Solution assay of Cu
2+ exhibited a concentration-dependent decrease of photocurrent (
Fig. 3c), from which a good linearity can be obtained in the range of 0.5–15 µmol/L with a correlation coefficient (
R2) of 0.9934 (Fig. S16 in Supporting information), and the detection limit was estimated to be 0.46 µmol/L (data from independent experiments are presented as mean ± standard deviation,
n = 5). Such linear range is just suitable for the
in vivo analysis of extracellular brain Cu
2+, which is reported to be 2–10 µmol/L [
34]. The selectivity of the PEC microsensor against other metal ions and small molecules potentially coexisting in biological environments was evaluated (Fig. S17 in Supporting information). There was no detectable difference in photocurrent before and after addition of the interfering species, even when some interferents were at a concentration much higher than that in the body. As known, ascorbic acid (AA) usually acts as the electron donor in PEC sensing [
7]. Therefore, the influence of AA concentration on PEC signal needs to be examined. As shown in Fig. S18 (Supporting information), the photocurrent increased with AA concentration in the range of 0–100 µmol/L, whereas it remained constant at higher concentrations (100–600 µmol/L). Since the physiological level of AA in the brain is significantly higher than 100 µmol/L [
34], the signal of this PEC sensor would not be disturbed by possible variation of AA concentration. In addition, we also confirmed that other endogenous reductive species including glutathione (GSH), cysteine (Cys), dopamine (DA) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) did not induce perceptible changes of photocurrent in the presence of AA (
Fig. 3d), since AA has lower oxidation potential than these reductive species (Fig. S19 in Supporting information). Beside, the signal of this PEC sensor was insensitive to pH in the range of 5.0–9.0 (Fig. S20 in Supporting information). The stability of the sensor was inspected by monitoring the variation of photocurrent. The microsensor exhibited rapid and stable response in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing 200 µmol/L AA during 10 continuous cycles of irradiation (Fig. S21 in Supporting information). Reproducibility is also a key element of the electrode performance, and the results in Fig. S22 (Supporting information) indicated a good reproducibility (the relative standard deviation, RSD < 5.6%) of the microelectrodes. We also examined the performance of SA-CM/CdS@ZnO/GOFME
in vivo before proceeding to analysis in the brains. Under 10 continuous on-off-on cycles of irradiation, the photocurrent signal remained unchanged in the rat brain (Fig. S23 in Supporting information). Furthermore, the standard deviation for five microelectrodes tested in the same rat brain was < 6.0% (Fig. S24 in Supporting information). These results indicated a satisfactory reproducibility and stability of the as-prepared microsensor both
in vitro and
in vivo. Moreover, the cytotoxicity of the SA-CM/CdS@ZnO film was assessed by culturing U87 cells on its surface. As verified by fluorescence staining (Fig. S25 in Supporting information), the cells growing on the SA-CM/CdS@ZnO surface showed high viability. Photothermal effect of the microelectrode was investigated by an infrared thermal imaging camera. The results showed no change in temperature after irradiation for 10 s (Fig. S26 in Supporting information), precluding photodamage to bio-tissues. All these results indicated a good biocompatibility of the sensing materials. Lastly, to validate the feasibility of this sensor for
in vivo assay, exogenous Cu
2+ added by local microinjection was detected in rat brain. As shown in Fig. S27 (Supporting information), the photocurrent decreased obviously with the increase of Cu
2+ concentration.