In the previous report, oxidation of 5-HMF to DFF was almost all achieved in single organic solvent as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). However, the separation of DFF from DMSO was rather difficult to confirm the high yield of DFF. Meanwhile, production of DFF in water was rather difficult due to the instability of DFF in water and the multifunctional groups in 5-HMF [
22-
24]. MIBK was reported to be another solvent being used in oxidation of 5-HMF into DFF [
25,
26], which is immiscible with water to form biphase. Therefore, MIBK was selected here to be an organic phase to check the effect of POM PIC in aerobic oxidation of 5-HMF. Meanwhile, the biphase catalytic system containing H
2O/MIBK was also found to be more efficient in biomass conversion coupling the transformation and extraction in one unit [
24]. Herein, the aerobic oxidation of 5-HMF was firstly done in single solvents of H
2O and MIBK, and H
2O/MIBK biphase upon PMo
4V
8, PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
0/C
8NH
2), PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
8/2C
8NH
2), PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2 (C
8/C
8NH
2) and PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(2C
8/C
8NH
2) at 90 ℃ for 10 h (
Fig. 2). A normal homogeneous reaction system presented 52.2% and 32.6% conversion of 5-HMF with 7.34% and 24.4% yields of DFF upon PMo
4V
8 in H
2O and MIBK. To obtain DFF from 5-HMF was hard to be explored upon PMo
4V
8 either in H
2O nor in MIBK. Therefore, mixture of H
2O and MIBK might give rise to some enhancement in efficiency for 5-HMF oxidation. In H
2O/MIBK biphase, PMo
4V
8 and 5-HMF dissolved both in H
2O and MIBK, which acted as a homogeneous catalyst to increase the 5-HMF conversion to 49.9%. But the DFF yield was not higher as expected. PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
0/C
8NH
2) without alkyl groups, the conversion decreased due to the mass-transfer between 5-HMF, O
2 and solid catalyst in H
2O, MIBK, and H
2O/MIBK. The selectivity to DFF all increased being attributed to the protection of yield DFF by alkylamino groups on SiO
2(C
0/C
8NH
2) from being over-oxidized. PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
0/C
8NH
2) with only hydrophilicity could not emulsify the mixture of H
2O and MIBK, which only acted as a heterogeneous catalyst. A remarkably high conversion and yield were achieved on PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
8/C
8NH
2) with 81.8% conversion and 73.7% yield in H
2O/MIBK compared to those on PMo
4V
8 and PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
0/C
8NH
2). As mentioned above, PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
8/C
8NH
2) had a strong ability to emulsify the mixture of H
2O/MIBK to form stable water-in-oil (or oil-in-water system) [
27]. PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
8/C
8NH
2) located on the interface of H
2O and MIBK, providing a stable and highly viscous Pickering emulsion and leading to the combination of emulsification and catalytic properties. In addition, the amount of alkyl groups and amino groups on the surface of SiO
2 nanoparticles influenced the amphiphilicity and hence the activity. From the water contact angles, decreasing amino group loading amount gave rise to the increase in their hydrophobicity 98.6° and 67.2° for PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(2C
8/C
8NH
2) and PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
8/2C
8NH
2), respectively. The conversion of 5-HMF decreased with 16.4% and 39.1% compared to PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
8/C
8NH
2), indicating that stronger hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity of POM PIC did not favor for 5-HMF oxidation. A similar trend was observed using PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
6/C
8NH
2) and PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
10/C
8NH
2) as catalysts, which 51.6% and 63.7% conversion were obtained. These results suggested that PMo
4V
8(30)/SiO
2(C
8/C
8NH
2) had suitable hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties, which can form a stable and highly viscous Pickering emulsion to promote the oxidation rate.