Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Nickel-catalyzed hydromonofluoromethylation of unactivated alkenes for expedient construction of primary alkyl fluorides
收藏切换
PDF
Shan-Xiu Ni, Yan-Lin Li, Hui-Qi Ni, Yu-Xiang Bi, Jie Sheng, Xi-Sheng Wang*
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2023, 34(3) : 107614
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2023, 34(3): 107614
• Communication •
Nickel-catalyzed hydromonofluoromethylation of unactivated alkenes for expedient construction of primary alkyl fluorides
Full
Shan-Xiu Ni, Yan-Lin Li, Hui-Qi Ni, Yu-Xiang Bi, Jie Sheng, Xi-Sheng Wang*
Affiliations
  • Department of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
Published: 2023-03-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.037
Outline
收藏切换

A nickel-catalyzed direct hydromonofluoromethylation of unactivated olefins with industrial raw fluoroiodomethane is developed, furnishing various primary alkyl fluorides in a step-economic manner. The key factor to success is the use of pyridine-oxazoline as ligand and (MeO)2MeSiH as the hydrogen source. This transformation demonstrates high efficiency, mild conditions, good functional-group compatibility and great potential in the drug discovery.

Hydromonofluoromethylation  /  Unactivated alkenes  /  Nickel-catalysis  /  Primary fluorides  /  Ni-H species
Shan-Xiu Ni, Yan-Lin Li, Hui-Qi Ni, Yu-Xiang Bi, Jie Sheng, Xi-Sheng Wang. Nickel-catalyzed hydromonofluoromethylation of unactivated alkenes for expedient construction of primary alkyl fluorides[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023 , 34 (3) : 107614 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.037
Full Text
Less
Monofluorinated compounds serve as the most important kind of fluorine-containing molecules in pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals, due to their significantly increased lipid solubility, permeability, metabolic stability and bioactivity by comparison of the parent molecules (Fig. 1) [1-5]. Accordingly, the selective incorporation of fluorine atom into organic molecules has sustained significant interest in recent years [6-11], and persistent efforts have been devoted to establishing efficient methods by direct fluorination or indirect monofluoroalkylation to make monofluorinated alkanes. Indeed, the direct C-F bond construction from alkyl alcohols was first reported in the 1970s and was later popularized and expanded to other alkyl-X (X = halide, COOH, etc.) through decades of hard work from lots of groups [12-15]. Even though a number of fluorinating agents have been developed for direct fluorination in the past decades [16-28], the known methods for synthesis of alkyl fluorides, especially terminal aliphatic fluorides, were still suffered from limited substrate compatibility, low catalytic reactivity and poor site selectivity. Considering the C-F bond forming reductive elimination from the metal fluorides was quite difficult, an alternative C—C cross-coupling strategy offered a solution for synthesis of primary alkyl fluorides via a transition-metal catalyzed monofluoromethylation of aryl/alkyl halides or boronic acids [29-35]. Recently, our group reported a nickel-catalyzed reductive cross-coupling [32-34] of alkyl (pesudo)halides and fluoromethyl bromide to access various aliphatic fluorides, in which the reaction was initiated by oxidation addition of CH2FBr to Ni0 and followed by in situ reduction of NiII to NiI species for further activation of alkyl halides to furnish the final primary fluorides (Scheme 1a).
As the most abundant, low-cost and versatile feedstock on large scale readily available from petrochemical industry, simple unactivated alkenes have been widely utilied to a great variety of organic transformations to produce various fine chemicals or useful molecules for industrial production and academic research [36-38]. In view of the normally used electrophiles and nucleophiles were typically generated from alkenes, no doubtedly, the direct use of alkenes as the coupling partner for nickel-catalyzed monofluoroalkylation represents the most step-economic and efficient way to make primary aliphatic fluorides [39, 40]. As a powerful synthetic strategy developed rapidly in the past decade, the use of simple unactivated alkenes as alkyl organometallic equivalents in transition-metal catalzyed cross-coupling reactions, in which silanes were normally used as hydride sources to generate alkyl organic metal species by insertion of C═C double bond to M-H species generated in situ [41-44]. As one part of our continuous interests on monofluoroalkylation, we speculated that such alkylated NiI species could activate monofluoromethyl halide via two SET steps, affording the terminal alkyl fluorides after the following reductive elimination.
