Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Precisely manipulation of core composition of core-shell-type cobalt polyoxoniobates and proton conduction study
收藏切换
PDF
Zheng-Wei Guo, Yi Chen, Zhe-Hong Chen, Xin-Xiong Li*, Shou-Tian Zheng*
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(1) : 109124
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2024, 35(1): 109124
• Communication •
Precisely manipulation of core composition of core-shell-type cobalt polyoxoniobates and proton conduction study
Full
Zheng-Wei Guo, Yi Chen, Zhe-Hong Chen, Xin-Xiong Li*, Shou-Tian Zheng*
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis on Energy and Environment, School of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
Published: 2024-01-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109124
Outline
收藏切换

The development of core-shell nanoclusters with controllable composition is of utmost importance as the material properties depend on their constituent elements. However, precisely tuning their compositions at the atomic scale is not easily achieved because of the difficulty of using limited macroscopic synthetic methods for atomic-level modulation. In this work, we report an interesting example of precisely regulating the core composition of an inorganic core-shell-type cobalt polyoxoniobate [Co26Nb36O140]32− by controlling reaction conditions, in which the inner Co-core composition could be tune while retaining the outer Nb-shell composition of resulting product, leading to a series of isostructural species with a general formula of {Co26-nNb36+nO140} (n = 0–2). These rare species not only can display good powder and single-crystal proton conductivities, but also might provide helpful and atomic-level insights into the syntheses, structures and composition modifications of inorganic amorphous core-shell heterometal oxide nanoparticles.

Polyoxoniobate  /  Core-shell  /  Nanocluster  /  Atomic-level modulation  /  Proton conduction
Zheng-Wei Guo, Yi Chen, Zhe-Hong Chen, Xin-Xiong Li, Shou-Tian Zheng. Precisely manipulation of core composition of core-shell-type cobalt polyoxoniobates and proton conduction study[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2024 , 35 (1) : 109124 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109124
Full Text
Less
Core-shell nanostructures have attracted significant interest due to their charming configurations and intercomponent synergistic effects that might enhance their expected functions or launch exotic properties [1–21]. These have rendered the core-shell nano-structures one of prime targets in the development of advanced composite materials. Of them, intensive synthetic efforts have been invested into the development of inorganic core-shell metal nanoparticles during the past decade [1–13]. Precise construction of core-shell species with well-defined molecular structures and compositions is of significance to atomic-level understanding and regulation of their properties. However, although some effective approaches have been explored to precisely control the size, shape, thickness and composition of core-shell metal nanoparticles, it is still an enormous challenge to achieve their atomic-level bonding geometry and structural characterization.
Crystalline inorganic core-shell metal oxide nanoclusters with atomically and geometrically precise structural information are of great interest not only due to their fascinating structural features with unusual physical and chemical properties [22–29], but also important roles as the molecular models for the structures and physicochemical properties of inorganic core-shell metal oxide nanoparticles. Particularly, precisely tuning material compositions at the atomic scale remains an attractive target and scientifically interesting not only for developing novel composite materials with controllable composition but also providing atomic-level insights into the structures and physicochemical properties of amorphous core-shell heterometal nanoparticles.
Nevertheless, the targeted growth of inorganic core-shell heterometal oxide nanoclusters with atomic precision is still beyond our capacity owing to the difficulty of atomic-level design of both core and shell and the complexity of self-assembly reactions. And thus, the development of such species is still being sought, lagged far behind that of inorganic core-shell metal nanoparticles. At present, known such nanoclusters are limited and some representative examples are Cu20@W48 [24], V6@W48 [25], M16@W48 (M = Fe [26], Al or Ga [27]), Bi6@U24 and Pb8@U24 [28].
Recently, we reported the synthesis of an all-inorganic core-shell-type cobalt polyoxoniobate (PONb) Na8K14H10[Co26@Nb36]·nH2O (1, Co26@Nb36 = [Co26Nb36O140]32−), in which a large 36-nuclearity PONb shell {Nb36O124} (Nb36) encloses a 26-nuclearity mixed-valence cobalt oxide core {Co26O32} (Co26) (Fig. 1) [30]. Interestingly, the core composition of Co26@Nb36 is sensitive to the reaction conditions, allowing to precisely tune its inner Co-core content without affecting its outer Nb-shell composition and structure, resulting in a series of isostructures {Co26-nNb36+nO140} (n = 0–2). Proton conduction experiments reveal that these materials have good proton conducting properties.
