The photocatalytic performance of CeO
2 and D-CeO
2 was evaluated for the degradation of TC under AM 1.5 G illumination. As shown in Fig. S4 (Supporting information), the degradation rate increased with an increase in temperature. However, an excessively high temperature would destroy the fine structure of D-CeO
2, thereby impeding the inner hole-electron photoexcitation progress, which will reduce the degradation rate. At a relatively low temperature, the concentration of surface oxygen vacancies is too low to provide sufficient surface-active sites for photocatalytic reactions, which results in a poor photocatalytic performance. Thus, the samples hydrogenated at 500 ℃ had the highest concentration of oxygen vacancies. As shown in
Fig. 5a, under dark conditions, the adsorption capacity of D-CeO
2 is much higher than that of CeO
2 because of the large specific surface area of the nanosheets of D-CeO
2. The rate of photocatalytic degradation of TC by D-CeO
2 increased to 99.9% within 80 min, which is much higher than that of CeO
2. As can be seen from Fig. S5 (Supporting information), D-CeO
2 has higher degradation efficiency than that of CeO
2 in literatures. The hydrogenation of D-CeO
2 resulted in the generation of oxygen vacancies at an optimal concentration that was best suited for photocatalytic degradation. Moreover, the D-CeO
2 has higher photo-response than that of CeO
2. In addition, the mesoporous nanosheet promoted electron transmission and mass transfer. To study the effect of dark adsorption on the degradation of TC, we increased the adsorption time and found that the adsorption equilibrium could be reached within 30 min (Fig. S6 in Supporting information).
Fig. 5b shows the ln(
C0/
C) versus time plots for CeO
2 and D-CeO
2. The linear plots indicate that the photocatalytic decomposition of TC followed
quasi-first-order kinetics under the above-mentioned conditions. Further, the photocatalytic degradation rate constant (
k) of D-CeO
2 (0.0498 min
−1) was 3 times that of CeO
2 (0.0165 min
−1). The cyclic stability of D-CeO
2 was determined under the above-mentioned test conditions. After 10 cycles, the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of D-CeO
2 was more than 99% (
Fig. 5c) with negligible attenuation, which demonstrates the excellent stability of D-CeO
2. The stability of D-CeO
2 was further confirmed by the XRD analysis of D-CeO
2 after 10 degradation cycles. The XRD patterns of D-CeO
2 before and after 10 degradation cycles were almost the same, which confirm its high stability (Fig. S7 in Supporting information). In addition, the SEM of the sample after 10 cycles was also tested. As shown in Fig. S8 (Supporting information), the sample basically kept its original appearance without any change, which further confirmed the high stability of the sample. The high stability of D-CeO
2 can be attributed to the mesoporous nanosheets that remained separate and unaggregated, which led to each nanosheet working independently and efficiently. The separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs was analyzed by surface photovoltage spectroscopy (SPS). As shown in
Fig. 5d, an intense peak at approximately 260 nm can be seen and is ascribed to the electron transfer from the valence band to the conduction band, which is consistent with the UV–vis diffuse reflectance data. Moreover, the SPS peak intensity of D-CeO
2 was much stronger than that of CeO
2 because of its higher photogenerated charge carrier separation efficiency and longer excitation lifetime than those of CeO
2. The defect centers generated during nanosheet hydrogenation were measured by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. The results showed that both CeO
2 and D-CeO
2 had paramagnetic defect centers. The presence of oxygen vacancy defects [
46] can be observed at
g = 2.002 in the EPR profile (
Fig. 5e). Moreover, the intensity of the resonance peak of D-CeO
2 was significantly higher than the intensity of the resonance peak of CeO
2; this indicates that the oxygen vacancy defects considerably increased after the surface hydrogenation treatment. The corresponding band gap alignments of CeO
2 and D-CeO
2 are shown in
Fig. 5f. According to XPS valence band, the VB of CeO
2 and D-CeO
2 were −6.799 and −7.019 eV, respectively. The position shift of the VB can be attributed to the formation of surface oxygen vacancy defects. Based on the UV–vis spectra and M–T plots, the CB can be calculated as −4.179 and −4.629 eV, respectively. It is clear that the Fermi level of D-CeO
2 is closer to the bottom of the conduction band, which indicates that D-CeO
2 is of more n-type. SKP microscopy can show the relatively flat potential changes based on the work function (WF) by identifying small-molecule interactions by oscillating electromagnetic and acoustic fields. The SKP potential profiles of CeO
2 and D-CeO
2 are shown in
Fig. 5g. From the test results, the WFs of CeO
2 and D-CeO
2 were calculated as approximately 5.293 and 5.316 eV, respectively, by Eq. 2: