Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Different-shaped ligand mediating efficient structurally similar cage-to-cage transformation
收藏切换
PDF
Jinkang Zhu, Chunhui Li, Xiuqin Li, Qiaochun Wang*, Lei Zou*
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2023, 34(4) : 107693
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2023, 34(4): 107693
• Communication •
Different-shaped ligand mediating efficient structurally similar cage-to-cage transformation
Full
Jinkang Zhu, Chunhui Li, Xiuqin Li, Qiaochun Wang*, Lei Zou*
Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Joint International Research Laboratory of Precision Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Feringa Nobel Prize Scientist Joint Research Center, Frontiers Science Center for Materiobiology and Dynamic Chemistry, Institute of Fine Chemicals, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
Published: 2023-04-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.07.036
Outline
收藏切换

The transformation of a Palladium-based metal-organic cage to a structurally similar one by direct ligand replacement usually leads to unwanted ligand scrambling. In this work, an intermediate ligand with different shape and basicity from the initial/final ones was introduced to avoid ligand scrambling to achieve the efficient indirect cage-to-similar-cage transformation. Compared with the direct transformation, the stepwise conversion has the advantages of high efficiency (93%) and simple workup.

Cage to cage transformation  /  Ligand scrambling  /  Ligand exchange  /  Metal-organic cage  /  M2L4
Jinkang Zhu, Chunhui Li, Xiuqin Li, Qiaochun Wang, Lei Zou. Different-shaped ligand mediating efficient structurally similar cage-to-cage transformation[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023 , 34 (4) : 107693 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.07.036
Full Text
Less
Metal-organic cages have attracted huge attention because of their well-fined geometries and confined functional cavities, which are widely applied in drug delivery [1-4], catalysis [5-8], guest recognition [9-11] and separation [12, 13], and sensing [14-17]. Ligand exchange strategies are commonly used to synthesize and tune the properties of metal-organic cages [18, 19]. Palladium-based metal-organic cages with labile coordination bond can undergo ligand exchange [20] to achieve cage-to-cage transformations, which have been used to synthesize novel cages [21-25]. Compared with the direct coordination into cages, the cage-to-cage conversions, which are post-synthetic strategies originating from the ligand exchanging at the molecular level, can not only obtain higher-level self-assemblies [26-28], but also mimic the function of bio-systems [29, 30]. In the conversions of these Palladium-based cages, the basicity and geometric structure of the ligands are two key factors that affect the transformation efficiency. The basicity of the ligands on the initial and target cages determines the direction of transformation [31] and structural difference of ligands affects the process of cage-to-cage transformation [32]. When two ligands have large structural differences (especially the length), the initial homoleptic cage could be converted efficiently into another homoleptic cage [31, 33]. When the two ligands are of complementary structure [34-36], only a single of the heteroleptic cage will be obtained, which is described as integrative self-sorting. And when the two ligands have similar structures [37, 38], ligand scrambling would occur―the addition of the new ligand to the initial cage would generally lead to the formation of a series of heteroleptic cages (Fig. 1a). So far as we know, there are only a few reports of exploiting hydrogen bonding interactions and steric effects to avoid the ligand scrambling [35, 39, 40]. Therefore, it is of significant scientific value to develop new and universal strategies to achieve efficient interconversion of cages with similar structures.
Herein, we report the stepwise transformation of a cage (2a) to another one (2b) with similar structure in an extremely high yield by introducing an intermediate ligand (Lm), as illustrated in Fig. 1b. The basicity of Lm is between the initial cage ligand (La) and the target cage ligand (Lb), and its structure is also very different from the two. As a consequence, the intermediate cage (2m) can be obtained by adding Lm to 2a in 96% yield, and then almost quantitatively (97%) transferred to 2b in the presence of excess Lb. By comparison, the direct 2a-to-2b transformation by adding Lb to cage 2a leads to the formation of multiple mixed cages because of ligand scrambling, which results in a low yield (49%) of 2b formation and makes it difficult to be purified. This mediated cage-to-cage transformation provides a universal strategy for effective preparation of molecular cages from their counterparts with weaker ligand basicity.