Solid 1 crystallized in a highly symmetric cubic space group Fm-3m. The 36-nuclearity Nb36 shell structure can be described as a nanosized Td-symmetry tetrahedral nanocage comprising four {Nb3O13} triangles positioned at its four vertices and four {Nb6O24} hexagonal rings laid flat on its four faces (Fig. 2a), which are interlinked with each other via corner-sharing. The 26-nuclearity Co26 core, also with Td-symmetry, contains a tetrahedral {CoⅢ16O20} core and ten CoⅡO4 tetrahedra. The {CoⅢ16O20} core can be seen as consisting of five CoⅢ4O4 cubanes, wherein the innermost CoⅢ4O4 cubane joins four tetrahedrally arranged CoⅢ4O4 cubanes by sharing four CoⅢ atoms (Fig. 2b). Further, the ten CoⅡO4 tetrahedra occupy the six edge positions (in blue) and the four face-centered positions (in yellow) of the tetrahedral {CoⅢ16O20} core via corner-sharing with CoⅢO6 octahedra, giving the overall mixed-valence Co26 cluster.
Interestingly, the core composition of 1 is markedly affected by the reactants, allowing us to precisely manipulate its Co-core composition with atomic-level precision while keeping the same Nb-shell composition and topology. To begin with, we found that the starting phosphates of Na3PO4 and KH2PO4 in the reaction of 1 play a key role in determining the resulting core-shell nanocluster with an ordered or disordered core structure though they do not present in the products. Specifically, the reaction of 1 without the addition of phosphates yields an isomorph Na10K15H5[NbCo25@Nb36]·nH2O (2) (NbCo25@Nb36 = [Co25Nb37O140]30−). As shown in Fig. 3, the difference between Co26@Nb36 and NbCo25@Nb36 lies in that the four equivalent Co3+ sites (related by a S4 axis) of the innermost CoⅢ4O4 cubane in the former are found to be occupied either by Nb5+ or Co3+ ions in the latter. The disordered site is refined freely to give a Co/Nb occupancy factor of 0.758/0.242, followed by fixing it to 0.75/0.25, and thus the core composition of Co25Nb@Nb36 is NbCo25O32.
The observed Nb/Co disorder in Co25Nb@Nb36 reveals that Nb and Co ions compete to form the innermost cubane unit in the solution, and the addition of Na3PO4 and KH2PO4 favors the formation of ordered Co26@Nb36. Attempts to obtain analogs of Co26@Nb36 proved fruitless by the replacment of the phosphates with nitrate, carbonate, sulfate, acetate or silicate. Considering that core-shell structures are usually grown from inside out, the distinct innermost cubanes of Co4O4 and NbCo3O4 indicate that the starting phosphates Na3PO4 and KH2PO4 should have a unique influence on the initial nucleation of the core-shell nanocluster. Unfortunately, the detailed role of the phosphates still remains unclear. Potentially, they can affect the competitive relationship between Nb5+ and Co3+ ions for the initial nucleation of core-shell nanoclusters via hydrogen bond interactions or affect the pH value of the reaction solution and thus the reaction and crystallization processes.
Given that Nb and Co ions can compete to form the innermost metal cubane, we set out to explore the molecular growth of the core-shell Co-Nb clusters by adjusting the starting Co/Nb ratio to see if it can affect the core composition of resulting cluster. We studied the Co/Nb ratio influence over the range from 1:9 to 1:1, with the amount of K7HNb6O19·13H2O fixed at 0.33 mmol. When the Co/Nb ratios are in the range of 1:9~1:5 (noted that the Co/Nb ratio in the reaction of 2 is about 1:8), the obtained core-shell nanoclusters are all the same as NbCo25@Nb36 found in 2, as confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses of four single crystals from the four same reactions as 2 but with different initial Co/Nb ratios of 1:9, 1:7, 1:6 and 1:5, respectively. Increasing the Co/Nb ratio to 1:4 results in the formation of a new isostructural compound Na10K15H3[Nb2Co24@Nb36]·nH2O (3) (Nb2Co24@Nb36 = [Co24Nb38O140]28−), in which all trivalent Co3+ sites, that is, all Co sites of the whole tetrahedral {CoⅢ16O20} core in Co26@Nb36, are found as disordered Co/Nb sites in Nb2Co24@Nb36 (Fig. 3). The asymmetric unit of the {M16O20} (M stands for disordered Co/Nb sites) core in Nb2Co24@Nb36 contains two crystallographic independent M sites of M1 and M2, which are refined freely to give Co/Nb occupancy factors of 0.789/0.211 and 0.892/0.108, respectively, followed by fixing them to 0.8/0.2 and 0.9/0.1. Since the {M16O20} consists of four M1 and twelve M2, its composition exactly is {Nb2Co14}. Similar to the bivalent Co2+ sites in Co26@Nb36 and NbCo25@Nb36, all Co2+ sites in Nb2Co24@Nb36 are found to be full occupancy. And thus, the overall core composition is Nb2Co24. We further increased the Co/Nb ratios from 1:3 to 1:1 with attempt to get new isostructres and to check if these tetrahedrally coordinated Co2+ sites can be disordered as Co/Nb sites, however, no isostructural species but amorphous phases were obtained.
The distinct inner core compositions make NbCo25@Nb36 and Nb2Co24@Nb36 nanoclusters have different cluster charges of −30 and −28, respectively. Considering that the only difference in the syntheses of them is the starting amount of CoCl2, we attribute the formation of the distinct isostructures NbCo25@Nb36 and Nb2Co24@Nb36 to the role of the Co2+ ions on the mediation of solution pH via hydrolysis. It is known that, in basic solution, a higher solution pH will stabilize a higher-charge polyoxoanion. With different starting Co/Nb ratios from 1:9 to 1:5, the pH values after reactions are about 12.5 ± 0.1 (Table S1 in Supporting information), suggesting the Co/Nb ratios in the range from 1:9 to 1:5 have little effect on the pH values of reactions. Accordingly, all these reactions yield the same nanocluster of NbCo25@Nb36 with a net charge of −30. While, when the Co/Nb ratio increases to 1:4, the pH value after reaction decreases to 11.9, suggesting that this ratio has an obvious effect on the pH value of reaction. Accordingly, the reaction gives Nb2Co24@Nb36 with a lower net charge (−28) compared to NbCo25@Nb36. We can therefore speculate that the hydrolysis of different Co2+ concentrations lead to reaction solutions with different pH values, which make in-situ generating intermediates adjust their inner core compositions to form isostructural clusters with different negative charges that could be adapted to different pH values of reaction solutions.
The above results reveal that the atomic-level modulation of core-shell Co26@Nb36 cluster with order/disorder core structure and programmable core composition can be achieved by controlling the starting reagents. The obtainment of the series of core-shell Co-Nb bimetallic clusters constitutes a family with a general formula of {Co26-nNb36+nO140} (n = 0–2 in this work). These nanoclusters might provide atomic-level insights into the influence of the starting chemicals on the structures and compositions of amorphous bimetallic core-shell nanoparticles. Additionally, the observed disordered core structure evolution from {Co4O4} to {NbCo3O4}, and to {Nb2Co14O20} provides a case to reveal an inside-out molecular growth of core-shell bimetal nanoclusters at atomic level.
The metal contents of 2–3 were determined by ICP analyses, which are in good agreement with the calculated values based on single-crystal X-ray diffraction analyses (Table S2 in Supporting information). Further, XPS were performed to confirm their ratios in 2–3 (Fig. S1 in supporting information). Curve-fitting of the high-resolution Co 2p spectra reveals that the Co3+/Co2+ ratios in 2–3 are 1.48 and 1.38, respectively, perfectly matching their corresponding Co3+/Co2+ ratios of 1.50 and 1.40 identified by the BVS calculations [31].
High chemical stabilities, the presence of counter cations (H+, Na+, and K+) and oxo-rich surface point to the possible utility of 1 as proton conducting material. The conductivity of 1 was investigated by ac impedance measurements using a two-electrode configuration between 107 and 1 Hz. The humidity-dependent conductivity was first measured at room temperature (RT) (25 ℃). As dipicted in Fig. 4a, the conductivity is 2.68 × 10−4 S/cm at 55% relative humidity (RH), and it incerases to 1.74 × 10−3 S/cm when RH maintianed at 98%. Next, the temperature-dependent proton conductivity was measured over the temperature range of 25–85 ℃ under 98% RH. The result reveal that the conductivity of 1 reaches 2.64 × 10−2 S/cm at 85 ℃ (Fig. 4b), which is among the highest conductivity reported for POMs (Table S3 in Supporting information). According to the Arrhenius equation σT = σ0exp(-Ea/kBT), the activation energy, determined by linear regression analysis, is estimated to 0.304 eV (Fig. 4c), indicating that conduction is mainly carried out by the "Grotthus" mechanism (Ea < 0.4). We attribute the excellent proton conductivity to the presence of rich proton carriers within the structure of 1, including water molecules and terminal oxygen atoms, which help to form hydrogen-bonded proton "hopping" networks [32–35]. Additionally, the PXRD patterns showed that the sample remain consistent before and after conduction tests, revealing the integrity of sample 1 (Fig. 4d).
Although extensive research efforts have been devoted to studying the proton-conducting performances of POMs [36–40], most of them are based on compacted crystalline powder samples. The research on the conductivities of single-crystal POMs remains largely unexplored. Given that 1–3 contain different amounts of cations and might exhibit distinct conductivities, the single crystal proton conductivities of 1–3 were further investigated by ac impedance measurements using single crystals over the temperature range of 35–75 ℃ under 98% RH. Ag wires were carefully attached to a cubic crystal (0.20 mm × 0.20 mm × 0.20 mm) by using conductive silver paste along opposite faces. The temperature-dependent conductivity measurements reveal that the singel crystal conductivity of 1 at 35 ℃ is 2.2 × 10−6 S/cm, which is comparable to those of some reported single-crystal POMs [39,40]. As the temperature increases, the conductivity increases gradually and reaches a maximum of 1.08 × 10−5 S/cm at 75 ℃ (Fig. 5a). The conductivities of 2 and 3 at 35 ℃, 75 ℃ with 98% RH are 1.54 × 10−6 S/cm, 6.84 × 10−6 S/cm and 1.92 × 10−6 S/cm, 5.89 × 10−6 S/cm, respectively (Figs. 5b and c). The results show that the conductivities of 1–3 are almost at the same level. Nevertheless, crystal 1 with the most cations shows relatively high conductivity compared to crystals 2 and 3. According to the Arrhenius equation σT = σ0exp(-Ea/kBT), the activation energy of single crystals 1–3, determined by linear regression analysis, are 0.354, 0.346 and 0.260 eV, respectively, indicating that their conduction processes are mainly dominated by the "Grotthus" mechanism (Fig. 5d).
In summary, we demonstrate that the inner core structure (in order/disorder) and composition (with different Co/Nb distributions) of a unique all-inorganic core-shell-type Co-Nb heteropolyoxoniobate Co26@Nb36 can be precisely modulated by simple control of initial reaction reagents, leading to a family of isostructural core-shell nanoclusters {Co26-nNb36+nO140} (n = 0–2) with precise atoms and structures. Further, their proton conductivities have been examined to showcase them as promising candidates for proton-conducting materials. These bimetallic core-shell structures with tunable core structures allow studies in rich host-guest chemistry to be envisaged. Furthermore, we anticipate that other novel transition metal clusters can be captured, resulting in new discoveries in metal oxo cluster chemistry. Finally, this series of rare all-inorganic and atomically precise Co-Nb core-shell nanoclusters might provide a foundation to understand and investigate the chemical processes of Co-Nb-based non-molecular counterparts including inorganic core-shell nanoparticles and bulk materials.
Declaration of competing interest
Less
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
Less
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 21971039 and 22171045) and the Key Program of Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No. 2021J02007).
Supplementary materials
Less
Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109124.
References
Less
[1]
M. Kitano, Y. Inoue, M. Sasase, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 2648–2652.
[2]
X. Cui, W. Li, K. Junge, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 7501–7507.
[3]
H. Xiao, B. Liu, L. Qiu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202115136.
[4]
D.Y. Liu, N.W. Yang, Q. Zeng, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 3288–3297.
[5]
H. Dong, L.D. Sun, L.D. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 18492–18495.
[6]
Y. Xiong, Y. Yang, F.J. DiSalvo, H.D. Abruña, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 7248–7255.
[7]
C. Siefe, R.D. Mehlenbacher, C.S. Peng, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 16997–17005.
[8]
G. Liu, W. Zhou, Y. Ji, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 11262–11270.
[9]
S.F. Tan, G. Bisht, U. Anand, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 11680–11685.
[10]
S.T. Hunt, Y. Román-Leshkov, Acc. Chem. Res. 51 (2018) 1054–1062.
[11]
Z.W. Qiu, Y.T. Xue, J.Y. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 2807–2811.
[12]
Z. Li, R. Wang, J. Xue, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 17610–17616.
[13]
J. Guan, S. Yang, T. Liu, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 21899–21904.
[14]
L. Tang, A. Ma, C. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 17969–17973.
[15]
C. Falaise, S. Khlifi, P. Bauduin, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 14146–14153.
[16]
Z. Wang, J.W. Liu, H.F. Su, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 17884–17890.
[17]
J.W. Liu, Z. Wang, Y.M. Chai, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 6276–6279.
[18]
J.H. Huang, Y. Si, X.Y. Dong, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 12439–12444.
[19]
S.S. Mal, U. Kortz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44 (2005) 3777–3780.
[20]
A. Mgller, M.T. Pope, A.M. Todea, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46 (2007) 4477–4480.
[21]
Z.K. Zhu, Y.Y. Lin, R.D. Lai, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107773.
[22]
K.J. Qin, D.J. Zang, Y.G. Wei, Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107999.
[23]
X.F. Fan, W. Pang, H. Feng, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 2783–2798.
[24]
Y. Chen, Z.W. Guo, X.X. Li, S.T. Zheng, G.Y. Yang, CCS Chem. 4 (2022) 1305–1314.
[25]
Z. Li, Z.H. Lv, H. Yu, et al., CCS Chem. 4 (2022) 2938–2945.
[26]
O. Renier, C. Falaise, H. Neal, K. Kozma, M. Nyman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 13480–13484.
[27]
X. Fang, P. Kogerler, Y. Furukawa, M. Speldrich, M. Luban, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50 (2011) 5212–5216.
[28]
Z. Li, L.D. Lin, H. Yu, X.X. Li, S.T. Zheng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 15777–15781.
[29]
C. Busche, L. Vilá-Nadal, J. Yan, et al., Nature 515 (2014) 545–549.
[30]
Z.W. Guo, L.H. Lin, J.P. Ye, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202305260.
[31]
I.D. Brown, D. Altermatt, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Crystallogr. Cryst. Chem. 41 (1985) 244–247.
[32]
B. Tiwari, S. Ram, P. Banerji, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6 (2018) 16298–16307.
[33]
S. Ram, Acta Mater. 49 (2001) 2297–2307.
[34]
S. Ram, J. Mater. Sci. 35 (2000) 3561–3571.
[35]
S. Ram, Mater. Sci. Eng. A304-306 (2001) 923–927.
[36]
H. Ma, B. Liu, B. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (2016) 5897–5903.
[37]
Z. Li, X.X. Li, T. Yang, Z.W. Cai, S.T. Zheng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 2664–2669.
[38]
J.C. Liu, Q. Han, L.J. Chen, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 8416–8420.
[39]
R. Tsunashima, Y. Iwamoto, Y. Baba, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (2014) 11228–11231.
[40]
R. Tsunashima, I. Nakamura, R. Oue, et al., Dalton Trans. 46 (2017) 12619–12624.
Appendix
Less
Year 2024 volume 35 Issue 1
PDF
55
31
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109124
  • Receive Date：2023-07-15
  • Online Date：2025-11-20
  • Published：2024-01-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2023-07-15
  • Revised：2023-08-22
  • Accepted：2023-09-18
Affiliations
    State Key Laboratory of Photocatalysis on Energy and Environment, School of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.109124
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House