecanol column even though the separation time was prolonged to 20 min. For the weakly polar and basic anilines, the two columns also indicated different separation selectivity (Fig. S6 in Supporting information).
RPLC and HILIC are the most commonly used chromatographic modes for lipids separation. In HILIC mode, the lipids are often separated according to the properties of their polar headgroups which define the lipid classes. In RPLC mode, lipids are usually separated based on lipophilicity differences caused by the various lengths, geometries and double bonds numbers of acyl- or alkyl-chains which define the lipid species. Usually, it is difficult to achieve both classes and species separation via a single HPLC column. Herein, we exploited the separation potential of the Sil-SMA-derivatives columns for both the lipid classes and species. As shown in Fig. 4a, with Sil-SMA-amino acid column as an example, the phosphatidylcholine (PC) standards of lysoPC, DMPC, DPPC, DOPC, and DSPC were eluted and separated according to their hydrophobicity within 20 min using methanol/ACN/water (80:10:10, v/v/v) as the mobile phase. All the samples showed good peak shapes without obvious tailing phenomena. As shown in Fig. 4b, the phosphatidyl ethanolamine (PE) standards of DPPE, DOPE, and DSPE were also efficiently separated with the mobile phase of methanol/ACN/water (40:40:20, v/v/v). DPPG, DPPS, DPPE, and DPPC possess identical acyl chains but belong to different lipid classes. As shown in Fig. 4c, with n-hexane/isopropanol/H2O/glacial acetic acid/triethylamine (5:81:14:1.5:0.08, v/v/v/v/v) as mobile phase A and methanol as mobile phase B, the different classes of phospholipids were also efficiently separated. Obviously, on basis of the mixed-mode retention characteristics, the Sil-SMA-derivatives columns can simultaneously achieve separation of both lipid classes and species, showing good application potential for the comprehensive analysis of lipid molecules in biological samples.
For further test the separation performances for real samples, the Sil-SMA-amino acid column was further used for separation of lipids extracted from gastric cancer cells. With n-hexane/isopropanol/H2O/glacial acetic acid/triethylamine (5:81:14:1.5:0.08, v/v/v/v/v)/methanol (45:55, v/l-cysteine hydrochloride and dodecanol were utilized to post-modify the stationary phase materials. The new Sil-SMA-dodecanol and Sil-SMA-amino acid columns indicated mixed-mode RPLC/HILIC/ion exchange separation characteristic and also exhibited different separation selectivity for both hydrophobic and hydrophilic compounds. The column efficiency of the Sil-SMA-derivatives columns reached 77,300 N/m. One of the important characteristics of the Sil-SMA-derivatives columns is that both the lipid classes and species can be separated via a single column. The Sil-SMA-amino acid column was successfully used to separate lipids extracted from gastric cancer cells. In subsequent research, versatile Sil-SMA-derivatives stationary phases, by connecting more possible post-modification reagents, will be further designed and fabricated, dedicated to improving the separation and identification capabilities of complex lipid samples.
In conclusion, SMA derivatives were first exploited as the coating materials for fabrication of HPLC staationary phases to separate membrane lipids. As a proof-of concept demonstration, l-cysteine hydrochloride and dodecanol were utilized to post-modify the stationary phase materials. The nwe Sil-SMA-dodecanol and Sil-SMA-amino acid columns indicated mixed-mode RPLC/HILIC/ion exchange separatoin characteristic and alsoexhibited different separation selectivity for both hydrophobic and hydrophilic compounds. The column efficiency of the Sil-SMA-derivatives columns reached 77,300 N/m. One of the important characteristics of the Sil-SMA-derivatives columns is that both the lipid classes and species can be separated via a single column. The Sil-SMA-amino acid column was successfully used to separate lipids extracted from gastric cancer cells. In subsequent research. versatile Sil-SMA-derivatives stationary phases, by connecting more possible post-modification reagents, will be further designed and fabricated, dedicated to improving the separation and identification capabilities of complex lipid samples.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
We thank the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21675039), Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Nos. B2019201327 and H2019201170), Hundred Outstanding Innovative Talents in Universities of Hebei Province (No. SLRC2019016), Young Talent of Hebei Province, Natural Science Interdisciplinary Research Program of Hebei University (No. DXK201912).
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.008
References
Less
[1]
A. Luchini, G. Vitiello, Biomimetics 6 (2021) 3.
[2]
L.M. Butler, Y. Perone, J. Dehairs, et al., Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 159 (2020) 245–293.
