Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Non-contact gaseous microplasma electrode as anode for electrodeposition of metal and metal alloy in molten salt
收藏切换
PDF
Junhan Luoa, Qi Qinga, Liqin Huanga, Zhe Wang*, b, Shuang Liuc, Jing Chena, Yuexiang Lu*, a
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(4) : 108483
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(4): 108483
• Communication •
Non-contact gaseous microplasma electrode as anode for electrodeposition of metal and metal alloy in molten salt
Full
Junhan Luoa, Qi Qinga, Liqin Huanga, Zhe Wang*, b, Shuang Liuc, Jing Chena, Yuexiang Lu*, a
Affiliations
  • a Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • b The MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental System Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
  • c Nuclear Research Institute for Future Technology and Policy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
Published: 2024-04-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108483
Outline
收藏切换

Microplasma based on glow discharge could act as a non-contact gaseous electrode and has attracted much attention in both fundamental research and application. Herein, with microplasma as the anode, the electrodeposition process of a series of metal and metal alloys in molten salt has been systemically studied. Four metal cations with different valence states, silver (Ag+), nickel (Ni2+), copper (Cu2+), and iron (Fe3+), could all be reduced on the solid cathode with high current efficiency and the corresponding metal products were of high purity. The electrodeposition of aluminum-lanthanum (Al-Ln) alloy on the aluminum cathode was also successfully carried out with microplasma as the anode, and the same alloy was obtained by using the conventional anode electrode. These results indicated that microplasma anode based on non-contact direct-current (DC) glow discharge is a promising electrode to be applied in molten salt electrolysis.

Microplasma  /  Anode  /  Molten salt  /  Electrodeposition  /  Al-Ln alloy
Junhan Luo, Qi Qing, Liqin Huang, Zhe Wang, Shuang Liu, Jing Chen, Yuexiang Lu. Non-contact gaseous microplasma electrode as anode for electrodeposition of metal and metal alloy in molten salt[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024 , 35 (4) : 108483 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108483
Full Text
Less
Molten salt electrolysis has high efficiency and selectivity. It has been developed as a common method for depositing metals or synthesizing functional materials in recent years [1,2]. Compared with the aqueous solution, molten salt has a wider electrochemical window and higher conductivity, and is often used in metal metallurgy, the rare earth chemical industry, and spent fuel reprocessing [3–7]. However, the high temperature of hundreds or even a thousand degrees Celsius in the electrolysis process will lead to more serious problems such as the corrosion of solid anode, which puts forward more strict requirements for the selection of anode materials. In this case, graphite rod and precious metal platinum seem to be the optimal materials for the anode in most molten salt systems, but for some special systems, such as metal oxide reduction in LiCl-Li2O and CaCl2-CaO, graphite rod and metal platinum will also face many problems [8–13].
In recent years, microplasma has been applied as a new gaseous electrode in the field of electrolytic research [14,15]. Since there is no solid electrode in contact with the electrolyte, the charge transfer between the electrode and the electrolyte will be carried out by gas-phase electrons or ions in the plasma [16–18]. Due to the absence of the traditional solid-liquid contact interface, the electrochemical reaction under the excitation of the microplasma electrode is different from the traditional reaction and the microplasma might serve as an alternative new electrode for the anode in molten salt electrolysis. But sadly, the research of plasma in molten salt electrolysis has been poorly studied in the last decades. The utilization of low-pressure glow discharge to prepare dendritic metals through cathode discharge electrolysis of molten salts by Brenner and Sligh [19] seems to be the first plasma research applied to molten salt. Subsequently, the Ito research group in Japan also carried out some studies on the application of plasma in molten salt, and successfully obtained a series of metal and alloy nanoparticles in molten salt by inducing the cathode with the plasma of atmospheric-pressure arc discharge [20–27]. However, in arc discharge mode, if the plasma is used as the anode, the positive ions would be introduced into the electrolyte through the oxidation of the metal anode, resulting in a large amount of anode consumption.
