<i>In-situ</i> monitoring of cell-secreted lactate by electrochemiluminescence sensing under biomimetic microfluidic confinement

In-situ monitoring of cell-secreted lactate by electrochemiluminescence sensing under biomimetic microfluidic confinement

PDF

Yixin Liu^a, Yuanyuan Yao^c, Beibei Yang^d, Yan-Jun Liu^b^,^*, Baohong Liu^a^,^*

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(5) : 2705 - 2707

Less

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(5): 2705-2707

• Communication •

In-situ monitoring of cell-secreted lactate by electrochemiluminescence sensing under biomimetic microfluidic confinement

Full

Yixin Liu^a, Yuanyuan Yao^c, Beibei Yang^d, Yan-Jun Liu^b^,^*, Baohong Liu^a^,^*

Affiliations

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital, and State Key Lab of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

^bShanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism (Ministry of Science and Technology), Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China

^cCollege of Biological, Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China

^dDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226000, China

Published: 2022-05-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.074

Outline

Abstract

Less

Cell migration proceeds in 3D matrices in vivo, which can naturally switch to distinct phenotypes for better invasion in confined microenvironments. The studies of important metabolites under confinement are extremely meaningful for comprehensive insights into cancer metastasis. The integration of cell confinement device and analytical techniques is a key point for in-situ analysis of significant metabolites in vitro. Herein, an electrochemiluminescence (ECL) sensing platform was designed for in-situ monitoring of cell-secreted lactate in highly confined microenvironments. The 3-µm confiner was exactly fabricated via microfabrication and microfluidics technique, and cells in high confinement and low adhesion tended to be round with contractile blebs on cell margins. Significantly, in-situ monitoring of lactate was successfully achieved on the ECL platform with the catalysis of lactate oxidase, in which the levels in different time intervals were acquired in the luminol-hydrogen peroxide system. Furthermore, the results were verified by the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) technology, which showed similar fluctuations with the ECL platform. This system offered an available avenue for metabolites analysis in highly confined microenvironments, which may advance deeper insights into metabolic mechanisms of cancer metastasis

Key words

Confinement / ECL sensing platform / In-situ monitoring

Cite this Article

Yixin Liu, Yuanyuan Yao, Beibei Yang, Yan-Jun Liu, Baohong Liu. In-situ monitoring of cell-secreted lactate by electrochemiluminescence sensing under biomimetic microfluidic confinement[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022 , 33 (5) : 2705 -2707 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.074

Full Text

Less

Cell migration is a critical part in cancer metastasis, which plays an indispensable role in the process of detachment from primary lesions, circulation in microvessels, and further invasion into new sites for secondary tumor [1-2]. The comprehensive insights into metabolic mechanisms in microenvironments were extremely significant for therapeutic strategies targeting cancer. Traditional studies towards rare cell analysis and cellular responses were generally based on two-dimensional (2D) models in vitro [3-11], which may offer some concepts on understanding of molecular mechanisms. However, the fact is that cancer cells in vivo need to cross through complex and variable microenvironments for efficient metastasis, especially narrow, confined three-dimensional (3D) regions in tissues. Significantly, researches have indicated that cancer cells can autonomously change their phenotypes in confinement for convenient migration in vivo [12-13]. Thereinto, recently, Piel's group developed a confined microenvironment in vitro [14], in which cancer cells could switch to fast amoeboid migration under strong confinement and low adhesion. However, the metabolic mechanisms in confined environments were rarely unexplored.

Metabolic disorders are obvious features in cancer microenvironments, and cancer metastasis can be effectively promoted through adjustable metabolites for suitable bioenergetics [15]. Especially, the metabolism of migrated cells can be selectively regulated so as to form different metabolic traits for favorable migration in complex microenvironments [15]. Among these metabolic pathways, lactate is an important metabolite generated from aerobic glycolysis, which is known as "Warburg effect". It can be served as an important signaling molecule for effective protection against reactive oxygen species (ROS) in vivo, thus promoting cell migration in cancer metastasis. Additionally, the expression level of lactate is also a key indicator in clinic for health assessments. Thus, various strategies were widely developed for lactate detection in biological samples [16-18], however, in-situ monitoring of lactate is rarely studied in specific microenvironments. It is desirable to design a simple, sensitive and effective platform for in-situ lactate analysis for deeper understanding of metabolic mechanisms under confinement. Electrochemiluminescence (ECL) has been applied as a hot technique for targets analysis due to its low background, high sensitivity, simplified equipment and flexible controllability [19-22], in which ECL signals are generated from electrogenerated species under certain voltages. The luminol-hydrogen peroxide system is a highly efficient ECL platform for biomolecules detection benefiting from its powerful luminescence efficiencies after electrochemical reactions, which offers great potential for in-situ monitoring of cell-secreted lactate in confined microenvironments.

