Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Tryptophan-specific peptide modification through metal-free photoinduced N-H alkylation employing N-aryl glycines
收藏切换
PDF
Jianhui Yin1, Wenjing Huang1, Changyong Guo, Chao Liu, Fei Gao*, Honggang Hu*
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(6) : 109244
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(6): 109244
• Communication •
Tryptophan-specific peptide modification through metal-free photoinduced N-H alkylation employing N-aryl glycines
Full
Jianhui Yin1, Wenjing Huang1, Changyong Guo, Chao Liu, Fei Gao*, Honggang Hu*
Affiliations
  • School of Medicine or Institute of Translation Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
Published: 2024-06-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109244
Outline
收藏切换

Tryptophan (Trp) carries a unique heteroaromatic indole side chain and plays a critical role in peptide or protein modification. Herein, we have reported a metal-free photoinduced N-H alkylation strategy using N-aryl glycines for specific modification of tryptophan-containing peptides. The robustness of our approach is demonstrated by its wide substrate scope, excellent isolated yields, as well as almost unobservable side effects. Using this highly efficiently metal-free condition, alkylated Trp-containing peptides can be smoothly assembled. This study provides a reliable and practical tool for the chemo-selective modification of various tryptophan containing oligopeptides.

Tryptophan  /  Peptide  /  Modification  /  Glycine  /  Photoinduced
Jianhui Yin, Wenjing Huang, Changyong Guo, Chao Liu, Fei Gao, Honggang Hu. Tryptophan-specific peptide modification through metal-free photoinduced N-H alkylation employing N-aryl glycines[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024 , 35 (6) : 109244 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109244
Full Text
Less
Chemo-selective modifications of peptides and proteins have gained increased interest in drug development, which enhances peptide druggability or creates additional reactivity [1-5]. To date, a number of elegant strategies have been employed to increase drug efficiency, target affinity and cell penetration [6-9], such as transition-metal catalysis [10], multicomponent reaction [11, 12] and enzyme catalysis [13, 14]. However, most of traditional methods are often hampered by challenges including poor solubility, expensive catalysts, stringent reaction conditions, and difficult maneuverability [15]. Recently, photoredox catalysis has emerged as an ideal platform for post-synthetic modifications of peptides and proteins, owing to its mild and highly selective nature, as well as its compatibility with biological conditions [16]. And it has also been successfully utilized in the construction of cyclic peptides [17], label natural proteins and cells [18], as demonstrated in various studies. Tryptophan represents the rarest proteinogenic amino acid with a frequency of only 1.4%, compared to the 5% average frequency of other amino acids [19]. Yet it has gained widespread attention as a promising target for post-synthetic modifications due to its active chemical properties and crucial roles in protein stabilization and recognition [20-24]. Currently, most of photocatalytic strategies focus on adding electron-deficient units to the C2 site of tryptophan, including trifluoromethyl [25], difluoromethyl [26] and various α-carbonyl alkyl groups (Fig. 1A) [27]. Meanwhile, a photocatalytic tryptophan β-position modification has been reported [28], which exhibits remarkable chemo-selectivity for both simple and endogenous peptides, such as glucagon and GLP-1 amide (Fig. 1B). In addition, it is noteworthy that the NH of the indole ring is also an attractive target for photocatalytic modification. For instance, Studer's group successfully accomplished the insertion of photochemically generated siloxycarbenes into the N-H bond of tryptophan (Fig. 1C) [29].
