Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Solid-phase impregnation promotes Ce doping in TiO2 for boosted denitration of CeO2/TiO2 catalysts
收藏切换
PDF
Wang Songa, Jiawei Jia, Kai Guoa, Xin Wanga, Xiaoqian Weia, Yandi Caid, Wei Tana, Lulu Lie, Jingfang Sunb, Changjin Tangc, *, Lin Donga, b, d
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(2) : 935 - 938
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2022, 33(2): 935-938
• Communication •
Solid-phase impregnation promotes Ce doping in TiO2 for boosted denitration of CeO2/TiO2 catalysts
Full
Wang Songa, Jiawei Jia, Kai Guoa, Xin Wanga, Xiaoqian Weia, Yandi Caid, Wei Tana, Lulu Lie, Jingfang Sunb, Changjin Tangc, *, Lin Donga, b, d
Affiliations
  • aSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • bKey Laboratory of Vehicles Emission Control of Jiangsu Province, Center of Modern Analysis, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • cSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • dSchool of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • eSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China
Published: 2022-02-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.022
Outline
收藏切换

CeO2/TiO2 (denoted as CeTi) catalysts obtained by solid-phase impregnation behaved better in low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 (NH3-SCR) than that by conventional wet impregnation. To explore the main factors for activity distinction, the texture property, CeO2 dispersion and structure changes of TiO2 were comprehensively analyzed. It was found that surface changes of TiO2 had a significant impact on the improved activity. From results of inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES), diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectroscopy (UV–vis-DRS) and Raman, it was inferred that Ce ions were partially incorporated into TiO2 lattice, accompanied with the formation of defects and vacancies during solid-phase impregnation. Accordingly, CeTi catalysts from solid-phase impregnation exhibited superiority in adsorption and activation of reactants. Further result from monitoring the preparation process indicated that the evolved NO played an important role in promoting Ce doping through depriving oxygen atoms on TiO2 surface. The interaction between Ce and Ti was enhanced. The catalyst performed better in NH3-SCR, especially at low temperature, which testified the solid-phase impregnation could be an effective method to modulate interface structure for designing efficient catalyst.

CeO2/TiO2  /  NH3-SCR  /  Solid-phase impregnation  /  Interfacial interaction  /  NO induced incorporation
Wang Song, Jiawei Ji, Kai Guo, Xin Wang, Xiaoqian Wei, Yandi Cai, Wei Tan, Lulu Li, Jingfang Sun, Changjin Tang, Lin Dong. Solid-phase impregnation promotes Ce doping in TiO2 for boosted denitration of CeO2/TiO2 catalysts[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2022 , 33 (2) : 935 -938 . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.022
Full Text
Less
Air pollution has been severe in China and nitrogen oxide (NOx) is one of the major contaminants. NOx emission elicits problems such as ozone holes, acid rain, photochemical smog, human respiratory diseases [1-3]. Till now, catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia (NH3-SCR) is the dominant technology for nitrogen oxide elimination [2, 3]. Currently, the commercial catalysts for NH3-SCR are V2O5-WO3(MoO3)/TiO2. They show excellent activity at 300–420 ℃ with admirable SO2 tolerance. Nevertheless, several drawbacks are also confronted, such as narrow operating temperature window, poor N2 selectivity at high temperature, and toxicity of V2O5 [4, 5]. To overcome these obstacles, tremendous attention has been paid to improving V-based catalysts or developing novel catalysts like Ce, Mn, Fe, Cu-based catalysts, etc. [6-11]. As a typical Ce-based catalyst, CeTi has been widely investigated in recent decades due to its excellent performance in the mid temperature and environmental-friendly feature [12].
