Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Next-generation sequencing-based analysis of the effect of N6-methyldeoxyadenosine modification on DNA replication in human cells
收藏切换
PDF
Juan Wang, Yuwei Sheng, Ying Yang, Xiaoxia Dai*, Changjun You*
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(4) : 2077 - 2080
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(4): 2077-2080
• Communication •
Next-generation sequencing-based analysis of the effect of N6-methyldeoxyadenosine modification on DNA replication in human cells
Full
Juan Wang, Yuwei Sheng, Ying Yang, Xiaoxia Dai*, Changjun You*
Affiliations
  • Molecular Science and Biomedicine Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecular Chemical Biology, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Published: 2022-04-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.066
Outline
收藏切换

N6-methyldeoxyadenosine (6mdA) modification is considered as a new epigenetic mark that may play important roles in various biological processes. However, it remains unclear about the effect of 6mdA on DNA replication in human cells. Herein, we combined next-generation sequencing with shuttle vector technology to explore how 6mdA affects the efficiency and accuracy of DNA replication in human cells. Our results showed that 6mdA neither blocked DNA replication nor induced mutations in human cells. Moreover, we found that the depletion of translesion synthesis DNA polymerase (Pol) κ, Pol η, Pol ι or Pol ζ did not significantly change the biological consequences of 6mdA during replication in human cells. The negligible impact of 6mdA on DNA replication is consistent with its potential role in epigenetic gene expression.

-methyldeoxyadenosine  /  DNA replication  /  Next-generation sequencing  /  Shuttle vector technology  /  Translesion synthesis DNA polymerase
Juan Wang, Yuwei Sheng, Ying Yang, Xiaoxia Dai, Changjun You. Next-generation sequencing-based analysis of the effect of N6-methyldeoxyadenosine modification on DNA replication in human cells[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022 , 33 (4) : 2077 -2080 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.066
Full Text
Less
Nucleic Acid methylation represents an important type of nucleic acid modifications that may play crucial roles in diverse biological processes in living organisms [1, 2]. Of them, 5-methylcytosine and its oxidative derivates (e.g., 5-hydroxymethylcytosine) are well-established epigenetic marks dynamically occuring in DNA and RNA [3, 4]. In addition, N6-methyladenine modification in RNA has been acknowledged as a novel epigenetic modification involved in regulation of various biological activities such as tissue development, cellular DNA damage response, and stem cell fate determination [5, 6]. Methylation at N6 position of deoxyadenosine (dA) has also been characterized as a dominant internal modification in bacteria since the discovery of N6-methyldeoxyadenosine (6 mdA) five decades ago (Fig. 1) [7]. With the recent development of highly sensitive detection techniques, 6 mdA has also been observed in several eukaryotes, such as Chlamydomonas [8], C. elegans [9], Drosophila [10, 11], and human [12-15]. Increasing evidence has indicated the possible involvement of 6 mdA methylation in development, stress response and diseases including neurodegenerative disorders and cancers [11, 14-18].
Understanding the biological significance of 6 mdA necessitates the investigation about how this modified nucleoside affects the flow of genetic information during DNA replication. It has been reported that 6 mdA reduced the rate of DNA replication mediated by the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli (E. coli) DNA polymerase I and the large fragment of Bst DNA polymerase in vitro [19]. 6 mdA was also found to partially inhibit in-vitro DNA replication by human DNA polymerase (Pol) η and Pol ι, which play important roles in the translesion synthesis (TLS) of various types of DNA adducts [20, 21]. In addition, since the 6 mdA methyltransferase METTL4 can modulate the mitochondrial DNA copy number, the presence of 6 mdA has been hypothesized to affect mitochondrial DNA replication in mammals [14]. To date, the biological effects of 6 mdA during genomic DNA replication in mammalian cells remain elusive.
