The second possible question relates to the observation of light-mediated CO
2-responsiveness of the microgels. The characteristics of the change in
δ700 and <
Rh >
0 upon CO
2/N
2 purge in light is highly reminiscent of consequences of photoexcitation [
45-
47], which has been reported previously on metallopolymers that the internal energy absorbed from an exciting radiation could be lost by nonradiative processes among others [
23,
35]. Internal conversion (driven by the kinetic coupling between electronic states; Fig. S15 in Supporting information) and the intersystem crossing (mediated by the spin–orbit coupling) are main intramolecular nonradiative processes [
45-
47]. Note that most organics following photoexcitation undergo rapid internal conversion to the lowest excited singlet state (S
1) [
46,
47], but the internal conversion from S
1 to the lowest singlet state S
0 is relatively slow, allowing time to promote intersystem crossing rapidly of S
1-state to the lowest triplet state T
1 of organometallics
via heavy-atom effect without significantly perturbing the excited-state dynamics [
48], which facilitates formation of T
1-state of metallapentalenes [
24,
49]. As singlet and triplet states are distinct in nature [
45], particularly (anti)aromaticity [
28-
30,
47], the above explanation should be generalized for light-mediated CO
2-responsiveness of the microgels. In a density functional theory (DFT) calculation, metallapentalene with osmium center and with a strong
π-acceptor ligand (like CO;
Scheme 1) was proposed to be aromatic in S
0-state, whereas antiaromatic in T
1-state [
49]. (Anti)aromaticity refers to multidimensional manifestation in energetics, reactivity, electron delocalization and other properties, all of which in turn have been used to define numerous indices of (anti)aromaticity [
24,
28-
30]. For instance, the gain of aromaticity in FLP groups for the activation of asmall molecule (
e.g., CO
2) may result in a gain of stability in both the corresponding transition state (leading to a lower barrier transformation), and in final adduct (making the process thermodynamically more favorable) [
26,
27]. Thereby, it appears that light-mediated CO
2-responsiveness is driven by the loss of aromaticity from initial photoexcitation and concurrent formation of a less reactive, antiaromatic excited state of relatively low CO
2 binding affinity, and by subsequent relief of antiaromaticity that can enhance CO
2 removal upon N
2 purge in light, that is, the origination of good reversibility. In comparison with results recorded at the same temperature in dark, the decrease in
δ700 (
Fig. 2b) and increase in <
Rh >
0 (
Fig. 2d) upon CO
2 purge in light should support the suppression of light for CO
2 binding, thus, indirectly reflect the feasibility of the explanation.