Construction of ZnO@CDs@Co3O4 sandwich heterostructure with multi-interfacial electron-transfer toward enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction

Construction of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ sandwich heterostructure with multi-interfacial electron-transfer toward enhanced photocatalytic CO₂ reduction

PDF

Xiuzheng Deng^a, Yi Ke^a, Jiawen Ding^a, Yingtang Zhou^*^,^c, Hui Huang^b, Qian Liang^*^,^a, Zhenhui Kang^*^,^b

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(4) : 109064

Less

Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(4): 109064

• Communication •

Construction of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ sandwich heterostructure with multi-interfacial electron-transfer toward enhanced photocatalytic CO₂ reduction

Full

Xiuzheng Deng^a, Yi Ke^a, Jiawen Ding^a, Yingtang Zhou^*^,^c, Hui Huang^b, Qian Liang^*^,^a, Zhenhui Kang^*^,^b

Affiliations

^a Advanced Catalysis and Green Manufacturing Collaborative Innovation Center, CNPC-CZU Innovation Alliance, School of Petrochemical Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China

^b Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials & Devices, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China

^c Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Environmental Pollution Control, National Engineering Research Center for Marine Aquaculture, Marine Science and Technology College, Zhejiang Ocean University, Zhoushan 316004, China

Published: 2024-04-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109064

Outline

Abstract

Less

Photocatalytic conversion of CO₂ into small-molecule chemical feedstocks can meet the growing demand for energy and alleviate the global warming. Herein, a p-n ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ heterojunction with sandwich structure was constructed by calcination method of self-assembled ZIF-8@CDs@ZIF-67. The ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ with well-defined interfacial structure exhibited the significantly enhanced photocatalytic CO₂ reduction activity, and the optimal catalyst indicated the (CO + CH₄) evolution rate of 214.53 µmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ under simulated solar light, which was superior to ZnO, Co₃O₄ and binary ZnO@Co₃O₄. The internal cavity, exposed active sites, multiple interfaces and constructed p-n heterojunction can facilitate the light harvesting and photoexcited electron transfer. Besides, after introduction of CDs placed in the middle layer between ZnO and Co₃O₄, CDs with excellent photoelectric property further promoted charge separation and migration. This work represents an appealing strategy to construct well-defined photocatalysts for boosting CO₂ photoreduction.

Key words

Metal-organic framework / Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction / Carbon dots / p-n heterojunction / Sandwich heterostructure

Cite this Article

Xiuzheng Deng, Yi Ke, Jiawen Ding, Yingtang Zhou, Hui Huang, Qian Liang, Zhenhui Kang. Construction of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ sandwich heterostructure with multi-interfacial electron-transfer toward enhanced photocatalytic CO₂ reduction[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024 , 35 (4) : 109064 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109064

Full Text

Less

The conversion of CO₂ into valuable chemical fuels including CO, CH₄, and CH₃OH through solar energy can be considered as an attractive way [1–5]. Owing to the high thermodynamic stability of the linear CO₂ molecule involved, the photocatalytic CO₂ reduction reaction suffers from poor performance and low energy conversion efficiency [6]. Photosensitizer and/or cocatalyst loading [7], morphology regulation [8], doping [9], and heterojunction construction are efficient approaches to improve photocatalytic CO₂ reduction performance [10]. Recently, many photocatalysts including metal oxides (ZnO and Co₃O₄) [11], metal phosphides (NiP and CoP) [12], metal-organic frameworks (ZIF-67 and ZIF-8) [13,14], and so on [15], have been reported as favorable catalysts to improve CO₂ photoreduction [16–20].

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) constructed by periodically arranged metal atoms as well as organic ligands act as ideal templates to synthesize functional materials with unique structural characteristics [21]. Especially, porous sandwich, core-shell, yolk-shell heterostructures derived from MOF-on-MOF precursors not only afford the close interface contact, but expose abundant surface reaction sites because of shell permeability and internal voids [22]. For instance, ZIF-8@ZIF-67 derived n-ZnO@p-Co₃O₄ heterostructure with appropriate position of energy band and sufficient contact areas indicate the excellent photocatalytic performance [23]. However, owing to ZnO with the weak property of absorbing visible-light, and low electron transport efficiency in the heterostructure, the ZnO@Co₃O₄ still exhibits a low photocatalytic CO₂ reduction performance [24].

Much effort has been devoted to pursuing photocatalysts with high performance, among which the combination of cocatalyst and MOFs-derived catalyst has received great attention [25]. Recently, carbon dots (CDs) with a size below 10 nm, low toxicity and good electron transfer capability have been widely studied as an appropriate choice to form heterojunction with MOFs-derived catalyst [26]. CDs possess the broad solar absorption attributed to the strong π-conjugated structure, and it is noted that CDs as electron acceptor/reservoir can remarkably reduce the electron-hole recombination in photocatalysts [27]. Consider that ZnO@Co₃O₄ is short of strong light absorption and subjected to high charge recombination, the combination of CDs and ZnO@Co₃O₄ acts as an efficient approach to promote their photocatalytic activity predictably.

Inspired by these considerations, we designed a novel sandwich ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ (ZCC) by a one-step calcination of ZIF-8@CDs@ZIF-67 (ZCZ), and the photocatalytic CO₂ reduction reaction (CO₂RR) of ternary heterostructure was investigated. Characterizations reveal the phase and micro-structure, electrochemical properties, energy band structure, electron transfer pathway and photocatalytic mechanism of CO₂ over obtained photocatalysts. The formed p-n heterojunction can accelerate the charge transfer and CDs in the middle layer can provide the effective electron transport, which is conducive to the enhancement of CO₂RR activity.

Fig. S1 (Supporting information) display the XRD patterns of ZIFs, ZIFs derivatives, and ternary composites. The diffraction patterns of ZIF-8@ZIF-67 are consistent with the XRD pattern of ZIF-8 and ZIF-67, suggesting that the dual MOFs have been successfully synthesized (Fig. S1) [28]. From Fig. 1a, the ZnO@Co₃O₄ (ZC) displays the diffraction peaks of both ZnO and Co₃O₄, indicating that the Co₃O₄ is coated on the ZnO after one-step calcination. After loading of CDs, the ternary heterostructure exhibits the same diffraction peaks as for ZnO@Co₃O₄, which can be assigned to the low CD loading amount, suggesting that the characteristic diffraction peaks of ZnO@Co₃O₄ are maintained. N₂ adsorption-desorption isotherms as well as the corresponding porous characteristics of ZIF-8@ZIF-67 and the ternary composites are depicted in Fig. S6 (Supporting information) and Fig. 1b, respectively. Notably, the ZIF-8@ZIF-67 (Table S1 in Supporting information) exhibits the high specific surface area of 1282.63 m²/g, which reveals that the porous structure remains intact after in-situ synthesis. Besides, the ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ belongs to the type-Ⅳ isotherm, indicating that the high specific surface area is 21.70 m²/g, while ZnO@Co₃O₄ and Co₃O₄ show a low surface area (ZnO@Co₃O₄: 18.77 m²/g; Co₃O₄: 13.08 m²/g). The ZIF derivatives and ternary composite after pyrolysis are all characteristic of mesoporous material, suggesting that heterostructure can produce the active sites and afford the charge transport channels. The XPS spectra of Co 2p in Co₃O₄ (Fig. 1c) exhibit that four major peaks at 778.6, 779.9, 793.7, and 795.2 eV are agreement with Co³⁺ 2p_3/2, Co²⁺ 2p_3/2, Co³⁺ 2p_1/2 and Co²⁺ 2p_1/2, respectively. In addition, there are two satellite peaks in the Co 2p region, denoted as Sat.1 and Sat.2. Notably, the binding energies of Co species are positively shifted compared with bare Co₃O₄ [29]. For pure ZnO (Fig. 1d), the characteristic peaks at 1021.5 and 1044.6 eV are assigned to Zn 2p_3/2 and Zn 2p_1/2, respectively [30]. Compared with pure ZnO, the binding energy of Zn in the composite shifts to the negative direction, demonstrating that ZnO in composite is electron-rich.

The morphologies of the ZIFs, ZIF derivatives and ternary composites were observed by using SEM and TEM images. From Fig. 2, the ZIF-8 and ZIF-67 both exhibits the rhombic dodecahedral shapes with well-defined edges and smooth faces (Figs. 2a and b), and after formation of ZIF-8@ZIF-67, the shape inherits from the morphology of ZIF-8 and shows clear rhombic dodecahedral structures (Fig. 2c). Notably, after introduction of CDs, the ZIF-8@CDs@ZIF-67 matrix still keeps the intact rhombic dodecahedral morphology (Fig. 2d), exhibiting that the presence of CDs has no effect on the initial shape of ZIFs. After pyrolysis of the ZIF precursors, ZIF-67 derived Co₃O₄ and ZIF-8 derived ZnO endow the well-defined sunken dodecahedron structures with rough surfaces (Figs. 2e and f). While core-shell ZnO@Co₃O₄ remains the sunken and rough dodecahedron structure with a diameter of approximately 2 µm (Fig. 2g). After combining with the CDs, the ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ indicates a regular sunken and rough dodecahedron structure with a more uniform distribution (Fig. 2h).