In our previous work, it was found that microplasma based on atmospheric-pressure glow discharge can effectively avoid anode corrosion and will not introduce contaminated ions, making it promising to become a substitute for the traditional platinum electrode and graphite carbon rod [28]. The plasma excited in the electrolysis process can also be used as the excitation source of atomic emission spectroscopy (AES) for in situ analysis and real-time monitoring of the ion concentration through the spectrum, showing its promising application in molten salt electrolysis [29]. While, the study on microplasma anode in molten salt is still rare, it is highly needed to investigate its behavior in different electrochemical reactions for better understanding and application.
In this work, to fill the blank in the application of glow discharge microplasma anode in molten salt electrolysis and investigate the mechanism, the electrodeposition process of a series of metal and metal alloys in molten salt with the microplasma as the anode was systemically studied. Four metal cations with different valence states, Ag+, Ni2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+, were reduced on the solid cathode with the microplasma as the anode and the corresponding metal products were of high purity. Metal aluminum is widely used in extracting the lanthanide and actinide ions from molten salt [5,6,30–32] in the rare earth industry and spent fuel reprocessing. To verify the feasibility of microplasma anode in these areas, the electrodeposition of Al-Ln alloy on the aluminum cathode with microplasma as the anode was also carried out.
Firstly, the feasibility of the electroreduction of different valence metals with microplasma anodes in molten salt electrolysis was studied. A gravimetric method widely used in electrodeposition research has been applied to quantify the metal cations reduction on the solid cathode, by studying the electrodeposition products and estimating faradaic efficiency. The experimental setup for microplasma-induced anode discharge electrolysis is shown in Fig. 1. With flowing argon gas through a hollow stainless-steel capillary tube (diameter ~1.6 mm), the plasma was ignited by applying a DC voltage of ~2 kV, and fixed approximately 2 mm away from the molten salt surface. Molybdenum wire was used as a solid cathode. As mentioned previously, the charge will be transported through the plasma generated between the interface of the plasma anode and the molten salt and participate in the electrochemical reaction in the molten salt. According to the law of redox reaction, metal cations will be reduced to metal at the solid cathode, and chlorine gas will be generated at the plasma-molten salt interface:
Four different metal cations: Ag+, Ni2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ were selected as the research objects and introduced into the molten salt electrolyte by adding corresponding metal chlorides. To avoid the influence of other factors, the chlorides added during this experiment were all 2.0 mmol, the proportion and the mass of molten salt electrolyte were also kept unchanged (LiCl: 12.7 g, KCl: 14.9 g) to ensure the same concentration of metal cations in the four groups of experiments. The experimental temperature was controlled at 773 K. The plasma was ignited and ran for 1 h under a constant current of 20 mA. After electrolysis, the cathode was removed from the molten salt and the product was characterized after treatment. The corresponding X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and images of products obtained in the four groups of experiments were shown in Fig. 2, and the microscopic morphologies and element distribution characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) were shown in Fig. 3 separately. The results showed that at the bottom of the solid cathode, the four groups of electrolysis experiments had obtained obvious metallic deposits with different morphologies and colors. The peaks on the XRD of the sediments were identical to the standard PDF cards that correspond to metals reduced by metal cations in the molten salts, and there were nearly no impurity peaks, which confirmed the reduction of metals at the cathode. These results suggested that no matter the simple univalent metal ion Ag+, divalent ions Ni2+, and Cu2+ or trivalent variable metal ion Fe3+, they could all be reduced in molten salt with the microplasma as the anode and the corresponding metal products with high purity on the solid cathode were obtained, which verified the feasibility of the microplasma anode in molten salt electrolysis. The microstructure analyzed by SEM and EDS further confirmed the composition of the samples and showed that the four metal cations were deposited in the form of dendrites at the cathode, which was similar to traditional electrolysis.