The structures of La, Lm and Lb are shown in Fig. 2. Both La and Lb are V-shaped ligands while Lm adopts a quite different configuration with an azobenzene connecting with two meta-pyridines. The introduction of phenyloxy weak electron donating group on the meta position of Lm-pyridine was expected to make the basicity of Lm weaker than Lb (methoxy strong electron donating groups stay on the para position of Lb-pyridine) but stronger than La (no electron donating group on the La-pyridine).
La [41] and Lb [31] were prepared as reported and Lm was synthesized by the reduction of 3-(4-nitrophenoxy)pyridine (Scheme S1 in Supporting information). The relative basicity investment was carried out by 1H NMR trifluoroacetic acid titration experiments. Lm was found to be protonated more easily than La (Figs. S4 and S5 in Supporting information), and Lb was protonated more readily when compared to Lm (Figs. S6 and S7 in Supporting information). The basicity sequence La < Lm < Lb was thus confirmed.
The known 2a [41] and 2b [31] were then synthesized by the self-assembling of La and Lb with [Pd(CH3CN)4](BF4)2 respectively. The mediated cage 2m was obtained similarly by stirring Lm and [Pd(CH3CN)4](BF4)2 in 2:1 ratio in CD3CN at 70 ℃ for 5 h. 2m was characterized by 1H, 13C, DOSY and 1H–1H COSY NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Further X-ray single crystal analysis reveals that 2m crystallizes in monoclinic crystal system with C 2/c space group, and each square-planar Pd2+ is coordinated to four N atoms on pyridine of different Lm, generating the lantern shaped M2L4 structure (Fig. S13 and Table S1 in Supporting information) [42-44], which is the same pattern as 2a and 2b.
The direct cage-to-cage conversion was subsequently carried out by mixing 2a with Lb in different molar ratios (1.0: 2.0, 4.0, 7.0) in CD3CN at room temperature for 24 h (Scheme S4 in Supporting information). The 1H NMR results (Fig. S14 in Supporting information) indicate that 2a disappears while 2b comes into being after the addition of Lb. Except for those proton signals of 2b and the released free La and Lb, the rest peaks are difficult to be clearly assigned. Nevertheless, further high-resolution mass spectrometry (Fig. 3) shows that the reaction mixture also contains hybrid molecular cages, such as [Pd2(La)(Lb)3](BF4)4 (abbreviate as H1, m/z at 378.5711 for [H1–4BF4]4+, 533.7686 for [H1–3BF4]3+, 844.1517 for [H1–2BF4]2+) and [Pd2(La)2(Lb)2](BF4)4 (abbreviate as H2, m/z 363.5635 for [H2–4BF4]4+, 513.7659 for [H2–3BF4]3+, 814.1346 for [H2–2BF4]2+). These results indicate that obvious ligand scrambling occurs even though the basicity of Lb is stronger than that of La. Even though 7 equiv. Lb was used, the conversion efficiency was determined as low as 49% according to the NMR integrations (Figs. S15 and S16 in Supporting information). It should be noted that we failed to obtain pure 2b after several purification attempts, such as recrystallization and washing with poor solvents.
The step-by-step conversions from cage 2a to 2m and then to 2b (Scheme S3 in Supporting information) were then conducted. The first cage conversion process was investigated by treating 2a with Lm at room temperature for 24 h in CD3CN (Scheme S5 in Supporting information). As shown in Fig. S17 (Supporting information), a new set of 1H NMR peaks corresponding to 2m appears with the addition of 2.0 equiv. of Lm, and its intensity increases with the further addition of Lm, while the peaks of 2a gradually disappear. The 1H NMR results suggest that 2a was completely transferred into 2m after the addition of 7.0 equiv. of Lm (Fig. 4a). This conversion process was further confirmed by ESI-MS spectrometry of the mixtures of 2a and Lm. Both 2a and 2m peaks occur when the molar ratio of Lm to 2a is 2.0 (Fig. S19 in Supporting information), while those 2a ones disappear when the ratio come to 7.0 (Fig. S20 in Supporting information). The additional free La and Lm were removed by the simply addition of ethyl ether to the clear solution and 2m precipitated out. Further preparative experiment was conducted in CH3CN, and pure 2m was obtained from ethyl ether in a high yield of 96% (Scheme S5 in Supporting information).