Herein, we report the first example of nickel-catalyzed three-component hydrofluoromethylation of unactivated alkenes with industrial raw fluoroiodomethane as the fluoromethylating source, which furnished diverse terminal aliphatic fluorides in a convenient and efficient manner (Scheme 1b). This transformation tolerates diverse collection of terminal alkenes and demonstrates mild conditions, high catalytic reactivity and excellent functional group compatibility. Mechanistic studies support a Ni-H initiated hydronickelation of alkenes followed by monofluoromethyl radical-involved SET oxidative addition.
Our study commenced with but-3-en-1-ylbenzene (1a) as the pilot substrate, (EtO)3SiH as the hydrogen source, fluoroiodomethane (2) as the coupling partner, Na2CO3 (3.0 equiv.) as the base in DMAc. By using dtbpy (15 mol%) as the ligand, a careful investigation of nickel sources were firstly performed (Table 1, entries 1–5; for details, see Supporting information). While NiCl2 afforded none of the desired aliphatic fluoride 3a (Table 1, entry 1), to our interests, NiBr2 and NiI2 furnished 3a successfully under the same conditions, albeit with low yields at 15% or 26% respectively (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). In view of the solubility of different nickel sources may play a key role for the catalytic efficience, easily soluble nickels like NiCl2·DME and NiBr2·DME were next explored in this catalytic system to furnish the desired 3a in relatively higher yield in 51% and 54% yields respectively. To further improve the yield of this transformation, diverse nitrogen ligands have been carefully investigated. While phenanthroline and its derivatives (L8 and L9) afforded 3a with only lower yields, pyridine-imidazoline (L15) gave a slightly higer yield at 56%. As sterically hindered ligands could facilitate the reductive elimination of this nickel catalytic cycle, pyridine-oxazoline ligands were next examined and L20 could further prove the yield to 61% (Table 1, entry 10). Considering the important role of external hydrogen source played in forming the Ni-H species, several hydrogen sources were then examined (Table 1, entries 11–13), among which (MeO)2MeSiH increased productivity to 80%. Meanwhile, screening of the ratio of nickel salt to ligand revealed that 1:1 works best (Table 1, entries 14 and 15). To our satisfactory, a detailed examination of pyridine-oxazoline ligand analogs (for details see Supporting information) indicated that L25 with a CF3 group installed on the pyridine ring proved to be the best choice (92% yield, Table 1, entry 16).
With the optimized conditions in hand, we examined the alkenes scope (Scheme 2). First, alkenes tethered with substituted phenyl ethers were used to evaluate the functional group tolerance. Good to excellent yields (68%–96%) were observed with numerous functional groups, including electron-neutral alkyl (3b-3d, 3m) and aryl (3e) groups, electron-donating groups such as thiomethyl (3f), methoxy (3k) and electron-withdrawing groups such as ester (3g), trifluoromethyl (3h), chloride (3i), cyano (3j) and formyl (3l). Silyl ether (3q) and benzoate derivatives (3n) were also well tolerated, giving 70%–76% yields. Of note we were able to prepare 3v, which contains a free hydroxyl group, and 3x, an amino acid derivative, in 84% and 70% yields respectively. Considering the importance of heterocycles as building blocks in medicinal chemistry, we next screened various representative heterocyclic compounds. We were pleased that coordinating atoms like nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur, which typically pose challenges in transition metal catalysis, were all compatible under our reaction conditions. For example, this transformation was effective with quinoline (3p), furan (3r), thiophene (3s), pyridine (3t), N-methyl indole (3u) and amide (3w), affording the desired products in 65%−96% yields. After demonstrating the excellent functional group tolerance and substrate compatibility, the synthetic potential of this method was then elucidated via monofluoromethylation of drug candidates. Alkene species bearing bioactive motifs such as flavonols (3aa), 4-methylumbelliferone (3ab), etodolac (3ac), isoxepac (3ad), loxoprofen (3ae), flurbiprofen (3af), estrone (3ag), febuxostat (3ah) and fenofibric acid (3ai) could be smoothly monofluoromethylated with gratifying yields (61%–83%), showcasing its great potential to be an efficient and expedient tactic for drug discovery. This method could be easily scaled up and allowed for isolation of 82% yield, indicating that it could be used for industrial-grade synthesis process (Scheme 3).
In analogy to earlier work, we surmised that the reaction may proceed via a radical pathway and a series of control experiments were carried out to verify this proposal (Scheme 4). First, 2.0 equiv. of free radical inhibitor TEMPO was added to the standard reaction system and found no product, while product 4 was detected by HRMS (Scheme 4a), indicating that there contains a monofluoromethyl radical in this process. Meanwhile, (2-vinylcyclopropyl)benzene 5 was then subjected to the standard conditions to verify the reaction sequence of Ni-H species and radical species with alkenes and the product 6 was obtained in 30% yield, while the ring-opening product normally furnished by fluoromethyl radical attack first to alkene was not isolated (Scheme 4b), which indicated that the concentration of free radicals was very low. This result indicates that the reation was initiated by the insertion of Ni-H species to the alkenes rather than the addition of the monofluoromethyl radical to the alkenes.
Based on our observations and previous reports [45-49], the plausible mechanism involving a NiI/NiIII catalytic cycle was depicted in Scheme 5. With the presence of Na2CO3, the hydrogen atom transfer between NiI species A and silane generated Ni-H species B, which offered alkyl-nickel intermediate C after the following insertion by alkene. Single electron oxidation of NiI species C by fluoroiodomethane 2 afforded monofluoromethyl radical and NiII intermediate D, and radical oxidation of D furnished NiIII species E. Finally, the reductive elimination from E furnished monofluoroalkane 3 and regenerated NiI catalyst A.
In conclusion, we have developed a nickel-catalyzed three-component hydrofluoromethylation of unactivated alkenes with industrial raw material CH2FI. This method enables the use of readily available and low-cost alkenes, thereby complementing the existing reductive cross-coupling reactions which requires the preparation of its alkyl halide counterparts. The transformation tolerates a diverse collection of functional groups and bioactive compounds. While this strategy is expected to flourish in the coming years with growing applications in the drug discovery, further exploration of the detailed mechanism and more synthetic applications was still ongoing in our laboratory.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgment
Less
We gratefully acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21971228) for financial support.
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.037.
References
Less
[1]
C. Ni, J. Hu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 45 (2016) 5441–5454.
[2]
R. Berger, G. Resnati, P. Metrangolo, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 40 (2011) 3496–3508.
[3]
M.C. Walker, M.C.Y. Chang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 6527–6536.
[4]
J. Wang, M. Sanchez-Rosello, J.L. Acena, et al., Chem. Rev. 114 (2014) 2432–2506.
[5]
N.A.J. Meanwell, Med. Chem. 61 (2018) 5822–5880.
[6]
T. Liang, C.N. Neumann, T. Ritter, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52 (2013) 8214–8264.
[7]
M.G. Campbell, T. Ritter, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 612–633.
[8]
D.A. Petrone, J. Ye, M. Lautens, Chem. Rev. 116 (2016) 8003–8104.
[9]
S. Barata-Vallejo, M.V. Cooke, A. Postigo, ACS Catal. 8 (2018) 7287–7307.
[10]
R. Szpera, D.F.J. Moseley, L.B. Smith, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 14824–14848.
[11]
M. Reichel, K. Karaghiosoff, Angew. Chem. 132 (2020) 12364–12377.
[12]
G.S. Lal, G.P. Pez, R.J. Pesaresi, et al., J. Org. Chem. 64 (1999) 7048–7054.
