To further excavate the structural origin and photoluminescence mechanism, quantum chemical calculations were performed on the free DASP, DTE-DASP, and their DNC-bound assemblies in the ground (S
0) and first singlet excited (S
1) states. It is known that the singlet excited state of push-pull-type molecule DASP spontaneously relaxes to the twisted intramolecular charge-transfer (TICT) state and hence keeps in fluorescent silence [
32]. Our calculations by the density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) methods also revealed that the ground state of DASP moiety adopts a coplanar conformation, whereas the most stable singlet excited state of DASP moiety is twisted by the −92.2° rotation of dimethylaniline with respect to pyridinium unit
via the central chemical double bond, which is in consistent with the TICT relaxation mechanism (
Figs. 4a and
b). Meanwhile, other possible conformations of DTE-DASP in the first singlet excited state were also considered but they were all higher in energy than the conformation in
Fig. 4b (Fig. S16 in Supporting information). The encapsulation in DNC ring could not change the coplanar conformation of DASP moiety in the ground state (the torsion angle
φ = 179.3° in
Fig. 4c). In sharp contrast, the captured DASP completely retained the coplanar conformation (the torsion angles
φ = 177.2° in
Fig. 4d) in the ring of DNC even in the local excited (LE) state, which was co-stabilized by the multiple
π-stacking and hydrogen-bonding interactions. Consequently, through the cooperative host-guest stabilization in the S
1 state, the undesirable nonradiative quenching process from the susceptible TICT state is essentially blocked and the emissive channel from the S
1 state revives as the dominant pathway to dramatically augment the fluorescence efficiency. The transition energies of DASP and DTE from the S
0 to the S
1 state were also calculated to gain more insights into the energy transfer pathway. The energy difference between DTE
OF and DTE
CF is fairly large at the S
1 state, which provides an opportunity to switch the energy transfer behaviors with a photosensitizer possessing suitable singlet energy to fill the gap [
33]. Indeed, the obtained transition energy of DASP (2.62 eV) is higher than that of DTE
CF (1.94 eV) but lower than that of the DTE
OF (3.25 eV), suggesting that the energy transfer can only take place from DASP to DTE
CF rather than DTE
OF. As a result, the fluorescence emission is accordingly switched off by virtue of the energy-level matching and the close range in the donor-to-acceptor contact between two chromophore centers (2.16 nm,
Fig. 4c).