As shown in Fig. S12 (Supporting information), the three reduction peaks in the initial scan for SnS
0.5Se
0.5 are observed at 1.01, 0.65 and 0.14 V, corresponding to the Na
+ insertion into the SnS
0.5Se
0.5 layer, the conversion reaction of Na
xSnS
0.5Se
0.5 and structural activation process, and the alloying reaction of Sn, respectively. Meanwhile, the three oxidation peaks at 0.28, 0.91 and 1.04 V in the anodic scan are attributed to the desodiation process (Na
3.75Sn → Sn → Na
xSnS
0.5Se
0.5 → SnS
0.5Se
0.5). Compared with curves of SnS
0.5Se
0.5, the redox process of SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers is relatively gentle in the presence of NSSe-C, suggesting that the NSSe-C can prevent the large volume changes of active materials. In Fig. S13 (Supporting information), the subsequent CV curves (2
nd to 5
th) of SnS
0.5Se
0.5 are completely different, and some redox peaks shift or even disappear, which is ascribed to the irreversible decomposition of SnS
0.5Se
0.5 caused by the volume changes. On the contrary, the following CV curves of NSSe-C almost coincide in Fig. S14 (Supporting information) with excellent electrochemical reversibility. Meanwhile,
Fig. 3a presents the reproducible curves of SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers, demonstrating the superior reversibility of sodiation/desodiation behavior of SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers. As displayed in Fig. S15 (Supporting information), the initial discharge and charge capacities of SnS
0.5Se
0.5, NSSe-C and SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers are 794.5/566.4, 448.8/214.8 and 1123.8/676.7 mAh/g at 0.1 A/g, respectively. The high discharge capacity of SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers is attributed to multiple reaction mechanisms of SnS
0.5Se
0.5 and the generation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) with more sodium ions consumption [
23]. In addition, the irreversible capacity loss is mainly owing to some irreversible structural changes of SnS
0.5Se
0.5 and low coulombic efficiency of NSSe-C. The cycling performance of SnS
0.5Se
0.5, NSSe-C and SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers was evaluated at 0.1 A/g and exhibited in
Fig. 3b. Obviously, the SnS
0.5Se
0.5 particles present the rapid capacity fading and a low capacity of 25.4 mAh/g after 100 cycles. The low conductivity and large volume expansion of SnS
0.5Se
0.5 may lead to the poor cycling ability with severe pulverization. Moreover, the NSSe-C nanofibers play excellent cycling stability during discharge and charge process. To determine the effect of S/Se doping on the N−CNF, the cycling and rate performance of N−CNF were tested and shown in Fig. S16 (Supporting information). The cycling capacity of NSSe-C nanofibers is higher than that of the pure N−CNF, indicating that the S/Se doping can improve the electrochemical activity of the pure N−CNF. Profiting from the high theoretical capacity of SnS
0.5Se
0.5 and high conductivity of the NSSe-C nanofibers, the SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers can maintain a reversible capacity of 478.8 mAh/g, much higher than the capacity of SnS
0.5Se
0.5.
Fig. 3c compares the rate performance of SnS
0.5Se
0.5, NSSe-C and SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers, and the specific capacities of the SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C are higher than the values of SnS
0.5Se
0.5and NSSe-C at various current densities. A comparison of the cycling performance of SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers for SIBs with some reported TMCs is listed in Table S1 (Supporting information) and SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers show the better sodium storage performance. Furthermore, Fig. S17 (Supporting information) shows the long cycling performance of SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers at 2.0 A/g. After five cycles at 0.1 A/g, the SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C can reach a high capacity of 225.0 mAh/g after 2000 cycles, indicating the outstanding rate capability of the SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C nanofibers. As presented in Fig. S18 (Supporting information), the SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C with low carbon content delivers the better cycling performance than that with high carbon content, which is attributed to that more carbon content can reduce the amount of active material. It was found that no fibrous precursor was formed when the ratio of raw material (Sn: S: Se) exceeded 4:6:6. Thus, the ratio of 4:6:6 can be the best ratio to enhance the cycling capacity of SnS
0.5Se
0.5@NSSe-C.