Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Additive regulating Li+ solvation structure to construct dual LiF−rich electrode electrolyte interphases for sustaining 4.6 V Li||LiCoO2 batteries
收藏切换
PDF
Xi Tanga, Chunlei Zhua, Yulu Yanga, Shihan Qia, Mengqiu Caia, Abdullah N. Alodhaybb, Jianmin Maa, *
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(12) : 110014
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(12): 110014
• Communication •
Additive regulating Li+ solvation structure to construct dual LiF−rich electrode electrolyte interphases for sustaining 4.6 V Li||LiCoO2 batteries
Full
Xi Tanga, Chunlei Zhua, Yulu Yanga, Shihan Qia, Mengqiu Caia, Abdullah N. Alodhaybb, Jianmin Maa, *
Affiliations
  • a School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
  • b Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Published: 2024-12-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110014
Outline
收藏切换

The battery energy density can be improved by raising the operating voltage, however, which may lead to rapid capacity decay due to the continuous electrolyte decomposition and the thickening of electrode electrolyte interphases. To address these challenges, we proposed tripropyl phosphate (TPP) as an additive−regulating Li+ solvation structure to construct a stable LiF–rich electrode carbonate−based electrolyte interphases for sustaining 4.6 V Li||LiCoO2 batteries. This optimized interphases could help reduce the resistance and achieve better rate performance and cycling stability. As expected, the Li||LiCoO2 battery retained 79.4% capacity after 100 cycles at 0.5 C, while the Li||Li symmetric cell also kept a stable plating/stripping process over 450 h at the current density of 1.0 mA/cm2 with a deposited amount of 0.5 mAh/cm2.

Lithium metal batteries  /  Electrolyte additive  /  Solid electrolyte interphase  /  Cathode electrolyte interphase  /  Solvation structure
Xi Tang, Chunlei Zhu, Yulu Yang, Shihan Qi, Mengqiu Cai, Abdullah N. Alodhayb, Jianmin Ma. Additive regulating Li+ solvation structure to construct dual LiF−rich electrode electrolyte interphases for sustaining 4.6 V Li||LiCoO2 batteries[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024 , 35 (12) : 110014 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110014
Full Text
Less
As one of typic commercial cathode materials, LiCoO2 has huge potential as high–capacity cathode for lithium metal batteries (LMBs) [1–3], especially coupled with Li anode [4–6], since only half of the theoretical capacity of LiCoO2 can be delivered at the cut–off voltage of 4.25 V. Thus, the energy density of Li||LiCoO2 batteries can be promoted by raising the cut–off voltage [7–10]. Unfortunately, traditional carbonates have strong binding ability with Li+ that are difficult to desolvation, which leads to slow reaction kinetics. Moreover, the strong coordination of EC and EMC with Li+ lead to serious side reactions with LiCoO2, resulting in loose porous organic cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI), which is constantly broken/reconstructed during the charge/discharge process, resulting in continuous consumption of electrolyte and rapid capacity decay [11–13]. Moreover, the continuous accumulation of non–conducting and fragile solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) leads to poor interface stability and uncontrolled growth of Li dendrites, which reduce the capacity and coulomb efficiency (CE) [14–19]. Therefore, it is very crucial to promote cycling stability and rate capability by optimizing CEI and SEI in high–voltage Li||LiCoO2 batteries [20–23].
Electrolyte additive strategy is demonstated to effectively improve CEI/SEI performance [24–28]. Among them, phosphates are well–known co–solvents and additives due to their non–flammability and film–forming properties [29–31]. Moreover, phosphate–based additives are also reported to improve the cycling performance of lithium–ion batteries at elevated temperatures by constructing superior electrode electrolyte interphases [32]. However, the efficient phosphate–based additives are rarely reported in high–voltage Li||LiCoO2 batteries.
In this work, we proposed an additive regulating Li+ solvation structure strategy for constructing dual LiF–rich electrode electrolyte interphases to support 4.6 V Li||LiCoO2 batteries. For the cathode, the well–formed CEI with inorganic substances restrains the harassing oxidative decomposition of solvents. For the anode, TPP promotes the formation of SEI enriched in fluoride/phosphide components, which facilitates uniform Li deposition and suppresses the formation of Li dendrites [33,34]. This work contributes to a deep comprehensive understanding of the specific working mechanism of phosphate additives.
