To elucidate the mechanisms behind the metal sites dependent performance for CO
2 photoreduction, we studied the whole reaction process systematically. Firstly, the electronic structure of catalyst is one key factor to determine the photocatalytic capability. The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (Figs. S23 and S24 in Supporting information) were conducted to give the bandgap energy of 2.86, 1.88 and 1.47 eV for
BIF-43, Co@
BIF-43 and Ni@
BIF-43, respectively. Mott-Schottky measurements were carried out to determine the flat-band position to be −0.81, −0.84 and −1.17 eV for
BIF-43, Co@
BIF-43 and Ni@
BIF-43 (
Fig. 4a and Fig. S25 in Supporting information), respectively, which are approximately close to the bottom of the conduction band (CB). Combined with the analysis of the UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra, the energy level diagrams for all three catalysts are obtained (
Fig. 4b). The CB potential for all the three catalysts were higher than the reduction potential of CO
2-to-CO and lower than the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of Ru (−1.27 eV) [
5]. These results suggested that these catalysts were thermodynamically capable of receiving the photoexcited electrons from the excited Ru for reducing the adsorbed CO
2 to CO product. However, although the catalytic activity of Co@
BIF-43 was higher than that of Ni@
BIF-43, its CB potential was lower than that of Ni@
BIF-43. Therefore, energy band positions only endow sufficient driving force to trigger the CO
2 reduction process but cannot determine the catalytic activity. Furthermore, charge separation efficiency of these catalysts was investigated by the transient photocurrent response and the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) under the photocatalytic system condition, shown in
Figs. 4c and
d. Greatly enhanced photocurrent intensity and reduced semicircle arc of Nyquist plots have been observed over Co@
BIF-43 and Ni@
BIF-43, suggesting the enhanced separation efficiency of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs and faster electron transfer from the excited Ru photosensitizer to the reaction center by anchoring Co/Ni ions. Based on previous works [
5,
37] and the above results, a conceivable mechanism was proposed. Under visible light irradiation, the photosensitizer (Ru) is promoted to the excited state. This excited state is then oxidatively quenched by the catalyst of M@
BIF-43 and transfers electron to the exposed metal active site where CO
2 molecule is activated and reduced to CO. Finally, Ru returned back to its original state by electron supply from the sacrificial reductant TEOA. Moreover, the highest current intensity and lowest charge-transfer resistance of Co@
BIF-43 was consistent with its highest catalytic activity towards CO, which demonstrates that charge separation and transport efficiency may be the key factor for the boosted catalytic reaction rate. Whereas, Ni@
BIF-43 shows the higher selectivity of CO over H
2, indicating the important selective role of the metal center in the catalytic process. The above results clearly indicate that BIFs modified by transition metal ions can significantly facilitate the charge separation, and vastly improve photocatalytic CO
2 efficiency, and the catalytic performances highly dependent the types of active metal ions.