Isopropanol is very hazardous to human health [
22]. Isopropanol vapor was used as the target VOCs to detect the response of the sensor (The process of vapor testing can be found in Supporting information). The solvents were injected into the test chamber without contacting the RhB@ZIF-8 chip (The photograph of the SPCE setup and schematic of the test chamber are shown in Fig. S7 in Supporting information), followed by continuous scanning of the angle distribution pattern until the pattern no longer changed to ensure a balance between adsorption and desorption of the target VOCs on the sensing layer.
Fig. 3A showed the performance of the RhB@ZIF-8 based SPCE sensor. After the adsorption of the saturated isopropanol vapor, the angle distribution pattern showed angle shift as well as peak intensity change. The refractive index and thickness of the dielectric over the plasmonic metal film both cause angle shifts in SPCE [
44,
45]. And it has been reported in the literature that the change in the ZIF-8 thickness is negligible after the adsorption of isopropanol vapor [
35]. The VOCs adsorbed by porous ZIF-8 will replace the air in the pores and lead to an increase in refractive index [
35,
36,
46] (Equation details can be found in section 9 in Supporting information), which caused the angle shift. From the theoretical simulation (
Fig. 3B), we can derive the refractive index of RhB@ZIF-8 film changed from 1.42 to 1.50 due to the adsorption of isopropanol vapor into the MOF film. It was worth noting that the consistent depth of the simulated reflectivity dips obtained from Fresnel simulations before and after isopropanol vapor adsorption meant the same coupling efficiency with the surface plasmon (
Fig. 3B)[
47], which implied that the change in peak intensity came from RhB@ZIF-8 materials. To investigate the mechanism of peak intensity change, the response of free space emission was measured under saturated isopropanol vapor. As shown in
Fig. 3C, the interaction of the RhB@ZIF-8 materials with isopropanol vapor resulted in a change in the fluorescence property of RhB molecules. The substantial increase in fluorescence intensity was due to the fact that RhB could exist in three different states (lactone, zwitterion, and cation), where the zwitterion showed strong fluorescence. Polar proton solvents (isopropanol) could stabilize the zwitterion and therefore produce an intense fluorescence [
32]. The enhancement of free space emission intensity on the sample side was in general agreement with the enhancement of the peak intensity of the angle distribution pattern. During the adsorption of isopropanol vapor, the peak intensity enhancement originated from the change of fluorescence property of RhB@ZIF-8 film. The experimental results suggested that two processes occurred simultaneously in the RhB@ZIF-8 based SPCE sensor during the adsorption of isopropanol vapor: (1) The isopropanol vapor enhanced the fluorescence intensity of RhB molecules; (2) The adsorbed isopropanol vapor changed the refractive index of RhB@ZIF-8 material and caused angle shift. And the same phenomenon occurred during the adsorption of methanol vapor and ethanol vapor (Figs. S9A and B in Supporting information). In our strategy, both processes were monitored simultaneously by a single SPCE signal measurement. To better demonstrate the signal intensity variations caused by refractive index change and fluorescence property change (
Fig. 3A), the SPCE curve after adsorption of isopropanol vapor was normalized to show the signal intensity variation caused by refractive index change. The signal intensity variations caused by refractive index change (
F1) can be obtained by measuring the signal change between the red dotted curve and the black curve at
θmax. The signal intensity variation caused by fluorescence property change (
F2) can be obtained by measuring the signal change between the green curve and the red dotted curve at
θmax. And the SPCE sensor amplified the detection signals (
F3) by combining the signal intensity variations caused by the changes in refractive index (
F1) and the fluorescence intensity (
F2) after the adsorption of VOCs. The reversibility of the sensor was shown in Fig. S8 (Supporting information), the physisorption character of interaction between the isopropanol vapor and the RhB@ZIF-8 materials ensured the reversibility of the sensor. To better demonstrate the performance of the multi-information acquisition sensing strategy, the sensor was used to measure the response to acetone vapor. Conventional fluorescence measurements showed negligible response after adsorption (
Fig. 3D). However, the angle shift in fluorescence signal measurement based on SPCE could imply that RhB@ZIF-8 film adsorbed acetone vapor (
Fig. 3E). And the same phenomenon occurred during the adsorption of ether vapor and ethyl acetate vapor (Figs. S9C and D in Supporting information). SPCE signal measurement that acquaints both fluorescence information and refractive index information can provide a comprehensive analysis of the interface compared to traditional fluorescence technique.