To investigate the electrochemical stability and solvation effects of the phosphate–based additives, the theoretical prediction based on density functional theory (DFT) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were carried out (Fig. 1). Among the molecules, EMC and TPP have the highest HOMO and are easily oxidized while FEC and TPP exhibit the lowest LUMO and are easily reduced (Fig. 1a), which provides a thermodynamic basis for the growth of interphases. The MD simulation results in Figs. 1b-f show that the Li+ in the blank electrolyte is closely coordinated with EC and EMC, which are carried to the electrode surface for oxidation to form various loose and unstable organic by–products. As expected, the highly electronegative O atom of TPP coordinates with Li+ and occupies the solvated group, reducing the coordination number of anions and solvent molecules due to its large steric hindrance (Fig. S1 in Supporting information). Therefore, in the process of charging, more free PF6− are preferentially adsorbed on the surface of the positively charged LiCoO2 under electrostatic action than the Li+−solvent complexes, realizing the anion−dominated inner Helmholtz plane (IHP) and the formation of inorganic species−rich CEI layer. At the same time, the solvation degree of weakly coordinated FEC increases with the influence of TPP, which is conducive to the formation of LiF−rich SEI.
To build a deeper understanding of the phosphate−based additive, the surface chemical compositions of CEI films formed in different electrolytes were characterized by X−ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). As shown in Fig. 2, Figs. S2 and S3 (Supporting information), the depth profile of the LiCoO2 electrode was detected by Ar sputtering at 2 min and 4 min. The CEI films in all electrolytes contain organic components (C−F, C−O, C=O and C−C/C−H) and inorganic components (Li2CO3, LiF and LiPFxOy). The C signal peaks in Figs. 2a and b and Fig. S3 show that the organic compounds (C−O, C−C peaks) from the decomposition of carbonate solvents are abundant in the CEI formed in the blank electrolyte, suggesting a large amount of electrolyte consumption during the cycling process. The organic−rich CEI is quite tightly bound to the LiCoO2 surface and cannot withstand the large volume changes generated by the oxide cathode during the cycling process, resulting in CEI fragmentation and continuous side reactions between the LiCoO2 and electrolyte during the lithiation/delithiation process [35,36]. In sharp contrast, the anions are well adsorbed in the IHP of LiCoO2 with the attraction of electrostatic field due to the exisitence of TPP, and then decomposed into the LiF−rich CEI. The bonding energy of the inorganic substances and transition metal oxide is relatively weak, which can accommodate the repeating volume change during cycling and play a positive role in protecting the cathode material [37]. In addition, the decomposition product LiF of PF6− has a wide electrochemical stability window, which passivates LiCoO2 surface [38]. The LiF−rich CEI effectively hinders the interface side reactions between the highly oxidized LiCoO2 and the electrolyte, and reduces solvent molecular consumption. As can be seen from Figs. 2c−g, the strong signals of LiF and LiPFxOy in the inner layer of CEI with TPP indicate the formation of anion−derived CEI, which is consistent with the speculation. In addition, due to the highest HOMO, a trace amount of TPP can be also decomposed on LiCoO2 to provide phosphide components for CEI.
To visually assess the enhancement effect of TPP on LiCoO2 cathode, Li||LiCoO2 batteries with different electrolytes were measured in a voltage range of 3−4.6 V. As shown in Fig. 3a, the battery with TPP shows a little higher initial discharge capacity of 187.7 mAh/g while the capacity remained at 149.0 mAh/g with a retention rate of 79.4% after 100 cycles. By contrast, the battery without TPP only shows a low retention rate of 67.9% over 100 cycles. The voltage polarization can be demonstrated by the voltage profile curve visually. As shown in Fig. 3b, the capacity of the battery with blank electrolyte decreases and the polarization voltage increases rapidly over 100 cycles, which is attributed to the intense side reactions between the electrolyte and LiCoO2 as well as the continuous fragmentation/remodeling of CEI. However, the polarization voltage of the battery with TPP has little change (Fig. 3c). In Fig. 3d, the impedance of the battery with TPP is significantly lower than that of the battery with blank electrolyte since the almost same battery impedances before cycling (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). Moreover, the equivalent circuits and fitting results of the EIS were shown in Fig. S5 (Supporting information), which exhibits a much smaller charge transfer impedance (Rct) of the battery with TPP than that with blank electrolyte after 10 cycles. The EIS results revealed the fast electrochemical reaction kinetics in the electrolyte with TPP. Furthermore, the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterizations visually display the explicit shape of CEI (Figs. 3e and f). Due to the extremely low electronic conductivity of LiF, the anion−induced CEI with TPP is thin and compact, while the CEI with blank electrolyte is bumpy. The firm CEI structure with TPP provides the sustainable basis of the repeated lithiation/delithiation. Furthermore, the battery with TPP exhibits enhanced rate capacities of 194.9, 180.3, 168.1, 149.9, 123.3 mAh/g at current densities of 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 C, respectively, and returns to 189.2 mAh/cm2 at 0.2 C (Fig. 3g), while a capacity of 109.7 mAh/g is delivered at 5 C for battery with blank electrolyte, which indicates the formation of fast Li+ transport dynamics in the CEI formed with TPP.
Finally, the phosphate−based additive also has an impact on Li plating/stripping. As shown in Figs. 4a and b, the Li||Li symmetric cell with TPP could maintain a stable plating/stripping process over 450 h at the current density of 1.0 mA/cm2 with the capacity of 0.5 mAh/cm2 while only 285 h is sustained for the cell with blank electrolyte. At lower current density, the cells with/without TPP exhibit the same polarization voltage value. The cell with TPP exhibits the longer plating/stripping process in ~260 h with a lower polarization voltage when the current density increases to 2.0 mA/cm2 (Figs. 4c and d). As shown in Figs. 4e and f, Li deposited into a bulb shape in the blank electrolyte. The transport of Li+ was hindered by the accumulated layer of dead Li. In contrast, the plated Li anode with TPP exposed a smooth surface without projecting Li dendrites. The bulk Li with dense and overlapping surface maintains structural integrity during the plating/stripping process, avoiding battery safety issues caused by Li dendrites piercing the diaphragm. The surface morphologies of the Li anodes correspond to the performances of the symmetrical cells [39]. The SEI formed on the Li anodes were further characterized by XPS, which are composed of organic/inorganic components including C−C/C−H, C−O/C=O, ROCO2Li, Li2CO3, LiF and LiPFxOy. The results are shown in Fig. 4g and Figs. S6−S8 (Supporting information). According to the Li+ solvation results, the most easily reducible FEC with low LUMO in the solvation group is enhanced, and the TPP is involved in solvation and decomposed on Li surface, which provides high F and P content for SEI, respectively. Thus, the SEI formed with TPP contains rich LiF produced by the decomposition of FEC, which is a strong electrical insulator for suppressing the continuous consumption of the electrolyte by resisting the electrons that passing through the SEI layer [40,41]. Besides, LiF exhibits lithiophobicity properties and high Young’s modulus, which can promote the lateral growth and the uniform deposition of new Li on the anode surface [42]. Moreover, LiPFxOy provides the SEI with high ionic conductivity and reduced impedance, which enables efficient transport of Li+ and allows the battery to exhibit better rate performance [43].
In summary, we have successfully explored a phosphate−contained high−voltage electrolyte for 4.6 V Li||LiCoO2 batteries. TPP could regulate the Li+ solvation structure to optimize the structure and components of CEI/SEI. The designed anion−derived CEI with plenty LiF component forms a parclose to protect the LiCoO2 structure and reduce the persistent side reactions of solvents. At the same time, the TPP−induced SEI with high content of F and P radicals guarantees excellent anode stability. This work demonstrate the effectiveness of electrolyte additives to optimize the structure and components of electrode electrolyte interphases via regulating the Li+ solvation structure.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
We herein declare that there is not any conflict in this manuscript.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Less
Xi Tang: Writing – original draft. Chunlei Zhu: Visualization. Yulu Yang: Formal analysis. Shihan Qi: Formal analysis. Mengqiu Cai: Writing – review & editing. Abdullah N. Alodhayb: Writing – review & editing. Jianmin Ma: Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
Less
The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U21A20311) and the Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP) at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110014.
References
Less
[1]
J.C. Zhang, Z.D. Liu, C.H. Zeng, et al., Rare Met. 41 (2022) 3946–3956.
[2]
D. Li, B. Zhang, X. Ou, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 2333–2337.
[3]
Q. Wu, B. Zhang, Y. Lu, J. Energy Chem. 74 (2022) 283–308.
[4]
Y. Wang, Q. Zhang, Z.C. Xue, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 10 (2020) 2001413.
[5]
J. Huang, Y. Zhu, Y. Feng, et al., Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 38 (2022) 2208008.
[6]
X. Chen, Q. Sun, J. Xie, et al., J. Energy Chem. 74 (2022) 91–99.
[7]
G.G. Bizuneh, C. Zhu, J. Huang, et al., Small Methods 7 (2023) 2300079.