[13]
H. Dang, M. Mailig, G. Lalic, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (2014) 6473–6476.
[14]
J. Guo, C. Kuang, J. Rong, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 25 (2019) 7259–7264.
[15]
V. Fasano, N. Winter, A. Noble, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 8502–8506.
[16]
Y. Li, C. Ni, J. Liu, et al., Org. Lett. 8 (2006) 1693–1696.
[17]
J. Liu, L. Zhang, J. Hu, Org. Lett. 10 (2008) 5377–5380.
[18]
K. Matsuzaki, T. Furukawa, E. Tokunaga, et al., Org. Lett. 15 (2013) 3282–3285.
[19]
Y. Geng, A. Liang, X. Gao, et al., J. Org. Chem. 82 (2017) 8604–8610.
[20]
G. Parisi, M. Colella, S. Monticelli, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 13648–13651.
[21]
G.K.S. Prakash, I. Ledneczki, S. Chacko, et al., Org. Lett. 10 (2008) 557–560.
[22]
Y. Zhao, B. Gao, C. Ni, et al., Org. Lett. 14 (2012) 6080–6083.
[23]
H. Doi, I. Ban, A. Nonoyama, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 15 (2009) 4165–4171.
[24]
N.Y. Wu, X.H. Xu, F.L. Qing, ACS Catal. 9 (2019) 5726–5731.
[25]
Y. Cao, L. Jiang, W. Yi, Adv. Synth. Catal. 361 (2019) 4360–4368.
[26]
X. Shen, M. Zhou, C. Ni, et al., Chem. Sci. 5 (2014) 117–122.
[27]
Z. He, P. Tan, C. Ni, et al., Org. Lett. 17 (2015) 1838–1841.
[28]
N. Noto, T. Koike, M. Akita, ACS Catal. 9 (2019) 4382–4387.
[29]
X. Jiang, S. Sakthivel, K. Kulbitski, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 9548–9551.
[30]
X. Jiang, M. Gandelman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 2542–2547.
[31]
Y.M. Su, G.S. Feng, Z.Y. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 6003–6007.
[32]
J. Sheng, H.Q. Ni, H.R. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 7634–7639.
[33]
J. Sheng, H.Q. Ni, S.X. Ni, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 15020–15027.
[34]
R. Cu, J. Sheng, B.B. Wu, et al., Chem. Commun. 57 (2021) 9084–9087.
[35]
Y.L. Li, W. Liu, Z.Y. Liu, CCS Chem. 3 (2021) 3320–3328.
[36]
C.J. DeSantis, S.E. Skrabalak, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 3989–3996.
[37]
X. Wu, F.A. Cruz, A. Lu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 10126–10130.
[38]
X. Li, J. Jin, P. Chen, Nat. Chem. 14 (2022) 425–432.
[39]
M. Arlt, O. Hindsgaul, J. Org. Chem. 60 (1995) 4617–4628.
[40]
Q. Liu, Y. Lu, H. Sheng, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 25477–25484.
[41]
Y. Zhang, B. Han, S. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 13860–13864.
[42]
Y. He, C. Liu, L. Yu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 9186–9191.
[43]
D. Qian, Sr. Bera, X. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 1959–1967.
[44]
Y. Cheng, Z. Gui, R. Tao, et al., Green Synth. Catal. 3 (2022) 377–379.
[45]
Y. He, Y. Cai, S. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 1061–1064.
[46]
Z.Y. Wang, G.H. Wan, G.Y. Wang, et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 59 (2018) 2302–2305.
[47]
Z. Wang, H. Yin, G.C. Fu, Nature 563 (2018) 379–383.
[48]
S. Wang, J.X. Zhang, T.Y. Zhang, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 2771–2780.
[49]
W. Guo, L. Cheng, G. Ma, et al., Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 1796–1801.
Appendix
Less
Year 2023 volume 34 Issue 3
PDF
47
26
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.037
  • Receive Date：2022-04-24
  • Online Date：2025-11-21
  • Published：2023-03-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2022-04-24
  • Revised：2022-06-13
  • Accepted：2022-06-14
Affiliations
    Department of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.037
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House