In peptide drug optimization, alkylation modification is an important approach for expanding the structural diversity of peptide candidate drugs in drug optimization [30]. Recently, photoinduced decarboxylative alkylation has led to wide-spread attention amongst chemists, pharmacologists and biologists [31-37]. Glycine holds significant value as it is one of the most crucial and abundantly accessible natural amino acids [38-40]. Numerous studies have demonstrated that N-aryl glycines can efficiently generate α-amino radicals under visible light irradiation. These radicals can then undergo oxidation, leading to the transformation of iminium ions, which can ultimately be trapped with a diverse range of nucleophiles (Fig. 2A). In 2019, Le's group developed a novel photocatalyst-free decarboxylative aminoalkylation method using visible light to activate N-aryl glycines, allowing for efficient synthesis of disparate imidazo[1,2-α]pyridines via iminium ion captured by various nucleophilic reagents [41]. In 2020, Yu and co-workers efficiently assembled dihydroquinoxalin-2(1H)-ones and tetrahydroimidazo[1,5-a]quinoxalin-4(5H)-ones via visible light-induced heterogeneous g-C3N4-catalyzed decarboxylative reaction of quinoxalin-2(1H)-ones with N-aryl glycines [42]. More recently, Chen and co-workers also developed a new method to construct peptide macrocycles via radical-mediated intramolecular C−H alkylation reactions under photocatalytic decarboxylation of glycine [43]. Inspired by those publications, we herein reported a metal-free photoinduced post-synthetic alkylation of Trp-containing peptides with N-aryl glycines (Fig. 2B), which exhibited commendable chemo-selectivity, good substrate scope and outstanding isolated yields. We anticipated that this approach may be effectively employed in the discovery of new therapeutic agents.
At the outset of our studies, Boc-Trp-OMe (1a) and N-4-phenyl glycine (2a) were chosen as the potential model materials for the optimization investigation (Table 1). We were delighted to obtain the desired product 3aa in 30% yield without the use of a photosensitizer. And this transformation was conducted by employing TBPB as the oxidant and conducting the reaction at room temperature under 5 W blue LED lights in CH2Cl2 (entry 1). Subsequently, different oxidants, including air, DTPB and TBHP, were examined, a better yield of 50% was obtained when using TBHP (entries 2–4). For improving the reaction efficiency, diverse photocatalysts were introduced. After a comprehensive screening process of various photocatalysts, we were pleased to observe that Acr+-Mes-ClO4− emerged as the optimal choice for this transformation (entries 5–13). Next, further examination on various solvents revealed that toluene resulted in a satisfactory reaction yield of 86% for this reaction (entries 14–20). When there is a lack of photocatalyst, the reaction yield decreased from 86% to 54% (entry 14 as to entry 21), which verifies the role of Acr+-Mes-ClO4− in promoting the reaction. In addition, the control experiment confirmed that the lack of visible light resulted in the absence of the desired product 3aa, providing compelling evidence for the crucial role of visible light in facilitating this reaction (entry 22).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we proceeded to investigate the substrate scope of N-aryl glycines 2 (Scheme 1). As described in Scheme 1, the reaction between Boc-Trp-OMe (1a) and various N-aryl glycines 2a-j, containing either electron-rich or electron-deficient substituents on the aryl ring, was examined. As expected, substrate 2b with a para-positioned -Me group on the phenyl moiety was smoothly converted to 3ab in 60% yield. Meanwhile, steric hindrance did not affect the efficiency of the reaction, as evidenced by the good yields of the desired compounds 3ai and 3aj (77% and 58%, respectively), which were obtained from ortho- or meta-substituted N-aryl glycines as the starting compounds. To our surprise, it was found that N-aryl glycines containing various electron-withdrawing groups (-F, -Cl, -Br, -I, and -CN) or even a strong electron-donating group (-OMe) were not suitable for this transformation. And only trace amounts of the desired products (3ac-3ah) were detected.