[8]
J. Liu, M. Wu, X. Li, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 13 (2023) 2300084.
[9]
K. Guo, C. Zhu, H. Wang, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 13 (2023) 2204272.
[10]
F. Xian, J. Li, Z. Hu, et al., Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 4998–5001.
[11]
J. Zhang, H. Zhang, S. Weng, et al., Nat. Commun. 14 (2023) 2211.
[12]
Z. Sun, H. Zhou, X. Luo, et al., J. Power Sources 503 (2021) 230033.
[13]
Y. Lyu, X. Wu, K. Wang, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (2021) 2000982.
[14]
X. Hu, J. Liu, Y. Yang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108456.
[15]
R. Yu, Z. Li, X. Zhang, X. Guo, Chem. Commun. 58 (2022) 8994–8997.
[16]
H. Wang, J. He, J. Liu, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 (2021) 2002578.
[17]
S. Qi, J. He, J. Liu, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 (2021) 2009013.
[18]
B. Roy, P. Cherepanov, C. Nguyen, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (2021) 2101422.
[19]
F. Li, J. He, J. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 6600–6608.
[20]
W. Xue, R. Gao, Z. Shi, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 14 (2021) 6030–6040.
[21]
W. Lu, J. Zhang, J. Xu, X. Wu, L. Chen, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 (2017) 19313–19318.
[22]
K. Zhang, J. Chen, W. Feng, et al., J. Power Sources 553 (2023) 232311.
[23]
H. Zhang, Z. Zeng, S. Wang, et al., Nano Res. 17 (2024) 2638–2645.
[24]
S. Tan, Z. Shadike, J. Li, et al., Nat. Energy 7 (2022) 484–494.
[25]
Z. Guo, H. Yang, Q. Wei, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108622.
[26]
X. Yang, M. Lin, G. Zheng, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 (2020) 2004664.
[27]
Z. Qin, B. Hong, B. Duan, et al., Electrochim. Acta 276 (2018) 412–416.
[28]
Y. Sun, J. Huang, H. Xiang, et al., J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 55 (2020) 198–202.
[29]
P. Shi, H. Zheng, X. Liang, et al., Chem. Commun. 54 (2018) 4453–4456.
[30]
G. Jiang, J. Liu, Z. Wang, J. Ma, Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 (2023) 2300629.
[31]
T. Zheng, B. Zhu, J. Xiong, et al., Energy Stor. Mater. 59 (2023) 102782.
[32]
H. Zhao, Y. Qian, S. Hu, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 29676–29690.
[33]
J. Tan, J. Matz, P. Dong, J. Shen, M. Ye, Adv. Energy Mater. 11 (2021) 2100046.
[34]
D. Wu, J. He, J. Liu, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 12 (2022) 2200337.
[35]
C. Yang, X. Liao, X. Zhou, et al., Adv. Mater. 35 (2023) 2210966.
[36]
R. Qi, M. Yang, T. Zheng, et al., Small 20 (2024) 2312087.
[37]
J. Liu, B. Yuan, N. He, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 16 (2023) 1024–1034.
[38]
P. Bai, X. Ji, J. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202202731.
[39]
Q.K. Zhang, X.Q. Zhang, J. Wan, et al., Nat. Energy 8 (2023) 725–735.
[40]
X.Q. Zhang, X.B. Cheng, X. Chen, C. Yan, Q. Zhang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 27 (2017) 1605989.
[41]
M.Y. Zhou, X.Q. Ding, J.F. Ding, et al., Joule 6 (2022) 2122–2137.
[42]
S. Liu, J. Xia, W. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202210522.
[43]
H. Su, Z. Chen, M. Li, et al., Adv. Mater. 35 (2023) 2301171.
Appendix
Less
Year 2024 volume 35 Issue 12
PDF
49
26
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110014
  • Receive Date：2023-06-29
  • Online Date：2025-11-26
  • Published：2024-12-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2023-06-29
  • Revised：2024-04-08
  • Accepted：2024-05-14
Affiliations
    a School of Physics and Electronics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
    b Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2024.110014
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House