Conventional preparation methods of CeTi catalyst, such as wet impregnation, co-precipitation and sol-gel method [13], are ubiquitously operated in solution, involving evaporation and drying. Except for high energy consumption, evaporation of solvent can also lead to the redispersion of active components and phase segregation, which are not conducive to the improvement of catalytic activity [14]. We previously reported an approach called solid-phase impregnation to synthesize supported catalysts [15, 16]. During the process, the active component precursor (nitrate) and supports mechanically are mixed and then calcined. In addition to avoiding these disadvantages, the interaction between active components and carriers can also be enhanced [17, 18]. Herein, the CeTi catalysts were rationally constructed by solid-phase impregnation (CeTi-G) and compared to the counterparts from wet impregnation (CeTi-I). The detailed preparation procedure and activity test condition are shown in the supporting information. The activity results showed that CeTi-G samples exhibited superior performance, especially at low temperature. Furthermore, via various characterization techniques and tracing the catalyst preparation process, the driving force for the enhanced activity of CeTi-G was revealed.
The NH3-SCR activity test result is shown in Fig. 1. It is obvious that irrespective of ceria loading, the sample prepared by the solid-phase impregnation method showed better activity, especially at low temperature range (≤ 300 ℃). For instance, at 300 ℃ the NO conversion of CeTi-G0.1 was 81%, which was much higher than that of CeTi-I0.1 (59%). There was almost no N2O observed (less than 20 ppm) during the reaction for all samples, which demonstrated excellent N2 selectivity of CeTi based catalyst (Fig. S1 in Supporting information) [19, 20].
Previous studies showed that catalytic activity of supported catalysts is dependent on the particle size and dispersion of active component over supports [21-23]. As shown in the Table S1 and Fig. S2 (Supporting information), no conspicuous difference could be observed for the specific surface area, pore volume, pore size and particle size. Given that, it is concluded that texture properties had limited impact on performance of both samples. Furthermore, the dispersion of active phase over support was measured by X-ray diffraction (Fig. 2a). When the loading amount is below 0.4 mmol CeO2/g TiO2, only peaks attributed to anatase (PDF# 21-1272) emerged, suggesting that CeO2 was in a well dispersion state. Further increasing loading amount, CeO2 (PDF# 34-0394) crystal phase peak did appear in the CeTi-I0.4, while did not exist in CeTi-G0.4. Besides, both CeTi-I0.8 and CeTi-G0.8 obviously showed the CeO2 phase. Convincing results could be found in the HR-TEM images (Fig. S2). For CeTi-G0.4, lattice fringe belonging to CeO2 (111) was absent but clearly shown in CeTi-I0.4. No CeO2 lattice fringe was observed for CeTi-0.1 samples. Combined with XRD results, it could be concluded that CeO2 was well dispersed over TiO2 in both CeTi-G0.1 and CeTi-I0.1, with no distinct difference in the surface dispersion of CeO2. Nevertheless, a discrepancy in NO conversion still existed between them, indicating that there was other pivotal factor to determine the catalytic performance instead of the dispersion of active components.
In literature report, it has been well established that the catalytic activity of CeO2-TiO2 based catalysts has a close relation with the degree of interaction between CeO2 and TiO2 support [19, 24]. As reported by several works on CeTi mixed oxides [19, 24], the strong interaction originated from the incorporation into each other's lattice. It is noteworthy that 0.4 mmol/g is exactly the single-layer dispersion capacity of CeO2 over TiO2 surface in this work [25]. The absence of CeO2 crystal phase in the CeTi-G0.4 hinted that Ce ions might be incorporated into support TiO2 surface lattice oxide, enhancing the interaction between Ce and Ti. Consequently, the activity of CeTi catalysts was improved.
In order to verify the assumption above, we investigated surface properties of CeTi catalysts. According to the literature [26], Ce ions embedded in the lattice of TiO2 are difficult to be dissolved out. To find out whether Ce ions entered into TiO2 lattice, samples were dissolved in a mixture solution of H2O2 and aqua regia, then cerium content in solution was analyzed via ICP-AES, and results are listed in Table 1. Except for CeTi-G0.1, series of CeTi-G specimens showed a lower Ce concentration than corresponding CeTi-I ones, which proved the speculation of incorporation. Measurement errors from low Ce concentration might account for the exception. To keep samples with similar dispersion state for better comparison, we briefly chose CeTi-G0.1 and CeTi-I0.1 as representatives for further characterizations.
