收藏切换
Rational design of a turn-on fluorescent probe for visualization of GRP78 protein in tumor models
收藏切换
PDF
Ying Wena, Ning Jinga, Fangjun Huob, Caixia Yina, *
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2023, 34(3) : 107604
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2023, 34(3): 107604
Review
Rational design of a turn-on fluorescent probe for visualization of GRP78 protein in tumor models
Full
Ying Wena, Ning Jinga, Fangjun Huob, Caixia Yina, *
Affiliations
  • a Institute of Molecular Science, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
  • b Research Institute of Applied Chemistry, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
Published: 2023-03-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.027
Outline
收藏切换

Fluorescence image for accurate tumor label still faces challenges in cancer detection and diagnostics. Emerging evidence is indicating that glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), a stress-inducible protein chaperone, is a great potential biomarker and therapeutic target for cancer. However, currently available probe for image tumor based on GRP78 has not been reported, owning to no obvious strategy in probe design towards this protein. In this paper, a hairpin-shaped peptidyl probe (pepFAM) conjugated with a 5-FAM fluorophore and a dabcyl quencher at both ends was developed, respectively. The probe was designed by performing a traditional fluorescence resonance energy transfer mechanism and employing a GRP78 specifically-binding peptide. Furthermore, the probe was used to specifically image cancer cells, and accurately image xenograft tumors in mice models. The novel fluorescent probe is expected to be a useful tool for the diagnostics of cancer.

Glucose-regulated protein 78  /  Fluorescence probe  /  Living cell imaing  /  Tumor diagnosis
Ying Wen, Ning Jing, Fangjun Huo, Caixia Yin. Rational design of a turn-on fluorescent probe for visualization of GRP78 protein in tumor models[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2023 , 34 (3) : 107604 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.027
Accurate cancer imaging is essential for patient assessment, before, during, and after treatment [1]. It is most challenging at the very early stages of cancer. Thus, many advanced molecular imaging approaches including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron-emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT), fluorescence imaging, photoacoustic imaging, and multimodal imaging are under constant development to improve diagnosis and to assess therapeutic efficacy [2-6]. As for accurate imaging systems, cancer imaging agents should specifically locate the target to enhance the image contrast at the tumor site [7,8]. This requires targeting ligands to bind to receptors expressed specifically on cancer cells.
The glucose-regulated protein, GRP78 (also referred to as BiP or heat shock protein family A member 5 [HSPA5]), is a stress‐inducible molecular chaperone that is evolutionarily conserved from yeast to humans [9]. It is also a member of the HSP70 family. In its inactive state, GRP78 maintains endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress sensors and ER‐associated proapoptotic machineries by sustaining ER protein folding capacity to regulate the balance between cancer cell survival and apoptosis [10]. Although GRP78 was believed to reside exclusively in the ER lumen, new studies demonstrate that it can be actively translocated to the cell surface [11]. Furthermore, a wealth of literature has confirmed that GRP78 exists on the cell surface of certain cell types and functions as a multifunctional receptor to influence tumor cell growth and survival [12]. Emerging evidence has highlighted cell surface GRP78 is associated with increased malignant behavior and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy by endowing various cancer cells with increased proliferative ability, altered metabolism, improved survival, and augmented invasive and metastatic potential [13]. GRP78 is, therefore, may be an effective target for cancer diagnosis and treatment [13-17]. However, currently available probes designed based on GRP78 for specifically image tumor have not been reported.
It is noted that many different synthetic peptides have been designed for GRP78 binding [18]. The specific peptide WIFPWIQL is the most employed peptide that have shown superior targeting activity and specificity towards GRP78 [19-21]. Thus, in this paper, we employed this peptide to design a fluorescent probe to specifically label GRP78 for accurate tumor fluorescence imaging. Compared to other imaging techniques, fluorescence imaging has shown unique advantages, involving real-time, multi-level, non-invasive, and non-disruptive features [1,22-25]. Our group have designed a lot of fluorescent probes towards bioactive small molecule with the excellent property [14,26-28].
In this probe design, FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) design mechanism was introduced. As we know, in a probe based on FRET, a key process that affects the fluorescent signal release mainly depends on the spectral matching and distance between fluorophores, involving in donor and acceptor/quencher [23,27,29]. The peptide chain above described has outstanding advantages, such as small size, little immunogenicity, and economic synthesis; offers an ideal linker for donor and quencher of probes. Thus, both sides of this peptide were conjugated with classic FRET fluorophore molecular pairs: 5-FAM fluorophore and dabcyl quencher, respectively. Due to the flexibility of peptide chain and π-π stacking of dyes, the whole probe showed a hairpin shape; the FRET process happened and the fluorescent signal of 5-FAM was quenched (Fig. 1a). After the response to GRP78, the conformational changes lead to increase in the space distance of fluorophore and quencher, suppression of FRET process, and finally release of fluorescence of 5-FAM (Fig. 1a). The produced fluorescence signal was used to detect the presence of GRP78 with high sensitivity and high selectivity. Furthermore, the capacity of specifically image cancer cells and tumors of this probe was verified.