After establishing a reliable method for the selective N-H alkylation of tryptophan, we proceeded to the versatility of our strategy to various Trp-containing peptides 1b-1y. As shown in Scheme 2, an array of peptide structures allowed tryptophan-functionalization at the N-H position of the indole ring. In the case of the Ac-Trp-OMe (1b), the desired product 3ba was isolated in 89% yield under the optimized reaction conditions. Then, we evaluated the reaction efficiency of various dipeptides with aliphatic side chains including glycine (1c), alanine (1d), 2-aminobutyric acid (1e), norleucine (1f), valine (1g), 2-amino-2-methylpropionic acid (1h), affording the corresponding products in moderate to excellent yields (3ca-3ha). This finding suggested that the spatial effect of the side-chain has a negligible influence on the efficiency of the reaction. Subsequently, Trp-derived dipeptides 1i-1l containing polar uncharged side chains also delivered the desired products in outstanding yields. Serine and threonine, each with methoxyl side chains, together with glutamine's esterified side chains, efficiently participated in this transformation. It was worth noted that serine (1m) characterized by the hydroxyl side chain, also successfully underwent this transformation, delivering the product 3ma in 74% yield. Gratifyingly, dipeptides (1n-1q) featuring aromatic side chain were smoothly converted to the products, especially substrate 1p with tyrosine reacted cleanly to give 3pa in 79% isolated yield. While the dipeptide Boc-Cys-Trp-OMe (1r) with thiol-containing side chains did not success in the transformation, substrate 1s, featuring a methylthio group, yielded the corresponding product 3sa with a 62% efficiency. Additionally, our method could be successfully applied to the substrate 1t with the long chain fatty acid, rendering the alkylated compound 3ta in 81% yield. And we also studied the effect of tryptophan residues' position in the peptide sequence, whether it was located at the C-terminus or N-terminus. It was found that this did not impact with a 92% yield of 3ua achieved. Unfortunately, this reaction was incompatible with exposed amino or carboxyl groups (3va-3wa). And extending the peptide chain to three monomers yielded only trace amounts of the desired products (3xa-3ya). This could be attributed to the low solubility of the tripeptide in toluene, which led to low reaction efficiency.
To gain a better understanding of the reaction mechanism, the control experiment was conducted. As shown in Scheme 3a, additional of the radical scavenger TEMPO (3.0 equiv.) showed obvious negative influence on the model reaction, effectively proving a radical mechanism for this reaction. Based on this control experiment and previous literatures [44, 45], a tentative mechanism for this decarboxylative coupling process was proposed, as depicted in Scheme 3b. After initial excitation of the photocatalyst Acr+-Mes-ClO4− (PC), N-aryl glycine 2a was oxidized by the excited state photocatalyst (PC*) to generate the aminyl cation A. The intermediate A underwent a proton transfer and decarboxylation process to yield α-amino cation radical B, which subsequently lost a hydrogen ion to form the imine intermediate C. Finally, the electron-rich tryptophan derivative 1a captured the mine intermediate C to produce the desired alkylated product 3aa. Furthermore, the reduced photocatalyst PC− was expected to undergo reoxidation by HO•, effectively regenerating the photoactive catalyst PC for the next run.
In summary, a metal-free photoinduced N-H alkylation strategy for the specific modification of tryptophan-containing peptides is reported. This reaction employed N-aryl glycines to efficiently generate α-amino radicals under visible light irradiation, exhibiting broad substrate scope and functional group tolerance. It provides a mild and efficient access to the N-H activation of tryptophan indole ring. Given the growing importance of Trp-containing bioactive peptides, this protocol will become increasingly attractive in medicinal chemistry research.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
We are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22107062), and the National Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No. 21ZR1422600).
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109244.
References
Less
[1]
X. Li, S. Chen, W.D. Zhang, et al., Chem. Rev. 120 (2020) 10079–10144.
[2]
M. Muttenthaler, G.F. King, D.J. Adams, et al., Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20 (2021) 309–325.
[3]
G.M. Fang, X.X. Chen, Q.Q. Yang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 29 (2018) 1033–1042.
[4]
H. Yang, Y. Xiong, M. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 108106.
[5]
Y. Li, K.A. Clark, Z. Tan, Chin. Chem. Lett. 29 (2018) 1074–1078.
[6]
J.R. Immel, M. Chilamari, S. Bloom, Chem. Sci. 12 (2021) 10083–10091.
[7]
L. Reguera, D.G. Rivera, Chem. Rev. 119 (2019) 9836–9860.
[8]
Y. Wu, Y. Zou, L. Sun, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 4045–4048.
[9]
Y. Wu, Y. Li, W. Cong, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 107–110.
[10]
J. Liu, P. Wang, Z. Yan, et al., ChemBioChem 22 (2021) 2762–2771.
[11]
L. Reguera, Y. Mendez, A.R. Humpierre, et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 51 (2018) 1475–1486.
[12]
Q.L. Hu, J.T. Liu, G. Fan, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107730.