The transformation of cage 2m to 2b was finally carried out. Similarly, the 1H NMR spectra were recorded after the progressive addition of Lb (2.0, 4.0 and 7.0 equiv.) to the CD3CN solution of 2m at room temperature for 24 h (Scheme S6 and Fig. S21 in Supporting information). It can be found that the proton signals of 2b enhance with the addition of Lb, and those of 2m disappear entirely when the molar ratio of Lb to 2m reaches to 7.0 (Fig. 4b). Pure 2b was obtained after being precipitated from ethyl acetate in 97% yield in the preparative experiment (Scheme S6).
Further experiments of the mixing of cage 2b with different amounts of Lm (2.0, 4.0 and 7.0 equiv.) were conducted to investigate the details of the back-transformation of 2b to 2m. According to the integrations of 1H NMR spectrometry, the conversions are 7%, 12% and 19% respectively with the increasing addition of Lm (Fig. S23 in Supporting information) and the peaks of 2m, 2b, Lm and Lb all appear in the ESI-MS of the mixture of 2b with 2.0 and 7.0 equiv. of Lm (Figs. S24 and S25 in Supporting information). These results indicate that the cage-to-cage conversion is a dynamic equilibrium process.
It can be seen that both direct and stepwise cage-to-cage transformations can be performed at room temperature. Compared with the low efficiency (49%) of the former, the latter has one more reaction step, but the yield has been greatly improved to 93% (i.e., 96% × 97%) after simple work-up. In addition, this cage transformation method of introducing a mediated ligand with large structural differences can well solve the problem of ligand scrambling without requiring additional modifications to the initial and final cages.
In summary, the direct conversion of cage 2a to 2b results in the formation of heteroleptic cages because of serious ligand scrambling between La and Lb, making the conversion process complex. To avoid this ligand scrambling, an intermediate ligand Lm with different shape and basicity from La/ Lb was introduced and 2a was indirectly converted to 2b via the intermediate cage 2m. The latter mediated method possesses the advantage of high yield and simple operation, providing a new idea for preparing molecular cages from those ones with similar structure. This research further supports that the geometry and basicity of ligand are key factors among the cage-to-cage transformation. And furthermore, such a strategy of achieving effective cage-to-cage transformation in a controlled manner has good potential application prospects in the constructions of molecular machines and drug delivery systems.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21572063), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2018SHZDZX03) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.07.036.
References
Less
[1]
J.E.M. Lewis, E.L. Gavey, S.A. Cameron, J.D. Crowley, Chem. Sci.3 (2012) 778–784.
[2]
N. Ahmad, H.A. Younus, A.H. Chughtai, F. Verpoort, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 9–25.
[3]
W. Zhu, J. Guo, Y. Ju, et al., Adv. Mater. 31 (2019) 1806774.
[4]
Y. Liu, B. Shi, H. Wang, et al., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 39 (2018) 1800655.
[5]
X. Qiu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhu, et al., Adv. Mater. 33 (2021) 2001731.
[6]
V. Marti-Centelles, A.L. Lawrence, P.J. Lusby, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 2862–2868.
[7]
N. Xu, K. Su, E.S.M. El-Sayed, et al., Chem. Sci. 13 (2022) 3582–3588.
[8]
K. Wu, K. Li, S. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 2639–2643.
[9]
L. Yang, D. Zhang, H. Yan, et al., Inorg. Chem. 58 (2019) 4067–4070.
[10]
T.R. Schulte, J.J. Holstein, G.H. Clever, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 5562–5566.