Apparently, CeTi-G0.1 is yellow colored while CeTi-I0.1 was pale close to TiO2 (Fig. 2b), which reflects their different surface states [27]. In this regard, we characterized the two catalysts together with TiO2 by diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectroscopy. Compared with CeTi-I0.1, the absorption wavelength of CeTi-G0.1 showed an obvious red shift from 400 nm to 500 nm, indicating the generation of defects on TiO2 surface [28, 29]. As shown in Fig. 2c, all samples show four typical Raman bands at around 142, 394, 514, and 638 cm−1, which can be attributed to modes of anatase phase with the symmetries of Eg, B1g, A1g, and Eg, respectively [30]. Conspicuously, the dominated peak, shifted to 142.7 cm−1 and broadened, which could be attributed to localized defects or lattice disorder (non-stoichiometry) related to surface oxygen vacancies [31, 32]. Considering the analyses above, we suppose surface defects or oxygen vacancies might be induced by the incorporation of Ce into surface TiO2 lattice. Thereby, the interaction between Ce and Ti species was enhanced, which was a prerequisite for the improvement of activity.
Changes of TiO2 surface affected the redox properties and surface oxygen species of samples, hence H2-temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) experiment was conducted. In Fig. 2d, for CeTi-G0.1 and CeTi-I0.1, two reduction peaks appeared at around 450 ℃ and above 650 ℃, assigned to the reduction of surface oxygen species (α) and lattice oxygen (β), respectively [33, 34]. The H2 consumption of CeTi-G0.1 at low temperature was higher than that of CeTi-I0.1 (Table 2), manifesting that CeTi-G0.1 has more surface oxygen species. This could be corroborated by the result of O 1s by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). As shown in Fig. 2e and Table 2, it could be obtained that CeTi-G0.1 displayed a higher content of Oα (43.4%) in comparison with CeTi-I0.1 (19.3%). Abundant surface defects or vacancies led to the enhanced surface oxygen adsorption. Thus, more NO could be oxidized to NO2, which was demonstrated by NO oxidation test (Fig. S3 in Supporting information) and NO + O2-temperature programmed desorption (NO+O2-TPD) below. This process promoted the "fast-SCR" reaction that was beneficial for improving the low-temperature catalytic activity [35].
Surface changes also influenced adsorption property of catalysts [36-38]. To investigate the impact further, NH3-TPD and NO + O2-TPD experiments were carried out. The results were depicted in Figs. 2f and g, and quantitative desorption amount was listed in Table 2. It could be found that ammonia desorption capacity of CeTi-G0.1 (91 µmol/g) was higher than that of CeTi-I0.1 (74 µmol/g), especially at low temperature. This evidenced that CeTi-G0.1 exhibited the superiority to absorb and activate NH3, which were vital to SCR reaction. It is reported that ammonia desorption peak at low and medium temperature was assigned to NH4+ absorbed on Brønsted acid sites [20, 39]. Surface defects mentioned above could participate in the formation of Brønsted acid sites through H2O dissociation to form hydroxyl groups [40]. In Fig. 2g, two kinds of NOx species desorbed over samples, NO2 dominated quantitatively and the initial desorption temperature was lower than that of NO. For CeTi-G0.1, NO and NO2 desorbed was 27 and 56 µmol/g, which was higher than that for CeTi-I0.1 (22 and 36 µmol/g, respectively). More NO was adsorbed and then oxidized into NO2 over CeTi-G0.1 due to abundant surface oxygen species from surface defects, which agreed with the outcome of NO oxidation experiment (Fig. S3). NO2 was conducive to the "fast SCR" reaction, resulting in improved low-temperature performance [35]. As such, CeTi-G0.1 exhibited preponderance in activation and desorption of reactants due to the existence of surface defects and vacancies, which originated from Ce doping into TiO2.