The TEM images of ZIF-8@CDs@ZIF-67 and ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ are shown in Figs. 2i and j. From TEM image of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ in Fig. 2j, it is clear seen that the formed nanocages are composed of numerous tiny nanoparticles including ZnO, Co₃O₄ and CDs. The middle layer appears to be particularly clear attributed to the existence of CDs, suggesting the formation of sandwich structure. Further observation, the HRTEM image of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ shows three distinct lattice spacings, which are indexed to those at 0.21, 0.25, and 0.48 nm ascribed to the (100) of CDs, (111) of ZnO and (111) of Co₃O₄, respectively (Fig. 2k) [31,29]. From the EDX spectra (Fig. 2l), it is clear that the ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ ternary composite shows the distributions of Zn, C, N, O, and Co elements, confirming the successful synthesis of the ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄. The elemental mapping images of ZIF-8@CDs@ZIF-67 reveal that C, N, Zn, and Co elements are uniformly distributed on the ternary heterostructure, and it can be observed that Zn element is mainly distributed in the center and Co element exists in the periphery of the composite, clearly indicating ZIF-67 as outer layer coated on the ZIF-8 core (Fig. 2m). For ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ (Fig. 2n), the C element in the outer layer is remarkably reduced compared with ZIF-8@CDs@ZIF-67, and C element in the middle layer is reserved, demonstrating the formation of sandwich structure, in which the CDs act as a bridge between ZnO and Co₃O₄.

The photocatalytic CO₂ performances of ZIFs, ZIF derivatives and ternary composites were evaluated in the TEOA/H₂O/MeCN mixed solution under simulated solar light. The main CO, CH₄ and H₂ products were detected in this photocatalytic system. As displayed in Fig. 3a, the bare ZnO and Co₃O₄ exhibit the low performance, while ZnO@Co₃O₄ (ZC) composites indicate the improved photocatalytic CO₂ reduction rate and the yield of CH₄ (9.16 µmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹) and CO (89.06 µmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹) of ZnO@Co₃O₄–50 mg (ZC-50 mg) is the highest. Especially, ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ (ZCC) catalysts exhibit the further enhanced photocatalytic performances (Fig. 3b), and considering the effect of CDs loading on the performance, it is found that the highest CO yield of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄–3% (ZCC-3%) is 183.21 µmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹, which is 6.10 and 2.06 times that of pure ZnO and binary ZC, respectively. Besides, the highest AQY of ZCC-3% is up to 3.6% (Table S3 in Supporting information). By contrast, the ZIF-8@ZIF-67 (ZZ) composites exhibit the much lower performance (35.11 µmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹) than ZnO@Co₃O₄ under the same condition (Fig. S10 in Supporting information), indicating that the pyrolysis process is necessary. The control tests (Fig. 3c) and isotope tracer analysis (Fig. 3d) confirm that the carbonaceous reagents indeed originate from CO₂ reduction. Fig. 3e shows the photostability of the optimal ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ composite by cyclic tests. The ZCC-3% retains the high photoreduction CO₂ performance after four cycles, indicating the outstanding catalytic durability. Furthermore, the XRD pattern for ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ after the photocatalytic reaction is the same as the initial status, which verifies the high stability and recyclability of the samples (Fig. 3f).

The UV–vis DRS spectra were studied for the as-prepared ZnO, Co₃O₄, ZnO@Co₃O₄, and ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄, as shown in Fig. S2a (Supporting information). The ZIF-derived Co₃O₄ indicates the broad absorption edge in the entire region, while ZnO exhibits an optical absorption edge around 400 nm and rarely absorbs visible light. The absorption edge of ZnO@Co₃O₄ presents an obvious red shift in comparison with bare ZnO, suggesting that ZnO@Co₃O₄ can absorb more visible light. After the introduction of the CDs, the absorption edge of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ has no significant change compared with ZnO@Co₃O₄, probably due to CDs in the middle layer, in which the light absorption ability of CDs is inhibited by Co₃O₄ outer layer. Furthermore, from the Tauc plot (Fig. S2b in Supporting information), the band-gap energies (E_g) of Co₃O₄ and ZnO are estimated to be 1.86 and 3.12 eV [32–34].