Thus, in this work, an ECL sensing platform was designed for in-situ monitoring of cell-secreted lactate in confined microenvironments. As shown in Fig. 1, cells were put into a confined microenvironment, in which exact polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microstructures were fabricated based on pre-designed templates. Remarkably, compared with non-confined cells, contractile blebs emerged on margins of the confined cells along with distinct deformations of the cell body and nucleus. Subsequently, in-situ monitoring of lactate in confined microenvironments was achieved by the ECL platform, of which the expression in different time intervals was measured based on luminol-hydrogen peroxide systems by means of lactate oxidase. Additionally, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) technology was employed for further verification. The perfect combination of cell confinement device and ECL techniques offered a promising platform for in-situ monitoring of key metabolites in confined microenvironments, which may promote further studies on metabolic mechanisms of cancer in variable microenvironments in vitro.

As shown in Fig. 1, confined microenvironments for HeLa cells were successfully engineered according to the previous report [23], and the detailed processes were provided in the supplemental files. Briefly, large PDMS pillars for main supports were acquired via a customized template. Similarly, the confinement slide was fabricated through a silicon mold, which was covered with regular holes with 440-mm diameters and 3-µm heights. Large PDMS pillars on the center of cover lids were applied to load with the confiner, and then covered on cells in a 6-well plate for constant force by use of adhesive tapes. The modification of pLL(20)-g[3.5]-PEG(2) (pLL-PEG) on coverslips was employed to form non-adhesive surfaces. The real-time monitoring of cell phenotypes in highly confined microenvironments was achieved in a microscope. As displayed in Fig. 2B, cells in low adhesion and confined microenvironments exhibited distinct behavioral phenotypes. Compared to non-confined cells (Fig. 2A), the cross-section of nucleus got bigger in effects of confined microenvironments (inset in Fig. 2B), and the cell body showed rounded phenotypes with continuously contractive blebs around the cell edge. This was caused by increased cortex contractility in confined cells [24], which might further switch to amoeboid-like phenotypes in the complete medium under stable confinement. The distinct phenotypes of confined cells were directly relevant to the differential expression of metabolites.

Considering application of the ECL platform in confined microenvironments, as exhibited in Fig. 1, the glass for imaging in the 6-well-plate device was replaced by indium tin oxide (ITO) conductive substrates, and the cover lid of the 6-well-plate was perforated for introducing electrodes for next ECL analysis. In this work, lactate was investigated as a key metabolite in confined microenvironments. Thus, as shown in Fig. 3A, the ECL platform showed well performance for lactate detection, of which ECL signals were increased with the concentrations of lactate with the catalysis of lactate oxidase, which showed a regression equation of y = 11.22x − 16.66 (R² = 0.9952) in the range of 10−200 µmol/L with a detection limit of 5 µmol/L (Fig. 3B). Therefore, the well-engineered ECL platform provided a possibility for in-situ monitoring of cell-secreted lactate in confined microenvironments.

For exploring metabolic differences in highly confined microenvironments, HeLa cells were cultured in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution for in-situ monitoring of secreted lactate on the ECL platform. The ECL responses were measured at different time intervals in the presence and absence of lactate oxidase. As exhibited in Fig. 3C, confined cells showed contractive blebs around the cell edge along with time. The background in microenvironments (Fig. 3D) may result from varied metabolism, while the signal differences in Fig. 3E resulted from cell-secreted lactate gradually increased along with time, and the concentration reached ~5 µmol/L at 4 h. Simultaneously, signal differences of ECL responses in non-confined microenvironment were hard to be monitored, which indicating stronger metabolisms of anaerobic respiration under confinement.

For verifying the fluctuation of lactate in confined microenvironments, as shown in Fig. 4A, samples in different time intervals were collected through centrifugation for LC-MS/MS analysis. The lactate in samples was well detected in LC-MS/MS methods, and the heat map of samples in different time intervals (Fig. 4B) was intuitively exhibited for the differential expression. The secreted lactate gradually increased along with confined time (Fig. 4C), which was consistent with in-situ monitored results on the ECL platform. The above results further demonstrated the accuracy of the ECL platform.

In summary, an ECL sensing platform was applied for in-situ monitoring of cell-secreted lactate under biomimetic microfluidic confinement. The highly confined microenvironments were well achieved by microfabrication and microfluidics technique. The cell body became round with retractile blebs on the cell margin, and the cell nucleus deformed under biomimetic confinement. Significantly, the lactate in confined microenvironments was successfully monitored in the ECL sensing platform by use of lactate oxidase, of which metabolic differences in different time intervals were obtained. The results indicated more active metabolisms in highly confined cells, which was further verified by the LC-MS/MS technology. This work offered a new perspective for in-situ monitoring of significant metabolites in biomimetic confined microenvironments in vitro, which may promote the development of molecular mechanisms of cancer metastasis.