To quantify the reduction of different valence metal cations, the weight of the reduced metal was measured and compared to the theoretical amount based on the total charge passed. The ratio of the measured mass to the predicted mass was defined as the Faradaic efficiency [14,33]. The theoretical mass m was calculated using Faraday's law of electrolysis.
where I is the current of electrolysis, t is the electrolytic time, F is Faraday's constant, z is the number of electrons transferred in the reaction (z = 1 for Ag+, 2 for Ni2+ and Cu2+, 3 for Fe3+), and M is the molar mass constant of metal. The Faradaic efficiency (FE) was then defined as the ratio of m and m.
where m is the mass of metal obtained by weighing the products generated at the cathode.
Fig. 4 showed the measured weight of metal collected at the molybdenum cathode for various microplasma anode discharge times and Table S1 (Supporting information) summarized all the results of Faraday efficiency varying with electrolysis time. It is evident that the mass of the four metals deposited on the cathode was proportional to the discharge time, and all of them increased with the discharge time, which fully accorded with Faraday's law.
Within 1 h of electrolysis of univalent metal ion Ag+, Faraday efficiency was close to 100%, indicating that for the electric reduction of the simple valence state univalent Ag+, the actual charge through the whole circuit was close to the theoretical value. In the case of no solid-liquid contact at the anode, the plasma perfectly undertakes the task of charge transfer in the circuit. When the electrolysis time was extended to 2 h, the Faraday efficiency decreased significantly, which was mainly caused by the decrease of Ag+ concentration. Since the total amount of Ag+ added to the electrolyte was only 2.0 mmol (under the 20 mA current, the electrolytic process would complete within 2.68 h theoretically). Without the introduction of additional metal sources, the electrolytic process for 2 h would consume about 74.6% of Ag+, and lead to the continuous reduction of the limiting current on the cathode surface. Therefore, when the limiting current of Ag+ was reduced to less than 20 mA, the excess current would no longer participate in the reduction of Ag+, which was reflected in the decline of Faraday efficiency.
The Faraday efficiency of bivalent metal ion Cu2+ and trivalent metal ion Fe3+ was slightly more than 100%, and the Faraday efficiency of metal Fe was higher than that of metal Cu. The main reason for this phenomenon was that metal Cu and Fe were easily oxidized in air and water, though the reduction process was completed in the glove box without water and oxygen, the oxidation of some products was inevitable during the subsequent cleaning and drying process. Since the relative atomic mass of Cu and Fe was small, the relative molecular mass of the oxide and the relative atomic mass ratio of the metal were 1.5 and 1.86, respectively, the mass of the oxidized part could not be ignored, which had a great impact on the overall Faraday efficiency. Therefore, the Faraday efficiency of Cu and Fe was higher than 100%, and metal Fe was higher than metal Cu. Since the oxidation of metals Fe and Cu accounts for a small proportion in the product (no obvious characteristic peak of oxides was detected in the XRD results), a more than 100% Faraday efficiency still indicated that the microplasma anode had good electrolytic efficiency and selectivity in reduction of metal ions Cu and Fe. For the divalent metal ion Ni2+, its Faraday efficiency was lower than that of other metals, but it was still more than 85%. The possible reason is there were side reactions in the reduction process of Ni2+, and some electrons did not participate in the reduction of Ni2+.
It is a widely researched direction in the field of molten salt electrochemistry to extract and recover actinide and lanthanide elements from spent fuel by molten salt electrolysis or to introduce rare earth elements into active metals to prepare alloys with excellent properties. In this kind of molten salt system, the reduction mechanism of actinide and lanthanide ions is slightly different from that of ordinary metal ions. Since the reduction potential of lanthanide actinides is generally more negative than Li+ [5,7], they cannot be reduced within the electrochemical window of LiCl-KCl molten salt, so active aluminum metal is usually used as the electrodeposition cathode through the principle of underpotential deposition [34] to produce alloy. For the anode, graphite rods or expensive precious metal electrodes such as platinum are used.