The details of synthesis and characterization of probe (designated as pepFAM, shown in Fig. 1b) are provided in the Experiments Section and Figs. S1 and S2 (Supporting information). The spectroscopic properties of pepFAM were assessed under in vitro physiological conditions (in PBS, pH 7.4). In the absence of GRP78, pepFAM displayed weak fluorescent emission under excitation of 490 nm (Fig. 2a). After the addition of GRP78, a green fluorescence majored at 530 nm increased over time, as shown in Fig. 2a. Fig. 2b showed the absence spectra of pepFAM. Upon the addition of GRP78, the absorbance majored at 490 nm increased slightly. To verify the selectivity of pepFAM for GRP78, the fluorescent changes were examined upon addition of intracellular proteins (glutathione S-transferases, human albumin, lysozyme, and ferritin), active sulfur (Cys, Hcy and GSH), reactive oxygen species (H2O2) and ions (NaHSO3, NaF, NaCl and NaHCO3). At 2 h, the above species induced a weak increase with fluorescence intensity at 530 nm being (< 2.4-fold), which was markedly smaller than that obtained with GRP78 (9.7-times), as shown in Fig. 2c. The good selectivity showed that pepFAM could serve as a turn-on fluorescent probe for GRP78 with minimum interference from other ROS/RSS, proteins or ions. In addition, a linear correlation between the fluorescent emission intensity at 530 nm and the GRP78 concentration was presented at Fig. 2d. The detection limit of the probe for GRP78 was calculated with the equation 3σ/k [30]. The value was estimated as 0.19 µg/mL. In 3σ/k, σ is the standard deviation of blank measurement; k is the slope of the calibration curve in Fig. 2d. Fluorescence kinetics tests of probe and probe for GRP78 have been performed and displayed in Fig. S3 (Supporting information). These data indicated that pepFAM is an ideal turn-on probe for GRP78 with high selectivity and high sensitivity.
Next, CCK-8 assay was performed to verify the low acute toxicity of pepFAM to living HCT116 cells (human colorectal cancer cells). The viabilities were shown to be > 88.7% at 12 h in the incubation of 1–20 µmol/L pepFAM (Fig. S4 in Supporting information), clearly suggesting probe has low acute toxicity and excellent biocompatibility. Then, confocal imaging experiments were employed to evaluate the capabilities of probe to permeate living cells and specifically turn on cancer cells. HCT116 cells were incubated with 10 µmol/L pepFAM. As shown in Fig. 3a, the green channel signal dramatically increased over time and corresponding fluorescence intensity increased by 4.4-fold at 120 min, in Fig. 3c. The time-dependent green fluorescence increase was attributed to the increase of incubation time of probe and the specific response of probe for GRP78. It is noted that the green channel signal is almost undetectable in HL7702 cells (human normal liver cells), even with 2 h incubation time (Figs. 3b and c). This data indicated that the probe can specifically turn on cancer cells.
To verify the capacity of the probe to for specifically tumor labeling, a tumor model was established by subcutaneous injection of HCT116 cells in the right-back of a BALB/c nude mouse at the age of 6–8 weeks. The mice were kept for about 2 weeks. Then fluorescent imaging of the mice was performed using a small animal optical imaging system. We obtained images of the mice after injection of the probe at 0, 5, and 180 min, which are given in Fig. 4a. Weak fluorescence at the tumor site was observed after 5 min of probe injection, indicating that the probe exhibits good tissue permeability and high sensitivity. Within 180 min of monitoring, the fluorescence signal at tumor sites in the mice became more and more obvious (Fig. 4a). At 180 min, the fluorescence intensity in the tumor region increased by 63.5-fold, compared to that of before injection (Fig. 4b). Ex vivo fluorescence images of the isolated organ assay displayed that the obvious fluorescence signal appeared in the tumor, instead of other organs, including the heart, liver, kidneys, spleen, and lung (Fig. 4c).