We have previously reported the use of shuttle vector technology, together with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based analysis, for successful evaluation of the biological consequences and repair of multiple types of DNA adducts during replication in mammalian cells [22, 23]. It has also been reported that the next-generation sequencing (NGS) methodology is capable of determining the replicative bypass and mutagenic properties of DNA adducts in vitro and in E. coli cells, which are consistent with those obtained from LC-MS/MS and other traditional approaches but at a much higher throughput [24-26]. Herein, we combined our traditional shuttle vector technology with NGS to investigate the biological consequences of 6 mdA methylation during replication in human cells (Figs. 2A and B). We also investigated the potential roles of the major TLS DNA polymerases, including Pol κ, Pol η, Pol ι and Pol ζ, in the replication bypass of 6 mdA in human cells.
Using the gapped vector-based method [25, 26], we first constructed the double-stranded pTGFP-Hha10 shuttle vector housing a site-specifically incorporated 6 mdA (Fig. 2A). We also introduced C/C mismatched bases near the modified nucleoside site so as to differentiate the replication products of 6 mdA-bearing strand from that of the unmodified complementary strand, which was used as an internal control as described elsewhere [23, 27]. In this vein, introduction of mismatched base pair has been accepted as an efficient strategy to distinguish the replication products of the modified nucleoside-bearing and unmodified control strands, which may be replicated at distinct efficiencies in mammalian cells [23, 27].
The 6 mdA-bearing pTGFP-Hha10 plasmid was transfected into HEK293T cells as well as the isogenic cells deficient in Pol κ, Pol η, Pol ι or Pol ζ for the replication study. After 24 h of incubation, the progenies of 6 mdA-bearing plasmid were isolated from human cells, and residual unreplicated plasmid DNA was removed by a combined treatment of DpnI and exonuclease Ⅲ [22, 23]. The DNA region of interest was PCR amplified and indexed with sample-specific barcodes, which designed the respective five host cell lines and the three biological replications. The 15 sets of tagged PCR products were combined and adenylated at the 3′-end, and then ligated to PE adapters. The ligation products were subsequently amplified with PE PCR primers, and the resulting PCR product was purified and subjected to NGS analysis (Fig. 2B, Table S1 in Supporting information).
We obtained a total of ~2 million valid NGS reads for the replication products of 6 mdA-bearing plasmid from triplicate replication experiments in five host cell lines (Tables S2 and S3 in Supporting information). The effect of 6 mdA on replication efficiency can be determined by the 'bypass efficiency', which was calculated by dividing the total number of sequencing reads from 6 mdA-carrying strand with that obtained from its unmodified complementary strand. The quantification data showed that the bypass efficiencies of 6 mdA varied from ~87.3% to 99.0% in HEK293T cells as well as the isogenic cells deficient in Pol κ, Pol η, Pol ι or Pol ζ (Fig. 3), which suggested that the presence of 6 mdA did not substantially inhibit DNA replication in human cells.
Using the NGS-based assay, the effect of 6 mdA on replication fidelity can be determined by the 'base substitution frequency', that is, the relative distribution of nucleobase (A, T, C or G) frequencies opposite the original modified site from 6 mdA-carrying strand. It turned out that the mutation frequencies of A → C, A → G or A → T arising from the replication of the 6 mdA-carrying strand in wild-type and TLS polymerase-deficient HEK293T cells were generally occurring at frequencies of 0.01%–0.03% (Fig. 4A), which were similar to the background error rates (0.01%–0.07%) identified from the unmodified complementary strand (Fig. 4B). These results indicated that 6 mdA did not compromise the fidelity of DNA replication in human cells.
As discussed above, DNA 6 mdA modification has recently attracted substantial research interests regarding their genomic distribution patterns and potential biological functions in eukaryotes [7, 28]. In this study, we have demonstrated that 6 mdA did not inhibit DNA replication or induce mutations in human HEK293T cells using a next-generation sequencing-based cellular replication assay. In addition, replication bypass of 6 mdA is also highly efficient and accurate in human cells that are deficient in any of the four TLS polymerases examined in our study. These results are inconsistent with the observation that 6 mdA can impede considerably in vitro DNA replication mediated by several distinct DNA polymerases including the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I as well as human Pol η and Pol ι [19-21]. These differences could be, at least in part, attributed to the fact that the in vitro replication studies were carried out with a single-type DNA polymerase, whereas the cellular DNA replication often involved the collaborative participation of different DNA polymerases and their auxiliary proteins [26, 29].