[3]
S. Takatori, T. Fujimoto, Essays Biochem. 57 (2015) 81–91.
[4]
M. Torres, C.A. Rosselló, P. Fernandez-Garcia, et al., Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (2020) 2322.
[5]
T. Thomas, D. Stefanoni, M. Dzieciatkowska, et al., J. Proteome Res. 19 (2020) 4455–4469.
[6]
U.N. Das, Arch. Med. Res. 52 (2021) 107–120.
[7]
H. Prakash, D. Upadhyay, O.R. Bandapalli, A. Jain, B. Kleuser, Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 152 (2021) 106504.
[8]
K. Yang, X. Han, Trends Biochem. Sci. 41 (2016) 954–969.
[9]
J. Aldana, A. Romero-Otero, M.P. Cala, Metabolites 10 (2020) 231.
[10]
S.E. Hancock, B.L.J. Poad, A. Batarseh, S.K. Abbott, T.W. Mitchell, Anal. Biochem. 524 (2017) 45–55.
[11]
W. Zhang, B. Shang, Y. Xia, J. Anal. Test. 4 (2020) 210–216.
[12]
S.M. Lam, H. Tian, G. Shui, Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1862 (2017) 752–761.
[13]
K. Jurowski, K. Kochan, J. Walczak, et al., Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 47 (2017) 418–437.
[14]
S. Sethi, E. Brietzke, Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 128-129 (2017) 8–16.
[15]
J. Chen, N. Yuan, D. Jiang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 3398–3401.
[16]
N.P. Long, S. Park, N.H. Anh, et al., J. Anal. Test. 4 (2020) 183–197.
[17]
J. Walcza, P. Pomastowski, S. Bocian, B. Buszewski, J. Chromatogr. A 1432 (2016) 39–48.
[18]
Y. Zhang, H. Zhong, S. Zhou, et al., J. Chromatogr. A 1642 (2021) 462045.
[19]
E. Rampler, A. Criscuolo, M. Zeller, et al., Anal. Chem. 90 (2018) 6494–6501.
[20]
M. Li, L. Yang, Y. Bai, H. Liu, Anal. Chem. 86 (2014) 161–175.
[21]
T.H. Pham, M. Zaeem, T.A. Fillier, et al., Sci. Rep. 9 (2019) 5048.
[22]
S.R. Tonge, UK Pat. WO/2006/129127, 2006.
[23]
J.M. Dorr, S. Scheidelaar, M.C. Koorengevel, et al., Eur. Biophys. J. 45 (2016) 3–21.
[24]
T.J. Knowles, R. Finka, C. Smith, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 7484–7485.
[25]
J.F.B. Juarez, J.C. Muñoz-García, R.I. dos Reis, et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1862 (2020) 183152.
[26]
T. Ravula, N.Z. Hardin, S.K. Ramadugu, A. Ramamoorthy, Langmuir 33 (2017) 10655–10662.
[27]
T. Ravula, S.K. Ramadugu, G. Di Mauro, A. Ramamoorthy, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 11466–11470.
[28]
S. Lindhoud, V. Carvalho, J.W. Pronk, M.E. Aubin-Tam, Biomacromolecules 17 (2016) 1516–1522.
[29]
K.M. Burridge, B.D. Harding, I.D. Sahu, et al., Biomacromolecules 21 (2020) 1274–1284.
[30]
S.C.L. Hall, C. Tognoloni, J. Charlton, et al., Nanoscale 10 (2018) 10609–10619.
[31]
M. Esmaili, C. Acevedo-Morantes, H. Wille, M. Overduin, Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1862 (2020) 183360.
[32]
D.J.K. Swainsbury, M.S. Proctor, A. Hitchcock, et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1859 (2018) 215–225.
[33]
H. Ayub, M. Clare, I. Milic, et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1862 (2020) 183419.
[34]
M. Esmaili, M. Overduin, Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1860 (2018) 257–263.
[35]
J.J. Dominguez Pardo, J.M. Dörr, A. Iyer, et al., Eur. Biophys. J. 46 (2017) 91–101.
Appendix
Less
Year 2022 volume 33 Issue 6
PDF
47
25
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.008
  • Receive Date：2021-07-08
  • Online Date：2025-12-19
  • Published：2022-06-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2021-07-08
  • Revised：2021-09-12
  • Accepted：2021-10-08
Affiliations
    College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hebei Province Key Laboratory of Analytical Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Diagnosis, Ministry of Education, Hebei University, Baoding 071002, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.008
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House