To verify whether underpotential deposition also exists in the discharge process of microplasma anode, and explore the feasibility of gas electrodes replacing traditional electrodes in spent fuel reprocessing, the electrodeposition of cerium (Ce) and samarium (Sm) on the aluminum cathode was studied. 1.5 mmol of anhydrous CeCl3 and SmCl3 were respectively added into LiCl-KCl molten salt with fixed proportion and mass, and aluminum foils were used as the cathode. The obtained samples through the microplasma-induced anode discharge were treated and characterized after electrolysis.
The XRD results (Fig. 5) showed that Ce3+ and Sm3+ in molten salt were successfully reduced on the surface of aluminum foils by microplasma anode, and formed Al-Ce and Al-Sm alloys with metal aluminum. Metal oxychloride was a common byproduct of rare earth elements, which was generated by the reaction of anhydrous CeCl3 and SmCl3 at high temperatures in our samples. Since it was insoluble in molten salt and water, it would be embedded in the alloy and taken out from the molten salt with the cathode. At the same time, Ce3+ was taken as the research object to study the influence of different plasma electrolytic times on the alloy composition on the cathode surface. It was found that under the constant current of 20 mA, the alloy obtained by electrolysis for 1 h was Al4Ce, for 2 h was Al11Ce3, and for 3 h was Al2Ce and Al3Ce. With the increase of electrolysis time, the Al-Ce alloy on the aluminum foil surface gradually changed into the alloy phase with more metal Ce enrichment, indicating that the reduction reaction of Ce3+ was gradually carried out. It was proved that Ce3+ was reduced and enriched on an aluminum foil surface by underpotential deposition, and it was similar to the traditional solid anode [6,35,36]. These phenomena further indicate that as a new gas electrode, the microplasma electrode also follows the general electrochemical law and is suitable for the manufacture of rare earth alloys.
In summary, the Ag+, Ni2+, Cu2+, and Fe3+ ions have been successfully reduced to corresponding metals in LiCl-KCl molten salt system by using microplasma anode, thus verifying the feasibility of microplasma electrode acting as an anode in molten salt electrolysis. The Faraday efficiency of the four metals was slightly different, univalent metal ion Ag+ was close to 100% within electrolysis for 1 h, but with the increase of electrolysis time, its efficiency would gradually decrease. Due to oxidation, the Faraday efficiency of bivalent metal ion Cu2+ and trivalent metal ion Fe3+ was slightly more than 100%. For the divalent metal ion Ni2+, its Faraday efficiency was lower than that of other metals, but it was still more than 85%. By replacing the cathode with aluminum foils, Al-Ce and Al-Sm alloys could also be obtained on the active aluminum cathode by underpotential deposition. Based on these researches, as a new gaseous electrode, the microplasma electrode followed the general electrochemical law and was suitable for the general application in the field of molten salt electrochemistry. The proof-of-concept experiments in this work have shown that the microplasma anode could offer a new choice as an anticorrosive electrode for molten salt electrolysis, due to its unique charge transfer property, and may have great significance for the whole field of electrochemistry.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21976104, 21906051), Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program (No. 2021QNRC001) of China Association for Science and Technology.
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108483.
References
Less
[1]
X. Liu, N. Fechler, M. Antonietti, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 8237–8265.
[2]
X. Zhang, L. Zhang, T. Bo, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 3527–3530.
[3]
Y.I. Chang, Nucl. Technol. 88 (1989) 129–138.
[4]
E.Y. Choi, S.M. Jeong, Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. 25 (2015) 572–582.
[5]
S.E. Bae, Y.J. Park, S.K. Min, Y.H. Cho, K. Song, Electrochim. Acta 55 (2010) 3022–3025.
[6]
Y. Castrillejo, P. Fernández, J. Medina, P. Hernández, E. Barrado, Electrochim. Acta 56 (2011) 8638–8644.
[7]
P. Masset, R.J.M. Konings, R. Malmbeck, J. Serp, J.P. Glatz, J. Nucl. Mater. 344 (2005) 173–179.
[8]
E.Y. Choi, C.Y. Won, J.S. Cha, et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 444 (2014) 261–269.
