Encouraged by the obvious uptake differences of ZJU-194a, we employed the well-established Ideal Adsorbed Solution Theory (IAST) to estimate its adsorption selectivity for 50/50 (v/v) C
2H
2/CO
2 mixtures (
Fig. 3a and Figs. S9-S12 in Supporting information). For the very challenging C
2H
2/CO
2 separation, ZJU-194a shows an ultrahigh selectivity up to 125.0 at 0.01 bar (
Fig. 3d). With the increase of pressure, the selectivity gradually decreases down to 22.4 at 1.0 bar. We further made comparison of C
2H
2/CO
2 selectivity at ambient conditions among reported MOFs with various separation mechanisms. Clearly, as shown in
Fig. 3b, it is hardly for those MOFs to achieve high C
2H
2/CO
2 selectivity (> 20) based on a single separation mechanism including OMS, H-binding and pore confinement [
55–
60]. On the contrary, the combined effects of OMS or H-binding with pore confinements afford the increased C
2H
2/CO
2 selectivity [
61–
66]. Actually, most leading MOFs for C
2H
2/CO
2 separation are those with tight binding sites within small pores. Especially, those ultramicroporous MOFs with high density OMS exhibit the benchmark C
2H
2/CO
2 selectivity including ZJU-74a [
32] and ATC-Cu [
15]. Whereas, it seems more challenging for MOFs to achieve benchmark C
2H
2/CO
2 selectivity
via H-binding combined with pore confinement effects, as most of them show moderate selectivity. In particular, although some MOFs with large pores exhibit extremely high C
2H
2 uptake capacity such as SNNU-45 [
53], MOF-160 [
63,
64] and ZJNU-117 [
67], their C
2H
2/CO
2 selectivity are still lower than that of ZJU-194a. Moreover, the C
2H
2/CO
2 selectivity of ZJU-194a is even comparable to the benchmark MOFs with high density OMS such as FeNi-M'MOF (24) [
32] and NKMOF-1-Ni (~22) [
33], and much higher than most reported promising materials including BUT-85 (6.1) [
29], MUF-17 (6.0) [
54], JCM-1 (13.7) [
56], CAU-10-NH
2 (10.8) [
58], TCuCl(16.9) [
51], UTSA-74 (9.0) [
27] and FJU-6-TATB (4.3) (
Fig. 3e) [
24]. We further obtained the static uptake isotherms of C
2H
2 and CO
2 from equimolar C
2H
2/CO
2 mixtures based on IAST calculations. As shown in
Fig. 3c and Fig. S13 (Supporting information), ZJU-194a gives high adsorption capacity of C
2H
2 (1.97 mmol/g and 1.32 mmol/g for 273 K and 296 K respectively) at 1.0 bar while almost completely excluding CO
2, further indicating its particular promise for C
2H
2/CO
2 separation. Dynamic breakthrough test was thus conducted to evaluate the feasibility of ZJU-194a for equimolar C
2H
2/CO
2 mixtures. Clearly, the efficient separation can be accomplished by ZJU-194a. As shown in
Fig. 3d, CO
2 eluted first from the column, while C
2H
2 could be detected after 23 min. The regeneration curves of ZJU-194a were obtained
via purging by He flow (5 mL/min) at 308 K. As illustrated in Fig. S15 (Supporting information), 96% CO
2 could be desorbed within 5 min, while it needs 35 min to totally remove C
2H
2 from the breakthrough column. In addition, the C
2H
2 production is estimated to be 0.77 mmol/g for one cycle, and the recovered purity reaches up to 80%.