It has been suggested that DNA 6 mdA modification may act as a new epigenetic mark that is associated with the regulation of gene expression [30]. In this respect, the enrichment of 6 mdA around the transcription start sites or transposon regions was found to be correlated with increased transcriptional activity [8, 10, 31]. It was also reported that 6 mdA can impact transcription by interfering with RNA polymerase elongation, changing chromatin structure, or modifying transcription factor binding affinities [32, 33]. Since epigenetic DNA modifications generally do not compromise the flow of genetic information during replication [34], our findings that 6 mdA has a negligible effect on DNA replication in human cells is in keeping with its potential role in epigenetic regulation of gene expression.
Similar as 6 mdA, it was reported that the replication of 5-methyldeoxycytidine (5mdC) and its oxidation products, including 5-hydroxymethyl-dC, 5-formyl-dC and 5-carboxyl-dC, are highly efficient and accurate in human cells, consistent with the notion that these oxidized cytidine derivatives may serve as novel epigenetic marks. These epigenetic DNA modifications do not perturb Watson-Crick base pairing, which may account for their non-cytotoxic effects in human cells [4, 34]. On the other hand, the N1 and N3 positions of dA are also among the major methylation sites in DNA, and the resulting DNA adducts 1 mdA and 3 mdA are highly cytotoxic because they can impair Watson-Crick interactions and strongly block DNA replication in human cells [35, 36].
In conclusion, we have employed NGS, together with shuttle vector technology, to quantatively assess how 6 mdA affects the fidelity and efficiency of DNA replication in human cells. Our results showed that 6 mdA has a negligible impact on DNA replication in human cells, which is consistent with its potential role as an epigenetic mark. It is worth noting that we only evaluated the effect of 6 mdA on DNA replication in a single sequence context, and it is possible that the biological consequences of 6 mdA during replication may be infuenced by sequence contexts. In this vein, previous studies have shown that DNA sequence contexts could affect the repair and replicative bypass of several DNA lesions such as the ultraviolet light-induced 6-4 photoproduct [37, 38]. In addition, it has been recently reported that 6 mdA can be modified by ALKBH1 protein to give N6-hydroxymethyl-dA in mammalian genomic DNA [39], and it would be interesting to investigate how this new type of chemical modification modulates the process of DNA replication.in mammalian cells. A more complete understanding of the biological consequences of 6 mdA also requires a further assessment of the modulation activities of cellular repair proteins such as 6 mdA demethylases in mammalian cells. The shuttle vector- and NGS-based strategy described in this study should be applicable for quantitatively assessing the potential effects of sequence contexts and cellular repair activities on the replication of 6 mdA as well as other DNA adducts such as N6-hydroxymethyl-dA and the oxidation products of 5mdC in the future.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
We thank Prof. Yinsheng Wang for kindly providing the initial pTGFPHha10 vector and TLS polymerase knockout cell lines used in the present study. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21807030, 21907028), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (No. 2019RS2020), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2020JJ5046), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. 531118010061, 531118010259).
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can befound, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.066
References
Less
[1]
S. Horvath, K. Raj, Nat. Rev. Genet. 19 (2018) 371-384
[2]
S. Zaccara, R.J. Ries, S.R. Jaffrey, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20 (2019) 608-624
[3]
J. Song, C. Yi, ACS Chem. Biol. 12 (2017) 316-325
[4]
L. Shen, C.X. Song, C. He, Y. Zhang, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83 (2014) 585-614
[5]
B.S. Zhao, I.A. Roundtree, C. He, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18 (2017) 31-42
[6]
X. Deng, R. Su, H. Weng, et al., Cell Res. 28 (2018) 507-517
[7]
H. Heyn, M. Esteller, Cell 161 (2015) 710-713
[8]
Y. Fu, G.Z. Luo, K. Chen, et al., Cell 161 (2015) 879-892
[9]
E.L. Greer, M.A. Blanco, L. Gu, et al., Cell 161 (2015) 868-878
[10]
G. Zhang, H. Huang, D. Liu, et al., Cell 161 (2015) 893-906
[11]
S. He, G. Zhang, J. Wang, et al., Nat. Commun. 10 (2019) 2219
[12]
C.L. Xiao, S. Zhu, M.H. He, et al. e307, Mol. Cell. 71 (2018) 306–318.