[9]
J.M. Hur, J.S. Cha, E.Y. Choi, ECS Electrochem. Lett. 3 (2014) E5–E7.
[10]
S.W. Kim, E.Y. Choi, W. Park, H.S. Im, J.M. Hur, Electrochem. Commun. 55 (2015) 14–17.
[11]
S.W. Kim, M.K. Jeon, H.W. Kang, et al., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 310 (2016) 463–467.
[12]
A. Merwin, D. Chidambaram, Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 46 (2014) 536–544.
[13]
Y. Sakamura, M. Iizuka, Electrochim. Acta 189 (2016) 74–82.
[14]
R. Akolkar, R.M. Sankaran, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 31(2013) 5.
[15]
W. Chiang, D. Mariotti, R.M. Sankaran, J.G. Eden, K.K. Ostrikov, Adv. Mater. 32 (2020) 1905508.
[16]
C. Richmonds, M. Witzke, B. Bartling, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 17582–17585.
[17]
P. Rumbach, M. Witzke, R.M. Sankaran, D.B. Go, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 16264–16267.
[18]
Z. Ren, Y. Lu, H. Yuan, et al., Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 31 (2015) 1215–1218.
[19]
A. Brenner, J.L. Sligh, J. Electrochem. Soc. 117 (1970) 602.
[20]
S. Ghosh, R. Hawtof, P. Rumbach, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 (2017) D818–D824.
[21]
M. Tokushige, T. Nishikiori, M.C. Lafouresse, et al., Electrochim. Acta 55 (2010) 8154–8159.
[22]
T. Oishi, T. Goto, Y. Ito, J. Electrochem. Soc. 149 (2002) D155–D159.
[23]
T. Oishi, T. Goto, Y. Ito, Electrochemistry. 70 (2002) 697–700.
[24]
T. Oishi, T. Goto, Y. Ito, J. Electrochem. Soc. 150 (2003) D13–D16.
[25]
T. Oishi, T. Hattori, T. Goto, Y. Ito, J. Electrochem. Soc. 149 (2002) D178–D181.
[26]
T. Oishi, H. Kawamura, Y. Ito, J. Appl. Electrochem. 32 (2002) 819–824.
[27]
H. Kawamura, K. Moritani, Y. Ito, Plasmas Ions. 1 (1998) 29–36.
[28]
G. Wei, Y. Lu, S. Liu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 497–500.
[29]
G. Wei, X. Liu, Y. Lu, et al., Anal. Chem. 90 (2018) 13163–13166.
[30]
M. Zhang, H. Wang, W. Han, et al., Sci. China. Chem. 57 (2014) 1477–1482.
[31]
M. Zhang, Y. Li, W. Hang, et al., Rare. Metal. Mat. Eng. 45 (2016) 1956–1960.
[32]
Y. Xue, Q. Wang, Y.D. Yan, et al., Energy Proced. 39 (2013) 474–479.
[33]
M. Witzke, P. Rumbach, D.B. Go, R.M. Sankaran, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 45 (2012) 442001.
[34]
D.M. Kolb, M. Przasnyski, H. Gerischer, J. Electroanal. Chem. 54 (1974) 25–38.
[35]
L. Wang, Y.L. Liu, K. Liu, et al., Electrochim. Acta 147 (2014) 385–391.
[36]
M.R. Bermejo, J. Gómez, J. Medina, A.M. Martínez, Y. Castrillejo, J. Electroanal. Chem. 588 (2006) 253–266.
Appendix
Less
Year 2024 volume 35 Issue 4
PDF
51
27
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108483
  • Receive Date：2023-03-14
  • Online Date：2025-11-20
  • Published：2024-04-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2023-03-14
  • Revised：2023-04-10
  • Accepted：2023-04-19
Affiliations
    a Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
    b The MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental System Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China
    c Nuclear Research Institute for Future Technology and Policy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108483
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House