[11]
A. Jimenez, R.A. Bilbeisi, T.K. Ronson, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (2014) 4556–4560.
[12]
D. Zhang, T.K. Ronson, Y.Q. Zou, J.R. Nitschke, Nat. Rev. Chem. 5 (2021) 168–182.
[13]
W. Fan, S.B. Peh, Z. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 17338–17343.
[14]
J. Dong, Y. Zhou, F. Zhang, Y. Cui, Chem. Eur. J. 20 (2014) 6455–6461.
[15]
M. Zhang, M.L. Saha, M. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 5067–5074.
[16]
Y. Cui, Z.M. Chen, X.F. Jiang, et al., Dalton Trans. 46 (2017) 5801–5805.
[17]
T. Feng, X. Li, J. Wu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 95–98.
[18]
X. Kang, M. Zhu, Chem. Mater. 31 (2019) 9939–9969.
[19]
M.J. Hardie, Chem. Lett. 45 (2016) 1336–1346.
[20]
C.H. Li, J.L. Zuo, Adv. Mater. 32 (2020) 1903762.
[21]
A. Kumar, P.S. Mukherjee, Chem. Eur. J. 26 (2020) 4842–4849.
[22]
W.M. Bloch, G.H. Clever, Chem. Commun. 53 (2017) 8506–8516.
[23]
S. Bandi, D.K. Chand, Chem. Eur. J. 22 (2016) 10330–10335.
[24]
K. Wu, B. Zhang, C. Drechsler, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2020) 6403–6407.
[25]
S. Sudan, R.J. Li, S.M. Jansze, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 1773–1778.
[26]
D.K. Chand, R. Manivannan, H.S. Sahoo, K. Jeyakumar, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005 (2005) 3346–3352.
[27]
J.J. Henkelis, C.J. Carruthers, S.E. Chambers, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 14393–14396.
[28]
J.J. Henkelis, J. Fisher, S.L. Warriner, M.J. Hardie, Chem. Eur. J. 20 (2014) 4117–4125.
[29]
P.M. Cheng, L.X. Cai, S.C. Li, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 23569–23573.
[30]
T. Sawada, H. Hisada, M. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 4449–4451.
[31]
S.M. Jansze, K. Severin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 815–819.
[32]
S. Pullen, G.H. Clever. Acc. Chem. Res. 51 (2018) 3052–3064.
[33]
D. Samanta, P.S. Mukherjee, Chem. Eur. J. 20 (2014) 12483–12492.
[34]
R.J. Li, F. Fadaei-Tirani, R. Scopelliti, K. Severin, Chem. Eur. J. 27 (2021) 9439–9445.
[35]
D. Preston, J.E. Barnsley, K.C. Gordon, J.D. Crowley, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 10578–10585.
[36]
W.M. Bloch, J.J. Holstein, W. Hiller, G.H. Clever. Angew. Chem. 129 (2017) 8399–8404.
[37]
A.M. Johnson, R.J. Hooley. Inorg. Chem. 50 (2011) 4671–4673.
[38]
M. Yamashina, T. Yuki, Y. Sei, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 21 (2015) 4200–4204.
[39]
R. Zhu, W.M. Bloch, J.J. Holstein, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 24 (2018) 12976–12982.
[40]
B. Chen, J.J. Holstein, A. Platzek, et al., Chem. Sci. 13 (2022) 1829–1834.
[41]
P. Liao, B.W. Langloss, A.M. Johnson, et al., Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 4932–4934.
[42]
V. Croué, S. Krykun, M. Allain, et al., New J. Chem. 41 (2017) 3238–3241.
[43]
D.A. McMorran, P.J. Steel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37 (1998) 3295–3297.
[44]
L.P. Zhou, Q.F. Sun, Chem. Commun. 51 (2015) 16767–16770.
Appendix
Less
Year 2023 volume 34 Issue 4
PDF
58
32
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.07.036
  • Receive Date：2022-03-14
  • Online Date：2025-11-21
  • Published：2023-04-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2022-03-14
  • Revised：2022-07-12
  • Accepted：2022-07-15
Affiliations
    Key Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Joint International Research Laboratory of Precision Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Feringa Nobel Prize Scientist Joint Research Center, Frontiers Science Center for Materiobiology and Dynamic Chemistry, Institute of Fine Chemicals, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.07.036
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House