The above characterization results give clear evidence that solid-phase impregnation has the advantage of incorporation more Ce into the lattice of TiO2. As a result, the interface structure of CeO2/TiO2 changed, which influenced the catalytic performance [41, 42]. So, the question arises, what is the driving force for the solid-phase impregnation to alter the interface structure of CeTi catalyst? According to literature study [22, 23], we propose here for the first time that the main transformation of CeO2 from TiO2 surface to bulk is related to the decomposition property of nitrate, which plays a significant role in constructing the interface structure. Cerium nitrates decompose according to the general reaction [43]:
It could be seen that vast of nitrogen oxides would release during the transformation. To distinguish the kinds of nitrogen oxides and probe their respective impacts on catalyst structure, the decomposition was traced via detecting the exhaust gas composition from heating uncalcined precursors in Ar atmosphere. As shown in Fig. 2h and Fig. S4 (Supporting information), products of nitrate decomposition were NO, NO2 and negligible N2O. As the main product, amount of NO2 differed apparently, while that of NO resembled for two samples. In Fig. 2h, it was found that once heating, NO2 was let off concomitantly for CeTi-G0.1, which was much earlier than CeTi-I0.1. Meantime, NO2 released from CeTi-G0.1 was much more than that from CeTi-I0.1. Besides loss of part nitrate species during evaporation in wet impregnation, the discrepancy of NO2 emission might result from that more NO transformed into NO2 through snatching one oxygen atom of TiO2 over CeTi-G0.1 precursor. This might also provide an opportunity for Ce ions to enter into the TiO2 surface lattice, inducing more defects or vacancies on the surface of anatase, which was borne out by characterizations above. Furthermore, the presence of NO could prevent sintering and redistribution during nitrate decomposition, and then ensure good dispersion of active species [22, 23]. In order to confirm whether NO could promote Ce to intercalate into TiO2 lattice, CeTi-I0.4 sample before calcination was heated in a flow containing different NO concentrations, and Ce content was measured by ICP-AES mentioned above. The corresponding result was presented in Fig. 2i. In contrast to that heated in air, less Ce was dissolved out for samples heated in low NO concentration (≤ 1%) atmosphere, indicating that the promotion of NO did exist. Interestingly, such an effect was not evident further increasing NO concentration in atmosphere. Hence, more NO evolved during decomposition of nitrate precursor indeed played a non-negligible role in facilitating the incorporation of Ce into TiO2 surface lattice.
In summary, the supported CeTi catalysts prepared by solid-phase impregnation exhibited better performance than that by wet impregnation in NH3-SCR. The texture properties and dispersion of CeO2 had a limited impact on the activity. It could be found that Ce might be embedded into TiO2 surface lattice, and more defects and vacancies were created through ICP-AES, UV–vis-DRS and Raman analyses. Moreover, CeTi-G-0.1 behaved better in redox, adsorption and activation of reactants because of defects and vacancies over supports. The traced results of preparation process showed that NO might scavenge atomic oxygen of TiO2 and made it possible for Ce to incorporate into TiO2 which was affirmed by ICP-AES outcomes. We expected that such solid-phase impregnation would be an effective approach to developing high-performed NH3-SCR catalysts.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgment
Less
We gratefully acknowledge the financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21976081, 21773106).
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.022
References
Less
[1]
A. Richter, J.P. Burrows, H. Nüß, C. Granier, U. Niemeier, Nature 437 (2005) 129-132.
[2]
F. Luck, J. Roiron, Catal. Today 4 (1989) 205-218.
[3]
F. Nakajima, I. Hamada, Catal. Today 29 (1996) 109-115.
[4]
K.J. Lee, P.A. Kumar, M.S. Maqbool, et al., Appl. Catal. B 142 (2013) 705-717.
[5]
F. Liu, H. He, C. Zhang, W. Shan, X. Shi, Catal. Today 175 (2011) 18-25.
[6]
S. Zhang, H. Li, Q. Zhong, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 435 (2012) 156-162.
[7]
L. Chen, J. Li, M. Ge, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009) 21177-21184.
[8]
C. Tang, H. Zhang, L. Dong, Catal. Sci. Technol. 6 (2016) 1248-1264.
[9]
H. Xu, N. Yan, Z. Qu, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (2017) 8879-8892.
[10]
Q. Liu, C. Bian, S. Ming, et al., Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 607 (2020) 117865.
[11]
S. Mohan, P. Dinesha, S. Kumar, Chem. Eng. J. 384 (2019) 123253.
[12]
Y. Zeng, K.G. Haw, Y. Wang, et al., ChemCatChem 13 (2021) 491-505.
[13]
X. Gao, Y. Jiang, Y. Fu, et al., Catal. Commun. 11 (2010) 465-469.
[14]
A.J. van Dillen, R.J.A.M. Terörde, D.J. Lensveld, J.W. Geus, K.P. de Jong, J. Catal. 216 (2003) 257-264.
