Properties such as dispersibility, luminescence intensity, and photostability of the other CDs on different matrices were compared under the same conditions; the results showed similar trends. All of them were found to have excellent dispersibility, high intensity, and the best light stability when PVA film was used as the matrix (Figs. S2 and S3 in Supporting information). In addition, the results of CDs mixed with the matrix were shown in Figs. S4 and S5 (Supporting information). We found that the luminescence intensity of the other two CDs@matrix is much lower than on PVA. R-CDs prepared using the second method could be well dispersed only in PVA, and serious aggregation and quenching were observed in PMMA, PVP and PS, respectively; for oPD-CDs, it could be dispersed in PVA, PMMA and PVP, and serious quenching were observed in PMMA and PS. The luminescence intensities of the R-CDs and oPD-CDs in the different matrix were compared (Figs. S4e and S5e). It is obvious that the luminescence intensity of the three kinds CDs@matrix is much lower than that on PVA. The above results indicated that CDs maintain excellent dispersibility and luminescence intensity when using the first method. We highlight that the luminous efficiency and photostability of CDs in solid state are the two main liminations for single-particle experiments, and the luminous efficiency/luminescence intensity should be the top priority for futher experimental observation. The comparison of photostablity may be meaningless when the significant difference in luminescence intensity and serious aggregation occurred. The aggregation was affected by intermiscibility or dispersibility of polymer solution with CDs solution. A typical example is that PMMA is soluble in benzene, methylbenzene, anisole and other organic solvents. However, R-CDs and oPD-CDs can be dispersed in ethyl alcohol, but not in methylbenzene and other organic solvents. In addition, the interaction between matrix and CDs should be taken into consideration. For the three CDs were functionalized with abundant functional groups −OH, −COOH, and −NH
2, which are prone to conbine with similar functional groups forming a uniform fluorescent film, but to form aggregation or quenching with other local matrix environments. The zeta potentials of the three CDs suggested that the above results were not directly related to their electronegativity values (Fig. S6 in Supporting information). All the above results suggested that PVA is a better matrix than the other three. Since the high luminous efficiency is expected to be effectively quenched by the host-guest interaction, the PVA matrix must play a key role. As reported that hydrogen bonds is important factors for fluorophores, which minimizes the non-irradiation transfer and results high fluorescence quantum yields [
51-
55]. PVA contains abundant hydroxy groups and could form hydrogen bonds effectively with C−N/C=N/C=O functional groups on three CDs, limiting the intramolecular motions and preventing the nonradiative relaxation [
56,
57]. In combination with the hydrogen bond being easily destroyed by water molecules [
58], we investigated the changes in the PL performance of the CDs on PVA film before and after being affected by tiny amounts of water (20 µL) and water vapor to confirm the inference. As shown in Fig. S7 (Supporting information), obvious quenching phenomenon was observed for the three CDs, and the fading rate of PL intensity was also increased. The above results indicated that hydroxy groups of PVA could effectively form hydrogen bonds with the functional groups on CDs, preventing the nonradiative relaxation. Meanwhile, PVA was observed to effectively block the interfacial interaction between the CDs and the glass substrate. In addition, different polymer cohesive energy density might have influence on the luminescent properties of carbon dots. In addition, different cohesive energy density (CED) in the polymer may have a different binding energy between the CDs and the polymer, which will affect its luminescence performance. Among them, the CDE of PVA (> 750 J/cm
3) is greater than PMMA and PS (< 400 J/cm
3). As we all know, the CED increase with the increasing of the strong polar groups, which is prone to form hydrogen bonds with the surface groups of CDs.