In summary, this paper described the design and synthesis of a turn-on fluorescent probe and its excellent properties, as well as their application in solution, in living cell, and in vivo tumor imaging. The probe is composed of a specific peptide chain for GRP78 protein conjugated with a 5-FAM fluorophore and a dabcyl quencher based on FRET mechanism to form harpin-shape structure. The probe could specifically recognize GRP78 protein, open the harpin structure and release green fluorescence. Favourable characteristics of the probe also are demonstrated in terms of high specificity, high sensitivity, and stable photo-stability. In particular, the probe has been successfully applied to cellular imaging and the diagnosis of tumors in a xenogeneic mouse model. The superior properties of the probe give it great potential in other biosystems and in vivo imaging studies.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
We acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21705102, 21775096, 22074084) and the Basic Research Program of Shanxi Province (Free Exploration) (No. 20210302123430). We are also very grateful for the help of Dr. Lichao Zhang. All the animal experiments were performed by following the protocols approved by the Radiation Protection Institute of Drug Safety Evaluation Center in China (Production license: SYXK (Jin) 2018-0005).
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.027.
[1]
M. Gao, F. Yu, C. Lv, J. Choo, L. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev. 46 (2017) 2237-2271.
[2]
K.I. Matsumoto, J.B. Mitchell, M.C. Krishna, Molecules 26 (2021), 1614.
[3]
S.H. Gardner, C.J. Reinhardt, J. Chan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 5000-5009.
[4]
J. Liu, M. Liu, H. Zhang, W. Guo, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 12992-12998.
[5]
X. Zhang, Y. Chen, H. He, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 26337-26341.
[6]
Z. Zhao, C.B. Swartchick, J. Chan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 (2022) 829-868.
[7]
L. Wu, X. Qu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 2963-2997.
[8]
Y. Wen, C.L. Schreiber, B.D. Smith, Bioconjug. Chem. 31 (2020) 474-482.
[9]
I. Hernandez, M. Cohen, Cancer Lett. 524 (2022) 1-14.
[10]
M. Wang, S. Wey, Y. Zhang, R. Ye, A.S. Lee, Antioxid. Redox Signal. 11 (2009) 2307-2316.
[11]
I.M. Ibrahim, D.H. Abdelmalek, A.A. Elfiky, Life Sci. 226 (2019) 156-163.
[12]
U. Gopal, S.V. Pizzo, J. Cell. Physiol. 236 (2021) 2352-2363.
[13]
M. Farshbaf, A.Y. Khosroushahi, S. Mojarad-Jabali, et al., J. Control. Release 328 (2020) 932-941.
[14]
Y. Huang, Y. Zhang, F. Huo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 18706-18714.
[15]
R.J. Passarella, D.E. Spratt, A.E. van der Ende, et al., Cancer Res. 70 (2010) 4550-4559.
[16]
M. Gonzalez-Gronow, U. Gopal, R.C. Austin, S.V. Pizzo, IUBMB Life 73 (2021) 843-854.
[17]
S. Xia, W. Duan, W. Liu, X. Zhang, Q. Wang, J. Transl. Med. 19 (2021) 118.
[18]
Y.L. Tsai, A.S. Lee, Cell surface GRP78: anchoring and translocation mechanisms and therapeutic potential in cancer, in: S.V. Pizzo (Ed. ), Cell Surface GRP78, a New Paradigm in Signal Transduction Biology, Academic Press, New York, 2018, pp. 41-62.
[19]
M.A. Arap, J. Lahdenranta, P.J. Mintz, et al., Cancer Cell 6 (2004) 275-284.
[20]
A.N.I. Viswanath, J.W. Lim, S.H. Seo, et al., Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 92 (2018) 1555-1566.
[21]
Z. Li, C. Zhao, Z. Li, et al., Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 47 (2014) 68-75.
[22]
P. Wei, L. Liu, Y. Wen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 4547-4551.
[23]
X. Wu, R. Wang, N. Kwon, H. Ma, J. Yoon, Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 (2022) 450-463.
[24]
Y.F. Huang, Y.B. Zhang, F.J. Huo, Y. Wen, C.X. Yin, Sci. China Chem. 63 (2020) 1742-1755.
[25]
L. Liu, F. Liu, D. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202116807.
[26]
W. Zhang, F. Huo, F. Cheng, C. Yin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 6324-6331.
[27]
Y. Wen, F. Huo, J. Wang, C. Yin, Anal. Chem. 91 (2019) 15057-15063.
[28]
Y. Wen, F.J. Huo, C.X. Yin, Chin. Chem. Lett. 30 (2019) 1834-1842.
[29]
E. Pazos, O. Vazquez, J.L. Mascarenas, M.E. Vazquez, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38 (2009) 3348-3359.
[30]
Y. Wen, F. Xue, H. Lan, et al., Biosens. Bioelectron. 91 (2017) 115-121.
Year 2023 volume 34 Issue 3
PDF
39
21
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.027
  • Receive Date:2022-03-08
  • Online Date:2025-11-21
  • Published:2023-03-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2022-03-08
  • Revised:2022-06-08
  • Accepted:2022-06-09
Affiliations
    a Institute of Molecular Science, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Molecular Engineering of Ministry of Education, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
    b Research Institute of Applied Chemistry, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.06.027
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT