Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Controlled semi-Pinacol rearrangement on a strained ring: Efficient access to multi-substituted cyclopropanes by group migration strategy
收藏切换
PDF
Wenyu Gao, Liming Zhang, Chuang Zhao, Lixiang Liu, Xingran Yang, Jinbo Zhao*
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(9) : 109447
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(9): 109447
• Communication •
Controlled semi-Pinacol rearrangement on a strained ring: Efficient access to multi-substituted cyclopropanes by group migration strategy
Full
Wenyu Gao, Liming Zhang, Chuang Zhao, Lixiang Liu, Xingran Yang, Jinbo Zhao*
Affiliations
  • Faulty of Chemistry and Life Science, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China
Published: 2024-09-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109447
Outline
收藏切换

We describe a versatile electrophile addition/SPR sequence of readily available cyclopropyl carbinols that affords multi-substituted carbonylated cyclopropanes with high stereo-fidelity. This approach tolerates various heteroatom electrophiles, migration of carbon moiety of all possible hybridization states, facile ring reorganization and natural compound valorization. The examples represent an unprecedented version of SPR wherein migration to a non-benzylic bulky tertiary carbo-cation is realized with promising enantiocontrol.

Cyclopropene α-carbinols  /  Electrophile addition  /  Semi-Pinacol rearrangement  /  Cyclopropane
Wenyu Gao, Liming Zhang, Chuang Zhao, Lixiang Liu, Xingran Yang, Jinbo Zhao. Controlled semi-Pinacol rearrangement on a strained ring: Efficient access to multi-substituted cyclopropanes by group migration strategy[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024 , 35 (9) : 109447 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109447
Full Text
Less
The cyclopropane scaffold is present in numerous bioactive natural and artificial compounds and ranks 10th in the most prevalent cyclic scaffolds of clinical drugs [1–4], of which carbonylated cyclopropane is a prominently featured subclass (Fig. 1) [5–10]. While many synthetic bioactive molecules feature sparsely-substituted cyclopropane moieties, increasing substitution at the cyclopropane scaffold have been recognized to improve their biological effects [11,12]. Despite of the numerous strategies being developed toward cyclopropane synthesis, access to stereo-defined polysubstituted cyclopropanes remains a daunting task. Traditional methods, such as metal-catalyzed olefin cyclopropanation with diazo derivatives [13–16] and Michael addition initiated ring-closure of sulfur ylides with α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds [17,18] usually fall short in multisubstituted cyclopropane synthesis due to increased steric-hindrance or plagued selectivity issues [19]. Transition metal-catalyzed C—H functionalization of cyclopropane backbone becomes an efficient straightforward approach [20–23]. Recent efforts in metal-catalyzed ring-retentive cyclopropene functionalization has blossomed as an exciting alternative, although available modes are limited to only a few intermediates [24]. Although exciting new strategies are being continually uncovered to address the cyclopropane synthesis [25–28], assembly of multi-substituted cyclopropanes with diverse structural patterns and defined stereocontrol remains an unsolved object.
The semi-Pinacol rearrangement (SPR) has been widely applied in the synthesis of β-functionalized ketones [29] and as key steps in natural product total syntheses (Scheme 1a) [30]. While allylic alcohol bearing substituted olefins have been intensively studied, examples of SPR on a strained ring were only reported very recently with (aza)bicyclo[1.1.0]butyl carbinols (Scheme 1b) [31,32], which are intrinsically limited to unimolecular processes, posing severe limitation to the synthetic versatility, and the intermolecular reactivity of highly strained olefins remains unestablished due to facile ring-opening [33,34].
Based on our interest in cyclopropane synthesis [35–38], we envisioned that electrophilic activation of cyclopropane carbinols, readily available from bromoalkene and an aldehyde or ketone via two steps, may generate highly reactive yet under-exploited cyclopropyl cation that may undergo group migration to provide an avenue to multi-substituted, carbonylated cyclopropanes, a highly useful synthetic target and an increasingly important synthon [39]. Envisioned challenges include (1) involvement of tertiary cationic centers may increase the steric hindrance and lower the driving force, and (2) the presence of multiple competing ring-opening processes involving the high-energy structures may steer the reaction away from productive migration reactivity. Herein we present the realization of this process, which can be used for late-stage cyclopropane formation, a well-known challenge in cyclopropane syntheses (Scheme 1c).
Our studies commenced by evaluating the SPR of cyclopropene carbinol 1a, which can be readily assembled via a 2-step procedure from 2-bromo-2-butene, bromoform, and acetophenone. After brief optimization (Table S1 in Supporting information), we found that treatment of 1a with 2 equiv. of PhSeBr at –40 ℃ in THF in the presence of 2 equiv. of 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine (DTBP) afforded the phenyl migrated product 3a facilely in 82% yield as a single diastereoisomer, as shown in the X-ray structure of its oxidized product 4a (Scheme 2).
We then turned to interrogate the scope of the selenylation initiated SPR (Scheme 2). Electron-rich aryls migrated efficiently (3b and 3c). The reaction can be performed on a gram scale with a higher yield of 3c (97%). Functionalities such as tert-butyldimethylsilyl ether and secondary alcohols are also tolerated (3d-3e). For substrates bearing tertiary allyl alcohol moieties derived from benzophenone derivatives, the more electron-rich aryl group migrated preferentially (3f-3j). Introduction of heteroaryl such as thienyl (3k) and 2-pyridinyl (3l) onto the allyl alcohols was also successful. Toleration of pyridyl moiety is noteworthy and serves as a complement for transition-metal based protocols wherein the strong coordination of pyridine is often problematic. Both cinnamaldehyde-derived secondary alcohols (1m) and benzylidene acetone derived tertiary alcohol substrates (1n) underwent the rearrangement uneventfully, despite of the lower yield of the metastable product 3m. This problem can be solved by in-situ reduction with NaBH4. When both aryl and styrenyl are available, aryl migration product was obtained as the sole product (3o). The substrate derived from dibenzylideneacetone (dba) also reacted smoothly, delivering the expected product 3p in 57% yield. Aliphatic alkenyl group could also migrate, despite with diminished efficiency (3q'). Notwithstanding, trisubstituted alkene displayed higher migration aptitude, giving the target product in relatively high yield (3r). Migration of Csp moiety was also realized (3s and 3t). Cyclopropenyl carbinols derived from cyclic stocks such as 1-indanone, 3-coumaranone and 1-benzosuberone facilely delivered the ring-enlarged products 3u, 3v and 3w in moderate to high yields. Notably, product 3u shares a common tricyclic skeleton with the natural product (‒)-cycloclavine. The more rigid benzo-cycloheptatrienone derived substrate also succumbed to facile ring-enlargement to the cyclooctenone with a spiro cyclopropane (obtained as its oxidized form 4x). The ring-enlarged products 3y-3z were also successfully obtained from aliphatic cycloalkenone derived substrates. Saturated cyclic alkenone derived substrates, as expected, are less reactive, and while 3aa was obtained in a decent yield due to strain release, 3ab was formed with decreased efficiency.
Variation on the cyclopropene was then scrutinized. Migration of phenyl substituents can also be easily achieved with spirocyclic substrates (3ac, 3ad). 3,3-Diphenyl substituted cyclopropene is not compatible, leading to the ring-opening products, likely due to the very facile selenium-mediated deoxygenation to form the cyclopropenyl cation intermediate [40]. Nonetheless, 3-aryl-3-alkyl pattern is tolerated, and product 3ae was obtained in a 46% yield. In addition, a linear alkyl substitution at the 3-position turned out promising (3af). Finally, medium ring fused cyclopropane is a frequent subunit in many natural products such as the neuroprotective preschisanartane [41]. The product 3ag bearing a 7/3 bicyclic skeleton can be efficiently accessed. With respect to limitations, migration of C(sp3)-moieties or hydride without enough strain release turned out challenging, as is also the case for SPR with a few representative substrates (3ah-3aj).
The facile cyclopropane incorporation can be used in late-stage ring-reorganization (Fig. 2). As such, flavanone was readily converted by the same 2-step sequence to a bicyclic product 3ak as a single diastereoisomer in 75% yield, whose structure and configuration were determined by NOESY spectrum (Fig. S11 in Supporting information) and single crystal X-ray diffraction of its oxidation product 4ak (Figs. S3 and S4 in Supporting information). The high diastereoselectivity control arises from the high 1,3-diastereocontrol by the phenyl group in the addition of cyclopeopenyl moiety to the ketone, and subsequent face-selective approaching of the electrophile in the most stable conformation of the carbinol substrate, as revealed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations with Orca 5.0 (for details, see Fig. S12 in Supporting information) [42]. In a similar manner, d-(‒)-carvone can be readily converted to 3al in a good yield as a single diastereomer. The substrate derived from safranal, the main ingredient of crocus sativus, reacted smoothly under standard conditions, affording the desired product 3am in 64% yield. Finally, TBS-protected testosterone was converted to separable pentacyclic derivatives 3an and 3an' in 1.5:1 dr, with their A rings being efficiently edited to cyclopropyl spired cyclopentenone (Figs. S5–S8 in Supporting information).
We then set out to investigate the compatibility of other electrophiles in this reaction (Scheme 3). Initially, we chose N-bromo succinimide (NBS) as the electrophile. Treatment of 1a under condition A afforded the phenyl migrated product 5a in 83% yield. Acetophenone and benzophenone derived cyclopropenyl carbinol substrates delivered the corresponding rearranged products 5b-5g in moderate to good yields. Styryl migration is also nicely realized (5h). Cyclopropyl migration, failed in the selenylation conditions above, is feasible and the product 5i was obtained in 30% yield. Non-substitution at the 3-position of the cyclopropene ring turned out to be beneficial, as product 5j was obtained in a high yield of 91%. 3-Aryl-3-alkyl substitution pattern is also accommodated (5k), albeit with a poor yield likely due to competing ring-opening side processes.
The reaction of phenylsulfenyl chloride as the electrophile with benzophenone derived substrate delivered the target product 6a in a yield of 78% (Scheme 3). Acetophenone derivatives with electron-donating methoxy substituents at the phenyl ring was also produced in good yields (6b). Furthermore, dimethyl or aryl/alkyl substitution at the 3-position of the cyclopropene ring were both obtained in moderate yields (6c, 6d).
Finally, the SPR triggered by trifluorothiomethylation reagent could incorporate SCF3+ into cyclopropane efficiently, enabling direct and diversified decoration of the cyclopropane without laborious preparation of trifluorothiomethylated olefins (Scheme 3) [43]. We found that cyclopropenyl carbinols bearing a secondary alcohol are amenable to the trifluorothiomethylation promoted SPR, as demonstrated by the moderate to good yields of products 7a-7d, which feature different substitution patterns at the 3-position.
Although catalytic asymmetric SPR [44–46] and electrophilic sulfenylation [47] has witnessed much progress recently, successful catalytic asymmetric SPR protocols all feature a styrene-type olefin moiety, which involves a benzylic cationic center whose enantiocontrol is relatively easier. Realizing high enantiocontrol in catalytic SPR reactions involving nonstabilized cationic centers, especially bulky tertiary ones remain a well-known challenge. Using the readily available cyclopropene substrate to construct poly-substituted cyclopropane with two chiral centers would be highly fascinating. After some initial attempts, we found that up to 79:21 er and exclusive diastereoselectivity can be obtained using the chiral P=Se type chiral Lewis base catalyst (R)-L1, indicating its potential use in asymmetric synthesis (Scheme 4).
In summary, we disclosed an unprecedented SPR on the strained cyclopropene ring for the facile synthesis of stereo-defined carbonylated cyclopropanes. The readily availability of the cyclopropene α-carbinols, tolerance of various hetero-atom based electrophiles and migrating groups of various hybridization characters, ready scalability, latestage cyclopropane-implementation and scaffold editing are all notable features of this reaction. Preliminary studies on the catalytic asymmetric version of the reaction also reveals the potential for developing more challenging, non-benzylic and/or tertiary center based asymmetric SPRs.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
Financial support of this work from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21871045) and startup funding from Changchun University of Technology is gratefully acknowledged.
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109447.
References
Less
[1]
H.N.C. Wong, M.Y. Hon, C.W. Tse, et al., Chem. Rev. 89 (1989) 165–198.
[2]
O.G. Kulinkovich, Cyclopropanes in Organic Synthesis, 1st ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2015.
[3]
T.T. Talele, J. Med. Chem. 59 (2016) 8712–8756.
[4]
Y. Fan, X. Gao, J. Yue, Sci. China Chem. 59 (2016) 1126–1141.
[5]
E. Zubia, M.J. Ortega, J.L. Carballo, J. Nat. Prod. 71 (2008) 2004–2010.
[6]
G. Tang, H. He, Y. Gu, et al., Tetrahedron 68 (2012) 9679–9684.
[7]
A. Homs, M.E. Muratore, A.M. Echavarren, Org. Lett. 17 (2015) 461–463.
[8]
X. Deng, Y. Wang, H. Wu, et al., Bioorg. Chem. 81 (2018) 35–43.
[9]
M. Elliott, N.F. Janes, Chem. Soc. Rev. 7 (1978) 473–505.
[10]
C. Duchemin, N. Cramer, Chem. Sci. 10 (2019) 2773–2777.
[11]
J. Rancourt, D.R. Cameron, V. Gorys, et al., J. Med. Chem. 47 (2004) 2511–2522.
[12]
I.A. Novakov, A.S. Babushkin, A.S. Yablokov, et al., Russ. Chem. Bull. 67 (2018) 395–418.
[13]
G. Maas, Chem. Soc. Rev. 33 (2004) 183–190.
[14]
D. Qian, J. Zhang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 677–698.
[15]
S. Chanthamath, S. Iwasa, Acc. Chem. Res. 49 (2016) 2080–2090.
[16]
C. Damiano, P. Sonzini, E. Gallo, Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 (2020) 4867–4905.
[17]
M.M. Heravi, S. Asadi, N. Nazari, B.M. Lashkariani, Curr. Org. Synth. 13 (2016) 308–333.
[18]
M.G. Edwards, R.J. Paxton, D.S. Pugh, A.C. Whitwood, R.J.K. Taylor, Synthesis 2008 (2008) 3279–3288.
[19]
H. Lebel, J.F. Marcoux, C. Molinaro, A.B. Charette, Chem. Rev. 103 (2003) 977–1050.
[20]
M. Wasa, K.M. Engle, D.W. Lin, E.J. Yoo, J. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (2011) 19598–19601.
[21]
T. Saget, N. Cramer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51 (2012) 12842–12845.
[22]
T. Lee, J.F. Hartwig, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 8723–8727.
[23]
P. Shen, L. Hu, Q. Shao, K. Hong, J. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 6545–6549.
[24]
L. Dian, I. Marek, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 8415–8434.
[25]
M.J.R. Richter, F.J. Zecri, K. Briner, S.L. Schreiber, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202203221.
[26]
K.E. Berger, R.J. Martinez, J. Zhou, C. Uyeda, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 9441–9447.
[27]
M.J. Kim, D.J. Wang, K. Targos, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202303032.
[28]
M. Montesinos-Magraner, M. Costantini, R. Ramirez-Contreras, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 5930–5935.
[29]
B. Wang, Y. Tu, Acc. Chem. Res. 44 (2011) 1207–1222.
[30]
Z. Song, C. Fan, Y. Tu, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 7523–7556.
[31]
C.H.U. Gregson, A. Noble, V.K. Aggarwal, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 7360–7365.
[32]
M.J. Kerner, P. Wipf, Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 3615–3619.
[33]
R. Hu, S. Qiang, Y. Chan, et al., Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 9533–9537.
[34]
B. Liu, L. Wang, Y. Qin, X. Xu, J. Zhao, Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 5693–5697.
[35]
Y. Zhang, Y. Li, W. Zhou, et al., Chem. Commun. 56 (2020) 12250–12253.
[36]
Z. Li, J. Zhao, B. Sun, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 11702–11705.
[37]
Z. Li, M. Zhang, Y. Zhang, et al., Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 5432–5437.
[38]
H. Li, M. Zhang, H. Mehfooz, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 6 (2019) 3387–3391.
[39]
T. Yu, J. Yang, Z. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 4304–4310.
[40]
G. Gallego, A. Ariafard, K. Tran, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem. 9 (2011) 3359–3363.
[41]
T. He, B. Yan, K. Hu, et al., Bioorg. Chem. 105 (2020) 104353.
[42]
F. Neese, The ORCA program system, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2 (2012) 73–78 and update 12 (2022) e1606.
[43]
A. Haas, W. Hinsken, J. Fluor. Chem. 28 (1985) 303–317.
[44]
L. Dai, W. Liu, Y. Zhou, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 26599–26603.
[45]
Y. Xie, Z. Chen, H. Luo, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 12491–12496.
[46]
B. Yang, P. Cai, Y. Tu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137 (2015) 8344–8347.
[47]
J. Qi, F. Wei, S. Huang, C. Tung, Z. Xu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 4561–4565.
Appendix
Less
Year 2024 volume 35 Issue 9
PDF
49
27
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109447
  • Receive Date：2023-08-16
  • Online Date：2025-11-20
  • Published：2024-09-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2023-08-16
  • Revised：2023-12-14
  • Accepted：2023-12-20
Affiliations
    Faulty of Chemistry and Life Science, Changchun University of Technology, Changchun 130012, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109447
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House