To further explore the charge transfer of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄, the photoluminescence (PL) and time-resolved (TR)-PL spectra were conducted under 380 nm excitation in Figs. S2c and d (Supporting information) [35]. After loading with CDs, the decreased PL peak of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ can be noticed, due to the remarkably improved separation efficiency of charge carriers. According to the double exponential fitting function, the average lifetimes of Co₃O₄ are shortened from 3.91 ns to 1.17 ns after formation of heterojunction. In addition, after combining with CDs, the average lifetime decreases sharply from 1.17 ns (ZnO@Co₃O₄) to 0.67 ns (ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄), suggesing that the tenary heterostructure can significantly suppress the photoinduced electron-hole pairs recombination. The charge separation and transfer were further analyzed by photocurrent and EIS (Figs. S3a and b in Supporting information). The ternary composite exhibits the highest photocurrent, indicating that the loading of CDs can signicantly improve the separation efficiency of photogenerated carriers [36]. Meanwhile, the ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ exhibits the smallest arc radius compared with ZnO@Co₃O₄, Co₃O₄ and ZnO, suggesting the highest electrical conductivity of ternary composite in the EIS Nyquist diagram [37].

The M-S curves (Figs. S3c and d in Supporting information) reveal that Co₃O₄ possesses the p-type semiconductor ability, while ZnO belongs to an n-type semiconductor. Since the E_FB (vs. NHE) is about 0.2 V more positive than E_FB (vs. Ag/AgCl) [38], the E_FB of Co₃O₄ and ZnO is 0.93 and −0.55 V vs. NHE, respectively. For an n-type semiconductor, it is widely accepted that E_FB is about 0.1 V positive than E_CB, while for a p-type semiconductor, its E_VB is 0.1 V positive than E_FB [39]. Therefore, the E_VB of Co₃O₄ is about 1.03 V vs. NHE, and the E_CB value of ZnO is −0.65 V vs. NHE. Based on the formula E_CB = E_VB - E [40], the E_CB value of Co₃O₄ is −0.83 V vs. NHE, and the E_VB of ZnO is 2.47 V vs. NHE. To gain a deeper understanding of the charge transfer pathways within the heterojunction, we examined the EPR spectra of Co₃O₄, ZnO, and ZCC-3% using 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide to detect DMPO~^•OH and DMPO~^•O₂⁻ signals, respectively (Figs. 4a–c). As illustrated in Figs. 4d–f, the peaks attributed to DMPO-^•OH signals are detected for ZnO, while no significant signals are observed for Co₃O₄ and ZCC-3%, indicating that the holes are accumulated on the E_VB of Co₃O₄ in the p-n heterojunction.

Additionally, DFT simulations were used to study the charge transfer direction of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ heterostructure (Figs. 5a–c). Since the work function values of ZnO and Co₃O₄ are 4.71 and 5.26 eV, respectively, the electrons in ZnO are moved to Co₃O₄ until the Fermi level (E_f) reaches the equilibrium. After formation of heterojunction (Fig. 5e), the band of ZnO bends upward and that of Co₃O₄ bends downward, resulting in the construction of built-in electric field. Importantly, the co-catalyst CDs in the heterostructure can be considered as a good bridge to facilitate the charge transfer between Co₃O₄ and ZnO. After illumination, the photoinduced electrons are transferred from E_CB of Co₃O₄ to that of ZnO, while holes are migrated from E_VB of ZnO to that of Co₃O₄, in which the CDs accelerate the charge migration.

To investigate the mechanism for superior CO selectivity, the charge free energy for photocatalytic CO₂ reduction over pristine Co₃O₄ and ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ were carried out (Fig. 5d). Obviously, the free energy at each stage for heterostructure is lower than that of Co₃O₄, suggesting that CO₂ photoreduction prefers to occur in ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ under natural conditions. It can be seen that the formed *COOH intermediate acts as the rate-limiting step to sequentially produce CO and CH₄, and the composite presents the better capability to adsorb-activate CO₂ and generate the key intermediate [41]. Besides, the free energy of *+CO is much lower than that of *HCO, indicating that the CO is easier to be generated compared with CH₄ in this catalyst system, in agreement with the photocatalytic CO₂ performance.