[13]
M.J. Koziol, C.R. Bradshaw, G.E. Allen, et al., Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23 (2016) 24-30
[14]
Z. Hao, T. Wu, X. Cui, et al., Mol. Cell 78 (2020) 382–395
[15]
C.W.Q. Koh, Y.T. Goh, J.D.W. Toh, et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 46 (2018) 11659-11670
[16]
C. Ma, R. Niu, T. Huang, et al., Nat. Cell Biol. 21 (2019) 319-327
[17]
T.P. Wu, T. Wang, M.G. Seetin, et al., Nature 532 (2016) 329-333
[18]
B. Yao, Y. Cheng, Z. Wang, et al., Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1122
[19]
S. Wang, J. Wang, X. Zhang, et al., Chem. Sci. 7 (2016) 1440-1446
[20]
K. Du, X. Zhang, Z. Zou, et al., DNA Repair 78 (2019) 81-90
[21]
S. Zhang, B. Li, K. Du, et al., Biochimie 168 (2020) 134-143
[22]
C. You, A.L. Swanson, X. Dai, et al., J. Biol. Chem. 288 (2013) 28548-28556
[23]
B. Yuan, C. You, N. Andersen, et al, J. Biol. Chem. 286 (2011) 17503-17511
[24]
S.C. Chang, B.I. Fedeles, J. Wu, et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 43 (2015) 5489-5500
[25]
D.J. Taggart, T.L. Camerlengo, J.K. Harrison, et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 41 (2013) e96
[26]
B. Yuan, J. Wang, H. Cao, R. Sun, Y. Wang, Nucleic Acids Res. 39 (2011) 5945-5954
[27]
J.H. Yoon, G. Bhatia, S. Prakash, L. Prakash, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107 (2010) 14116-14121
[28]
G.Z. Luo, C. He, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24 (2017) 503-506
[29]
G. Maga, G. Villani, E. Crespan, et al., Nature 447 (2007) 606-608
[30]
K.J. Wu, Cancer Lett. 494 (2020) 40-46
[31]
S.J. Mondo, R.O. Dannebaum, R.C. Kuo, et al., Nat. Genet. 49 (2017) 964-968
[32]
W. Wang, L. Xu, L. Hu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 14436-14442
[33]
K. Sugimoto, S. Takeda, H. Hirochika, Plant J. 36 (2003) 550-564
[34]
D. Ji, C. You, P. Wang, Y. Wang, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 27 (2014) 1304-1309
[35]
J. Conde, J.H. Yoon, J.R. Choudhury, L. Prakash, S. Prakash, J. Biol. Chem. 290 (2015) 29794-29800
[36]
J.H. Yoon, J.R. Choudhury, J. Park, S. Prakash, L. Prakash, J. Biol. Chem. 292 (2017) 18682-18688
[37]
X. Huang, A. Kolbanovskiy, X. Wu, Biochemistry 42 (2003) 2456-2466
[38]
P. Shriber, Y. Leitner-Dagan, N. Geacintov, T. Paz-Elizur, Z. Livneh, Mutat. Res. 780 (2015) 71-76
[39]
J. Xiong, T.T. Ye, C.J. Ma, et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 47 (2019) 1268-1277
Appendix
Less
Year 2022 volume 33 Issue 4
PDF
50
26
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.066
  • Receive Date：2021-07-06
  • Online Date：2025-12-19
  • Published：2022-04-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2021-07-06
  • Revised：2021-08-10
  • Accepted：2021-08-13
Affiliations
    Molecular Science and Biomedicine Laboratory, State Key Laboratory of Chemo/Biosensing and Chemometrics, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Biomacromolecular Chemical Biology, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.066
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House