Declaration of competing interest

Less

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Acknowledgments

Less

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21934001 and 31870978), the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (No. LQ20B050002).

Supplementary materials

Less

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.074

References

Less

[1]

N. Reymond, B.B. d'Água, A.J. Ridley, Nat. Rev. Cancer13 (2013) 858–870.

[2]

J.A. Joyce, J.W. Pollard, Nat. Rev. Cancer9 (2009) 239–252.

[3]

P. Friedl, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16 (2004) 14–23.

[4]

H.M. Estabridis, A. Jana, A. Nain, D.J. Odde, Ann. Biomed. Eng. 46 (2018) 392–403.

[5]

K. Wolf, S. Alexander, V. Schacht, et al., Semin. Cell Dev. Biol20 (2009) 931–941.

[6]

J.W. Hou, X. Liu, S.B. Zhou, View 2 (2021) 20200023.

[7]

L. Miccio, F. Cimmino, I. Kurelac, et al., View1 (2020) 20200034.

[8]

R. Zhang, B. Le, W. Xu, et al., Small Methods3 (2019) 1800474.

[9]

H.T. Tan, H.Q. Hu, L. Huang, K. Qian, Analyst145 (2020) 5699–5712.

[10]

J.G. Liu, C.L. Cai, Y.N. Wang, et al., Adv. Sci. 7 (2020) 1903730–1903739.

[11]

S.Y. Sun, R.M. Wang, Y.D. Huang, et al., Small15 (2019) 1902441–1902449.

[12]

P. Friedl, S. Alexander, Cell147 (2011) 992–1009.

[13]

S. Alexander, B. Weigelin, F. Winkler, P. Friedl, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 25 (2013) 659–671.

[14]

Y.J. Liu, M.L. Berre, F. Lautenschlaeger, et al., Cell160 (2015) 659–672.

[15]

G. Bergers, S.M. Fendt, Nat. Rev. Cancer21 (2021) 162–180.

[16]

A.L. Hu, Y.H. Liu, H.H. Deng, et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 61 (2014) 374–378.

[17]

N. Nesakumar, K. Thandavan, S. Sethuraman, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 414 (2014) 90–96.

[18]

K.K. Hussain, N.G. Gurudatt, M.H. Akthar, et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 155 (2020) 112094–112102.

[19]

S. Majeed, W.Y. Gao, Y. Zholudov, K. Muzyka, G.B. Xu, Electroanalysis28 (2016) 2672–2679.

[20]

T.T. Zhao, C.S. Lin, Q.H. Yao, X. Chen, Talanta154 (2016) 492–497.

[21]

X. Xiong, Y. Zhang, Y.F. Wang, et al., Sens. Actuators B297 (2019) 126812–126820.

[22]

Y. Zou, H.X. Zhang, Z.H. Wang, et al., Talanta198 (2019) 39–44.

[23]

Y.J. Liu, M.L. Berre, F. Lautenschlaeger, et al., Cell160 (2015) 659–672.

[24]

E. Sahai, C.J. Marshall, Nat. Cell Biol. 5 (2003) 711–719.

Appendix

Less

Year 2022 volume 33 Issue 5

PDF

Cite this Article

BibTeX

Article Info

doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.074

Receive Date：2021-05-31
Online Date：2025-12-19
Published：2022-05-15

Article Data

Affiliations

History

Received：2021-05-31
Revised：2021-09-06
Accepted：2021-09-22

Affiliations

^aDepartment of Chemistry, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital, and State Key Lab of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China

^cCollege of Biological, Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China

^dDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nantong University, Nantong 226000, China

References

Share

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.09.074

Share to

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article

BibTeX

Citations

表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of in-situ ECL monitoring of lactate in confined microenvironments.

Fig. 2 HeLa cells in non-confined (A) or confined (B) microenvironments on low adhesive substrates. Cells were cultured in PBS buffer solution (10 mmol/L, pH 7.4). The fluorescence imaging of nucleus in confined or non-confined cells was shown in the inset.

Fig. 3 HeLa cells in non-confined (A) or confined (B) microenvironments on low adhesive substrates. Cells were cultured in PBS buffer solution (10 mmol/L, pH 7.4). The fluorescence imaging of nucleus in confined or non-confined cells was shown in the inset.

Fig. 4 HeLa cells in non-confined (A) or confined (B) microenvironments on low adhesive substrates. Cells were cultured in PBS buffer solution (10 mmol/L, pH 7.4). The fluorescence imaging of nucleus in confined or non-confined cells was shown in the inset.

Articles: Latest Articles; Most Read; Collections

Updates: Events; News; Multimedia

About: About Us

Contact

No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing

100081

010-62199257

qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House