In summary, we have successfully synthesized the novel ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ heterojunction, and explored its photocatalytic performance for CO₂ reduction. The ZIF-derived ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ nanocage with sunken dodecahedron exhibits abundant active sites and close contact, in which CDs as middle layer between ZnO and Co₃O₄ construct the sandwich-structure. Besides, the formed p-n heterojunction by coating Co₃O₄ on ZnO exhibits the re-established built-in electric fields, and CDs with electron transfer/reservoir property can facilitate the charge transfer, thereby boosting CO₂ photoreduction and stability. As expected, the ternary catalyst exhibits the maximum (CO + CH₄) yield of 214.53 µmol g⁻¹ h⁻¹ with TEOA, which is 6.32-fold that of bare ZnO and 2.18-fold that of ZnO@Co₃O₄. This study provides an effective strategy to fabricate a CDs-based sandwich heterostructure for highly active CO₂ photoreduction.

Acknowledgments

Less

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51725204, 21771132, 51972216, 52041202), Qinglan Project Foundation of Jiangsu Province, Zhejiang Province Key Research and Development Project (No. 2023 C01191).

Supplementary materials

Less

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109064.

References

Less

[1]

X. Wu, R. Zhong, X. Lv, et al., Appl. Catal. B 330 (2023) 122666.

[2]

E. Gong, S. Ali, C.B. Hiragond, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 15 (2022) 880–937.

[3]

Y. Liang, X. Wu, X. Liu, C. Li, S. Liu, Appl. Catal. B 304 (2022) 120978.

[4]

F. Zhang, Y.H. Li, M.Y. Qi, et al., Chem. Catal. 1 (2021) 272–297.

[5]

J.Y. Li, L. Yuan, S.H. Li, Z.R. Tang, Y.J. Xu, J. Mater. Chem. A 7 (2019) 8676–8689.

[6]

L. Song, W. Wang, J.P. Yue, et al., Nat. Catal. 5 (2022) 832–838.

[7]

H.K. Wu, Y.H. Li, M.Y. Qi, et al., Appl. Catal. B 278 (2020) 119267.

[8]

L. Yuan, D. Li, H. Liu, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (2022) 2208065.

[9]

Y.X. Yang, Y.X. Pan, X. Tu, et al., Nano Energy 101 (2022) 107613.

[10]

Y. Cheng, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, et al., Nano Res. 15 (2022) 8880–8889.

[11]

Y. Duan, D.Y. Wang, R.D. Costa, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 (2021) 2104634.

[12]

Q. Li, W.J. Feng, Y.Q. Liu, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (2022) 15752–15765.

[13]

W. Zhang, M.J. Bojdys, N. Pinna, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202301021.

[14]

X. Li, W. He, C. Li, et al., Appl. Catal. B 287 (2021) 119934.

[15]

S. Zhao, Q. Liang, Z.Y. Li, et al., Nano Res. 15 (2022) 5953–5961.

[16]

L. Yuan, M.Y. Qi, Z.R. Tang, Y.J. Xu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 21150–21172.

[17]

D. Li, M. Kassymova, X.C. Cai, et al., Coord. Chem. Rev. 412 (2020) 213262.

[18]

C. Han, Y.H. Li, J.Y. Li, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 7962–7970.

[19]

L. Yuan, K.Q. Lu, F. Zhang, X. Fu, Y.J. Xu, Appl. Catal. B 237 (2018) 424–431.

[20]

S.H. Li, M.Y. Qi, Y.Y. Fan, et al., Appl. Catal. B 292 (2021) 120157.

[21]

H.D. Liu, M. Cheng, Y. Liu, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 15 (2022) 3722–3749.

[22]

M.M. Li, J.W. Yuan, G. Wang, et al., Sep. Purif. Technol. 298 (2022) 121658.

[23]

W.J. Yan, H.S. Xu, M. Ling, et al., ACS Sens. 6 (2021) 2613–2621.

[24]

Q.S. Zhang, Y. Xiao, Y.M. Lia, et al., Chem. Eng. J. 393 (2020) 124681.

[25]

X. Wang, L. Wu, Z. Wang, et al., Appl. Catal. B 322 (2023) 122075.

[26]

Z. Chen, Y. Liu, Z. Kang, et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 55 (2022) 3110–3124.

[27]

Y. Zhou, H. Qi, J. Wu, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (2022) 2113335.

[28]

F.F. Chen, L. Zhou, C. Peng, et al., Appl. Catal. B 331 (2023) 122689.

[29]

J.X. Li, L.J. Liu, Q. Liang, et al., J. Hazard. Mater. 414 (2021) 125395.