[13]
J. Lu, Y. Li, Z. Bai, et al., Nat. Prod. Rep. 38 (2021) 981–992.
[14]
T. Zhu, L. Song, R. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 29 (2018) 1116–1118.
[15]
C.M. Czekster, H. Ludewig, S.A. McMahon, et al., Nat. Commun. 8 (2017) 1045.
[16]
T.A. King, J. Mandrup Kandemir, S.J. Walsh, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (2021) 39–57.
[17]
L. Raynal, N.C. Rose, J.R. Donald, et al., Chemistry 27 (2021) 69–88.
[18]
R.C. Oslund, T. Reyes-Robles, C.H. White, et al., Nat. Chem. Biol. 18 (2022) 850–858.
[19]
C. Bottecchia, T. Noel, Chemistry 25 (2019) 26–42.
[20]
R.E. Herman, E.G. Makienko, M.G. Prieve, et al., J. Biomol. Screen. 12 (2007) 1092–1101.
[21]
N. Sakai, K. Shimamura, R. Ikeda, et al., J. Org. Chem. 75 (2010) 3923–3926.
[22]
B. Laroche, X. Tang, G. Archer, et al., Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 285–289.
[23]
N.A. Clanton, T.E. Spiller, E. Ortiz, et al., Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 3233–3236.
[24]
H. Gruss, N. Sewald, Chemistry 26 (2020) 5328–5340.
[25]
B. Ding, Y. Weng, Y. Liu, et al., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019 (2019) 7596–7605.
[26]
Y. Wang, J. Wang, G.X. Li, et al., Org. Lett. 19 (2017) 1442–1445.
[27]
R.N. Lima, J.A.C. Delgado, D.I. Bernardi, et al., Chem. Commun. 57 (2021) 5758–5761.
[28]
Y. Yu, L.K. Zhang, A.V. Buevich, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 6797–6800.
[29]
J. Reimler, A. Studer, Chemistry 27 (2021) 15392–15395.
[30]
J.C.H. Chu, M.L. Chin, C.T.T. Wong, et al., Adv. Ther. (2020) 2000204.
[31]
S.J. McCarver, J.X. Qiao, J. Carpenter, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 728–732.
[32]
M. Garreau, F. Le Vaillant, J. Waser, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 8182–8186.
[33]
M. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Huo, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 6873.
[34]
M. Jiang, Y. Jin, H. Yang, et al., Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 26161.
[35]
M. Jiang, H. Yang, H. Fu, Org. Lett. 18 (2016) 1968–1971.
[36]
A. Noble, S.J. McCarver, D.W. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 624–627.
[37]
S. Ventre, F.R. Petronijevic, D.W. MacMillan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 5654–5657.
[38]
X. Yang, Z. Xie, Y. Li, et al., Chem. Sci. 11 (2020) 4741–4746.
[39]
W. Wen, L. Chen, M.J. Luo, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 9774–9780.
[40]
Z.Q. Zhu, S. Liu, Z.Y. Hu, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 363 (2021) 2568–2572.
[41]
J.J. Ji, Z.Q. Zhu, L.J. Xiao, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 6 (2019) 3693–3697.
[42]
Y.F. Si, X.L. Chen, X.Y. Fu, et al., ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8 (2020) 10740–10746.
[43]
X. Hu, X. Chen, B. Li, et al., Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 716–721.
[44]
S. Li, X. Li, T. Wang, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 364 (2022) 2346–2351.
[45]
J. Yang, M. Song, H. Zhou, et al., Green Chem. 23 (2021) 5806–5811.
Appendix
Less
Year 2024 volume 35 Issue 6
PDF
47
25
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109244
  • Receive Date：2023-08-31
  • Online Date：2025-11-21
  • Published：2024-06-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2023-08-31
  • Revised：2023-10-18
  • Accepted：2023-10-24
Affiliations
    School of Medicine or Institute of Translation Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109244
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House