[15]
C. Tang, H. Zhang, C. Sun, et al., Catal. Commun. 12 (2011) 1075-1078.
[16]
C. Tang, J. Sun, X. Yao, et al., Appl. Catal. B 146 (2014) 201-212.
[17]
Y.M. Wang, Z.Y. Wu, H.J. Wang, J.H. Zhu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 16 (2006) 2374-2386.
[18]
T.M. Eggenhuisen, J.P. d. Breejen, D. Verdoes, P.E. d. Jongh, K.P. d. Jong, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132 (2010) 18318-18325.
[19]
Y. Liu, W. Yao, X. Cao, et al., Appl. Catal. B 160 (2014) 684-691.
[20]
X. Yao, R. Zhao, L. Chen, et al., Appl. Catal. B 208 (2017) 82-93.
[21]
P. Munnik, P.E. de Jongh, K.P. de Jong, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 6687-6718.
[22]
J.R.A. Sietsma, J.D. Meeldijk, J.P. d. Breejen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (2007) 4547-4549.
[23]
J.R.A. Sietsma, H. Friedrich, A. Broersma, et al., J. Catal. 260 (2008) 227-235.
[24]
P. Li, Y. Xin, Q. Li, et al., Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012) 9600-9605.
[25]
H. Zhang, L. Ding, H. Long, et al., J. Rare Earths 38 (2020) 883-890.
[26]
K. Qian, S. Lv, X. Xiao, et al., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 306 (2009) 40-47.
[27]
Q. Cai, F. Wang, J. He, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 517 (2020) 146198.
[28]
A.A. Bonapasta, F. Filippone, G. Mattioli, P. Alippi, Catal. Today 144 (2009) 177-182.
[29]
G. Wang, Y. Ling, Y. Li, Nanoscale 4 (2012) 6682-6691.
[30]
T. Ohsaka, F. Izumi, Y. Fujiki, J. Raman Spectrosc. 7 (1978) 321-324.
[31]
A. Naldoni, M. Allieta, S. Santangelo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 7600-7603.
[32]
A.L. Bassi, D. Cattaneo, V. Russo, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 98 (2005) 074305.
[33]
H. Wang, S. Cao, Z. Fang, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 330 (2015) 245-252.
[34]
W. Song, Y. Zeng, Y. Wang, et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 476 (2019) 834-839.
[35]
A. Kato, S. Matsuda, T. Kamo, et al., J. Phys. Chem. 85 (1981) 4099-4102.
[36]
R. Sun, C. He, L. Fu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. (2021) doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.072.
[37]
L. Fu, R. Wang, C. Zhao, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 414 (2021) 128857.
[38]
R. Wang, C. He, W. Chen, C. Zhao, J. Huo, Chin. Chem. Lett. (2021) doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.05.024.
[39]
C. Fang, D. Zhang, S. Cai, et al., Nanoscale 5 (2013) 9199-9207.
[40]
W.P. Dow, T.J. Huang, J. Catal. 160 (1996) 171-182.
[41]
S. Huang, T. Ouyang, B. Zheng, D. Meng, Z, Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 9546-9552.
[42]
S. Huang, B. Zheng, Z. Tang, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 422 (2021) 130086.
[43]
W.W. Wendlandt, J.L. Bear, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 12 (1960) 276-280.
Appendix
Less
Year 2022 volume 33 Issue 2
PDF
58
31
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.022
  • Receive Date：2021-04-20
  • Online Date：2025-12-12
  • Published：2022-02-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2021-04-20
  • Revised：2021-05-23
  • Accepted：2021-07-06
Affiliations
    aSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    bKey Laboratory of Vehicles Emission Control of Jiangsu Province, Center of Modern Analysis, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    cSchool of Environment, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
    dSchool of the Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    eSchool of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.07.022
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House