[30]

Z. Li, D. Jin, Z.H. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci. 529 (2020) 147071.

[31]

C. Zhang, B.Q. Liu, W.P. Li, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 9 (2021) 11665–11673.

[32]

G. Palanisamy, K. Bhuvaneswari, M. Srinivasan, et al., Diam. Relat. Mater. 118 (2021) 108540.

[33]

Y. Sun, H. Fan, Y. Shang, et al., Sens. Actuators B Chem. 390 (2023) 133975.

[34]

Y. Zhang, H. Liu, M. Yang, Z. Jin, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 630 (2023) 99–110.

[35]

Q. Liang, X. Yan, Z.Y. Li, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 10 (2022) 4279–4287.

[36]

Y. Zhou, H. Qi, Z.H. Kang, et al., Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (2022) 2113335.

[37]

C.H. Liu, S. Min, Y. Yao, et al., Chem. Commun. 58 (2022) 13155–13158.

[38]

Q. Liang, S. Zhao, Z.Y. Li, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13 (2021) 40754–40765.

[39]

L.S. Chen, Q.Q. Tang, S.H. Wu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107903.

[40]

L. Yang, J. Liu, L. Yang, et al., Renew. Energy 145 (2020) 691–698.

[41]

J. He, X. Wang, S. Lan, et al., Appl. Catal. B 317 (2022) 121747.

Appendix

Less

Year 2024 volume 35 Issue 4

PDF

Cite this Article

BibTeX

Article Info

doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109064

Receive Date：2023-06-19
Online Date：2025-11-20
Published：2024-04-15

Article Data

Affiliations

History

Received：2023-06-19
Revised：2023-09-01
Accepted：2023-09-07

Affiliations

^a Advanced Catalysis and Green Manufacturing Collaborative Innovation Center, CNPC-CZU Innovation Alliance, School of Petrochemical Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China

^b Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials & Devices, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China

References

Share

https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109064

Share to

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article

BibTeX

Citations

表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

科 Family	属数 Number of genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)	属 Genus	种数 Number of species	占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae	2	11	5.26	鹅膏菌属 Amanita	10	4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae	2	12	5.74	丝盖伞属 Inocybe	5	2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae	8	14	6.70	蜡蘑属 Laccaria	5	2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae	3	23	11.00	小皮伞属 Marasmius	6	2.87
				小菇属 Mycena	11	5.26
				光柄菇属 Pluteus	5	2.39
				红菇属 Russula	17	8.13
				栓菌属 Trametes	5	2.39

关闭全屏

BibTeX
EndNote
RefWorks
TxT

Fig. 1 (a) XRD patterns of Co₃O₄, ZnO, ZnO@Co₃O₄, and ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄ composite. (b) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of Co₃O₄, ZnO@Co₃O₄, and ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄. XPS spectra of Co₃O₄, ZnO, ZnO@Co₃O₄, and ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄: (c) Co 2p and (d) Zn 2p.

Fig. 2 SEM images of (a) ZIF-67, (b) ZIF-8, (c) ZIF-67@ZIF-8, (d) ZIF-8@CDs@ZIF-67, (e) Co₃O₄, (f) ZnO, (g) ZnO@Co₃O₄, (h) ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄. TEM images of (i) ZIF-8@CDs@ZIF-67, (j) ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄, HRTEM image of (k) ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄, and (l) EDX pattern of ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄. The corresponding elemental mapping images of (m) ZIF-8@CDs@ZIF-67, and (n) ZnO@CDs@Co₃O₄.

Fig. 3 Production rate of CO, CH₄ and H₂ of (a) binary catalysts and (b) ternary catalysts. (c) Production of CO, CH₄ and H₂ under various reaction conditions. (d) ¹³C isotopic labeling experiment. (e) Stability tests of ZCC-3%. (f) XRD patterns of ZCC-3% before and after CO₂ photoreduction tests.

Fig. 4 DMPO~^•O₂⁻ spin-trapping EPR spectra of (a) ZCC-3%, (b) ZnO and (c) Co₃O₄. DMPO~^•OH spin-trapping EPR spectra of (d) ZCC-3%, (e) ZnO and (f) Co₃O₄.

Fig. 5 Work functions of (a) Co₃O₄, (b) ZnO and (c) CDs. (d) The calculated potential free-energy diagrams for CH₄ and CO formation. (e) The proposed mechanism of Co₃O₄@CDs@ZnO catalyst.

Articles: Latest Articles; Most Read; Collections

Updates: Events; News; Multimedia

About: About Us

Contact

No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing

100081

010-62199257

qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House